US seeks to weaken global development finance efforts, UN document shows
The Trump administration opposes draft reforms of the world's financial system intended to help developing countries, including around taxation, credit ratings and fossil fuel subsidies. It also wants mentions of "climate," "gender equality" and "sustainability" stripped out.
The previously unreported document sheds light on how the Trump administration is seeking to imprint an "America First" agenda, including opposition to efforts to slow climate change and promote diversity, on the institutions at the heart of fixing global systemic crises.
The once-a-decade, 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4) in Seville, Spain, in June aims to influence the strategic direction of the world's development finance institutions. Countries agreed at FFD3, for example, to broaden tax cooperation efforts so that developing countries could help set the rules and as of last May more than 140 countries were involved.
"This conference is about bringing the world's leaders together and setting the underlying rules and priorities for financing development goals over the next decade," Tom Mitchell, executive director of the International Institute for Environment and Development, told Reuters.
Compiled by the permanent representatives to the U.N. of Mexico, Nepal, Norway, and Zambia, with help from the U.N. secretariat, the April 11 negotiating draft is annotated with the positions of the 193 nations involved in the discussions.
At U.N. negotiations over the FFD4 document in March, the U.S. mission said the draft at that time was too long and prescriptive and denounced "the ever-widening definition of sustainable development."
"The international financial institutions have independent mandates and authorities, and we do not support attempts in the U.N. system to dictate their priorities or activities," the U.S. statement from acting U.N. Economic and Social Council representative Jonathan Shrier said.
The U.N. does not hold direct authority over the multilateral development finance institutions.
With ongoing changes at the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in the fight against climate change already facing pushback from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the document showed it was seeking to water down the U.N.'s reform prescriptions.
Among specific points in the text that refer to the systemic reform, the document shows the U.S. wants to remove a reference to a "package of reforms" for sustainable development. It wants to replace a line promising to "commit to reform the international financial architecture" with a pledge to "recognize the need to enhance its resilience and effectiveness in responding to present and future challenges and crises."
Such changes in language signal the degree of shared commitment that can then be used as support for action or inaction in future talks.
U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has acknowledged the need to overcome multiple challenges ahead of the conference, but urged "all countries to be at the table in Sevilla focused on solutions," spokesperson Florencia Soto Niño said in an email to Reuters.
The Treasury Department and State Department both declined to comment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
While the U.S.' position on development has become tougher under Trump, the negotiating document shows it remains supportive of efforts that include developing countries working more closely with the private sector, and fostering innovation and financial literacy.
CLIMATE CHANGE
A key goal of the global reforms is to better help poorer nations cope with weather disasters, which are worsening due to climate change, and to boost economic development using low-carbon energy rather than traditional fossil fuels.
President Donald Trump has quit the UN Paris climate agreement, slashed U.S. foreign development aid by more than 80% as part of a government overhaul led by billionaire Elon Musk and embarked on a trade war that is hurting many poorer nations.
Among areas of the FFD4 document that the U.S. objects to is a call for countries to explore "global solidarity levies" that could include taxes on highly polluting activities or on the super-rich to finance sustainable development.
If included, the levies could be taken up in U.N. negotiations on taxes this year and would bolster a task force led by France, Kenya and Barbados that aims to develop such taxes among smaller groups of countries.
Other countries to object include Russia, Saudi Arabia and China.
The U.S. is also seeking to delete a paragraph calling for companies to pay tax to the countries where economic activity occurs; a paragraph on helping developing countries bolster tax transparency; and another on phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, the document shows.
Many of the world's poorest countries struggle with high debt and the costs of rebuilding after disastrous storms, but the FFD4 document shows the U.S. wants to strike a paragraph on reforming the credit-rating system.
That includes a push for raters to take a more forgiving approach to poorer nations that voluntarily restructure their debt to invest in green projects, it showed.
The U.S. also opposes a commitment to ensure countries receive "adequate and uninterrupted funding on appropriate terms of social protection and other essential social spending during shocks and crises," the document shows.
While the U.S. has considerable influence as the biggest shareholder in both the World Bank, which provides loans and grants to developing countries, and the IMF, and is currently reviewing its role in both, the draft deal is likely to change further as countries continue negotiations in May, before reaching consensus on a final document in mid-June.
The U.S. position puts pressure on other countries to accept a weaker deal, since the talks aim to adopt a deal by consensus. (Reporting by Kate Abnett and Simon Jessop in London Additional reporting by David Lawder and Daphne Psaledakis in Washington Editing by Dawn Kopecki, Rod Nickel and Stephen Coates)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
With Damascus strikes, Israel seeks to tear up Trump's vision for Syria
Israel and the US appear to be on divergent paths in Syria. While the allies aren't on a collision course yet, current and former Arab, US and Israeli officials say their differences could complicate the Trump administration's grand diplomatic plans. On Wednesday, Israel carried out powerful air strikes on Damascus, blowing up a part of the defence ministry and hitting near the presidential palace, as it framed its attacks as an effort to protect Syria's Druze minority. The strikes marked a significant Israeli escalation against the government of President Ahmed al-Sharaa and came despite his warming ties with the US and his burgeoning security contacts with Israel. "Israel and the US are definitely not on the same page," Dareen Khalifa, a senior advisor at the International Crisis Group, told Middle East Eye. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Israel claimed that its attack was in response to requests from Druze inside Israel for intervention, where the minority is around 150,000-strong. Prominent Syrian Druze, Sheikh Hikmat Salaman al-Hajri, who is seen as close to Israel, did in fact call for international support, saying the minority faced a "total war of extermination". Other Syrian Druze leaders, however, have rejected Israel's intervention. "There is definitely genuine Druze pressure inside Israel to intervene," a US diplomat in the region who has been monitoring the fighting told MEE. "Regardless of whether the pressure is real or not, the outcome is the same: a zone of influence for Israel in Syria. That means telling the Syrians where they can and cannot put their tanks." When asked to comment on Israel's strikes and the instability plaguing the war-ravaged country, US President Donald Trump declined to comment and instead deferred reporters to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Earlier in the day, Rubio tried to characterise the strikes and worsening security situation as a simple "misunderstanding". 'All roads lead to Damascus' Israel's move to assert itself as the dominant power protecting the Druze in a swath of southern Syria clashes with the visions of the Trump administration. Earlier this year, the US rejected Israeli pleas to keep more troops in northeastern Syria, MEE revealed. Kurdish fighters there are lobbying for more autonomy. The Trump administration wants to reduce its military footprint in Syria and ensure the country - a tapestry of Christians, Muslims, Druze and Kurds - has one undisputed power centre backed up by US allies like Nato member Turkey, cash-rich Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Tom Barrack, Trump's billionaire, Lebanese-American envoy to Syria and ambassador to Turkey, waxed on about Syria just last week in front of reporters. "You have the Druze that want it to be Druze land. You have the Alawites who want it to be Alawite land. You have the Kurds who want it to be Kurdistan," Barrack said. "What Syria is saying, what Damascus is saying, that's not going to happen - all roads lead to Damascus." 'In Netanyahu's mind, undermining the Syrian state is way more important than any normalisation' - Alon Pinkas, former Israeli diplomat "There's not an indication on our part that there's going to be a separate Alawite state or a separate Druze state. There's Syria," he said. To be sure, Syria has been battered by sectarian violence since Sharaa, a former leader of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham and before that al-Qaeda's Syrian branch, ousted former President Bashar al-Assad last year. In March, Syrian security forces killed hundreds of Alawites - the sect to which Assad belonged - along the Mediterranean coast. In June, at least 25 people were killed in a bombing at Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church. Sharaa was criticised for his handling of the fallout. While the Trump administration condemned the attacks, it is focused on a speedy lifting of sanctions and assuaging sectarian tensions. Barrack has praised Gulf investments in Syria. And if there is an outside military power that the US has leaned towards recognising in Syria, it is Turkey, experts say. MEE revealed that the US was instrumental in pressing Turkey and Israel to establish a deconfliction line in Syria earlier this year. 'Default mode' For Trump, Gulf investment and Turkish buy-in complement the normalisation of ties between Syria and Israel. When Trump met Sharaa in Riyadh in May, he asked him to join the Abraham Accords - the diplomatic agreements between Israel, Morocco, Bahrain and the UAE that Trump sees as one of his signature foreign policy achievements. Barrack told The New York Times that the US has supported back-channel talks between Israel and Sharaa's government, which have reportedly been held in Baku, Azerbaijan - Turkey's closest ally. The UAE has also mediated talks between the two, according to Reuters. Talk of Syria and Israel striking an agreement reached a crescendo after the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict ended. Posters sprang up in Tel Aviv showing Trump, Netanyahu and Sharaa along with other Arab leaders. How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East Read More » "This puts to shame the nonsense of normalisation," Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli diplomat, told MEE. "In Netanyahu's mind, undermining the Syrian state is way more important than any normalisation." Diplomats in the region say that the Israeli strikes are a direct rejection of Trump's efforts. "The Israelis will go along with Trump talking peace, but they prefer Syria divided," an Arab diplomat told MEE. "The minute they got the opportunity, they went back to default mode - tear up Syria." Israel's willingness to bomb Damascus as they were talking to the Syrians does reflect a real difference of opinion between the two allies on Sharaa, the US and Arab diplomats told MEE. "The Trump administration has been much more willing to give Sharaa a chance with Turkish and Saudi backing. For the Israelis, Sharaa is not genuine - he is a jihadist," the US diplomat told MEE. After Assad's removal, Israel launched widespread strikes on Syria. Netanyahu sent soldiers to occupy a swath of southwestern Syria that includes a United Nations buffer zone in the Golan Heights. Israel seized much of the strategic plateau in the 1967 war. Arab and US diplomats say the first step to any normalisation would be reinstating a 1974 disengagement agreement that created the buffer zone along the two countries' borders. Some of the biggest advocates of normalisation now say it is in jeopardy. "Israel's unnecessary strikes must cease immediately," Republican Congressman Joe Wilson said on Wednesday, before calling the strikes "suicidal for Israel'.

Gulf Today
6 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump ‘not currently firing Fed Chair, but not ruling out'
US President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he was not currently planning to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but added that he did not rule it out. Trump's mixed messaging, after months of escalating attacks on the independent central bank chief, sent the yield on the 30-year US Treasury bond surging above five per cent. Asked about whether he would eject Powell, Trump said he is 'doing a lousy job but no, I'm not talking about that.' 'I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely,' he added. Trump noted that he would in any case be able to make a change at the top of the Fed when Powell's term ends next year. 'We'll pick somebody that's good,' Trump said. 'We want to see lower interest rates.' Powell's term at the helm of the US central bank does not conclude until May 2026, and his term as a Fed governor is up at a later date. The Fed chair has said that he did not plan to step down early, and considers the central bank's independence over monetary policy to be a matter of law. A Supreme Court order recently suggested that Fed officials cannot be taken out of their jobs over policy disagreements, meaning they have to be removed 'for cause,' which could be interpreted to mean wrongdoing. The US leader has repeatedly lashed out at Powell for not lowering interest rates more quickly, calling the central banker a 'numbskull' and 'moron' recently. Late Tuesday, Trump suggested that a $2.5 billion renovation plan at the Fed could be sufficient cause to force Powell out. Asked by a reporter if the spending was a fireable offense, Trump said: 'I think it sort of is.' The US leader on Wednesday floated the possibility of 'fraud' involved with the renovation, but provided no details substantiating the allegation. The president has received political backing from his party for firing the Fed chair, US media reported Wednesday, noting that he told a room of Republican lawmakers that he would do so. A White House official told CNBC: 'They expressed approval for firing him. The president indicated he likely will soon.' The New York Times reported that Trump showed off a draft letter to oust Powell at his meeting with about a dozen House Republicans late Tuesday, although the president said Wednesday that he only 'talked about the concept' of removing Powell instead. Trump added Wednesday that many people want the top job at the Fed, saying: 'I think it's one of the easiest jobs in government, you show up once a month and you make a statement about where the economy is going, and we're going to raise or lower interest rates.' US House Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday said he believes it would be beneficial to have new leadership at the US Federal Reserve, although he's not sure the president has the authority to fire Chair Jerome Powell, according to media reports. 'I do I believe new leadership would be helpful at the Fed,' a Wall Street Journal reporter on X quoted Johnson as saying. Punchbowl News, in a separate X post, reported Johnson said he's 'really not sure' if the president can fire Powell. Financial markets took a hit after reports about Trump's plans, although they recouped some losses after his later remarks. The dollar initially fell by one percent against the euro before regaining ground, while safe haven asset gold logged gains. Wall Street's main indexes stumbled, while the yield on the 30-year US bond surged on market worries. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat while the broad-based S&P 500 Index and tech-focused Nasdaq both lost 0.1 per cent. Meanwhile, gold prices jumped on Wednesday following news reports that US President Donald Trump planned to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, but trimmed gains after Trump denied the claim. Trump said he was not planning to fire Powell, but declined to rule anything out, citing an investigation into cost overruns on a $2.5-billion Fed renovation project. Spot gold rose 0.9% to $3,352.49 per ounce, as of 1233 pm after rising as much as 1.5% earlier. US gold futures were up 0.7% at $3,360.80. 'Headlines suggesting Trump was considering firing Powell drove gold prices higher ... He later clarified it's highly unlikely. Gold markets were whipsawed by the back and forth,' said Daniel Ghali, commodity strategist at TD Securities. Israel launched powerful airstrikes in Damascus, damaging the Defence Ministry and striking near the presidential palace. The attack added to geopolitical worries and supported purchases of safe-haven gold. On the trade front, the European Commission prepared to target $84.1 billion worth of US goods for possible tariffs if trade talks with Washington fail after Trump threatened last week to impose 30% tariffs on imports from the EU. Adding support to gold was data that showed US producer prices were unexpectedly unchanged in June from a 0.3% rise in May. It followed Tuesday's data that showed overall consumer prices rose 0.3% in June, up from 0.1% in May, signalling the Federal Reserve may continue to exercise caution before cutting interest rates. Agencies

The National
6 hours ago
- The National
ICEBlock: app reports immigration agent sightings amid crackdowns by Trump administration
ICEBlock, an app that allows people to report sightings of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, has been downloaded about one million times and has become the bane of US President Donald Trump's administration. While the app continues to gain popularity, Mr Trump has increased funding for ICE, whose mandate includes detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants. Critics say the agents arrest and deport people with little concern for their legal rights, including due process. 'When I saw what was happening in this country I knew I had to do something to fight back,' said ICEBlock app developer Joshua Aaron, who resides in Texas, a state with a large undocumented immigrant population. Mr Aaron, who is Jewish, told The National that he had decided to create the app after meeting Holocaust survivors and learning all about Adolf Hitler's rise to power in Nazi Germany. The app aims to alert users to the presence of ICE officials in an 8km radius. It is powered by crowdsourced data, relying on people to report ICE agents wherever they might be. The app also allows for users to describe the vehicles ICE might be using and their attire. Once a sighting is reported, push notifications are sent to other users nearby. It is ranked in the top 20 for downloads in the social networking section of Apple's App Store. The app is only available for iPhone. According to Mr Aaron, the privacy settings he deems necessary for ICEBlock are not yet possible on Android devices. Mr Aaron acknowledges criticism that the software could be misused, as the Trump administration has claimed violence against ICE agents is on the rise. 'Please note that the use of this app is for information and notification purposes only,' reads a disclaimer appearing throughout ICEBlock, with an added warning that the app should not be used 'for the purposes of inciting violence or interfering with law enforcement'. Despite the disclaimers, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has suggested that those promoting the app should face prosecution. 'We're working with the Department of Justice to see if we can prosecute them because what they're doing is actually encouraging people to avoid law enforcement activity operations,' she recently told a reporter. As for Mr Aaron, US Attorney General Pam Bondi recently told Fox News that the Justice Department was 'looking into him'. 'He is giving a message to criminals where our federal officers are and he cannot do that,' she said, adding that Mr Aaron should 'watch out' and claiming that his app did not fall into the category of protected speech. Various legal precedents, however, have tended to protect those who report the potentially illegal actions of law enforcement. But Timothy Kneeland, a professor of history, politics and law at Nazareth University in upstate New York, said that the Trump White House could pursue several legal avenues that might create problems for the app. 'The government could invoke national security issues because ICE might be trying to apprehend a suspected terrorist,' he told The National, also acknowledging that many legal arguments could be made to defend the app, such as the right against self-incrimination. He also said the government might pursue the angle that ICEBlock enables obstruction of justice, which has led to jail time in the past. The developer, however, disagreed with how some are interpreting his software. 'This app is to inform not obstruct,' said Mr Aaron. 'They can continue to demonise me and the app all they want, but nothing about it is illegal.' He added that if ICE officials are abiding by the US Constitution in how they go about their work, there should be no reason for the White House to fear people knowing their whereabouts. Mr Aaron also accused ICE of having complete disregard for individual circumstances with their arrests, referring to college students being targeted for their decision to protest, mothers being separated from their children, or detainees not being given access to legal representation. 'That is not something I can abide and is the reason ICEBlock was created,' he continued, referring back to the rise of Hitler in Nazi Germany. 'We are literally watching history repeat itself.'