We logged every RCMP Black Hawk flight for 6 weeks. Here's what we found
After weeks of near-daily flights, the RCMP's much-hyped Black Hawk helicopters have been used to stop one illegal border crossing from the U.S. into Canada since patrolling began in January, according to the RCMP and analysis by CBC News.
The national police force leased the choppers as part of Ottawa's $1.3 billion border security upgrade, following U.S. President Donald Trump's initial threat to impose tariffs on Canada if it didn't do more to stem the southward flow of migrants and fentanyl.
CBC's visual investigations unit analyzed all the flights taken by the choppers — which use the tail registrations C-FHKS and C-FHLY, visible in footage — over six weeks.
Using the flight tracking website ADS-B Exchange, the team logged 68 flights between Jan. 17 — when patrolling officially began — and Feb. 28. The team looked primarily at flights along the border, and excluded those that appeared to be for transit or refuelling.
It was not possible, based on the data, to determine exactly how the choppers were being deployed. The RCMP repeatedly declined to share specifics with CBC News, but said the Black Hawks give the force a "rapid response capability" for the roughly 9,000-kilometre Canada-U.S. border.
The RCMP also would not offer any specifics on the Black Hawks' involvement in stopping migrants or fentanyl entering the U.S.
Still, it was possible to spot trends.
The choppers were in the air for just under four hours at a time on average, mostly in the daytime, and made multiple stops at different airports along their route, which often encompassed long stretches of the border.
Across the country over the same period, the RCMP stopped 15 people trying to cross illegally from the U.S. in three separate operations. In only one case was a Black Hawk involved.
According to the RCMP, leasing the Black Hawks from Ottawa's Helicopter Transport Services cost taxpayers $5.3 million — part of an effort to mollify Trump and avert the tariffs.
It has been, to a degree, "border security theatre" said Wesley Wark, senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, a think-tank in Waterloo, Ont.
"We're putting up hardware into the skies, Black Hawk helicopters, we're putting up 24/7 surveillance on the border," he said. "It's designed to appease the United States."
Tracking the illegal border crossing
On Feb. 23, C-FHKS took off from Carp Airport, near Ottawa, at around 8:49 a.m. ET, according to flight tracking data. At around 9:21 a.m., it was just east of Cornwall approaching the border between Quebec and New York state, flying at under 800 feet.
C-FHKS had previously, over a period of several weeks, made approximately 21 flights in and around this border area.
But what made this day stand out was, for the first time in six weeks, that Black Hawk was apparently deployed in an illegal crossing operation.
Flight tracking data became unavailable at around 9:25 a.m., but just after 10:30 a.m. the chopper re-emerged — heading northeast toward Saint-Jean Airport in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Que.
CBC News can't confirm whether this was exactly when it was involved in the operation, but RCMP said in a statement that a Black Hawk was called in that morning to help search for migrants in the woods for a rescue that lasted nearly eight hours.
RCMP also said that 20 police officers were involved in arresting two people who were attempting to smuggle five others near the Canada-U.S. border crossing around Hinchinbrooke, Que., overnight.
The five people were suffering from hypothermia, the release said. The driver and alleged smuggler were arrested. The latter was released on a promise to appear in court and will face charges, according to the RCMP.
Flight patterns
Flight trends also showed the Black Hawks patrolling borders in B.C., Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and New Brunswick.
C-FHKS stayed primarily in Eastern Canada, going between Ontario and New Brunswick. The bulk of its flights were along the border between Quebec and New York state.
C-FHLY mostly monitored the Prairies and the West Coast, with 16 of its patrols following the Manitoba-North Dakota border.
The Black Hawks aren't the only part of the RCMP border surveillance arsenal: It also uses drones, surveillance planes and surveillance towers. The force announced in February that it arrested migrants crossing the border illegally on Jan. 14 with the help of a surveillance plane, and released dramatic thermal footage from the operation.
More operations are expected as part of the $1.3 billion package to bolster border security.
But the choppers, both of which are more than 40 years old, have become the most visible and flashiest parts of this plan and they have security experts wondering: Why Black Hawks? And why now?
"It's not clear to me that aerial surveillance is the greatest challenge that we face at the border, in part because the United States already runs very rigorous aerial surveillance across and along the entire border," said Christian Leuprecht, professor at Royal Military College of Canada and Queen's University.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen … can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?'
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.'
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
