logo
U.S. lawmakers want mandatory sanctions, reporting on Haiti as gang violence worsens

U.S. lawmakers want mandatory sanctions, reporting on Haiti as gang violence worsens

Miami Herald22-05-2025

A bipartisan group of U.S. Senators wants to mandate sanctions against supporters of Haiti's criminal gangs and is pushing the State Department to provide a list of the country's most prominent gangs and their leaders — along with a report on the connections between the gangs and the Caribbean nation's political and economic elites.
The Haiti Criminal Collusion Transparency Act of 2025 was filed in the Senate on Thursday amid growing concerns about Haiti's escalating security crisis, which is fueling horrific crimes, including rape, murders and kidnapping. The violence has led to 5.7 million people — more than half the country's population — struggling to find food to eat and more than 1 million people being internally displaced.
The bill was introduced in the Senate by New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and co-signed by Sens. Rick Scott, R-Florida, Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, John Curtis, R-Utah, and Chris Coons, D-Connecticut. A House version of the bill was introduced and passed out of the House Foreign Affairs Committee last month. It was led by ranking Democrat Gregory Meeks of New York.
Last week, Shaheen wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, calling on him to address the humanitarian and democratic governance crises in Haiti. The letter laid out recommendations for U.S.-Haiti policy, including strengthening support for the Multinational Security Support mission, using strategic sanctions against Haitian armed criminal actors and their political and economic enablers, and making efforts to target illicit arms-trafficking networks.
While testifying before both Senate and House committees this week, Rubio said an inter-agency review is currently taking place to come up with options for addressing Haiti's crisis. He suggested that the anti-gang effort, currently being led by Kenya after the United Nations-authorized a multinational security, should be replaced by the Organization of American States, or OAS.
The proposed legislation reflects the current limitations of U.S. efforts to tackle the gang crisis, supporters say. For instance, while the Biden administration issued several sanctions against former Haitian politicians and former parliamentarians, they were mostly cancellations of visas, which under U.S. law are kept private.
Also, the sanctions are not mandatory and members of Congress say they have a blind spot on who major gang leaders are, and their enablers.
Under the legislation, the State Department's sanction authorities would now be mandatory rather than discretionary. The bill also requires that the interagency prioritize resources to sanction such individuals.
The State Department, in coordination with other federal agencies and the intelligence community, would also be required to provide Congress with an explicit list of all known gang leaders and political and economic elites who have direct and significant ties to gang networks. If the legislation passes, the State Department would also be required to provide an assessment of threats to U.S. national interests and democratic governance in the country.
The bill does not include specific funding for implementation, but it's expected that the State would dedicate additional resources.
Resources, however, remain a huge challenge. U.S. intelligence capabilities on the ground in Haiti have been significantly reduced, with the State Department issuing several evacuation orders for staff and the Drug Enforcement Administration targeting its office in Port-au-Prince for closure.
Organization of American States
On Thursday, experts at a discussion on Haiti at the OAS headquarters were told that in addition to gangs' control of up to 90% of the Haitian capital and significant parts of its Artibonite region and some municipalities in the Central Plateau region, the Haitian territory was serving multiple functions in the global drug trade.
'Haiti has increasingly become a preferred transit route for cocaine moving from South America to North America and Europe,' Gaston Schulmeister, director of the Department against Transnational Organized Crime of the Secretariat for Multidimensional Security, said. 'But equally concerning is Haiti's immersions as a transit route for precursor chemicals used also for drug production. Haiti has also become both a source and a transit country for human trafficking victims.'
The country's security and governance challenges were further laid out by its officials including Haiti Transitional Presidential Counselor member Smith Augustin and the defense and justice ministers who flew to Washington for the discussion, 'Finding Urgent Solutions for the Haiti Crisis.'
'We must be clear, the challenges facing Haiti will not be resolved through symbolic gestures. They demand effective cooperation. They demand new additional financial resources, new additional human resources, new additional material resources,' outgoing OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro said. 'They need a strategic investment and a shared vision rooted in democratic values and human rights.'
The country needed the help of its partners, Haiti's Justice Minister Patrick Pélissier said. He detailed how gangs had destroyed dozens of police stations and all of the country's jails in the metropolitan Port-au-Prince area, forcing them to house some of the 8,000 inmates in a rehabilitation facility that also included children.
'What is the consequence to the legal branch? Since 2018 we haven't seen any trials for those crimes in the' West region because the court is in the territory occupied by the gangs, he said, later telling the room that its words need to be transformed into actions.
The crisis, Defense Minister Jean Michel Moïse said, is not just a Haitian one. 'Haiti's stability threatens the entire region, because arm and drug trafficking know no borders,' he said. 'Like the firearms, the drugs are not originating from Haiti, nor are they consumed by Haitians.'
Haiti, he warned, is on the brink of being fully controlled by gangs.
'It is so frustrating that the gangs are so well armed and they have easy access to militarized weapons and ammunition, and the legal entities in Haiti, the army, the police, face challenges in acquiring weapons,' Moïse said.
Moïse noted that the country has restrictions such as the U.S.'s Leahy Law, which restricts access to weapons by Haiti's armed forces. 'We would like to see our good friend, the United States, lift this restriction,' he said, noting that the army only has about 1,000 individuals, who are ill-equipped and ill-trained to carry out urban warfare.
After a preliminary panel, diplomats from several member and observer countries offered up comments about the deteriorating crisis. None, however, addressed Rubio's suggestion that the crisis should be led by the OAS given its role as a hemispheric body. Instead, there were calls for more support for the mission, with a representative for Kenya appealing for more forces that can fight and forward operating bases in order to expand the mission beyond its current 1,000 personnel.
During the conference, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Barbara Feinstein addressed recent efforts by the Trump administration to designate Haiti's major gangs as foreign and global terrorists. But she also called for the need for more accountability from Haiti's transitional government, which has been dogged by corruption scandals and faces possibly a third transition with elections increasingly looking out of reach this year.
'We intend to use these new authorities within our country to decisively take action against those that are providing material support and we believe that this is a critical part,' Feinstein said.
But that alone will be insufficient, she noted, stressing that the U.S. needs a stronger security response including financial assistance from foreign partners and efforts by Haitian leaders to combat endemic corruption.
'Corruption erodes trust and the effectiveness of any security or governance strategy, including efforts to restore democratic order through through free and fair elections,' she said. 'The United States condemns the actions of those who commit abuses of office, including illicit public enrichment work with terrorist organizations and those who participate in arms and ammunition trafficking. This permissiveness only continues to fuel gang violence and complicates the resolution of this dangerous situation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 1600: America Doesn't Have a Conservative Party
The 1600: America Doesn't Have a Conservative Party

Newsweek

time24 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

The 1600: America Doesn't Have a Conservative Party

The Insider's Track Good morning, I paid $8 for a black iced coffee yesterday in my neighborhood. Eight. Dollars. Sometimes I think most of the underlying rage you see bubbling up around the country can be attributed to this feeling of just being constantly ripped off wherever you go. Speaking of getting ripped off, Congress is in the process of stitching up the votes on President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" flagship legislation in hopes of getting it to his desk by the Fourth. Following a narrow 51–49 procedural vote over the weekend, the Senate advanced the bill to the debate stage, with Senators Rand Paul and Thom Tillis joining all Democrats in opposition. Targeted by MAGA for his disloyalty, Tillis immediately announced he's not running for re-election, thus putting NC potentially in play for Senate Dems next year (the modern GOP has no room for actual conservatives). So once the Senate passes the bill, it gets kicked back to the House as part of the reconciliation process before going to Trump. I'd put it at extremely likely that this giant turd of a bill becomes law in time for the fireworks on Friday. So what's in this thing? It's mostly an extension of the 2017 tax cuts, with some deep cuts to the welfare state for good measure. The current Senate version raises the debt ceiling $5 trillion. It'll increase the deficit by some $3 trillion over the next decade, per the Congressional Budget Office. (I've seen lots of Trump supporters attack the CBO for its scoring of this bill as some kind of "lefty" organization. Please. The CBO is run by a Bush appointee). The bill uses this well-worn accounting trick to make it look like Republicans are actually reducing the deficit by $508 billion, as Lindsey Graham falsely claimed over the weekend. But that's based on this little gimmick that lets them basically write off the $4 trillion cost of extending the tax cuts. So when you see Republicans tossing around that $508B number this week, it should immediately set off your B.S. detector. Here's some other random little tidbits that caught my eye in the current manifestation of the bill: A huge cut in SNAP benefits and food assistance for the poor, plus another $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare (but mostly Medicaid). Millions will probably lose their coverage. This is the provision that Dems could run with as a winning message for the midterms, if they aren't too busy fighting for trans girls in sports or whatever. A tax on remittances, which is the money that immigrants send home, has been watered down to effectively be meaningless. House Rs passed a 5% tax on remittance, which was cut to 3.5% by the Senate, and then further to 1%. It also doesn't apply to bank transfers. This is one of those things I don't understand. It's a tax on US dollars flowing out of the country. Who is the lobby pushing Senate Rs against this? Western Union? On the energy front, the bill phases out Biden's tax credits for solar and wind—not surprising—while adding an excise tax on new renewable projects that utilize components made in China. At the same time, there's provisions tucked in there to incentivize domestic coal production. Making Coal Great Again, baby. Our children will be ashamed of us. Thankfully, the bill no longer includes Sen. Mike Lee's provision to sell off millions of acres of pristine federal land in the West to developers after an outcry from (actual) conservative voters. Teddy Roosevelt would've been spinning in his grave. The bottom line is that this legislation acts as a giant wealth transfer from the poor to the rich and the young to the old. Younger earners get nothing from the tax cuts, which are all structured to benefit higher-earners. It adds trillions to the national debt, which means higher taxes and mortgage payments for young Americans trying to start or build their families. One nonpartisan analysis suggests a 40-year-old making the median income will lose $7,500 over their lifetime, while a 70-year-old with the same income nets $17,500. The Boomers win, as always. And then we wonder why young voters turn out in record numbers in our most expensive city to elect a socialist. If this is the alternative, why wouldn't they? If this whole charade does anything, it should finally disabuse Americans of this notion that modern-day Republicans are the conservative party. You simply cannot be an actual conservative while voting to increase the debt, adding to the deficit, all while doing precisely nothing to deal with our spending problem. The Rundown A fierce war of words has erupted between Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Donald Trump following recent U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Khamenei accused Trump of "exaggerating in order to cover up and conceal the truth," directly responding to Trump's claim that the U.S. had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites. Separately, Trump said that he is offering Iran "nothing" and is refusing to engage with Iranian officials, signaling a hardening U.S. stance. Read more. Also happening: US-Canada trade talks: Canada and the United States have resumed trade negotiations after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to rescind the country's digital services tax on U.S. technology companies. The development follows President Donald Trump's announcement on Friday that he was suspending all trade talks with Canada "effective immediately" over the tax policy. Here's the latest. Week in review: President Donald Trump is coming off what may be his most successful week in office—a landmark Supreme Court ruling, a successful NATO summit, a ceasefire that appears to be holding in the Middle East, another peace deal in Africa, a stock market back to setting records and a key trade breakthrough with China. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)

The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Live updates: Senate fights to the finish line on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Live updates: Senate fights to the finish line on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Live updates: Senate fights to the finish line on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Senate will resume debate on massive GOP policy legislation dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill' on Monday morning after a marathon weekend of adjusting legislation to fit parliamentarian rulings and appease particular senators. Senators will convene for a lengthy 'vote-a-rama,' during which lawmakers can offer an unlimited number of amendments that are related to the mammoth proposal. Democrats will be at the heart of the action, as they try to amend the mammoth bill that champions President Trump's agenda. Republicans can lose a maximum of three votes, with Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) already expected to vote 'no' over their opposition to proposed Medicaid cuts and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling hike, respectively. The House will return midweek to vote on the bill. Catch up on the weekend's action: The White House will brief reporters at 1 p.m. EDT Monday. In court action, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans will hear oral arguments in a case contesting the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members. And the Supreme Court will announce a lineup of cases for its next term. Follow along on these events and more here today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store