&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When the #BlackLivesMatter sparked a movement to change the world
Black Lives Matter activists and supporters gather to mark the fifth anniversary of the May 25, 2020 Minneapolis murder of George Floyd, in Los Angeles, California, US, May 21, 2025. File Image/Reuters
As part of Firstpost's History Today series, July 13 is a date that resonates deeply across activism and culture.
In 2013, the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter first appeared, resulting in a global movement against racist violence.
Twenty years earlier, in 1985, Live Aid raised over $100 million for famine relief in Africa.
And in 2024, then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania.
#BlackLivesMatter debut
On July 13, 2013, a simple but powerful hashtag changed the landscape of modern activism.
When Patrisse Cullors created #BlackLivesMatter on Twitter, she sought to amplify Alicia Garza's Facebook proclamation — and in doing so sparked a global social justice movement that would resonate across decades.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
People take part in a Black Lives Matter protest in Oklahoma City. File Image/Reuters
In February 2012, Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old Black teenager in Florida, was fatally shot by neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman. Zimmerman's acquittal in July 2013 — citing Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' law — generated national outrage.
Alicia Garza responded on July 13, 2013 with a meant-for-internal Facebook post that resonated beyond its intention: 'Our lives matter, Black Lives Matter.'
Just hours later, Patrisse Cullors turned it into #BlackLivesMatter on Twitter, giving it global reach.
Within 24 hours, #BlackLivesMatter was used widely. Its strength lay in its direct yet open-ended statement: not 'all lives matter,' but a specific acknowledgment of systemic disregard for Black bodies.
The slogan shifted public dialogue toward racial justice and policing in the digital age.
By late 2013, co-founders Garza, Cullors, and Opal Tometi had formalised #BLM into a movement, highlighting not just protest but political education, community organising and transformative justice.
This new activism was decentralised, with over 40 autonomous chapters and hundreds of affiliated groups by 2020. Goals included ending police violence, electoral empowerment, economic equity and dismantling structural racism.
The first major protest under #BLM came in late 2014 after Michael Brown's killing in Ferguson, Missouri, by police officer Darren Wilson. Protests rocked the town, media coverage went global and the hashtag became a key rallying cry.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Later, #BLM was central in protests following the deaths of Eric Garner, Freddie Gray, Philando Castile, Alton Sterling, Tamir Rice and others, broadening its message from policing to systemic injustice.
By 2015, #BlackLivesMatter had inspired global action — Algerians, Turks, Queensland Australians marched with the slogan. In 2020, George Floyd's murder in Minneapolis sparked the largest protests recorded in US history — over 15 million across 2,000 cities.
International solidarity came from London's Hyde Park marches to thousands in Bogotá, Delhi, Melbourne, Lagos, and beyond — affirming Black lives as a global moral cause.
BLM has impacted law enforcement and legislation. Local reforms included:
Ending no-knock warrants, chokeholds, and requiring police to intervene when peers used excessive force.
Cities like Minneapolis, Los Angeles and Seattle reviewed budgets and enacted greater accountability.
Federally, it spurred the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, requiring data collection, banning chokeholds, mandating body cameras and stripping qualified immunity from officers.
Economic movements within BLM have supported Black entrepreneurship and divestment from systems that benefit from inequality. Corporations and nonprofits pledged $10 billion for racial equity by 2020.
Cultural changes followed too:
Television and film saw more diverse representation, with pushback on police glorification.
Publishers prioritised racial justice titles, and historical monuments came under scrutiny — Confederate memorials removed from cities like Richmond and Atlanta .
Academia embraced diversity with curricular reforms and new research programmes on Black liberation, while universities faced student-led calls for renaming campuses and dedicating funds.
The movement confronted sharp opposition. Critics said 'All Lives Matter' trivialised BLM's specificity. Political backlash included defunding, anti-protest laws, accusations of disloyalty and censorship.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Yet BLM held ground — garnering endorsements from civil rights groups, corporations, international bodies like the UN, and National Football League (NFL) players kneeling in protest.
The 2020 protests saw spike in online activism: #BlackLivesMatter trended on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, triggering donor drives and online education as well as amplification of marginalised voices.
However, social media companies struggled with content moderation — some hashtags were throttled, others hijacked by hate, sparking debates over tech's role in public discourse.
BLM evolved into electoral influence, endorsing candidates, amplifying civic engagement among Black communities, and lobbying for voting rights — contributing to key 2020 election shifts, especially in Georgia and Michigan.
Critics within the movement cautioned against institutional co-option, calling for structural change rather than merely symbolic inclusion.
Ten years after its inception, #BlackLivesMatter remains a worldwide benchmark in hashtag activism and anti-racist mobilisation. Its legacy includes:
Legal reforms in police accountability.
Greater public understanding of systemic racism.
A thriving global movement spanning generations and geographies.
Institutional commitments to racial justice, tempered by continuous demands for deeper structural reform.
On July 13, 2013, when Patrisse Cullors typed the words into a tweet, few could have foreseen the depth and breadth of its outcomes.
Live Aid concert raises $100 million
On July 13, 1985, Live Aid mounted twin concerts at Wembley Stadium (London) and JFK Stadium (Philadelphia) — brainchild of Bob Geldof and Midge Ure — broadcast to an audience of 1.5 to 1.9 billion viewers in over 150 countries.
Hosted by Princess Diana and Prince Charles, the event featured iconic performances — from Queen's historic set to U2 and David Bowie.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It raised over $100 million for famine relief in Ethiopia, shaping the template for global charity concerts. While praised for urgency and unity, Live Aid also faced critiques of cultural oversimplification and misallocation of funds.
Its success demonstrated music's transformative power in mobilising international support and remains an emblem of media-driven humanitarian activism.
Trump survives assassination attempt
On July 13, 2024, then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump was speaking at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, when gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old Pennsylvania man, opened fire from a rooftop with an AR-15-style rifle.
The bullet hit Trump in the ear; a Secret Service sniper neutralised the attacker within seconds, killing him.
Sean Curran and Secret service agents surround Donald Trump after an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in July. File Image/AP
One supporter was killed, two others critically injured.
Trump later spoke at the Republican National Convention, debuting with a bandage over his ear.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Qatar threatened to cut EU LNG supplies over sustainability law
Qatar has threatened to cut gas supplies to the European Union in response to the bloc's due diligence law on forced labour and environmental damage, a letter from Qatar to the Belgian government, seen by Reuters, showed. Qatar is the world's third-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), after the United States and Australia. It has provided between 12 per cent and 14 per cent of Europe's LNG since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In a letter to the Belgian government dated May 21, Qatari Energy Minister Saad al-Kaabi said the country was reacting to the EU's corporate sustainability due diligence directive ( CSDDD ), which requires larger companies operating in the EU to find and fix human rights and environmental issues in their supply chains. "Put simply, if further changes are not made to CSDDD, the State of Qatar and QatarEnergy will have no choice but to seriously consider alternative markets outside of the EU for our LNG and other products, which offer a more stable and welcoming business environment," said the letter. A spokesperson for Belgium's representation to the EU declined to comment on the letter, which was first reported by German newspaper Welt am Sonntag. The European Commission also received a letter from Qatar, dated May 13, a Commission spokesperson told Reuters, noting that EU lawmakers and countries are currently negotiating changes to the CSDDDD. "It is now for them to negotiate and adopt the substantive simplification changes proposed by the Commission," the spokesperson said. Brussels proposed changes to the CSDDD earlier this year to reduce its requirements - including by delaying its launch by a year, to mid-2028, and limiting the checks companies will have to make down their supply chains. Companies that fail to comply could face fines of up to 5 per cent of global turnover. Qatar said the EU's changes had not gone far enough. In the letter, Kaabi said Qatar was particularly concerned about the CSDDD's requirement for companies have a climate change transition plan aligned with preventing global warming exceeding 1.5 celsius - the goal of the Paris Agreement. "Neither the State of Qatar nor QatarEnergy have any plans to achieve net zero in the near future," said the letter, which said the CSDDD undermined countries' right to set their own national contributions towards the Paris Agreement goals. In an annex to the letter, also seen by Reuters, Qatar proposed removing the section of CSDDD which includes the requirement for climate transition plans. Kaabi is also chief executive of QatarEnergy. Qatar Energy gas has long-term supply contracts with major European companies, including Shell, TotalEnergies and ENI.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Can US, EU actually reach a trade deal? Trump says there's '50/50 chance or maybe less'
Brussels and Washington are reportedly nearing a potential agreement that could involve a 15 per cent US tariff on EU goods, with possible exemptions for key sectors read more US President Donald Trump sips Diet Coke from his wine glass after a toast, during a luncheon for world leaders at the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, US, September 25, 2018. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump on Friday (July 25) stated there was roughly a '50/50 chance, maybe less' of reaching an agreement with the European Union to lower import tariffs, as he spoke to reporters before departing the White House for Scotland. Trump, aiming to reduce US trade deficits, has threatened punitive tariff increases on numerous countries unless they secure trade deals with Washington by August 1. '90 deals in 90 days' His administration launched a '90 deals in 90 days' initiative in April, postponing higher duties, but has so far announced only five agreements, including with Britain, Japan, and the Philippines. 'I would say that we have a 50/50 chance, maybe less than that, but a 50/50 chance of making a deal with the EU,' Trump remarked. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The EU's 27 member states have tasked the European Commission with negotiating to avoid steep US tariffs, with Trump warning of 30 per cent levies if no deal is reached by the end of the month. According to multiple diplomats, Brussels and Washington are nearing a potential agreement that could involve a 15 per cent US tariff on EU goods, with possible exemptions for key sectors. EU readies retaliatory sanctions package However, on Thursday, EU states approved a retaliatory package targeting $109 billion (93 billion euros) of US goods, set to take effect on August 7 if negotiations fail. Trump claimed that most of the trade deals he sought were nearly finalised, though he clarified that his focus was on sending letters to impose tariffs on trading partners, not on negotiating comprehensive free trade agreements. He noted that tariffs, paid by importers rather than the exporting country, effectively act as a sales tax passed on to US consumers. 'I don't want to hurt countries, but we're going to send a letter out some time during the week, and it's basically going to say, 'You're going to pay 10 percent, you're going to pay 15 percent, you're going to pay maybe less,' I don't know,' Trump explained. He added that his negotiators were working 'diligently' with EU counterparts but expressed frustration with Canada, threatening a 35 per cent tariff and stating, 'we haven't really had a lot of luck' in those talks. Trump also mentioned that the US and China, its third-largest goods trading partner this year, have the 'confines of a deal' in place. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Did Elon Musk order the 2022 Starlink shutdown in Ukraine? What SpaceX said
As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fourth year, a report has claimed that tech mogul Elon Musk ordered a brief shutdown of Starlink during a key Ukrainian offensive. The report further added that Musk's alleged order resulted in a communications blackout for Ukrainian troops.(REUTERS) In a report published by news agency Reuters, Elon Musk reportedly told senior engineers in SpaceX's California offices to cut coverage in areas, including Kherson, which was a key region Ukraine was trying to reclaim in 2022. Three people familiar with the command told Reuters that it was Musk's decision to cut the comms and at least a hundred Starlink terminals were deactivated. The report further added that Musk's alleged order resulted in a communications blackout for Ukrainian troops. Soldiers panicked, drones surveilling Russian forces went dark, and long-range artillery units, reliant on Starlink to aim their fire, struggled to hit targets, officials from the Ukrainian military told Reuters, adding that due to this, the operation to reclaim Kherson failed. Sources further told Reuters that one of the major reason behind this comms outage was Musk's fear of a possible nuclear response from Russia. Reuters' report on Musk's alleged order comes a day after Starlink witnessed a massive global outage, where thousands lost connectivity. Starlink confirmed the global disruption and Elon Musk took to X to apologise for the outage. "Service will be restored shortly. Sorry for the outage. SpaceX will remedy root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again," wrote Musk. SpaceX denies Ukraine outage report While an official statement has not been released, SpaceX has denied claims that Elon Musk ordered a comms shutdown during the Ukraine war. In an email to Reuters regarding the news agency's queries, a SpaceX spokesperson called the findings of the report "inaccurate." The spokesperson further referred to an earlier X post by the Musk-led company: 'Starlink is fully committed to providing service to Ukraine.' When the initial reports of this alleged deliberate outage surfaced, Musk also took to X in March and stated that Starlink "would never do such a thing."