Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government.
In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on U.K. goods.
But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy.
John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.'
Rebellion over welfare reform
On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030.
After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs.
Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition.
The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk.
'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.'
It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's only likely to save about half that amount.
Starmer acknowledges errors
The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular.
In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East' while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home.
'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure,' he said.
UK politics is in flux
Starmer's struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers.
But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour's – shifted in this year's local elections to Reform U.K., a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties.
Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029.
'There's still plenty of time to turn things around,' Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers' rebellion 'will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make in government.
'Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Despite One Big Not-So-Beautiful Price Tag
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 1: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) pauses while speaking to reporters off the Senate floor after the Senate passes President Donald Trump's so-called "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," Act at the U.S. Capitol Building on July 1, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) Getty Images Senate Republicans narrowly passed President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' with a 51-50 vote after three Republicans—(Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Rand Paul (Ky.), and Thom Tillis (N.C.)—joined Democrats in voting no. Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaker vote. The tax provisions in the Senate would make permanent a number of the expiring tax cuts contained in Trump's signature 2017 tax legislation— the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). According to the Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWB Model), a nonpartisan, research-based initiative that provides an economic analysis of public policy's fiscal impact, making those cuts permanent would increase the deficit by $4.3 trillion over 10 years. These changes would be partly offset by spending cuts of $1.460 trillion for a total conventional cost of $3.104 trillion. The PWB Model analysis scored the legislation against a current law baseline. That's also how the Joint Committee on Taxation originally scored the bill. The baseline impacts how the cost of extending tax cuts is calculated (that's called scoring) and how it impacts the overall budget. As you know from past bills, including the Bush tax cuts, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act, it has long been the case that bills are scored based on the cost to move forward based on current law (so, in all of those examples, any provisions that were set to expire are reset to zero while those previously made permanent are ignored). Senate Republicans had requested that the JCT rescore it using a new approach called a current policy baseline. With a current policy baseline, extending provisions that are set to expire are scored as having zero cost. The Parliamentarian ruled that the new approach breaks the rules—this is consistent with precedent. With a current law baseline, the cost of the extensions is fully counted. Senate Committees According to the PWB Model analysis, increases in spending under the Armed Services, Judiciary, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees would add $290 billion to the deficit. While other committees proposed net spending cuts or revenue increases, the savings amount to only $1.5 trillion, offsetting less than one-third of the $4.6 trillion increase in deficits from tax cuts and spending increases. You can see how those costs are expected to play out here: Penn Wharton Budget Model Analysis, Senate Bill Kelly Phillips Erb (You can read more about the TCJA extensions as they originally appeared in the House version of the bill here.) Major Spending Cuts The Senate bill includes changes to health programs, including Medicaid. Notably, it would cut Medicaid spending by imposing work requirements, restricting state-level taxes on healthcare providers that receive federal matching funds, increasing the frequency of eligibility checks, changing Medicaid eligibility requirements based on immigration status, and phasing down state-directed payments to providers to align with Medicare rates. Overall, cuts to Medicaid would reduce the federal deficit by more than $900 billion. The bill also reduces spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps) by $186 billion over ten years. The cost doesn't just disappear—it shifts the responsibility for payment to the states with a new cost-sharing formula. It would also create additional work documentation requirements, shift administrative costs to states, and make other changes to reduce federal SNAP costs. The Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee eliminates subsidized and income-driven loan repayment plans, imposes new limits on student borrowing, and tightens the eligibility requirements for Pell Grants. Altogether, it would reduce spending by $350 billion over the budget window. Impact To The Federal Debt Overall, the PWB Model analysis predicts that the bill would increase debt by 7.6% over 10 years and decrease gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.3% over the same period. That's different than the impact to the federal deficit. Here's the quick difference between deficit and debt: The federal deficit is the excess of expenditures over revenue in a fiscal year. In simple terms, if we spend more than we take in, we have a deficit. If we spend exactly what we take in, we achieve a balanced budget. If we take in more than we spend, we have a surplus. The deficit is recalculated annually based on the shortfall or surplus each month. If there is a deficit, the Treasury borrows money to make up the difference. The Treasury accomplishes this by selling securities like T-bills, notes, and savings bonds. The federal debt is essentially the total of the deficits. So, if we owe $800 million one year and it's not repaid, and in another year we owe $500 million that is also not repaid, we accumulate a debt of $1.3 billion. Make sense? Since this amount represents borrowed money, we also pay interest on it, causing it to continue growing even if we are not actively adding to it. Next Steps Now that the bill has passed the Senate, it moves back to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson can only afford to lose three votes—the last iteration in the House passed 215-214. The versions passed in the House and Senate must match exactly for the bill to become law. Forbes What's Comes Next For The One Big Beautiful Bill Act By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes As The Byrd Bath Continues, Here's A Look At What Will Likely Be Out Of The One Big Beautiful Bill (Updated) By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes House Passes Trump Tax Bill After Marathon Session, Now It Moves To The Senate By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes A Guide To The Tax Cuts In (And Out) Of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' By Kelly Phillips Erb


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
HDB's $1.5 Billion IPO Points to Strong Appetite For Large Offerings in India
Before the trading day starts we bring you a digest of the key news and events that are likely to move markets. Today we look at: Good morning, this is Ashutosh Joshi, an equities reporter in Mumbai. Local shares could be in for a volatile session, tracking losses in Asian markets as US President Donald Trump refuses to budge on his July 9 deadline for higher tariffs. All eyes will be on HDB Financial as the year's biggest IPO debuts on the bourses. Also in focus will be Asian Paints after the antitrust regulator ordered a probe on the company over alleged abuse of dominant market position.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asian stocks waver, dollar frail as Trump's tariffs, US rate path weighs
By Ankur Banerjee SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Asian stocks slipped on Wednesday and the dollar languished near 3-1/2-year lows as investors weighed the prospect of U.S. interest rate cuts and the scramble for trade deals ahead of President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for tariffs. Trump said he was not considering extending the July 9 deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the United States, and cast doubts again that an agreement could be reached with Japan, although he expects a deal with India. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan eased 0.23% in early trading, inching away from the November 2021 top it touched last week. Japan's Nikkei fell 0.78%, dragged by tech stocks. Tech-heavy Taiwan stocks and South Korea's Kospi Index also fell after U.S. tech firms were hit hard following a strong rally in June. Data on Tuesday showed the U.S labour market remained resilient with a rise in job openings for May, sharpening the focus on the payrolls report due on Thursday as investors try to gauge when the Federal Reserve is likely to cut rates next. Fed Chair Jerome Powell, under fire from Trump to cut rates immediately, reiterated that the U.S. central bank plans to "wait and learn more" about the impact of tariffs on inflation before lowering interest rates. Traders are pricing in 64 basis points of cuts this year from the Fed with the odds of a move in July at 21%. That maintained a bearish bias on the dollar. The euro last bought $1.1793, just below the three-and-half-year high it touched on Tuesday. The yen was steady at 143.52 per dollar. [FRX/] "Any disappointing economic data can prompt further dovish repricing of FOMC rate cuts and another round of USD selling," said Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. "The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act (OBBBA) and trade developments also have the potential to further weaken the USD if they undermine investor confidence about the U.S. economy." TRUMP'S BILL Investor focus over the last few days has pivoted to the progress of Trump's massive tax-and-spending bill, which is expected to add $3.3 trillion to the national debt. The legislation heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval after U.S. Senate Republicans passed it by the narrowest of margins. The bill has stoked fiscal worries but the reaction was relatively muted after it passed the Senate. The benchmark U.S. 10-year yields were steady at 4.245% having touched a two-month low in the previous session. Aninda Mitra, head of Asia macro strategy at BNY Investment Institute, said the legislation "hard wires" a steady deterioration of the fiscal position and the debt trajectory of the U.S. government. "The near-term impact is mostly in the price, but the uncertainty factor could keep term premia elevated. We don't think long-term yields will fall back materially in the 6-12 month horizon." The fiscal worries, trade uncertainties and the U.S. rate path trajectory have all led investors to flee U.S. assets and look for alternatives. Investors worry that Trump's chaotic trade policies could hit U.S. economic growth. That has left the dollar unloved, with the greenback down over 10% for the year in its worst first half performance since the 1970s. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six rivals, was at 96.649, near its lowest since March 2022. In commodities, spot gold eased to $3,332.19 per ounce, after surging 1% in the previous session. The yellow metal is up 27% this year on safe-haven flows. [GOL/]