NI Water based decisions on a budget allocation it did not have
Stormont Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins ordered forensic accountants to examine why the body, which provides water and sewerage services in the region, has been unable to live within its budget allocation.
Responding to the report, an NI Water spokesperson said it will study the report findings in detail when it is published.
They said that the report 'must be viewed in the context of a 27% funding gap compared to the level independently assessed as essential by the Utility Regulator as necessary to meet the Department for Infrastructure's Social and Environmental Guidance'.
'NI Water recognises the financial pressures facing DfI. However, if the proposed budget cannot be met, the Department and Utility Regulator must agree on what is realistically deliverable,' they added.
Speaking in the Assembly on Tuesday, Ms Kimmins said it is clear from the report, produced by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), that the NI Water board 'did not base its financial decisions on the budget that it had'.
'In other words, the amount allocated by the department. Instead, the board based those decisions on the larger amount that it felt was needed, despite not having that money to spend. PwC describes that as a 'significant limitation',' she told MLAs.
'I find it difficult to understand how a board can monitor operating costs when its budget is not aligned to the allocation from the department.
'That is clearly a fundamental flaw in oversight and governance processes.'
She added: 'While I appreciate that NI Water has a large number of variable costs that depend on issues outside its control, the report clearly highlights several issues relating to the fluctuations that could have been better controlled throughout the 2024/25 financial year.'
Ms Kimmins said she is intent on working closely with NI Water 'to help prevent such an occurrence in future years'.
'I am determined that the learning from this investigation will be useful for both parties, but it is essential that NI Water, like every other arms' length body, takes every opportunity, where it can, to live within its budget.
'The board needs to factor in affordability to all its decisions, alongside careful financial profiling, just as the department and other public bodies have to do.'
Stormont Infrastructure Committee chairwoman Deborah Erskine responded to the ministers' statement in the Assembly, calling it a 'whitewash'.
'This process cost the department thousands of pounds, yet it is a whitewash: it pinpoints themes that we knew would be the case before the forensic accountant even began work,' she said.
'Those themes can be replicated across a number of public bodies and in the spending profile of the public sector. Therefore, there is nothing new really.'
The DUP representative also pressed Ms Kimmins to come back to the Assembly with measurable targets for NI Water to meet the recommendations of the review.
Ms Kimmins rejected that claim, describing 'an important piece of work that has clearly identified areas for improvement'.
NI Water said in its statement: 'Persistent underinvestment in water and sewerage services is having wide reaching implications for Northern Ireland.
'Both the Northern Ireland Audit Office and the Fiscal Council have recognised that current funding arrangements are not sustainable.
'The underfunding, which has continued since the creation of NI Water in 2007, means that key objectives and priorities that underpin the Programme for Government cannot be met under these arrangements.
'In March 2024, NIAO highlighted how historic underinvestment has led to serious capacity constraints across Northern Ireland's wastewater network. It also warned that the short-term funding model undermines long-term planning—underscoring the urgent need for a comprehensive, expert-led review of funding and governance, and a coordinated, cross-departmental approach to infrastructure delivery.
'NI Water would welcome an Executive-led, fully funded, and realistic cross-departmental transition plan to simultaneously meet the objectives on housing, economic development, and the environment as set out in the Programme for Government.
'We remain ready to work with the Department, in conjunction with the Utility Regulator, and all relevant stakeholders to help shape and deliver a sustainable, joined-up solution.
'Prioritising one objective over others risks systemic failure, with profound consequences for the Programme for Government and the tough choices required to determine which outcomes in the current Price Control Determination should take precedence.
'NI Water's core mission remains unchanged: to deliver safe, reliable water and wastewater services that support existing homes and businesses, enable new housing and economic development, and protect the environment. These remain the three priorities that underpin the Programme for Government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
Why the future of NY under a ‘Mayor Mamdani' has already arrived
If you think a Mayor Mamdani couldn't bring us worse horrors than those already inflicted upon us by the 'progressive' brigade of former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, former Mayor Bill de Blasio, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Brooklyn DA Eric Gonzalez, state Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, at least a dozen woke City Council members and innumerable looney-left judges — you are profoundly in error. Some of my wealthy acquaintances in high-end commercial real estate say of Mamdani, 'Yes, he's an antisemitic, dopey dilettante who would impose a Soviet-style rule over us if he could, but, hey! The state, not the city, really has the power! The mayor is a paper tiger! Remember how de Blasio said he'd get rid of carriage horses on Day One!' Take no comfort in that. 5 Naysayers repeatedly speculate about the horrors awaiting New York City if Zohran Mamdani is elected. AP It's mercifully true that Mamdani couldn't make the buses free and thereby accelerate the MTA's fiscal tailspin (perhaps he'll have time to learn between now and Election Day that such a step would be up to the MTA, a state body over which the mayor has very limited influence). Nor should his pipe dream of city-run grocery stores panic supermarket and bodega owners, given the city's comically inept and corrupt record with such crucial tasks as making NYCHA apartments liveable. Yet, despite the mayoralty's tightly circumscribed authority, Mamdani could wreak havoc in two realms where significant progress in recent years has been made. The one most vital to New Yorkers on a day-to-day basis is crime. After an up-and-down start, Mayor Adams seems to have tamed the beast. Under NYPD commissioner Jessica Tisch, major crime is dramatically down. If the trend holds up, murders this year will total under 300, the holy-grail figure not seen since before the pandemic. Mamdani could undo all of that in a flash. Although he now denies he'd attempt to defund the NYPD despite having once proposed precisely that imbecilic notion, it would take only the appointment of a new top cop more committed to protecting criminals' 'rights' than to public order to kick-start the tailspin. The administrations of Adams, Bill de Blasio (yes, de Blasio) and Bloomberg did their best to alleviate the 'housing crisis.' After all, this is far more the fault of state and earlier city laws than to 'homelessness' largely due to mental illness and drug addiction. 5 Mamdani wants to make public transport free, along with taking an anti-police platform. Christopher Sadowski All three mayors promoted or approved rezonings that both opened up more districts to residential development, and enabled construction of 'affordable' units within those districts — the latter by requiring their inclusion for the size bonuses developers need to make projects economically viable. For elected officials and urbanologists who apparently prefer a North Korea-style housing program (free, government-assigned apartments for everyone in horrible buildings), no amount or percentage of affordable units is ever enough. But Bloomberg, de Blasio and Adams, in different ways, relied on a real-world approach. 5 A 'Mayor' Mamdani would have the power to replace newish NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who has made inroads against violent crime. Luiz Rampelotto/ZUMA / Variances to existing rules needed approvals under the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, or ULURP. The often contentious, seven-month slog sometimes included compromises, but the result was creation of tens of thousands of new units from the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn to Morris Park in The Bronx. Kiss such progress goodbye if Mamdani wins. His animus toward upper- and middle-class New Yorkers is well known. The loyalties of a man who wants to freeze all stabilized rents clearly are not with developers and landlords upon whom the city must rely to create and maintain sound housing. 5 Former council member Kristin Richardson Jordan, who took an anti-development and anti-'gentrification' stance, derailed a large-scale Harlem housing development that would have delivered low-cost homes to her district. LightRocket via Getty Images He'd more likely take his cue from anti-development and anti-'gentrification' zealots such as former council member Kristin Richardson Jordan, who single-handedly torpedoed a big Harlem project that would have brought 1,000 new rental homes to Malcolm X Boulevard and West 145th Street, half of which were to be priced below market. The ability of a single council member to block even projects supported by his or her entire community — a veto power called 'member deference' — has been so abused, Adams wants to put measures on the November ballot that would turn approval authority over to the City Planning Commission. 5 The site under consideration was — and remains — an empty lot. Stephen Yang Yet, even if voters show more common sense than Democratic primary voters last week and support the change, a mayor Mamdani could still — and almost surely will — stop any housing development in its tracks that doesn't impossibly make new apartments free or almost free. That's because ultimately, the mayor must sign off on any plan that passes ULURP muster. If you doubt he'd put the kibosh on new-housing proposals desired by just about everybody, just listen to him — and tremble. scuozzo@
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed a new two-year budget in the early morning hours Thursday in a race against Congress to ensure the state gets a federal Medicaid match that it would lose under President Trump's tax and spending cuts package. In an extraordinarily rapid succession of events, Evers and Republican lawmakers unveiled a compromise budget deal on Tuesday, the Senate passed it Wednesday night and hours later just before 1 a.m. on Thursday the Assembly passed it. Evers signed it in his conference room minutes later. Democrats who voted against the $111 billion spending bill said it didn't go far enough in meeting their priorities of increasing funding for schools, child care and expanding Medicaid. But Evers, who hasn't decided on whether he will seek a third term, hailed the compromise as the best deal that could be reached. 'I believe most Wisconsinites would say that compromise is a good thing because that is how government is supposed to work,' Evers said. Wisconsin's budget would affect nearly every person in the battleground state. Income taxes would be cut for working people and retirees by $1.4 billion, sales taxes would be eliminated on residential electric bills and it would cost more to get a driver's license, buy license plates and title a vehicle. Unprecedented speed There was urgency to pass the budget because of one part that increases an assessment on hospitals to help fund the state's Medicaid program and hospital provider payments. Medicaid cuts up for final approval this week in Congress cap how much states can get from the federal government through those fees. The budget would increase Wisconsin's assessment rate from 1.8% to the federal maximum of 6% to access federal matching funds. But if the federal bill is enacted first, Wisconsin could not raise the fee, putting $1.5 billion in funding for rural hospitals at risk. In the rush to get done, Republicans took the highly unusual move of bringing the budget up for votes on the same day. In at least the past 50 years, the budget has never passed both houses on the same day. 'We need to get this thing done today so we have the opportunity to access federal funding,' Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said at the start of debate just before 8 p.m. Wednesday. Governors typically take several days to review and sign the budget after it's passed but Evers took just minutes. Bipartisan compromise In a concession to the Democratic governor, Republicans also agreed to spend more money on special education services in K-12 schools, subsidize child care costs and give the Universities of Wisconsin its biggest increase in nearly two decades. The plan would also likely result in higher property taxes in many school districts due to no increase in general aid to pay for operations. The budget called for closing a troubled aging prison in Green Bay by 2029, but Evers used his partial veto to strike that provision. He left in $15 million in money to support the closure, but objected to setting a date without a clear plan for how to get it done. Republicans need Democratic votes The Senate passed the budget 19-14, with five Democrats joining with 14 Republicans to approve it. Four Republicans joined 10 Democrats in voting no. The Assembly passed it 59-39 with six Democrats in support. One Republican voted against it. Democratic senators were brought into budget negotiations in the final days to secure enough votes to pass it. 'It's a bipartisan deal,' Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein said before the vote. 'I think everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something everyone has agreed on.' Democrats said newly drawn legislative maps, which helped them pick up seats in November and narrow the Republican majorities, led to greater compromise this year. 'That gave us leverage, that gave us an opportunity to have a conversation,' Democratic Sen. Mark Spreitzer said. Still, Spreitzer said the budget 'fell far short of what was needed on our priorities.' He and other Democrats said it didn't go enough to help fund child care, K-12 schools and higher education, in particular. Evers vetoes prison closure deadline The governor noted in his veto message that the state has 'painful experience' with trying to close prisons without a fleshed-out plan, pointing out that the state's youth prison remains open even though lawmakers passed a bill to close the facility in 2017. 'Green Bay Correctional Institution should close — on that much, the Legislature and I agree,' Evers wrote. 'It is simply not responsible or tenable to require doing so by a deadline absent a plan to actually accomplish that goal by the timeline set.' Jim Rafter, president of the village of Allouez, the suburb where the prison is located, issued a statement Friday saying the veto shows how broken state government has become. 'The time for studying has come and gone,' he said. 'The Village of Allouez and our community demand action and the certainty they deserve about when this facility will be closed.' Governor kills grant as payback for ending stewardship Evers used his partial veto powers to wipe out provisions in the budget that would have handed the town of Norway in southeastern Wisconsin's Racine County an annual $100,000 grant to control water runoff from State Highway 36. The governor said in his veto message he eliminated the grant because Republicans refused to extend the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship Program. That program provides funding for the state and outside groups to buy land for conservation and recreation. Republicans have complained for years that the program is too expensive and removes too much land from property tax rolls, hurting local municipalities. Funding is set to expire next year. Evers proposed allocating $1 billion to extend the program for another decade, but Republicans eliminated the provision. Evers accused legislators in his veto message of abandoning their responsibility to continue the program while using the runoff grant to help 'the politically connected few.' He did not elaborate. The town of Norway lies within state Rep. Chuck Wichgers and Sen. Julian Bradley's districts. Both are Republicans; Bradley sits on the Legislature's powerful budget-writing committee. Wichgers didn't immediately return a voicemail. No one from Bradley's office responded to an email seeking comment. Rep. Tony Kurtz and Sen. Pat Testin, both Republicans, introduced a bill last month that would extend the stewardship program through mid-2030, but the measure has yet to get a hearing. ___ Associated Press writer Todd Richmond contributed to this report.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Wisconsin governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds
MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed a new two-year budget in the early morning hours Thursday in a race against Congress to ensure the state gets a federal Medicaid match that it would lose under President Trump's tax and spending cuts package. In an extraordinarily rapid succession of events, Evers and Republican lawmakers unveiled a compromise budget deal on Tuesday, the Senate passed it Wednesday night and hours later just before 1 a.m. on Thursday the Assembly passed it. Evers signed it in his conference room minutes later. Democrats who voted against the $111-billion spending bill said it didn't go far enough in meeting their priorities of increasing funding for schools, child care and expanding Medicaid. But Evers, who hasn't decided on whether he will seek a third term, hailed the compromise as the best deal that could be reached. 'I believe most Wisconsinites would say that compromise is a good thing because that is how government is supposed to work,' Evers said. Wisconsin's budget would affect nearly every person in the battleground state. Income taxes would be cut for working people and retirees by $1.4 billion, sales taxes would be eliminated on residential electric bills and it would cost more to get a driver's license, buy license plates and title a vehicle. There was urgency to pass the budget because of one part that increases an assessment on hospitals to help fund the state's Medicaid program and hospital provider payments. Medicaid cuts up for final approval this week in Congress cap how much states can get from the federal government through those fees. The budget would increase Wisconsin's assessment rate from 1.8% to the federal maximum of 6% to access federal matching funds. But if the federal bill is enacted first, Wisconsin could not raise the fee, putting $1.5 billion in funding for rural hospitals at risk. In the rush to get done, Republicans took the highly unusual move of bringing the budget up for votes on the same day. In at least the past 50 years, the budget has never passed both houses on the same day. 'We need to get this thing done today so we have the opportunity to access federal funding,' Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said at the start of debate just before 8 p.m. Wednesday. Governors typically take several days to review and sign the budget after it's passed but Evers took just minutes. In a concession to the Democratic governor, Republicans also agreed to spend more money on special education services in K-12 schools, subsidize child-care costs and give the University of Wisconsin System its biggest increase in nearly two decades. The plan would also likely result in higher property taxes in many school districts due to no increase in general aid to pay for operations. The Senate passed the budget 19-14, with five Democrats joining with 14 Republicans to approve it. Four Republicans joined 10 Democrats in voting no. The Assembly passed it 59-39 with six Democrats in support. One Republican voted against it. Democratic senators were brought into budget negotiations in the final days to secure enough votes to pass it. 'It's a bipartisan deal,' Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein said before the vote. 'I think everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something everyone has agreed on.' Democrats said newly drawn legislative maps, which helped them pick up seats in November and narrow the Republican majorities, led to greater compromise this year. 'That gave us leverage, that gave us an opportunity to have a conversation,' Democratic Sen. Mark Spreitzer said. Still, Spreitzer said the budget 'fell far short of what was needed on our priorities.' He and other Democrats said it didn't go enough to help fund child care, K-12 schools and higher education, in particular. The budget called for closing a troubled aging prison in Green Bay by 2029, but Evers used his partial veto to strike that provision. He left in $15 million in money to support planning for the closure, but objected to setting a date without a clear plan for how to get it done. The governor noted in his veto message that the state has 'painful experience' with trying to close prisons without a fleshed-out plan, pointing out that the state's youth prison remains open even though lawmakers passed a bill to close the facility in 2017. 'Green Bay Correctional Institution should close — on that much, the Legislature and I agree,' Evers wrote. 'It is simply not responsible or tenable to require doing so by a deadline absent a plan to actually accomplish that goal by the timeline set.' Evers used his partial veto powers to wipe out provisions in the budget that would have handed the town of Norway in southeastern Wisconsin's Racine County an annual $100,000 grant to control water runoff from State Highway 36. The governor said in his veto message he eliminated the grant because Republicans refused to extend the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship Program. That program provides funding for the state and outside groups to buy land for conservation and recreation. Republicans have complained for years that the program is too expensive and removes too much land from property tax rolls, hurting local municipalities. Funding is set to expire next year. Evers proposed allocating $1 billion to extend the program for another decade, but Republicans eliminated the provision. Evers accused legislators in his veto message of abandoning their responsibility to continue the program while using the runoff grant to help 'the politically connected few.' He did not elaborate. The town of Norway lies within state Rep. Chuck Wichgers and Sen. Julian Bradley's districts. Both are Republicans; Bradley sits on the Legislature's powerful budget-writing committee. Emails to both their offices seeking comment Friday morning weren't immediately returned. Rep. Tony Kurtz and Sen. Pat Testin, both Republicans, introduced a bill last month that would extend the stewardship program through mid-2030, but the measure has yet to get a hearing. Bauer writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Todd Richmond contributed to this report.
