'ED Not a Super Cop or a Loitering Munition to Attack at Will On Any Criminal Activity': Madras HC
The Madras high court. Photo: roadconnoisseur/Flickr CC BY-SA 2.0
New Delhi: The Madras high court has said that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can take action only upon the existence of a predicate offence and the agency cannot conduct investigations on its own.
A bench of Justices MS Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan reiterated the fact that ED is not a super cop for investigating anything and everything that came to its notice.
'The ED is not a super cop to investigate anything and everything which comes to its notice. There should be a 'criminal activity' which attracts the schedule to PMLA, and on account of such criminal activity, there should have been 'proceeds of crime'. It is only then the jurisdiction of ED commences,' said the court, reported LiveLaw.
The court added that there must be criminal activity coming within the schedule of the Act along with the presence of proceeds of crime based on which the ED will have jurisdiction to start a probe.
'The terminus a quo for the ED to commence its duties and exercise its powers is the existence of a predicate offence. Once there exists a predicate offence, and the ED starts investigation under the PMLA, and file a complaint, then it becomes a stand alone offence,' said the court.
The court said that if the agency was allowed to conduct an investigation merely on coming to know about any activity, the ED would be conducting roving enquiry.
'The essential ingredient for the ED to seize jurisdiction is the presence of a predicate offence. It is like a limpet mine attached to a ship. If there is no ship, the limpet cannot work. The ship is the predicate offence and 'proceeds of crime'. The ED is not a loitering munition or drone to attack at will on any criminal activity,' said the court.
The observations were made by the court while hearing a plea filed by RKM Powergen Private Limited, which has challenged the ED's action of freezing its fixed deposits.
The court added that as per Section 66(2) of the PMLA, if the ED comes across a violation of law during the course of the investigation, it cannot assume the role of an investigating agency and investigate those offences also.
In June this year, Justice Ramesh had remarked that while courts often term the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002 as an 'evolving legislation' which throws up new legal questions, but it is actually the 'officials of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) who are evolving day by day by expanding their powers.'
Justice Ramesh's remarks came as he wondered which provision of the PMLA empowers the ED officials to seal a residential/business premises if it was found to be locked when the officials go over there for a search and seizure operation.
Following the remarks, the ED had told the high court that it did not have the power to seal premises if the same was locked at the time of making a search as per Section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Police seize mobile phone from inmate during inspection at central prison
Thiruvananthapuram: Exposing security lapses at Central Prison and Correctional Home, Poojappura, officers seized a mobile phone from an inmate during an inspection. The mobile phone was spotted this time in the inner wear of an inmate, Shafeek U T, 28, of Pachira near Pallipuram. Police registered a case against him under Section 86 (2) of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Act-2010. "The mobile phone is sent for forensic examination to trace the owner using its IMEI number. A detailed probe will be ensured this time to identify how the mobile phones reached inside the prison," said station house officer at Poojappura police. This is the fifth time a mobile phone was seized from the prison. In previous incidents, mobile phones were spotted on the roof of the toilets and also found wrapped in plastic covers in the courtyard. In all cases, police identified the owners of the mobile phones. However, the probe team could not find how the mobile phones reached the inmates inside the central prison, where the security measures are fully capped. A year ago, a mobile phone was spotted inside the prison, and during the investigation, it was found that a prisoner on 'parole' threw it over the boundary wall for another inmate. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo "We will check CCTV visuals inside to know how the phone reached there," said police. In addition to the seizure of mobile phones, ganja was seized from the prison four times and banned tobacco products once in the past two years. In addition to these, two jail breaks were also reported and three inmates tried to commit suicide. The jail authorities blamed a shortage of staff and overcrowded cells for all the mess.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Online shopping scam: Kerala HC directs transfer of provisionally attached amount to interest-bearing treasury deposit
Kochi: High court has directed the competent authority under the BUDS Act to ensure that the provisionally attached amount, exceeding Rs 200 crore and lying in various bank accounts in connection with the scam-hit High Rich Online Shopee case, is transferred to an interest-bearing treasury deposit within two weeks. The bench of Justice P Gopinath issued the order on Monday in a petition filed by High Rich Online Shoppe Pvt Ltd and its directors, K D Dasan and his wife K S Sreena, challenging the actions taken under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (BUDS Act). The directive was issued after considering the fact that the amounts on deposit admittedly exceed Rs 200 crore, and that it would be in the interest of the depositors for the funds to earn interest rather than remain idle in current accounts across various banks. HC further directed that the details of the treasury deposit, including the applicable rate of interest, be duly intimated to it by the competent authority immediately after the transfer and deposit of the amount. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to Aug 13. Previously, a crime had been registered at the Cherpu police station in Thrissur under the BUDS Act against the petitioners, based on a private complaint in a financial fraud case. The complainant alleged that High Rich was engaged in multi-level marketing, thereby conducting a money chain business. Similar cases were also registered against the petitioners at the Ernakulam, Sulthan Bathery and Kannur police stations. In 2023, the additional chief secretary (home), acting as the competent authority under the Act, provisionally attached the assets.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat Congress leader files complaint against news channel editor, anchor for defamation
Former Union Minister and newly appointed Congress Legislature Party (CLP) leader in the Gujarat Assembly, Dr Tushar Chaudhary, has lodged a complaint of defamation and under Atrocity Act against the editor of a news channel and an anchor of another on Friday evening. Chaudhary has alleged that the journalists had defamed him and his father, former Chief Minister of Gujarat, the late Amarsinh Chaudhary. The complaint against Jagdish Mehta, group editor of Rajkot-based Headlines News channel, and Gopi Ghanghar, anchor of Ahmedabad-based Nirbhay News channel, was registered in Tapi district. The complaint was registered under Section 356 (Defamation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and various sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. In the FIR, the Congress MLA from Khedbrahma has alleged that in a show aired on July 22 on Nirbhay News, Ghanghar made an objectionable statement against him. He said Mehta consented to the statements, which were 'defamatory for him and the entire tribal community'. He said in the FIR, 'A live news debate video came to my personal assistant's mobile phone on July 22' where the statements were made. Talking to The Indian Express, Chaudhary said, 'My father and I got elected from the ST reserved seat, and we are also leaders of the tribal community. Both the accused had uttered statements defaming me, my father and my entire community, and we will not let this go.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Ghanghar said, 'Chaudhary has lodged a complaint against me and Mehta, and we are also looking into ways to respond to it legally. Till now, I have not received any call from Tapi police.' Deputy Superintendent of Police, SC/ST cell, Tapi district, Nikita Shiroya said, 'We have registered an offence against both the accused. We will first gather the original video footage of the debate so that we can determine the topic of discussion, the statements made, and the context in which they were made. Currently, we are at the stage of collecting evidence, and if necessary, we will again contact the complainant and take his statement. We are also looking for both the accused and will see what they have to say.'
