Eir seeks £67m in damages from rival BT relating to dispute over NI public sector contract
Eir
was kept 'unlawfully in the dark' by its rival BT when tendering for the biggest public sector contract in Northern Ireland, the High Court in London has heard.
On the opening day of the hearing, in which Dublin-based Eir is seeking damages from BT of £67 million (€78 million), the background to the long-running dispute was outlined, with Eir's barrister arguing that BT had a 'wealth' of secret information that led to it winning the £400 million contract in 2018.
'Eir went from being one of Northern Ireland's largest public sector players to being marginalised completely from the market ... and BT effectively stepping into their shoes in what was a role reversal,' Eir's barrister, Robert O'Donoghue, KC, said on Thursday.
The tender process for the lucrative nine-year Northern Ireland Public Sector Shared Network (NIPSSN) contract ran between April 2016 and March 2018.
READ MORE
Schools, Stormont departments, health trusts and councils were among 150 organisations who would avail of the service.
In 2020, Ofcom, the UK telecoms regulator, fined BT £6.3 million for unlawful anticompetitive practices during the procurement process.
During his opening submission, Mr O'Donoghue referenced the Ofcom ruling and 'turbocharged' legal obligations it had previously placed on BT to ensure a level playing field for its competitors.
'Interestingly and prophetically BT objected to this additional obligation at the time,' he told the court.
Eir, which is controlled by the French billionaire Xavier Niel, claims that Openreach (the network arm of BT) discriminated against it by failing to provide it with key information on costs and BT's fibre-to-the-premises on-demand product (FOD).
BT and Eir were the only two bidders for the contract.
For BT to portray its bid team as 'mavericks' in using FOD was 'self-serving nonsense', claimed Mr O'Donoghue, as the product 'is just another type of fibre that has been around many years'.
'The issue was that BT made it difficult to get a handle on costs ... Eir were kept unlawfully in the dark while BT had access to secret information on costs ... and the notion that the BT bid team had uniquely stumbled across some Holy Grail or secret source of FOD is obviously untrue.'
The case is listed to run for four weeks.
Some 14 witnesses, a 'considerable quantity' of expert material and complex technical background will be detailed, the court heard.
'It must be like staring at the foothills of the Matterhorn at the start of a climb,' Mr O'Donoghue told Judge Adam Johnson.
'But we submit that the points of this case are not actually that complicated, and to a material extent, not actually in dispute.
'The long and the short of it is, that everything matters, is admitted by BT. The starting point is that BT admitted the infringements to Ofcom.'
The case continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Karl Brophy buys stake in Piers Morgan's growing media group
Karl Brophy , a former journalist who sold his communications business Red Flag Consulting for an estimated €45 million earlier this year, has bought a multimillion euro stake in British broadcaster Piers Morgan's media business. Mr Brophy, a former Daily Mirror reporter who worked with its one-time editor Mr Morgan, is understood to have invested a significant seven-figure sum to buy a minority stake in the British man's Wake Up Productions. Another minority stake in the business is held by Martin Cruddace, a former racing executive and long-time associate of Mr Morgan's who also previously sat on the board of Red Flag. In March, Wake Up bought control of the Piers Morgan Uncensored news and opinion show from Rupert Murdoch's Talk TV, an online venture that broadcasts on YouTube but was previously a linear television channel. READ MORE [ Red Flag Consulting sold with expected €33m payout to founder Karl Brophy Opens in new window ] As part of that deal, Wake Up entered a four-year agreement with Mr Murdoch's News UK to share advertising revenue generated on YouTube by Piers Morgan Uncensored. The popular show presented by Mr Morgan last week passed four million subscribers on the Google-owned platform, where it broadcasts roughly six episodes each week. Recent guests included influencer Jake Paul; Eric Trump, son of US president Donald Trump; and former hip-hop star Kanye West, who now styles himself as Ye. Mr Morgan plans to expand the Uncensored brand in the online broadcasting market, using YouTube as its distribution platform. He told The Irish Times he may try to entice other YouTube stars with big subscriber bases to join the fold under the umbrella of the Uncensored brand. Or, he said, he could launch a stable of Uncensored shows covering different areas, similar to how Gary Lineker's Goalhanger stable of podcasts grew brands such as The Rest is Politics, The Rest is History, The Rest is Football and so on. Mr Morgan said all the content Wake Up produces is aimed at the burgeoning US media market – he has worked in the US on and off for two decades. 'We're in the top three in the world [with Piers Morgan Uncensored] on YouTube for news and opinion. No mean feat in three years,' Mr Morgan said. It is understood Mr Brophy will not join the board of Wake Up, but will contribute to strategy. Mr Morgan and Mr Cruddace were said to be keen to bring on board an investor who could help devise plans to grow the business. Mr Brophy, a former executive at Independent News & Media, founded Red Flag in 2013 with former INM chief Gavin O'Reilly as its chair and swiftly built up the business. Mr Brophy's wife Deirdre Grant runs the Irish division of Red Flag, which also has offices in London, Washington, Brussels and Cape Town. Mr Brophy personally held a 75 per cent stake in the business worth about €33 million when it was sold to US-based Ankura Consulting Group in February.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Appeal for prevention of more A5 road deaths following court order quashing upgrade
A man whose father was killed in a crash on the A5 in Northern Ireland has warned more people will lose their lives on the road because of a court ruling that has quashed its upgrade. On Monday Mr Justice McAlinden at the Belfast High Court said he was aware his ruling would bring 'fresh anguish' to bereaved families, but the proposed scheme breached elements of the Climate Change Act 2022. 'My appeal is to the minister, infrastructure officials in the department, to get this [upgrade] over the line, get the evidence that the judge has said is required delivered at pace and get moving on this,' Stephen Kelly, whose father, Terry, was killed on the road in 1995, said afterwards. 'Pull everybody together first thing and get working, because in the time it's going to take between now and whenever this project comes forward again, more people are going to lose their lives, and that is completely unacceptable.' READ MORE Mr Kelly, who is chief executive of Manufacturing NI , also said the A5 was a 'critically vital piece of economic infrastructure' for the west, and was needed 'from an economic, a political and a familial point of view'. In a statement following Monday's ruling, the North's minister for infrastructure, Liz Kimmins, said it was a 'disappointing day' and re-emphasised her commitment to the A5 upgrade. She saidshe would 'take time to carefully consider the judgment in full, including any implications for the scheme, and the department's next steps'. The upgrade of the A5, which runs from Derry to the Border at Aughnacloy, Co Tyrone and connects the northwest to Dublin, was first announced in 2007 but has been mired in delays and legal challenges. In that time more than 50 people have lost their lives on the road. The £1.2 billion (€1.4 billion) scheme was approved in October but judicial review proceedings were brought against the Department for Infrastructure by nine applicants including residents, farmers and landowners. The judge acknowledged it was 'likely that delays in the progression of this scheme will coincide with the occurrence of further loss of life and serious injury on the existing road' but he said the decision to proceed 'must be taken in accordance with the law'. Mr Kelly's father Terry, 45, was on his way home to Derry from his construction job in Omagh when he died in a collision 'on that bad corner in Bready', Co Tyrone. 'My father was just a normal working man in the construction industry, he left to go to work early in the morning of 31st August 1995 and he never returned home.' His son was 24. 'I'll never forget,' Mr Kelly said. 'This young police officer had to come to my family home, where I answered the door. 'He was visibly upset and stressed, and I was taken away in the police car to go down to Altnagelvin [Hospital] and identify his body. That's an experience that will always live with you. 'That corner has been slightly improved since then but there's been next to no improvement on that road in the 30 years since he lost his life.' Niall McKenna, chairman of the A5 Enough is Enough campaign group, also warned it was 'inevitable ... that delay will cause deaths'. He said the judge's decision had caused more 'anguish' to bereaved families who could not understand why, 'when there's a scheme there, and the vast majority of people want it, the money's there to build it, why can it not go ahead?' 'What is wrong with our legal system? What is the dysfunctionality of our system, a lot of our systems, that cannot deliver things that are for huge societal benefit?' he said. Additional reporting – PA.
Irish Times
19 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin
