Onshore wind strategy published – but government says jobs and economic growth would follow from investment in nuclear power
A Taskforce was set up last year to produce a strategy for developing the onshore wind industry in the UK and resolve any obstacles in its path. The Onshore Wind Taskforce has now been disbanded after producing its report.
While the plan is focused south of the border, it has an effect in Scotland 'where 90% of the current onshore wind pipeline is located'. The report says that it 'recognises the importance of addressing barriers to onshore wind development across the UK. Devolved matters have been respected while some subject matters which are not devolved under a devolution settlement have been considered by the Taskforce. Therefore, some of the actions in this report will have implications for the pipeline of onshore wind projects in the Devolved Administrations. As such, officials from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland have been involved in the Taskforce process'.
One of the recommendations is that the guidance currently in place in Scotland on landscape and visual impact assessments is adopted as best practice guidance elsewhere in the UK, as well as the contemporary guidance on bird collision risk which has already been adopted here.
It is admitted that supply chain constraints are less for onshore wind than for offshore, principally due to the hostile environment in the sea, but one delay in the build process highlighted in the report is caused by the requirement for a police escort for abnormal loads in Scotland 'constraining the speed with which onshore wind projects can deploy'. Police Scotland have been working with the onshore wind industry to address the need for this requirement including increasing police resources.
The government says that onshore wind is one of the easiest and cheapest technologies to build and will supply British homes and businesses with 'clean, secure homegrown power that ends a reliance on unstable global gas markets' – which is all part of Westminster's mission to get bills down for good.
Onshore Wind Strategy can be read in full here.
Energy Minister Michael Shanks said: 'Rolling out more onshore wind is a no-brainer – it's one of our cheapest technologies, quick to build, supports thousands of skilled jobs and can provide clean energy directly to the communities hosting it.
'After years of decline, we're giving industry the tools to get building again, backing industrial renewal and secure, clean, homegrown energy through our Plan for Change.'
Claire Mack OBE, Chief Executive of Scottish Renewables, said: 'Scotland has a proud history in onshore wind and the bold strategy published today reaffirms how central the Scottish onshore wind sector will be to the UK's clean power journey.
'Onshore wind is a cost-effective source of clean energy that can be deployed at pace, supporting skilled jobs and tangible community benefit. Making the most of our onshore wind resource will also strengthen our energy security in the years ahead.
'Scottish Renewables secured the landmark Scottish Onshore Wind Sector Deal in 2023 and the clear actions published today will build on this effort by tackling the issues that demand close working across the UK.
'Renewed commitments on planning efficiency, grid connections, radar and aviation in the strategy are all strong signals of intent by the UK and Scottish governments to boost onshore wind deployment. We will work closely with all stakeholders to deliver the strategy and determine the pathway beyond 2030 for the Scottish onshore wind sector.'
More detail on the over £40 billion of private investment in clean energy announced since July 2024 is available in the 'Clean energy industries sector plan'.
Some aspects of energy including the generation and supply of electricity, oil and gas, are devolved matters under The Scotland Act, and so fall within the remit of The Scottish Government.
At a recent meeting of The Scottish Government Ivan McKee, Minister for Public Finance, explained the correlation between ways that the government has helped offshore wind generation and The Scottish Government's budget. He said: 'The Scottish Government has sought to secure and leverage competitive advantage for our economy through our budget and priorities for growth. On the offshore wind sector, for example, the 2024-25 outturn shows that we supported the green economy and future jobs by kick-starting our commitment of up to £500 million to anchor a new offshore wind supply chain in Scotland. That has leveraged in private capital investment such as Sumitomo's £350 million cable factory investment at Nigg. We will continue to build on that to unlock growth and innovation across all sectors of our economy in 2025-26.'
Nuclear energy
There are claims from the UK Government that Scotland is becoming globally isolated on nuclear power – missing out on much needed skilled jobs and economic growth – because of The Scottish Government's ideological stance on nuclear power.
Westminster claims nuclear energy could create thousands of new, highly-skilled jobs in Scotland, while delivering clean, secure and more affordable energy for working people. Reliable, cheap nuclear power can support critical modern infrastructure in Scotland, such as supercomputers.
Speaking ahead of a visit to Torness Nuclear Power Station in East Lothian on Thursday, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray cited new research which shows that Scotland risks becoming one of few areas in Europe without nuclear plants. The Scottish Government has been repeatedly elected on a manifesto which takes a clear stance against new nuclear development.
Mr Murray said: 'In other parts of the UK, the UK Government is driving forward nuclear power, as are countries across Europe and indeed the world. But in Scotland the Scottish Government clings to its ideological objection to new nuclear sites. That means that Scotland is being left behind, missing out on thousands of skilled jobs and economic growth, as well as clean affordable energy. I urge the Scottish Government to put Scotland's interests first.'
Secretary of State for Scotland Ian Murray visiting Torness PHOTO courtesy of the UK Government
"Scotland is being left behind, missing out on thousands of skilled jobs & economic growth, as well as clean affordable energy"@IanMurrayMP, the Scottish Secretary, spoke about the opportunities for nuclear energy in 🏴 on a visit to Torness @edfenergy Power Station yesterday👇 pic.twitter.com/HBvkduQFmT — UK Government Scotland (@UKGovScotland) July 4, 2025
Sam Richards, CEO of pro-growth campaign group Britain Remade, said: 'Scotland is being left behind. While countries like Sweden and Finland embrace clean, reliable nuclear energy – the Scottish Government clings to its outdated ban on new nuclear. If nuclear industry jobs and investment are banned from coming to Scotland, they will go to these places instead.
'Torness has powered homes and supported jobs for decades, but a lack of certainty over its future puts this in jeopardy. Renewables are vital, but wind and solar can't do it all. Scotland needs nuclear to provide jobs and investment, deliver secure domestic energy, and cut emissions. Most Scots and even most SNP voters back it. It's time for ministers in Edinburgh to stop saying no and start saying yes to new nuclear.'
The UK Government says that since Torness started operating in 1988, it has contributed more than £16.1 billion to the UK economy and supported more than 2,600 jobs a year. Together Hunterston B and Torness have contributed more than £29.4 billion to the UK economy.
The costs of going nuclear
Last month the Chancellor approved spending of £14.2 billion on Sizewell C in Suffolk, the first British-owned nuclear power station to be announced in 30 years. The government will be the majority shareholder along with energy company EDF.
Ed Miliband, the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, said then: 'We will not accept the status quo of failing to invest in the future and energy insecurity for our country.
'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis.
'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.'
The new power station will be funded through the Regulated Asset Base model which 'protects consumers through regulation, strict cost controls and transparent oversight'.This will reduce the risk of cost overruns which have blighted the development at Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant in Somerset.
One of the latest estimates of cost of Hinkley Point C is around £35 billion, and completion, which was originally to take place in 2017, is forecast for 2031. That project involves EDF as a majority owner. EDF is a company wholly owned by the French government.
The Scottish Government is clear in its opposition to new nuclear power stations being constructed in this country. They do not oppose prolonging the life of Torness as long as that can be done within safety and environment criteria. A government statement says: 'We oppose the building of new nuclear stations using current technologies. We believe that nuclear power represents poor value for consumers. This is clear from the contract awarded by the UK Government to Hinkley Point C nuclear station in Somerset, which will result in energy consumers subsidising its operation until 2060.'
Wind turbine Creative Commons https://www.flickr.com/photos/vax-o-matic/2621890270
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK reestablishes diplomatic ties with Syria as Lammy visits Damascus
LONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - Britain said on Saturday it was reestablishing diplomatic relations with Syria, as foreign minister David Lammy visited the Syrian capital Damascus. "There is renewed hope for the Syrian people. The UK is reestablishing diplomatic relations because it is in our interests to support the new government to deliver their commitment to build a stable, more secure and prosperous future for all Syrians," Lammy said in a statement.
North Wales Chronicle
44 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Steve Coogan says ‘disappointing' Labour year will ‘pave the way' for Reform UK
The 59-year old actor and comedian, who recently starred in The Penguin Lessons, reportedly supported the Labour Party in previous elections until last year, where he backed the Green Party. Speaking to The Guardian, Coogan said the current Labour Government is 'no different from a Conservative government in neglecting ordinary people'. 'What they're doing is putting Band-Aids on the gash in the side of the Titanic,' he said. 'The success of Reform, I lay squarely at the feet of the neoliberal consensus, which has let down working people for the last 40 years and they're fed up. It doesn't matter who they vote for, nothing changes for them. 'They'll pave the way for the only alternative, which is a racist clown. Reform (UK) couldn't organise a p*** up in a brewery, but if there's no alternative, you understand why working people will make that choice.' This comes after the Labour Government marked one year since winning the 2024 general election. Coogan added: 'It's not just the fact that people are disempowered and feel like they have no autonomy. It's compounded by the fact that these people, these multinationals, are enabled and supported by the Government to keep their foot on the neck of working people. 'If any government wants to address that extremism, what they have to do is tackle the root cause…(which is) poverty and economic decline in the post-industrial landscape, especially in the North. 'If Labour addressed that problem, Reform would go away – all their support would dissipate.' Coogan also said he agreed 'wholeheartedly' with MP Zarah Sultana's statement shared on Thursday which said the Government had failed to 'improve people's lives' and that the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. Ms Sultana also announced that she was quitting the Labour Party to co-lead a left-wing alternative with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Coogan is best known for portraying Alan Partridge, a persona which pokes fun at British broadcasters, having appeared in several TV series as well as the 2013 feature film Alan Partridge: Alpha Papa. The Government has been contacted for comment.
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How a £1.5bn ‘wildlife-boosting' bypass became an environmental disaster
Lorries thunder over the A14 bridge north of Cambridge, above steep roadside embankments covered in plastic shrouds containing the desiccated remains of trees. Occasionally the barren landscape is punctuated by a flash of green where a young hawthorn or a fledgling honeysuckle has emerged apparently against the odds, but their shock of life is an exception in the treeless landscape. The new 21-mile road between Cambridge and Huntingdon cost £1.5bn and was opened in 2020 to fulfil a familiar political desire: growth. One of Britain's biggest infrastructure projects of the past decade, it was approved by the secretary of state for transport over the heads of locally elected councillors. National Highways, the government-owned company that builds and maintains Britain's A roads, promised that the biodiversity net gain from the construction project would be 11.5%; in other words, they pledged the natural environment would be left in a considerably better state after the road was built than before. But five years on from the opening of the A14, the evidence is otherwise, and National Highways has admitted biodiversity and the environment have been left in a worse state as a result of the road project. Empty plastic tree guards stretch for mile after mile along the new road, testament to the mass die-off of most of the 860,000 trees planted in mitigation for the impact of the road. Culverts dug as a safe route for animals such as newts and water voles are dried up and litter-strewn, while ponds designed to collect rainwater and provide a wildlife habitat are choked with mud and silt. With concerns that the rollback of environmental protections in Labour's planning and infrastructure bill will make it easier for developers to destroy nature, Edna Murphy, a Liberal Democrat on Cambridgeshire county council, is calling for MPs on the environmental audit committee to investigate the multimillion-pound failure of the A14 project. 'National Highways has resisted attempts by local representatives to discover what it is up to,' Murphy said. 'We have struggled over years to find out basic facts about the death of nearly all of the 860,000 trees that were originally planted and what has happened subsequently in terms of replanting. 'How can they be allowed to get away with this? How can anyone have confidence in promises about environmental mitigations in any national infrastructure projects in the future?' Murphy and her Lib Dem colleague Ros Hathorn believe the failure of the environmental improvements created in mitigation for the A14 are a shocking example of how powerful developers make environmental pledges in order to gain planning permission, which are then not upheld. They began asking questions of National Highways in 2021 when it became obvious from the scale of the tree die-off that something had gone wrong. They asked for details of how many trees were planted, how many had died, and for regular reports on the tree planting. A slide presentation in 2022 to Murphy and Hathorn indicated 70% of the 860,000 trees originally planted had died. In late 2023, Martin Edwards, a National Highways project manager, suggested to local councillors the die-off may have been only 50%. He said two re-plantings had taken place since the die-off, both of which had also subsequently failed. He blamed this on the policy to replant the same tree in the same place 'and keep your fingers crossed'. Edwards insisted that lessons had been learned and that in 2023 National Highways had carried out a full soil survey and a three-month tree analysis. This revealed they had planted the wrong species in the wrong place, and provided valuable lessons about the most appropriate season in the year to plant a tree, he said. Nicole Gullan, principal ecologist at the ecology consultancy Arbtech, said she was surprised by the approach: 'Tree planting on this scale should have been underpinned by ecological due diligence, including soil sampling, hydrological and geotechnical surveys, and an adaptive management plan to address potential failures. Proper reporting and mapping of planting locations is also essential for long-term monitoring and accountability.' A third replanting of 165,000 trees – at an estimated cost of £2.9m – took place over the autumn and winter of 2023-2024. National Highways promised to share details of their surveys and a new planting plan with Cambridgeshire council's biodiversity team. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion But in a report this June, council officers said the information had never been passed to them despite repeated requests. 'Documents that were provided to the group were basic overviews and did not contain the detailed information requested,' the officers said. 'The council therefore did not have evidence of where and why the planting had failed, which would be crucial to inform the replanting strategy, ensuring improved planting success.' Today, parts of the A14 where trees should be thriving still resemble a desert, and the whereabouts of the 165,000 new trees remain a mystery. 'The council does not know where replanting has taken place,' officials said, adding that officers had driven along the route to try to find them, but only found a few limited areas where replanting appeared to have taken place. Some residents have begun planting their own saplings. Vhari Russell from Brampton said she had grown various different trees in her garden in pots and planted all of those into the A14 embankment. 'I think we've probably put in 150,' she told local reporters. National Highways, which has been reprimanded by the office of roads and railways for failing to fulfil a key metric on biodiversity gain, has admitted that the A14 project has left nature worse off despite having pledged to improve it. In an evaluation report National Highways said the impacts on biodiversity 'were worse than expected', as were the impacts on the water environment. National Highways has faced no sanction for these failures. From 2026, biodiversity net gain will be mandatory for big infrastructure such as the A14 road. But Becky Pullinger, head of land management for the Wildlife Trusts, said developers had to be held to account once the mandate came in, so that recreated habitats had a fighting chance of survival. A recent report showed that only a third of ecological enhancements promised by housebuilders were fulfilled. Pullinger said the example of the A14 showed how important it was that harm to wildlife was avoided in the first place, reducing the need for compensation planting. 'The failures highlight the challenges of trying to recreate mature habitats: it takes years, if not decades, for saplings to turn into woodland and provide much needed spaces for the wildlife [affected] by development,' she said. A National Highways spokesperson said: 'We take our responsibility to the environment very seriously. The A14 upgrade project was not limited to just improving the road; our ongoing environmental work remains a long-term project that we will continue to monitor and support. Between October 2023 and April 2024 – the optimum planting season – 165,000 trees and shrubs were planted. These comprised 16 different species specially selected to enhance the surrounding areas and habitats. Our latest survey showed that nearly 90% of these trees have survived. Nationally, we continue to monitor, evaluate and adapt our practices to respond to a rapidly changing climate to meet the challenges that it brings.'
