
South Africa opens a new inquiry into apartheid-era killings known as Cradock Four
Sicelo Mhlauli was one of four Black men abducted, tortured and killed 40 years ago this month by apartheid-era security forces in South Africa. No one has been held accountable for their deaths.
But a new judge-led inquiry into the killings of the anti-apartheid activists who became known as the Cradock Four — and who became a rallying cry for those denied justice — opened this month.
It is part of a renewed push for the truth by relatives of some of the thousands of people killed by police and others during the years of white minority rule and enforced racial segregation.
Mhlauli described the state of her husband's body during testimony she gave at the start of the inquiry in the city of Gqeberha, near where the Cradock Four were abducted in June 1985. Relatives of some of the three other men also testified.
Thumani Calata never got to know her father, Fort Calata, who had been a teacher. She was born two weeks after the funerals of the Cradock Four, which drew huge crowds and galvanized resistance to apartheid.
'I don't know how it feels, and I will never know how it feels, to be hugged by my dad,' Thumani Calata, now 39, told the inquiry as she wept.
Two previous inquiries were held during apartheid. A two-year inquest that started in 1987 found the men were killed by unknown people. Another in 1993 said they were killed by unnamed policemen.
Police officers implicated have since died
Relatives of the Cradock Four likely will never see justice. The six former police officers directly implicated in the abductions and killings have died, the last one in 2023. None was prosecuted despite the post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission identifying them and denying them amnesty in the late 1990s.
That commission, set up by then-President Nelson Mandela, attempted to confront the atrocities of apartheid in the years after the system officially ended in 1994. While some killers were granted amnesty, more than 5,000 applications were refused and recommended for criminal investigation.
Hardly any made it to court.
Oscar van Heerden, a political analyst at the University of Johannesburg, said the bitter emotion of relatives at the Cradock Four inquiry showed wounds have not healed.
'Where it was felt that truth was not spoken and there wasn't sufficient evidence to warrant forgiveness, those were cases that were supposed to be formally charged, prosecuted and justice should have prevailed," van Heerden said. "None of that happened.'
Taking the government to court
The failure by post-apartheid governments for 25 years to pursue cases is now being scrutinized. Frustrated, the families of the Cradock Four finally forced authorities to rule last year that there would be a new inquiry into the killings.
They also joined with a group of relatives of other apartheid-era victims to take the South African government to court this year over the failure to investigate so many crimes.
As part of the settlement in that case, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa ordered a national inquiry led by a retired judge into why apartheid-era killers were not brought to justice. The inquiry, which has not opened yet, threatens to expose further uncomfortable moments for South Africa.
While the majority of victims of political violence during apartheid were Black and other people of color, some were white, and families have come together across racial lines. A group of survivors and relatives from the 1993 Highgate Hotel massacre, where unknown men opened fire in a bar full of white customers, joined with the Cradock Four families and others in the case against the government.
They allege that post-apartheid authorities deliberately blocked investigations.
Other inquests have been reopened, including one into the 1967 death of Albert Luthuli, who was president of the banned anti-apartheid African National Congress movement when he was hit by a train. Luthuli's death has been viewed with suspicion for more than 50 years.
Last chance to know the truth
At the Cradock Four inquiry, which is expected to resume in October for more testimony, Howard Varney, a lawyer for the families, said this is their last chance to know the truth.
The new inquiry has attempted to retrace the killings, from the moment of the men's abduction at a nighttime police roadblock to the time their bodies were discovered, burned and with signs of torture. The families also want a former military commander and ex-police officers who may have knowledge of the killings to testify.
Lukhanyo Calata, the son of Fort Calata, said he accepted it was unlikely anyone would ever be prosecuted over the death of his father and his friends Mhlauli, Matthew Goniwe and Sparrow Mkonto. But he said he wants official records to finally show who killed them.
' Justice now can really only come in the form of truth,' Lukhanyo Calata told The Associated Press. 'They may not have been prosecuted, they may not have been convicted, but according to court records, this is the truth around the murders of the Cradock Four.'
___
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs guilty on two charges but acquitted of racketeering and sex trafficking
Update: Date: 2025-07-02T15:35:49.000Z Title: The jury has founded Combs: Content: Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison for transportation to engage in prostitution related to Casandra Ventura and 'Jane' Full story: Sean Combs found guilty on two of five counts Key moments from the trial Seven weeks, 34 witnesses, a media circus: inside the trial Anna Betts and Shannon Ho Wed 2 Jul 2025 17.33 CEST First published on Wed 2 Jul 2025 16.06 CEST From 4.21pm CEST 16:21 NOT GUILTY of racketeering conspiracy NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of 'Jane' GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution, related to Casandra Ventura GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution related to 'Jane' Updated at 4.55pm CEST 5.33pm CEST 17:33 Here are some more images of the family emerging from court: NBC News spoke to Christian Combs, who said his his father was feeling 'Great.' 5.21pm CEST 17:21 Some supporters are putting their fists in the air outside the courthouse in lower Manhattan. They can be heard chanting 'Let Puffy go!' Updated at 5.25pm CEST 5.20pm CEST 17:20 Janice Combs, mother of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, gives a thumbs up after hearing the verdict in her son's sex-trafficking trial: 5.18pm CEST 17:18 More of Combs's supporters are showing up at the courthouse. Lots of smiles and clapping. 5.17pm CEST 17:17 Outside the courthouse, supporters of Combs are saying, 'If you're being abused, come out right away' – seemingly going after Combs's alleged victims for not coming forward about their alleged abuse sooner. 5.12pm CEST 17:12 Patrick Lam, a member of the Screen Actors Guild, was outside the courthouse after the verdict was read in Combs's trial. 'Here to support Sean and his family,' he said. 'Glad they found him not guilty for Rico because prosecutors tried to get whatever they wanted for political reasons.' Updated at 5.23pm CEST 5.09pm CEST 17:09 It's packed outside the courthouse in lower Manhattan as press as well as Combs's supporters fill the streets. People are shouting: 'Not guilty!' Updated at 5.24pm CEST 4.56pm CEST 16:56 Andrew Lawrence Since Combs's arrest last September on federal criminal charges for racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, a number of podcasters and YouTubers have been notably more sympathetic to him than to the witnesses called for the prosecution. The allegations about Combs's behavior are horrific and include shocking revelations about his drug use, sexual indulgences and hair-trigger temper. But you wouldn't know that from following trial coverage from these faithful evangelists of toxic masculinity. Combs's former girlfriend and key witness Cassie Ventura, especially, is an object of their derision, and their assessment of her testimony is withering. In their view, Combs is not a man with incredible power and influence who abused and mistreated those in his circle, but the target of a #MeToo-style witch-hunt orchestrated by Ventura. Before the verdict was announced, the Guardian's Andrew Lawrence wrote about how some commentators on Black masculinity are popular pundits on Sean Combs's case – and explores how they took a clear side: Updated at 5.05pm CEST 4.42pm CEST 16:42 The federal sex-trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs reached its conclusion on Wednesday, with a jury of 12 New Yorkers finding the music mogul guilty on two charges and not guilty on three charges. Here were some of the key moments from the seven-week trial: Updated at 4.53pm CEST 4.40pm CEST 16:40 In the courtroom, fans of the music mogul and his family are clapping and embracing each other. 4.39pm CEST 16:39 Both sides have been asked to submit letters to the judge regarding whether Combs should continue to be held in federal detention or released on bail. The parties will convene after the letters are submitted this afternoon. Updated at 4.53pm CEST 4.35pm CEST 16:35 The government has said that it will seek the maximum 20-year sentence for Combs. Each count that he has been found guilty of carries up to 10 years. Ultimately, it will be up to the judge how long Combs serves. 4.33pm CEST 16:33 The defense is asking that the court release Combs from federal detention, where he has been held since his arrest last September. Updated at 4.54pm CEST 4.32pm CEST 16:32 Given what the jury has found Combs guilty of, he faces a maximum of 20 years behind bars. Updated at 4.37pm CEST 4.30pm CEST 16:30 The judge has thanked the jurors for their 'sacrifice'. 'I want you to know that it is inspiring to all of us. You listened, you worked together, you were here every day, rain or shine. You did so with no reward, other than the reward that comes from answering the call of public service. That should give all of us hope,' Judge Arun Subramanian, who is presiding over this case, said. Updated at 4.54pm CEST 4.21pm CEST 16:21 NOT GUILTY of racketeering conspiracy NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of 'Jane' GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution, related to Casandra Ventura GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution related to 'Jane' Updated at 4.55pm CEST


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (24) who dragged visually impaired child away from her mother avoids jail
A man who dragged a visually impaired child away from her mother has been given a suspended sentence. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard that Stephan Obelngoa (24), of Deerpark Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, pleaded guilty to assault causing harm, assault of a peace officer and resisting arrest at The Square, Tallaght, Dublin, on October 2nd, 2023. He has six previous convictions and was on bail at the time of this offence. Advertisement Judge Sinéad Ní Chúlacháin handed down an 18-month prison sentence but suspended it in full on strict conditions. Obelngoa was suffering from a mental illness at the time and had not been taking his medication, the court heard. Garda Sergeant Gemma Collins told Shaun Smyth BL, prosecuting, that an 11-year-old girl, her mother and little brother were leaving the shopping centre on the day in question when they noticed a man later identified as Obelngoa. He was topless, and the mother described his movements as 'unnerving' and said he seemed 'aggressive'. The court heard the mother intended to walk on and avoid Obelngoa, but she suddenly noticed that her daughter had disappeared from her peripheral vision. Advertisement The woman turned around and saw her visually impaired daughter being dragged away by Obelngoa. The little girl was screaming, crying and struggling to get away. The mother described her daughter as 'bouncing off the ground'. Obelngoa then threw the girl into a concession stand. Gda Sgt Collins said two security guards immediately subdued Obelngoa. When gardaí arrived, they found Obelngoa was shouting, roaring and aggressive as he was being restrained. He then spat a mixture of blood and saliva into the face of one of the gardaí. As gardaí were trying to place handcuffs on Obelngoa, he tried to bite them. Advertisement Specialist gardaí interviewed the young girl, and she described to them 'being dragged like a doll and being dragged on the floor'. She said: 'I thought he was going to drag me away forever and would kidnap me'. The girl was examined the following day by a doctor, and a medical report stated she suffered minor spinal soft tissue tenderness and abrasions. The court heard the young girl had trouble sleeping and was extremely anxious in public places like shopping centres afterwards. Gda Sgt Collins agreed with Ciara Ní Ghabhann BL, defending, that gardaí were unable to interview her client after he was arrested, as he was made an involuntary patient in Tallaght Hospital, where he remained for a period of time. The garda agreed with counsel that CCTV footage obtained by the gardaí shows that the incident lasted a matter of seconds. Advertisement Ms Ní Ghabhann said her client suffers from schizophrenia and is given antipsychotic medication every three months. She said at the time of this incident, Obelngoa had been off his medications for six months and was self-medicating with cannabis. Counsel said her client is currently under the supervision of the Probation Services and has undertaken community response programmes. The Probation Services have said he is at low risk of reoffending. She said Obelngoa has written letters of apology to both the garda and the young girl in this case, outlining his sincere remorse. He does not have a clear memory of the incident, but when shown the CCTV footage, he was embarrassed. She asked the court to take into account that her client was quite young and had an acute mental health issue when this offence was committed. She said her client has taken steps to ensure that nothing like this will ever happen again. Advertisement At a hearing last month Judge Ní Chúlacháin said, 'these are very serious offences,' and adjourned the case for two weeks to consider her sentences and read all documents handed into court. In sentencing, the judge noted that the injured party was walking past him with her mother when he threw her into a concession stand and had to be pepper-sprayed. The judge asked Sgt Collins to explain to the injured party 'that we can't punish people for things that aren't their own fault' and that 'if he takes his medication, he's never going to come near her again.' 'It must be very strange to her that he is not going into prison,' the judge added. She said the onus was on the defence to establish their client was suffering from a mental illness and that she was satisfied they had done so. She noted he was unmedicated for six months and was displaying his genitalia in public while in hospital. Ireland McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP ami... Read More Judge Ní Chúlacháin noted his mental state at the time but said it 'does not reduce all your culpability,' she said. She said the appropriate sentence was 18 months, but she had to take account of his guilty plea, which saved the injured party giving evidence at her young age. The judge noted he was 24 and was in college but dropped out and was on bail for six offences, but there was a 'positive' probation report, and he was at low risk of reoffending if he continued on the same path. She imposed a one-year imprisonment term to run concurrently on each of the assault charges, but in view of the effect prison would have on him, she suspended it for two years on strict conditions.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
All the salacious evidence from seven weeks of the Diddy trial that guaranteed Sean Combs would WALK on charges threatening to put him away for life
After weeks of bombshell testimony about drug-fueled 'freak off' sex sessions and heartbreaking details of abuse from alleged victims, a Manhattan jury found Sean ' Diddy ' Combs not guilty of the most serious crimes he faced yet guilty on two counts related to prostitution. In total, Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy and two counts each of sex trafficking and transportation of individuals across state lines to engage in prostitution. The first two charges carried maximum sentences of life in prison, while the prostitution accusations may now put Combs away for up to 20 years.