Te Waka McLeod facing Peter Moeahu for New Plymouth Māori ward
Photo:
LDR / Craig Ashworth
In what might be the last election for New Plymouth's Māori ward, voters will choose between a young māmā ushering in the next generation and an experienced campaigner wanting land returned.
Three years ago Te Waka McLeod won Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa ward and on Friday confirmed she would stand again.
She faces one opponent so far: kaumātua Peter Moeahu, who has been active in council chambers for decades.
More may stand before the four week cut-off but candidates are competing for an uncertain prize.
Like almost all Māori wards, New Plymouth District Council's newest seat might be pulled from under the victor after three years, via a government-ordered referendum at October's election.
McLeod said the threat steeled her determination that the coming generation will know they belong in local government.
"Māori faces at the table are vital so rangatahi can imagine themselves sitting there."
"If Māori wards are voted down I worry people might forget how deeply we care about how our communities are run, how all our people and places are cared for."
Te Waka McLeod wants the next generation including her son Kahukura to know they belong in local government.
Photo:
LDR / Craig Ashworth
During her first term "quiet conversations and gentle educating" had brought progress, as had Taranaki's iwi liaison committees, other committees with tangata whenua representatives, and Māori staff.
"Everybody in the room sees how useful it is."
"Non-Māori councillors, staff and voters no longer have to guess what we're trying to achieve together with them."
McLeod had a baby in office and wanted to show young parents - especially mums - they could be involved.
"I don't need to be the loudest voice in the room. I work on kaupapa aligned with my values and my people and that's how change happens."
Peter Moeahu has been a voice for Māori in council chambers for decades.
Photo:
LDR / Craig Ashworth
Peter Moeahu often has had the loudest voice in the room.
Across the reigns of five New Plymouth mayors he has stood up for mana whenua in Taranaki's council chambers.
He sits on Taranaki Regional Council's Policy and Planning Committee and South Taranaki District Council's Te Kāhui Matauraura.
Moeahu said several New Plymouth councillors who had become experienced with iwi and hapū aspirations are stepping down, leaving him worried about candidates from right-wing ratepayer groups and the Act Party.
"That's why I'm throwing my hat in the ring," he said.
"If this is the last term for the Māori ward I want to be there and face up to whoever they chuck at us."
Moeahu wants a specific win: the return of land taken from Puketapu hapū in 1968, with no record of compensation.
His grandfather Pehimana Tamati helped established a trust for Mangati E Māori Reserve.
A year ago Peter Moeahu brought his great-grandchildren Te Kerei Rangimaia Edwards and Ohia Whatitiri to South Taranaki's Te Kāhui Matauraura, to get the mokopuna used to the council table.
Photo:
LDR / Craig Ashworth
"Three years later, the county council just took the land. Just took it under the Public Works Act."
Earmarked for sewerage works, nothing happened beyond the digging of two oxidation ponds Moeahu believes were never used.
New Plymouth District Council inherited control and Mangati E is part of Bell Block's Hickford Park and the coastal walkway.
In 2022
Moeahu asked for Puketapu's land back
, but councillors halted progress to investigate how to deal with the range of Māori land it governs.
"There are Māori reserves all around New Plymouth that were set aside for us to live on, for us to prosper on - and they're no longer in our hands," Moeahu said.
He wants Mangati back as a priority and precedent.
Mangati E block was taken for sewerage works but only oxidation ponds were dug - and likely never used.
Photo:
LDR / Craig Ashworth
"I want to see the finalisation of this piece of land, Mangati E, in my lifetime so we don't leave the situation for the next generation."
National's coalition deals with NZ First and Act promise referendums for wards elected by voters on the Māori roll.
No other type of ward can be voted down.
If voters ditch Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa it cannot be resurrected for six years.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Wellington mayoral candidate says cap on rates would reduce accountability
Andrew Little at his mayoral campaign launch in Wellington on 17 May. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A former Labour leader running for Wellington mayor says a cap on rates would only reduce accountability and undermine the relationship between councillors and residents. In an interview with RNZ this week , Finance Minister Nicola Willis reconfirmed the government was looking into "capping" - putting a hard limit on - council rates increases, saying it would get pushback from councils "because when you take candy away from kids in a candy store, they don't really like it". Labour's leader Chris Hipkins and councils' representative group LGNZ both pushed back , saying rates capping would in fact worsen the situation. Hipkins also argued the big rates increases seen in recent years was a result of the government scrapping Labour's three waters reforms, later labelled the "affordable water reform". Local Government Minister Simon Watts told RNZ the rates cap policy review was yet to be presented to Cabinet, but confirmed there would be announcements about it later in the year. "We're taking our time to make sure that the policy design of that mechanism is fit for purpose, importantly as I've said before taking on board also the learnings particularly in Australia where this has been implemented to make sure that we've learning from that experience." Former Labour leader Andrew Little has thrown his hat in the ring for the Wellington mayoral race this year, and said while rates did need to be better controlled a hard cap would reduce accountability. "A lot of people are really concerned about the level of rates rises. I mean, here in Wellington, we've seen rates rises of 30 percent over a two year period, which is unreasonable and is wrong," he said. "But at the end of the day, mayors and councillors are responsible for making the financial decisions." A cap would reduce accountability and responsibility, he said, and undermine the democratic relationship between mayor and councillors and their residents. "Mayors and councillors, every election, they are accountable to their people for the decisions they've made and if they've made bad decisions they're going to be responsible for that - that gets dealt with at the ballot box. If you take away ultimate responsibility for those decisions, then where do residents - as electors of mayors and councillors - go?" "Coming over the top with a central government mandated sort of decision isn't an answer to that requirement, and the problem that goes with councillors and mayors who get out of control and spend wrongly and irresponsibly." Pointing to Wellington's Town Hall upgrade, he said councils sometimes did need to say no to projects, "and I think in Wellington they haven't been, and it's making cities like Wellington unaffordable ... councils, particularly Wellington City Council, has to show much greater control over its financial decisions". He had a different stance from Hipkins on three waters, saying that while historical under-investment in water systems would end up costing, but "just scrapping three waters alone I don't think can be held responsible". "There's partly catch up on water stuff. The real impact of the current water reforms is yet to be seen." Minister Watts said rates capping was one mechanism the government was considering to "ensure that the money that is being collected through rates is spent appropriately," but not the only one. "We're also going to be releasing and publishing transparency reporting around councils' financials and also introducing legislation in regards to changes around what councils focus on. So it's a suite in a package of interventions that will get us to a more sustainable local government." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government unveils its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy
In the plan's forward written by Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti he said New Zealand was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii New Zealand has - at last - joined other countries in tackling the AI opportunity and challenge, with the government unveiling its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy. The plan - titled "Investing with Confidence" - has been met with enthusiasm from the business sector, but concern from critics who say it sets a "dangerous path forward" and is "worryingly light" on ethical considerations. In a foreword, Science and Technology Minister Shane Reti said New Zealand needed to get moving on AI, noting it was the last OECD country to publish such a strategy. "Artificial intelligence represents one of the most significant technological opportunities of our time," Reti said. "For New Zealand, embracing AI is not merely an option - it is essential." The plan - which was developed with the assistance of AI - positions New Zealand as a "sophisticated adopter" rather than as an inventor of new foundational models. For its part, the government is promising a "light-touch and principles-based" approach using existing legislation and regulations, rather than introducing new ones. "The government aims to encourage investment in AI adoption by reducing uncertainty, removing unintended and unwanted barriers to AI in legislation, and providing clear guidance on responsible AI innovation within New Zealand's existing legal framework." As well, the strategy includes a commitment to grow AI expertise in New Zealand, noting that this year's Budget includes more than $200 million for tuition and training subsidies and more than $60m for STEM and priority areas. Dr Andrew Lensen, a senior lecturer in Artificial Intelligence at Victoria University, said the strategy was heavy on economic growth opportunities but "worryingly light" on ethical and societal issues. "The strategy suggests that new legislation is unnecessary, which I, and many other AI researchers, disagree with," Lensen said. "Having 'principles' is not nearly sufficient to reduce AI-induced harm, bias, and inequity. We need clear legislation and well-resourced enforcement mechanisms to ensure AI does not further harm New Zealanders." Lensen, who also co-directs an AI consultancy, raised the risks of sourcing modern healthcare AI systems from overseas, for example, which might have no regard for New Zealand's unique demographics. "This AI Strategy sets a dangerous path forward for New Zealand, with an attitude of economic growth above social good." In contrast, the Auckland Business Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges applauded the new strategy, saying it would give "clarity and confidence" to many small and medium enterprises which were currently unsure where to start. "This strategy cuts through the fog," Bridges said. "It's practical, not hype. If we don't get moving, we'll fall behind - but this gives Auckland a real platform to lead." A 2024 Datacom survey found that 67 percent of larger New Zealand businesses utilised some form of AI, up from 48 percent in 2023. However, a separate Spark-NZIER survey, also last year, said 68 percent of SMEs had no plans to explore the technology. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Marlborough votes to establish separate water organisation
By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter The Marlborough District Council has decided to establish on a standalone water organisation to deliver services from 2026. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The Marlborough District Council has voted to establish a separate organisation to deliver water services in the region. The decision to form a Water Services Organisation (WSO) was passed by eight votes to five at an extraordinary council meeting on Monday. The government's Local Water Done Well policy required councils to come up with a financially sustainable water service delivery plan by 3 September. Mayor Nadine Taylor said it was an incredibly important decision for the region. "We have decided to take a once-in-a-generation opportunity to do things differently. To build better three waters infrastructure and provide greater intergenerational equity, spreading the costs over the long term," Taylor said. "By setting up a new, water-focused organisation, it will be easier to sustainably deliver efficiencies and savings for residents on council's drinking and wastewater supplies." During consultation with the Marlborough community, a slim majority of the roughly 45 submissions wanted a water delivery unit to stay within the council. And some councillors agreed. Defeated councillors Brian Dawson, Deborah Dalliessi, Allanah Burgess and Sally Arbuckle all said there was not enough information to convince them that a separate water services organisation could deliver services better than the council's in-house unit. The Marlborough District Council was in the minority for its preference of a standalone organisation, although not all councils had voted on it yet. Of New Zealand's 65 territorial authorities, only three have preferred a standalone WSO - Selwyn, Queenstown Lakes, and Marlborough. Nearly 68 percent, or 44 councils, preferred a multi-council organisation, joining up with neighbouring districts to deliver water services. The remaining 18 preferred to keep water services in-house. A WSO joining Tasman and Nelson services was briefly floated, but was shelved after Nelson mayor Nick Smith ruled out collaboration on water without a full Nelson-Tasman council amalgamation. Nelson and Tasman both eventually voted to keep their water services in-house, leaving Marlborough without a neighbour to join with. Marlborough is among the 4.6 percent of councils that preferred a standalone WSO. Photo: Supplied Taylor said having a separate organisation focused solely on Marlborough's water would keep the service in the hands of the experts who knew it best. "The new WSO will have a singular focus on the delivery of water infrastructure and be better positioned to attract the specialist staff we will need in the future," Taylor said. Removing water assets from the council books would free up resources to focus on other services, while allowing the new WSO to borrow against those assets at a lower cost than the council could. "Costs will be spread over a longer period of time through borrowing, leading to lower water charges when compared to retaining water services internally at council," she said. The organisation would be council-owned, the board of directors would be council-appointed, and its direction would be set with a legally binding Statement of Expectations. The governance setup would keep the organisation accountable to Marlburians, the council said. The council said any profit made from the WSO would be reinvested back into the water network. By 2034, Marlborough would need $410m of investment in water infrastructure. Nearly all the townships required upgrades to pipelines, pump stations and wells. "Many of Picton's and Blenheim's stormwater assets have an expected life of less than 10 years," Taylor said. "In addition we have requests from the community to provide new water reticulation services, for example in Ward, Rarangi and Dry Hills in Blenheim." The new organisation would be established on 1 July 2026, and become fully operable by 1 July 2027. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
