Speed Selangor policy to be launched in October to expedite business approvals, says MB
He said the initiative aims to fast-track six to seven types of approvals under local authorities (PBT) to ease processes for developers and investors.
'We plan to launch it at the Selangor International Business Summit in October 2025. It consolidates various initiatives previously introduced by local councils.
'Some PBTs already had their own express green approval systems. Now, we are integrating these into a single, unified framework for broader implementation,' he told a press conference after officiating the Publicity and Public Participation Programme for the Sepang Municipal Council Draft Local Plan 2035 (Replacement) today.
Amirudin said officers are currently undergoing training to ensure the smooth rollout of the policy.
'The initial focus is on development and investment approvals. Processes that typically take two months could be shortened to one,' he said.
He added that the policy may later be extended to cover public-facing services such as citizen complaints and home renovation applications.
'One of the most common issues raised is the approval process for home renovations. This could also benefit from the Speed Selangor approach. Through this initiative, the public will experience direct and meaningful economic impact,' he said.
The policy aims to enhance existing procedures to deliver faster, more efficient services to investors, developers, and the public.
On another matter, Amirudin said the issue of illegal waste dumping requires coordinated enforcement and legislative reform.
'We need stronger legal provisions to allow firm action, including seizures and heavier penalties for landowners and operators involved,' he said. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
37 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
TNB's share price falls after Federal Court decision on LHDN case
The dispute arose when the Inland Revenue Board disallowed Tenaga Nasional Bhd's claim that the generation, distribution and transmission of electricity was not manufacturing of electricity. PETALING JAYA : Tenaga Nasional Bhd's shares plunged a day after the Federal Court overturned a ruling in the largest corporate tax dispute in the country's history, resulting in losses of over RM3 billion in its market capitalisation. TNB's shares fell as much as 74 sen, or over 5%, to its lowest level since June 3, The Edge reported. The counter closed at RM14.02. Yesterday, the apex court overturned a Court of Appeal ruling that found the national utility company to be in the business of manufacturing electricity. The Federal Court said TNB should actually have been considered a utility company under Schedule 7B of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA). The dispute arose when the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) disallowed TNB's claim under Schedule 7A of the ITA on the basis that the generation, distribution and transmission of electricity was not manufacturing of electricity. TNB had also argued that it was only a service provider. In 2022, the High Court allowed TNB's judicial review application to set aside LHDN's RM1.8 billion tax assessment for the year 2018. Two years later, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's ruling. TNB has already paid the sum. Today, analysts told The Edge about the possibility of hefty provisions and potential implications for the company's other outstanding court cases. The Edge quoted CIMB Securities as expressing concerns that the case might set a legal precedent for TNB's other pending court cases for notices of additional assessment from LHDN.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
GST only better for revenue, economist says on tax debate
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said last month that Putrajaya would only consider reintroducing the GST once the economy improves and the minimum wage reaches RM4,000 or more. PETALING JAYA : Economists say the debate on the goods and services tax (GST) versus the sales and service tax (SST) is no longer relevant given the current economic climate, describing the issue as 'exhausted' and 'outdated'. Economist Geoffrey Williams said the GST only surpasses the SST in terms of revenue collection due to its broader scope of taxable goods and services. He said the GST naturally generates more revenue than the SST because more goods and services are taxed, and a larger proportion of the population – including lower-income groups – ends up paying it. 'The SST can be a fairer system depending on the tax coverage and design, as essential goods and selected services can be exempted,' he told FMT. Geoffrey Williams. Williams also said it was unreasonable to take more money from consumers who were already struggling with the cost of living, especially as incomes remained low. He said it would be better to wait until average and median incomes increase before imposing a broad-based consumption tax that would disproportionately affect low-income earners. Williams added that the rise of e-commerce, digital payments, and e-invoicing presented opportunities to introduce new forms of taxation, such as an electronic payments tax, that do not distort consumer spending and can be collected efficiently without placing additional administrative burdens on businesses. 'It's time to move beyond the narrow debate on taxing consumption and explore other options,' he said. Meanwhile, economist Barjoyai Bardai from Malaysia University of Science and Technology said the SST system could be refined to become more effective and less burdensome for the government. Barjoyai Bardai. 'We don't need to switch to the GST to achieve this,' he said. He said that despite the global popularity of the GST or value-added tax systems, some major economies such as the US do not implement them. 'They still use a sales tax, just like Malaysia,' he said. He urged the government to improve the SST framework by addressing its 'single-stage tax' nature and introducing a credit mechanism to eliminate the cascading effect of tax-on-tax. 'If that can be done, we can lower the prices of goods as they would no longer be taxed multiple times along the supply chain,' he said. Finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan said yesterday that the government had ruled out reintroducing the GST for now, calling it 'impractical' given the current economic conditions. Speaking as a guest on the Keluar Sekejap podcast, Amir said the government did not dispute the merits of the GST system but believed that it was 'not suitable for now'. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said last month that Putrajaya would only consider reintroducing the GST once the economy improves and the minimum wage reaches RM4,000 or more.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Why reasonable diligence? — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 4 — In the case of Datuk Seri Najib Razak v PP [2022] 5 MLJ 143, in his appeal to the Federal Court, former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak (appellant) applied for leave to adduce additional/further evidence to set aside his conviction and sentence on seven criminal charges. The purpose of the application was to show that the trial judge should not have presided over the trial since he was in a conflict of interest position. By his application, the appellant sought to introduce several documentary evidence as well as viva voce evidence of certain individuals, including officers from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). The appellant claimed that he had acquired the proposed additional evidence only in May and July of 2022, long after his trial was over, and that the evidence could not have been obtained at the trial even if reasonable diligence had been exercised. The appellant said he had satisfied the requirements for admission or adduction of the additional/further evidence. The Federal Court unanimously dismissed the application to adduce additional/further evidence. The apex court ruled, among others, that some of the additional evidence sought to be admitted/adduced was available at trial or, at the very least, could have been discovered or obtained by reasonable diligence. Attorney General of Malaysia, Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, arrives at the Federal Court in Putrajaya. July 1, 2025 — Picture by Raymond Manuel Accordingly, the appellant had failed to satisfy the requirements for adduction of fresh evidence established by decided cases, in particular, in the English case of R v Parks [1961] 3 All ER 633 which the apex court had previously endorsed and applied. The slew of cases emphasised the point of 'availability' of the evidence and whether it was discoverable by reasonable diligence by the party seeking leave to adduce the additional/further evidence. The test is therefore one of availability. Some of the additional evidence was available to the appellant even if he was not served with the evidence. The Federal Court emphasised that the evidence could have been obtained by reasonable diligence. It was the apex court finding that the first requirement for adduction of fresh evidence had not been satisfied. The court referred to its own decision in the case of Lau Foo Sun v Government of Malaysia [1970] 2 MLJ 70 where an application to adduce additional evidence was dismissed solely on the ground that it could have been obtained by use of reasonable diligence. The above explains the forceful argument of Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar that Datuk Seri Najib Razak did not exercise reasonable diligence to obtain a purported addendum or 'supplementary order' issued by the King for house arrest when the latter took the matter to court. Dusuki argued Najib had failed to demonstrate the supposed addendum could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before a judicial review hearing at the High Court in July last year. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
