How China's DeepSeek may have made Mark Zuckerberg lose faith in Meta's AI team, and start the biggest-ever talent war in Silicon Valley
Zuckerberg
is preparing to defend billions in AI spending as
Meta
faces its slowest profit growth in two years, with the CEO creating a secretive "
Superintelligence lab
" after the company's latest AI model reportedly failed to meet expectations.
Meta's
Llama 4 AI model
attempted to copy techniques from Chinese startup DeepSeek but received such poor reception from developers, making Zuckerberg authorize a complete overhaul of the company's AI strategy, according to sources cited by CNBC and the Financial Times.
Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI, bringing CEO Alexandr Wang aboard as chief AI officer alongside former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, ex-Safe Superintelligence CEO Daniel Gross, and ChatGPT co-creator
Shengjia Zhao
to lead the new Meta Superintelligence Labs. The unit operates in isolation at Meta's Menlo Park headquarters, with Zuckerberg personally meeting new hires as they join the closely guarded project.
The catalyst for this dramatic pivot came in January when DeepSeek's R1 model caught Meta off guard. The Chinese lab's mixture-of-experts (MoE) approach appeared cheaper to train and run than traditional dense models, prompting Meta executives to believe they had found a shortcut to leapfrog rivals like OpenAI, sources told CNBC.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Health: the best shoes to walk and stand all day
Ultra-Comfortable Shoes
Undo
However, Meta's rush to adopt MoE architecture backfired spectacularly. Developers found Llama 4 more difficult to customize and integrate compared to its predecessor, with many preferring the older Llama 3 model. The disappointing reception led Zuckerberg to lose confidence in his generative AI team's leadership, particularly after controversies over whether Meta had manipulated industry benchmark tests.
Zuckerberg's Superintelligence Lab is Meta's Manhattan Project-equivalent
The new Superintelligence Lab represents Mark Zuckerberg's attempt to create a startup-like environment within Meta's $1.8 trillion structure. "It's like the Manhattan Project. They are throwing all their cash at AI and trying to work out what to do," Uday Cheruvu, portfolio manager at Harding Loevner, told the Financial Times.
The hiring blitz began as early as March, when Zuckerberg started drawing up a list of top AI researchers before embarking on his offensive. He has since wielded nine-figure sign-on bonuses to poach approximately 50 top AI researchers from competitors including OpenAI, xAI, Tesla, Apple, and Google, including some of the biggest names in the industry.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Meta offered some of his employees as much as $100 million, and Wired's reports also indicate the same that Zuckerberg is offering $100 million for the first year, with over $300 million over four years. Although Altman also claimed he was sure no one would leave, since they were dedicated to OpenAI's mission, he turned out to be wrong. Last week, Meta hired ChatGPT co-creator Shengjia Zhao as the lab's chief AI scientist, marking a significant coup in Silicon Valley's intensifying talent war.
Despite the extraordinary compensation packages, gains have been limited: only a fraction of high-profile researchers opted to join. Meta also explored acquiring two startups founded by former OpenAI executives, Safe Superintelligence and Thinking Machines Lab, but was rebuffed in both cases. Then, acording to Wired, Meta approached more than a dozen staffers at Mira Murati's AI startup to discuss joining the lab. One researcher reportedly received an offer of more than $1 billion, but none accepted the offer, at least as of this writing.
Zuckerberg's spending spree hasn't been an isolated event. Microsoft recently poached two dozen Google DeepMind AI researchers, including some working on the company's Gemini model. Meanwhile, Google, after failing to close a deal with another startup on OpenAI's radar, invested $2.4 billion into WindSurf, acquiring its CEO, key AI talent, and its core tech, just as Meta did with Scale AI.
While some believe this AI talent war benefits researchers, DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis called it a rational move for Meta, saying the company is merely trying to catch up. Others, like Sam Altman, are less charitable, he has compared Meta's tactics to those of the mafia.
Zuckerberg's ambitions go beyond catching up. His goal is Superintelligence: AI that surpasses human intelligence across all domains. This includes integrating advanced AI into Meta's social platforms to offer digital companionship, generate unlimited personalized content, and enhance targeted advertising.
The CEO goal believes assembling an elite team is essential to maintain Meta's position as a top social and advertising platform, especially as rivals like Elon Musk's X are absorbed into AI-first companies. 'You actually kind of want the smallest group of people who can fit the whole thing in their head. So there's just an absolute premium for the best and most talented people,' he told The Information.
Meta faces investor scrutiny over massive AI spending
When Meta reports second-quarter earnings Wednesday, analysts expect the company's slowest revenue growth in seven quarters at 14.7% to $44.80 billion, with profit growth slowing to 11.5% as operating costs jump nearly 9%, according to Reuters data from LSEG. BNP Paribas estimates the Superintelligence hiring spree could drive $1.5 billion to $3.5 billion in additional annual research spending, with Meta already raising its capital expenditure forecast by 10% to between $64 billion and $72 billion for 2025.
Despite the massive investments and internal tensions as existing AI staff worry about being sidelined, Meta's stock has risen 20% this year as investors show more patience for AI spending compared to the metaverse push that drew sharp criticism in 2022. However, executives are now questioning Meta's open-source AI strategy, with some considering abandoning the planned release of Llama 4's "Behemoth" version in favour of developing proprietary models.
Zuckerberg remains confident the bet will pay off, telling The Information that Meta's "very strong business model that throws off a lot of capital" can support hundreds of billions in infrastructure and talent investments. The challenge now is convincing Wall Street that this secretive Manhattan Project will deliver the AI breakthrough Meta desperately needs.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination
Synopsis China has commenced construction on the Motuo Hydropower Station in Tibet, raising concerns in South Asia. The project, estimated at USD 170 billion, could give Beijing control over the Brahmaputra River, impacting millions downstream. India and Bangladesh have voiced concerns about potential water weaponization and ecological damage, while activists decry exploitation. ANI Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination China has begun construction on what it claims will be the world's largest hydropower project, the Motuo Hydropower Station, deep in the politically sensitive region of Tibet. Costing an estimated USD 170 billion and projected to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually (roughly the amount consumed by the UK in a year), the dam is raising serious alarm across South to The Institute for Energy Research (IER), the Motuo project will consist of five cascade hydropower stations in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, which becomes the Brahmaputra once it crosses into India and then Bangladesh. This gives Beijing direct control over a vital transboundary river that supports millions downstream and effectively hands China a dangerous new geopolitical weapon.A 2020 report by the Lowy Institute, cited by IER, warned that "control over these rivers effectively gives China a chokehold on India's economy." Experts now fear the Yarlung Zangbo could be used as a "water bomb," either draining the Brahmaputra during dry seasons or triggering devastating floods in India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states. Indigenous groups like the Adi tribe, who rely on the Siang River, one of the Brahmaputra's upper tributaries, stand to lose local ecosystem in the region, among the richest in the Himalayas, could be irreversibly damaged. Both India and Bangladesh have voiced formal concerns, with India reportedly exploring a countermeasure: a buffer dam on the Siang to offset sudden Chinese water discharges. IER notes that for China, this mega-project is about more than electricity. It serves Beijing's wider goals of industrialising Tibet and exporting power eastward to China's urban centres under the "xidiandongsong" policy, literally, "sending western electricity east." But activists and Tibetans see a darker motive: exploitation masked as development. Just last year, hundreds of Tibetan protesters were rounded up, beaten, and arrested for opposing another hydropower China's climate pledges of a carbon peak by 2030 and net-zero by 2060, IER argues the Motuo Dam is less about clean energy and more about strategic leverage. With glacial melt driving the river's flow, seasonal variability could undermine energy output. Still, Beijing appears undeterred, treating the project more as a geopolitical instrument than an environmental IER concludes, the Motuo dam exemplifies China's readiness to weaponise water, putting regional security, ecological balance, and human rights at grave risk.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination
China has commenced construction on the Motuo Hydropower Station in Tibet, raising concerns in South Asia. The project, estimated at USD 170 billion, could give Beijing control over the Brahmaputra River, impacting millions downstream. India and Bangladesh have voiced concerns about potential water weaponization and ecological damage, while activists decry exploitation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads China has begun construction on what it claims will be the world's largest hydropower project, the Motuo Hydropower Station , deep in the politically sensitive region of Tibet. Costing an estimated USD 170 billion and projected to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually (roughly the amount consumed by the UK in a year), the dam is raising serious alarm across South to The Institute for Energy Research (IER), the Motuo project will consist of five cascade hydropower stations in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River, which becomes the Brahmaputra once it crosses into India and then Bangladesh. This gives Beijing direct control over a vital transboundary river that supports millions downstream and effectively hands China a dangerous new geopolitical weapon.A 2020 report by the Lowy Institute, cited by IER, warned that "control over these rivers effectively gives China a chokehold on India's economy." Experts now fear the Yarlung Zangbo could be used as a "water bomb," either draining the Brahmaputra during dry seasons or triggering devastating floods in India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states. Indigenous groups like the Adi tribe, who rely on the Siang River, one of the Brahmaputra's upper tributaries, stand to lose local ecosystem in the region, among the richest in the Himalayas, could be irreversibly damaged. Both India and Bangladesh have voiced formal concerns, with India reportedly exploring a countermeasure: a buffer dam on the Siang to offset sudden Chinese water notes that for China, this mega-project is about more than electricity. It serves Beijing's wider goals of industrialising Tibet and exporting power eastward to China's urban centres under the "xidiandongsong" policy, literally, "sending western electricity east." But activists and Tibetans see a darker motive: exploitation masked as last year, hundreds of Tibetan protesters were rounded up, beaten, and arrested for opposing another hydropower China's climate pledges of a carbon peak by 2030 and net-zero by 2060, IER argues the Motuo Dam is less about clean energy and more about strategic leverage. With glacial melt driving the river's flow, seasonal variability could undermine energy output. Still, Beijing appears undeterred, treating the project more as a geopolitical instrument than an environmental IER concludes, the Motuo dam exemplifies China's readiness to weaponise water, putting regional security, ecological balance, and human rights at grave risk.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Just like NBA stars, US AI experts are now receiving $250 million pay packages
US AI researchers are securing $250 million+ deals as tech giants battle for top talent. (AI Image) In the latest development in the US artificial intelligence (AI) job market, top AI researchers are reportedly receiving compensation packages exceeding $250 million, matching or even surpassing earnings of NBA superstars. As reported by The New York Times, technology firms including Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft are engaging in aggressive recruitment strategies, likened to free agency negotiations in professional sports. The AI talent war has intensified as companies compete to develop "superintelligence" — advanced AI systems capable of outperforming the human brain. The scarcity of experienced researchers has led to highly competitive offers and personal interventions by tech executives to secure top talent. High-value offers and personal outreach Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg reportedly offered 24-year-old AI researcher Matt Deitke a compensation package worth approximately $250 million over four years. According to The New York Times, the offer included as much as $100 million in the first year alone. Mr Deitke, who co-founded the startup Vercept, had initially declined an earlier offer of around $125 million in stock and cash. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Legendary Cars from the Past Undo Following further negotiation and a personal meeting with Mr Zuckerberg, Mr Deitke accepted the revised offer. Recruitment efforts have become highly personalised. Zuckerberg has been directly messaging potential recruits, often following up with larger offers. As quoted by The New York Times, some Meta employees likened this strategy to the approach of sports franchise owners. The publication also reported that companies see these high compensation packages as justifiable, with the potential to significantly increase revenue through AI advancements. Recruitment tactics reflect professional sports culture The current AI hiring environment is marked by a level of intensity resembling that of major sports leagues. Companies have been poaching talent from each other, and social media has mirrored this dynamic with graphics and posts styled after sports trade announcements. One such post, made by the tech-focused online streaming platform TBPN, read: 'BREAKING: Microsoft has poached over 20 staff members from DeepMind over the last six months,' as cited by The New York Times. Many young AI researchers have reportedly formed private online groups to discuss offers, compare compensation packages, and advise each other on negotiation strategies. These discussions have taken place on platforms such as Slack and Discord, according to the report. The growing influence of these informal networks has shaped how researchers approach career decisions. Computing resources and recruitment networks In addition to financial compensation, companies like Meta are also offering vast computing resources. As per The New York Times, some recruits have been promised access to 30,000 graphical processing units (GPUs) — a critical asset for developing and training large AI models. Recruitment efforts are also being guided by internal documents, including one referred to as 'the List.' This list, as reported by The New York Times, contains names of top researchers with qualifications such as a Ph.D. in an AI-related field, experience at leading research labs, and a record of contributing to significant AI breakthroughs. Market shifts and internal challenges The demand for elite AI talent has also affected internal structures at companies like OpenAI. According to The New York Times, OpenAI's Chief Research Officer Mark Chen acknowledged in a staff meeting that the company has been countering offers from competitors. However, he noted that OpenAI had not matched Meta's financial proposals, stating, 'I personally think that in order to work here, you have to believe in the upside of OpenAI,' as quoted in the report. This rapid escalation in compensation has led to a redefinition of how value is assigned to AI expertise in the US, with new recruits often attempting to bring former colleagues into their teams. The New York Times also noted that researchers frequently try to recruit friends after joining a new lab, strengthening internal cohesion and collaboration. Background on Matt Deitke and Vercept Mr Deitke, who left a Ph.D. programme at the University of Washington, previously worked at the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, where he contributed to the development of Molmo — an AI chatbot capable of handling images, sounds, and text. In November, he and several colleagues founded Vercept, a startup building autonomous AI agents. Vercept has reportedly raised $16.5 million in funding, including investment from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Following Mr Deitke's decision to accept Meta's offer, Vercept's CEO posted on social media: 'We look forward to joining Matt on his private island next year,' as cited by The New York Times. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
