Doctors and Public Health Organizations Sue Kennedy Over Vaccine Policy Changes
The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association, and four other groups – along with an unnamed pregnant doctor who works in a hospital – filed the lawsuit in federal court in Boston. US health officials, following infectious disease experts' guidance, previously urged annual COVID-19 shots for all Americans ages 6 months and older. But in late May, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced he was removing COVID-19 shots from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.
A number of health experts decried the move as confusing and accused Kennedy of disregarding the scientific review process that has been in place for decades – in which experts publicly review current medical evidence and hash out the pros and cons of policy changes. The new lawsuit repeats those concerns, alleging that Kennedy and other political appointees at the US Department of Health and Human Services have flouted federal procedures and systematically attempted to mislead the public.
'This administration is an existential threat to vaccination in America, and those in charge are only just getting started,' said Richard H. Hughes IV, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. 'If left unchecked, Secretary Kennedy will accomplish his goal of ridding the United States of vaccines, which would unleash a wave of preventable harm on our nation's children.'
HHS officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Also joining the suit are the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
10 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
St. Jude Children's Hospital's fundraising arm selects new CEO in midst of global expansion
Ike Anand was promoted to president and chief executive officer of ALSAC, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's fundraising organization, on Tuesday. The leadership change comes as ALSAC – which raised more than $2.5 billion for the Memphis-based hospital in 2024, according to tax filings – navigates a global expansion and an increasingly complicated funding landscape in the US. 'My role is to make sure that ALSAC is able to deliver on its promises to St. Jude so that St. Jude can continue to dream big,' said Anand, who has been ALSAC's chief operating officer since 2020. 'And ALSAC has a lot of initiatives in the pipeline to make sure that that happens.' Dr. Frederick M. Azar, chairman of ALSAC's board of directors, said Anand has been instrumental in redefining the organization's strategic direction, including its six-year, $12.9 billion plan to provide pediatric cancer cures and treatments globally, and will help it continue to grow. 'Throughout his tenure, Ike has demonstrated visionary leadership and an unwavering commitment to the St. Jude mission,' Azar said in a statement. For Anand, who spent 15 years at travel tech firm Expedia Group and the rest of his career at other for-profit businesses, heading a nonprofit – even one as large and influential as ALSAC – was not an early life goal. But the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on his family and friends changed that. 'I was hunting to do something that makes me feel valuable and purpose-driven in this world,' Anand said. 'And what I found… it was the perfect match.' At Expedia, he learned the importance of data, nurturing customer relationships, and managing teams around the world – experiences he says help at ALSAC. 'We have a culture here now of testing and learning, getting better at what we do, and ultimately understanding that we're not really competing against anybody else,' he said. 'We are trying to be better at what we do.' One area where Anand has drawn attention is incorporating artificial intelligence into ALSAC's fundraising. Its initiative of using AI to help guide its communications with donors has influenced multiple programs in philanthropy. Anand is quick to point out that ALSAC does not use donors' specific data to communicate to them individually but does use aggregated data to make decisions about what information may interest certain types of donors. 'For us, it is really, really vital that the consumers have trust in us and that they see us valuing their privacy, that they see us valuing their information and using it in the right manner,' he said. 'And so we're really careful about it.' Health care policy changes from President Donald Trump's administration may impact rural hospitals and increase the need for St. Jude's services, which include free treatment for children with cancer. However, Anand says that St. Jude and ALSAC see it as their mission to care for all 400,000 children around the world diagnosed with cancer, so the changes do not really change their focus. 'Our mission is a unifying mission,' he said. 'We are not a political organization. I think everybody agrees that saving children is one of the most important things we can do as humanity.' Marlo Thomas, National Outreach Director for St. Jude and daughter of the late entertainer and philanthropist Danny Thomas, who founded ALSAC and St. Jude, said that goal has remained the same. 'When my father founded St. Jude with a dream that no child should die in the dawn of life, he meant no child anywhere,' she said in a statement. 'Ike Anand is the perfect person to carry that dream forward and help continue to expand our mission globally.'
Al Arabiya
15 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US Adults Want the Government to Focus on Child Care Costs, Not Birth Rates, AP-NORC Poll Finds
While the Trump administration explores ways to encourage Americans to have more babies and reverse the US's falling birth rate, a new poll finds that relatively few US adults see this as a priority or share the White House's concerns. Instead, Americans are more likely to want the government to focus on the high cost of child care and improving health outcomes for pregnant women, according to the survey from The Associated Press–NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Pronatalism, or the promotion of childbearing, has gained traction as a movement within the tech world and among some religious conservatives. Prominent figures on the right, like Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance, have espoused pronatalist beliefs, arguing more children are good for society. The survey finds that only about 3 in 10 Americans say declining birth rates are a major problem in the US, and just 12 percent say that encouraging families to have more children should be a high priority for the federal government. Republicans also see affordable child care and health outcomes for pregnant women as higher government priorities than promoting more births, indicating that even as conservatives push pronatalist policies, they're not getting much buy-in from the GOP base. 'In this day and age, it's not dire,' said Misty Conklin, a supporter of President Donald Trump, of the declining birth rate. Conklin, 50, lives in Indiana and thinks the government should prioritize making it more affordable to raise children, including supporting the social services her disabled granddaughter needs. 'It's hard to live as just a couple, let alone with children,' Conklin said. 'It's getting worse and worse.' Americans are more concerned about the cost of raising and caring for a child than the number of babies being born, the survey found. About three-quarters of US adults say the cost of child care is a major problem. That includes about 8 in 10 Democrats and women, as well as roughly 7 in 10 Republicans and men. Policies like free or low-cost daycare for children who are too young to attend public school and paid family leave are also popular with about two-thirds of Americans. For Maria Appelbe, a Trump voter in Arizona, child care costs factored into her decision to quit her job to care for her daughter when she was younger. The 49-year-old said, 'I was lucky enough that back in those days without inflation we were able to make it work.' Americans seem to have few opinions about the number of children families should have. Demographic projections have indicated the country's replacement rate is 2.1 children per woman, which would keep the population from shrinking over the long term. However, in the survey, there aren't strong opinions about whether it's mostly a good thing or mostly a bad thing for families to have fewer than two children or more than two. Appelbe, who has one teenager, thinks financially it makes sense to have small families. 'I'm so glad that I was able to give her everything that I could, but I definitely think if I had more children I wouldn't have been able to,' she said. While few Americans say the federal government should make it a high priority to encourage families to have more children, a majority (55 percent) do want the government to focus on improving health outcomes for women. Black adults are especially likely to say this, as are women. Black women have the highest maternal mortality rate in the US, which lags behind other wealthy nations in maternal health. There are small signs that some pronatalist policies are registering more with conservative Republicans than liberal Democrats, even though the poll indicates most aren't thinking about this issue. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say it's mostly bad for the future of the US if families have two or fewer children, although relatively few Republicans–about 2 in 10–hold this view. A social conservative and fiscal liberal, Dmitriy Samusenko, 28, does not identify with either major US political party. The California resident does think the declining US birth rate is a major problem that will determine if the nation will continue to exist in the long run. Samusenko said he supports using the government as a resource to enable families to grow and develop. Pronatalist advocates have pitched the White House on the idea of a $5,000 baby bonus to mothers after a new baby is born. Trump has said it 'sounds like a good idea,' but about half of conservative Republicans oppose the $5,000 baby bonus and about one-quarter support it. Americans overall are more split: about one-third are in favor, about 4 in 10 are opposed and about 3 in 10 are neutral. On the campaign trail, Trump promised to be the 'fertilization president.' In February, he signed an executive order supporting expanded access to in vitro fertilization. IVF is popular among Americans but controversial among parts of Trump's religious base, notably Catholics and some evangelicals. About 4 in 10 US adults consider the cost of fertility treatments to be a major problem in the US. Nearly half of US adults strongly or somewhat favor requiring insurance companies to cover fertility treatments. Bill Taylor, 72, of Washington state, watched his adult daughter face health challenges and expensive fertility treatments to have a child. He strongly favors the government requiring insurance companies to cover fertility treatments. Taylor, a Democrat, also said the declining birth rate is a problem, though a minor one. 'Bigger families mean a greater need for government health care and government social programs,' Taylor said. 'Conservatives don't want to do that. They just want to grow the family.'
Al Arabiya
18 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
COVID-19 cases surge across GCC as WHO reports global rise in infections
COVID-19 infections are rising sharply across GCC countries, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE among nations driving a global surge that has pushed test positivity rates to levels not seen since July 2024, according to the latest World Health Organization report. Global SARS-CoV-2 activity has increased significantly since mid-February 2025, with test positivity rates reaching 11 percent across 73 reporting countries - matching peaks observed during last summer's wave, the WHO report indicated. The Eastern Mediterranean region, which includes GCC states, has emerged as a key driver of the current surge, with test positivity rates climbing from four percent in mid-March to 17 percent by late April before declining slightly to 15 percent in mid-May. 'Recent reports of increases in circulation have been observed in five countries to date, including Egypt, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Pakistan,' the WHO said in its latest epidemiological update. The surge represents a sharp reversal from the relatively low transmission levels observed in the first quarter of 2025, when many countries reported test positivity rates as low as 2 percent. New variant Contributing to the rise is the emergence of NB.1.8.1, a new variant under monitoring that WHO designated in early 2025. The variant, which carries mutations that may enhance transmissibility and immune evasion, now represents 10.7 percent of global sequences reported as of mid-May, up from just 2.5 percent four weeks earlier. 'Spike mutations at position 445 have been shown to enhance binding affinity to hACE2 receptor, which could increase the variant's transmissibility,' the WHO said. The variant's rapid spread coincides with the declining circulation of LP.8.1, which had been the dominant strain since mid-March but is now being overtaken by NB.1.8.1 in many regions. While the Eastern Mediterranean region shows concerning trends, WHO officials reported gaps in surveillance data from the region, including GCC countries. 'The reporting of COVID-19 associated hospitalizations, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths is very limited from the countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the South-East Asia Region, and the Western Pacific Region and does not allow for evaluation of the impact on health systems by WHO,' the organization stated. The WHO report highlighted persistently low vaccination rates globally, including among high-risk groups in Gulf countries. Among older adults across 75 reporting member states, just 1.68 percent had received a COVID-19 vaccine dose in 2024 through September, while uptake among healthcare workers stood at only 0.96 percent. Regional disparities were also noted, with the Eastern Mediterranean region reporting coverage rates of less than 0.5 percent among older adults, significantly lower than the 5.1 percent achieved in Europe and 3.6 percent in the Americas. The WHO's Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition continues to recommend vaccines for at-risk groups, it said. The current surge across the GCC reflects a broader pattern of renewed COVID-19 activity across multiple regions. The Western Pacific region has seen test positivity rates climb from 5 percent to 11 percent over the past month, while the South-East Asia region experienced increases from 0.5 percent to 5 percent since early April. Unlike previous waves, the current surge lacks clear seasonal patterns, complicating efforts to predict and prepare for transmission peaks. 'Recent increases in SARS-CoV-2 activity are broadly consistent with levels observed during the same period last year, however, there still lacks a clear seasonality in SARS-CoV-2 circulation,' the WHO said. The WHO maintains that the global public health risk associated with COVID-19 remains high, despite evidence of decreasing impact on human health compared to earlier pandemic years. GCC countries, like other WHO member countries, are encouraged to maintain integrated surveillance systems, ensure equitable vaccine access, strengthen healthcare delivery, and enhance risk communication efforts. The organization specifically recommends that countries 'continue to monitor and report SARS-CoV-2 activity and burden, public health and healthcare system impacts of COVID-19, strengthen genomic sequencing capacity and reporting, in particular information on SARS-CoV-2 variants.'
