logo
Ely Cathedral's first peregrine chicks in four years die

Ely Cathedral's first peregrine chicks in four years die

BBC News02-06-2025
Two peregrine chicks which were the first to hatch at the top of a cathedral in four years have died. A pair of peregrine falcons had chosen the west tower of Ely Cathedral in Cambridgeshire as their nesting site this year.The eggs were laid between 19 and 24 April - and the last egg hatched at about 12:45 BST on Wednesday.A spokesperson for the Hawk and Owl Trust said in a social media post it was "saddened to share that both peregrine chicks died" over the weekend.
"Chick mortality is, unfortunately, common in the first weeks of life due to natural vulnerabilities - limited temperature regulation, weak immune systems, and potential food issues all play a role," said the spokesperson. "The adult falcon's behaviour also suggests she may be a first-time parent."The younger chick died on Saturday morning, while the remaining chick died overnight on Saturday. The cathedral saw its first pair of birds nest at the site in 2019 - with two chicks hatching a year later.However, it said there had not been a resident pair of peregrines since 2021. This year, a new pair began using the cathedral as a nesting site and laid three eggs.The trust added it would continue to monitor the adults, which have remained in the area.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My friends had to subsidise the cost of running my vital oxygen therapy
My friends had to subsidise the cost of running my vital oxygen therapy

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

My friends had to subsidise the cost of running my vital oxygen therapy

I am dependent on long-term oxygen therapy after a double lung transplant. I'm entitled to reimbursement of the excess electricity used by the oxygen concentrator and have received quarterly payments of about £48 from Vivisol, which administers rebates on behalf of the NHS. However, I was forced to stay with friends and family for a year after my house was flooded, and I spent a further two months convalescing at my daughter's house after a heart operation. I received no rebates during that time, and Vivisol told me l would not be reimbursed while I was not living at home, which means my hosts had to subsidise my treatment. SS, East Sussex The rebate scheme is intended to protect eligible patients who rely on an oxygen concentrator from spiralling energy costs. I see that Vivisol's website states, in passing, that patients are eligible for the cost of using the machine at their main address. This strikes me as insufficiently clear, as well as potentially unfair. It's a no-brainer that those with such serious health issues might have to relocate, as you did, for convalescence, for respite care or building work. It seems unreasonable to me to expect friends and family to foot what can be a considerable bill for treatment and, since concentrators record electricity consumption on an integrated meter unconnected to the household meter, it is straightforward to be able to monitor the costs involved. I first approached NHS England to ask if this restriction was NHS policy and whether there were exemptions for cases such as yours. It referred me to the NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board, which explained that patients can nominate a temporary address as their main residence via their service provider in circumstances such as yours. In the meantime, Vivisol responded to my contact by agreeing to reinstate and backdate your rebates to cover the period while you were away. A spokesperson said: 'All communication does highlight that the eligibility only applies at the patient's main address. As a result of your email, we will review to identify if that can be made clearer.' We welcome letters but cannot answer individually. Email us at or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime phone number. Submission and publication of all letters is subject to our terms and conditions.

If you say ‘pardon' to sound posh, you're wrong on two counts
If you say ‘pardon' to sound posh, you're wrong on two counts

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

If you say ‘pardon' to sound posh, you're wrong on two counts

What do you say if you mishear someone? 'I'm sorry?' or 'what?', perhaps? Or maybe you're a 'pardon?' person. One of those silly surveys has just come out, declaring that Gen Z have given up saying 'polite' words such as 'pardon' and 'excuse me' in favour of 'what?' or 'come again?' Three quarters of young Britons deem 'pardon' too formal, says the survey, so they reply 'huh?' or 'you what?' instead. Is 'you what?' better than saying nothing at all, which is what half of the survey's respondents claimed to do? Instead, apparently, the youth nod along and pretend to have understood. Though we've all been there, haven't we, at a noisy drinks party, for example. You're desperately trying to understand the other person, but you don't want to stick your ear any closer to their face because they've just eaten a salmon canapé, so you smile broadly, nod and maybe let out a little laugh, only to realise with horror that they were telling you their mother had just died. Unfortunately, however, this survey has got it all wrong. Look, I try not to be a word snob (all the time), but I can't let this one slide. 'Pardon' is an abysmal word, not polite, and certainly not a word anyone posh would use. It is a Hyacinth Bucket word – one that people may use because they think it sounds grand, and better than 'what', but which actually marks them out as deeply middle class. Sorry, don't blame me. I'm only passing on the facts, and the fact is, 'pardon' is awful. When I once came home from school and reported to my mother that I'd been told off for saying 'what' to my teacher one day, and told to use 'pardon' instead, my mother called up the school to complain. Because 'pardon' is ever so slightly common, and 'what' is, honestly, more acceptable. It depends how you say it, of course. You can't blurt it out in the manner of Harry Enfield's Kevin – 'Wot?' Try to be more gentle. I'm a fan of 'What was that?' if I miss whatever I've just been asked. Somewhat contradictorily, 'I beg your pardon?' is also tolerable. But just never, ever 'pardon'. So, for today's lesson, we're going to have a quick trot through a few other words that people believe are polite, but which are, in fact, infra dig. Again, it gives me no pleasure to pass these on. I merely offer them up so you don't embarrass yourselves.

How the Queen Mother dealt with grandchildren's divorce misery: The profound effect marriage breakdowns had on the royal, dubbed 'imperial ostrich' over her views - on what would have been her 125th birthday
How the Queen Mother dealt with grandchildren's divorce misery: The profound effect marriage breakdowns had on the royal, dubbed 'imperial ostrich' over her views - on what would have been her 125th birthday

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How the Queen Mother dealt with grandchildren's divorce misery: The profound effect marriage breakdowns had on the royal, dubbed 'imperial ostrich' over her views - on what would have been her 125th birthday

Today would have marked the Queen Mother 's 125th birthday and in her long and remarkable life she witnessed massive changes in attitudes within Britain. She lived to see the legalisation of abortion and homosexuality as well as the criminalisation of capital punishment. But the societal change that perhaps most impacted Elizabeth was the growing societal acceptance of divorce in Britain. Indeed, the Royal Family 's hostility to divorce in the 1930s was part of the reason her husband King George VI ascended to the throne. This came about after King Edward VIII caused a major constitutional crisis in 1936 when he made clear his wish to marry American divorcee Wallis Simpson. This ended with Edward abdicating and his younger brother taking his place. Looking forward 60 years, Elizabeth and George's daughter Queen Elizabeth II faced a cacophony of divorces, with three out of her four children in unhappy marriages. According to William Shawcross, who wrote the Queen Mother's official biography, the breakdowns of her grandchildrens' marriages affected her 'profoundly' and although she 'rarely committed her views to paper' she gave them as much support as they needed. Shawcross wrote the Royal Family were very aware of how unhappy Charles and Diana's marriage was long before their divorce. 'The births of their [Charles and Diana] two much-loved sons, Prince William in 1982 and Prince Harry in 1984, gave joy to them as well as to everyone else in the family. 'But hopes that motherhood would bring the princess fulfilment proved illusory. Within the family, enthusiasm and hopes for the marriage gave way to anxiety and concern.' And by 1986 the Queen Mother and other family members were very aware the Prince and Princess of Wales's marriage had 'all but broken down'. On top of this, Princess Anne had her own marital problems and she became Elizabeth's first granddaughter to separate from her husband, Captain Mark Phillips, in 1989 and by 1992 they were divorced. And then Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson's marriage started to deteriorate just six years after their wedding in 1986. By 1992 the Royals faced the prospect of not one but an unprecedented three royal divorces. In the midst of these crises, the matriarch of the Windsors was willing to give her grandchildren as much support as she could. However, while some wanted advice from her, Elizabeth always wished to avoid confrontation within the family. Shawcross said that her stance earnt the Queen Mother the unflattering nickname of the 'imperial ostrich' - in reference to her tendency to put her head in the sand duirng more difficult family affairs. 'She thought her role was not to try and change people's courses but to be an anchor,' he wrote. Even if she did want to metaphorically bury her head in the sand, the Queen Mother's grandchildren still leaned on her throughout this difficult time. In December 1992, Elizabeth was shown by Charles the draft statement to be made by the Prime Minister announcing his separation from Diana. The Queen Mother's old school views on privacy also clashed with how Diana and Sarah Ferguson handled the breakdown of their marriages. In June 1992, the Sunday Times started to serialise Andrew Morton's biography of Diana, which the Princess of Wales had covertly collaborated on. Then in August that year, damning photos of John Bryan, an American financial manager, sucking on Sarah's toes as she sunbathed were published in the UK press. Charles kisses his grandmother's hand. In December 1992, Elizabeth was shown by Charles the draft statement to be made by the Prime Minister announcing his separation from Diana Shawcross said: 'She [The Queen Mother] had been sympathetic to both the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of York over the enormous pressure they faced from the media. 'But the washing of dirty linen in public was utterly abhorrent to Elizabeth. Her entire life was based upon obligation, discretion and restraint. 'The Princess's [Diana's] public rejection of her husband and his life was contrary to everything that Elizabeth believed and practiced.' Likewise, she 'regretted' when Charles sat down for a series of interviews with journalist Jonathan Dimbleby. In response, Elizabeth said: 'It's always a mistake to talk about your marriage.' One person she was particularly concerned about through the drama of 1992 was her daughter Queen Elizabeth II who went on to describe the year as her 'annus horribilis'. Shawcross said: 'She also talked almost daily to her daughter the Queen, who was distraught about what was happening to her children and the fact that it was taking place so publicly. 'Queen Elizabeth often asked members of the Household, "Is the Queen alright?" They in turn recognized that the frequent conversations between mother and daughter helped the Queen to maintain her sangfroid and sense of perspective.' One person she was particularly concerned about through the drama of 1992 was her daughter Queen Elizabeth II who went onto describe the year as her 'annus horribilis' The end of the year ended on a high at least when Princess Anne married Commander Tim Lawrence on December 12. The ceremony took place at Crathie church near Balmoral. However, the wedding happened to clash with one of the Queen Mother's parties at the Royal Lodge in Windsor. But in order not to miss her granddaughter's second wedding the 92-year-old flew to Scotland for the ceremony before flying back to Windsor in time for dinner with her party guests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store