Bitcoin back above $100,000: Financial planning icon Ric Edelman reacts to the crypto ETF boom
Bitcoin's milestone week comes as new crypto exchange-traded funds are hitting the market.
Investor and best-selling personal finance author Ric Edelman thinks the rollout gives investors more access to upside.
He finds buffer ETFs and yield ETFs particularly exciting.
"You can now invest in bitcoin ETFs that protect you against the downside volatility while preserving your ability to enjoy the upside profits," Edelman told CNBC's "ETF Edge" this week." You can generate massive amounts of yield, much more than you can in the stock market."
Edelman is the founder of the Digital Assets Council of Financial Professionals, which educates financial advisors on cryptocurrencies. He is also in Barron's Financial Advisor Hall of Fame.
"Crypto is meant to be a long-term hold, just like the stock market," said Edelman. "It's meant to diversify the portfolio."
His thoughts came as a bitcoin rally got underway. The cryptocurrency crossed $100,000 on Thursday for the first time since February. As of Friday's close on Wall Street, bitcoin gained 6% this week. It is now up almost 10% so far this month.
However, Edelman sees problems when it comes to leverage and inverse bitcoin ETFs. He warned that not all crypto ETFs are appropriate for retail investors, suggesting most don't understand how they work.
"These leveraged ETFs often have an assumption you're going to hold the fund for a single day, a daily reset," he said. "That's literally the same thing as buying a lottery ticket. This isn't investing."
During the same interview, "ETF Edge" host Bob Pisani referenced 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) as an example of a leveraged bitcoin product that includes daily fees and resets.
The fund is beating bitcoin this week, jumping more than 12%. So far this month, the ETF is up 19%. But the BITX is underperforming bitcoin this year. It is up about 1.5%, while bitcoin is up roughly 10%.
Volatility Shares is the ETF provider behind BITX.
The company writes on its website: "The Fund is not suitable for all investors … An investor in the Fund could potentially lose the full value of their investment within a single day."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Rails vs Benchmark: Rethinking Stablecoins In a BTC-Denominated World
Photo by Ozan KOSE / AFP) (Photo by OZAN KOSE/AFP via Getty Images While stablecoins have emerged as crypto's dominant payment mechanism, a subtler shift may be underway: the emergence of Bitcoin not just as a store of value, but as a reference benchmark, a unit of account for global assets and financial flows. The idea may sound speculative, but some of the world's most prominent institutions are already signaling in this direction. Just this March, BlackRock's tokenized fund BUIDL added Bitcoin to its balance sheet, allocating to Sablier's Bitcoin streaming vault via an on-chain money market. Hours later, Franklin Templeton's CEO publicly endorsed BTC as a 'monetary anchor', stating: 'It's not just a hedge. It's part of a long-term capital structure.' Meanwhile, dollar-backed stablecoins have become the de facto infrastructure layer for digital payments with over 140 million daily transactions and settlement volumes rivaling major card networks. Yet the reliance on USD pegs comes with regulatory frictions and geopolitical exposure. What if the future of trade isn't denominated in fiat, but in Bitcoin while still settled in stablecoins? BTC as Benchmark, Not Just Collateral Historically, Bitcoin has occupied the 'digital gold' narrative; a scarce store of value held by long-term investors and protocol treasuries. But that framing may be expanding. 'More and more institutions are pricing assets in Bitcoin terms, not just holding it as treasury collateral,' says Luke Xie, co-founder of SatLayer. 'If you're a mining firm or a sovereign wealth desk in a high-inflation country, benchmarking in BTC can help de-risk exposure to dollar volatility. You still use stablecoins to settle but the unit of value is BTC.' This shift is playing out at multiple levels: mining equipment priced in BTC, tokenized assets benchmarking against Bitcoin baskets, and emerging DeFi derivatives denominated in sats rather than cents. Earlier this year MicroStrategy began referencing its own valuation in BTC terms, highlighting the symbolic and functional importance of Bitcoin as a monetary measuring stick. Are BTC-Denominated Stablecoins Next? If Bitcoin becomes the reference unit, what happens to stablecoins? 'People assume all stablecoins must be pegged to fiat but that's just the first chapter,' argues Alex Hung, product lead at BTCC. 'We're now seeing interest in stable-value instruments that are BTC-denominated: synthetic sat-backed units, baskets that adjust for volatility, or vaults that rebalance into BTC indexes. These are no longer theoretical. They're being built.' Indeed, on-chain experiments like Ethena's USDe (backed by ETH and delta-hedged positions) or Inverse Finance's DOLA are already pointing to hybrid stabilization models. Builders are now exploring whether similar constructions can track BTC reference prices, while maintaining predictable purchasing power for everyday transactions, particularly in emerging markets where dollar access remains constrained. Borja Martel Seward, co-founder and CEO of Roxom, sees this trend as part of a broader economic pattern already unfolding globally: 'What we see at Roxom is that the world could become one big Argentina. A bi-monetary world. People might spend and get paid in dollars or local currencies but they'll think in Bitcoin. Just like in Argentina, where citizens transact in pesos but save and measure wealth in USD, the global future could be spend-in-fiat, save-and-benchmark-in-BTC.' The appeal? A non-sovereign benchmark with programmable logic, coupled with stable settlement instruments that can function across jurisdictions without FX friction. Neutral Rails, Global Context In a fragmented monetary world, the allure of a politically neutral reserve benchmark (and programmable settlement rails) is growing stronger. The IMF recently projected that cross-border payment corridors could save $100 billion annually with programmable settlement layers. But implementation remains constrained by currency frictions and compliance complexity. Bitcoin may not replace the dollar in daily use but it could offer a consistent value layer across systems, enabling settlement in whichever stablecoin makes sense locally. It's a modular approach: Bitcoin sets the standard, stablecoins do the plumbing. From Theory to Trade This dual-stack thesis - BTC as unit of account, stablecoins as medium of exchange - is still nascent. But momentum is building. The Lightning ecosystem is exploring 'synthetic stablecoins' denominated in sats. Firms like Galoy and Fedi are developing Bitcoin-native community banking models that enable USD or fiat-pegged balances underpinned by BTC reserves. In parallel, sovereign miners, export firms, and even DeFi protocols are beginning to report in BTC, not dollars. This isn't a return to the gold standard, it's the emergence of a programmable, post-sovereign ledger standard. As institutions lean into tokenized real-world assets and programmable finance, the logic of separating benchmark from settlement may prove not just efficient, but inevitable. Will Regulators Allow This? Global regulators thus far have mandated that stablecoins maintain a 1:1 backing with fiat currency, emphasizing stability and investor protection, while expressing reluctance to allow reserves in alternative assets like cryptocurrencies or commodities due to their volatility. With that said, historically the U.S. dollar was backed by gold, a tangible asset that provided intrinsic value, until the abandonment of the gold standard in 1971. As Bitcoin gains traction as a decentralized store of value, often likened to "digital gold," could regulators eventually allow it to evolve into a reserve asset for stablecoins? While this shift is unlikely in the near term, figure adoption trends could prompt a reevaluation.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Asia markets set to open higher as investors await a slew of data releases
Aerial view of Seoul downtown city skyline with vehicle on expressway and bridge cross over Han river in Seoul city, South Korea. Mongkol Chuewong | Moment | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets are set to mostly climb Monday, with investors watching a slew of data points, including South Korea's and Japan's industrial output figures for May and China's purchasing managers' index readings for June. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open higher, with the futures contract in Chicago at 40,725 while its counterpart in Osaka last traded at 40,580, against the index's Friday close of 40,150.79. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 is slated to start the day higher, with futures tied to the benchmark at 8,521, compared to its last close of 8,514.20. Futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng index stood at 24,182, pointing to a weaker open compared to the HSI's last close of 24,284.15. U.S. equity futures rose in early Asia hours before the year stretches into the second half. All three key benchmarks on Wall Street rose sharply in last Friday's session. The broad-based S&P 500 hit a new record in more than four months after ending the session about 0.5% higher at 6,173.07 — overtaking its previous record of 6,147.43. The Nasdaq Composite also reached an all-time high, closing at a record after adding about 0.5%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose nearly 1%. The three benchmarks have staged a sharp recovery this month from the lows seen in April during the height of trade policy tensions. The whipsaw of global trade negotiations can quickly sway market sentiment and pose an ongoing threat to the strength of this rally. — CNBC's Pia Singh contributed to this report.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
European stocks have surged in the first half. How will they perform for the rest of 2025?
European shares surged in the first half of the year, massively outperforming stocks on Wall Street — but market watchers are divided on the potential for the trend to continue. As of Friday's close, the pan-European Stoxx 600 index has gained 7% so far this year. Germany's DAX index has surged 20% year-to-date, while the FTSE 100 is up 7.7%, Italy's FTSE MIB has gained 16%, and Spain's IBEX 35 has risen around 20%. That marks a major outperformance in comparison to U.S. stocks. During the same period, the S & P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite have both added around 5%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up by 3%. .STOXX YTD line Have European stocks got further to run? It is relatively rare for European stocks to rally by more than 6.6% in the first half of the year. The Stoxx Europe 600 index has risen 16 times, in 38 years, in such a manner since 1987. On average, when stocks do rally like they have in 2025, they return a mere 4.1% in the second half, according to CNBC's analysis. However, there's good news for investors. When stocks rallied in the second half, after a bumper performance in the first half, they went up by 11%. On the five occasions when stocks lost value in the second half, they fell by 9%. Wall Street's view Looking at the fundamentals, though, asset managers and analysts are also bullish for the second half of 2025. In its mid-year outlook report, Goldman Sachs Asset Management said that although the bull run in Europe had been driven in part by a diversification away from U.S. assets, the shift "isn't just about U.S. concerns." "Europe looks appealing, and many investment opportunities are emerging across sectors in the region," GSAM analysts said in the report. "Our primary focus is on identifying companies whose business are most likely to generate resilient earnings and high returns on capital." Fiscal policies across the region, like historic debt reform in Germany and a commitment from NATO members – most of whom are European nations – to drastically hike defense spending , are creating investment opportunities in defense, energy and infrastructure, they argued. "We see potential opportunities in the equity markets across geographies and sectors — including Europe and small caps, among others," they said. "Globally, companies with key differentiators and pricing power may have enhanced appeal in a world of higher tariffs." Within Europe, GSAM said it was identifying companies with strong ties to defense spending. "Europe's equity market, which has high financial and industrial sector weightings, offers useful diversification for portfolios allocated to US equities," they added. 'Substantial and lasting change' Frédérique Carrier, head of investment strategy for RBC Wealth Management in the British Isles and Asia, agrees that there are opportunities to be found across Europe. In her mid-year outlook report, Carrier argued that structural changes in Europe had the potential to pave the way for "substantial and lasting change." "The MSCI EMU (Economic and Monetary Union) Index, a proxy for European equities, trades at a price-to-earnings valuation of 15.4x 12-months forward consensus earnings forecast, roughly in line with its long-term average. It also trades at a discount to U.S. equities even on a sector-adjusted basis," she said. Carrier said RBC preferred sectors in Europe that were likely to benefit from new fiscal stimulus. Those included certain industrials, like defense and materials, as well as some financial stocks. "In our view, banks should benefit from the region's improved medium-term growth outlook and a steeper yield curve, while continuing to offer attractive shareholder returns via dividends and share buybacks," she said. "We are mindful that sectors subject to tariffs as well as those exposed to a strong currency are less likely to outperform." 'Time for a little more caution' However, some market watchers are making a case for taking a more wary approach to global equities, particularly those listed in Europe. "We as a team think it's time for a little bit of more caution at this stage, because the reality of the economic outlook over the next six months or so is that of the effect of tariffs still coming through," Julius Bendikas, European head of economics and dynamic asset allocation at Mercer, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Friday. "The hard data, in our view, is likely to turn sooner rather than later. The labor markets are still gradually cooling, so the economic fundamentals are a little bit softer, the valuations look a little bit stretched, and while the market technicals have been fairly bullish at this stage, I think the fundamental picture is still a bit softer." While he acknowledged European equities' outperformance in the first half of the year, Bendikas said he did not see a case for continuing to favor regional stocks. "I wouldn't be calling an overweight or underweight of Europe versus U.S., but we do think that playing [the] Europe narrative still very much via the euro is the best expression at this stage, and therefore would still advocate for euro versus dollar weight," he told CNBC. "But on the equities side, I would say we argue for neutrality." He also recommended favoring fixed income over equities, naming U.K. government bonds – known as gilts – "the asset class of most interest." Meanwhile, Bank of America strategists also remain bearish on European equities. In a Friday note to clients, BoA's Sebastian Raedler, Thomas Pearce and Andreas Bruckner acknowledged that the economic growth story for the euro area is improving, but said they were "sceptical about clear-cut upside this year" as German fiscal stimulus would take time. "We expect global growth to slow on tariff-related pressures, which should lift European equity risk premia and lower earnings," they added. "We stay negative on EU equities." They said their projections implied a 10% downside ahead for the Stoxx 600. "German fiscal beneficiaries have started to roll over, including defence and construction, but utilities, connected to German stimulus via climate and energy transition plans, have continued to outperform, with the sector's price relative up 24% since February and starting to overshoot their key macro drivers," they added. "As a consequence, we lower utilities from overweight to marketweight."
