'People are trying to attack me': Barnaby Joyce's mission to blow up net zero
As the former deputy prime minister prepares to table a private member's bill to abolish Australia's net zero by 2050 emissions reduction target, the backbencher says he is squarely focused on advocating for the powerless.
In his regional NSW electorate of New England, Mr Joyce tells this masthead, people are suffering with the soaring cost of living, chiefly high electricity prices.
"We represent the poorest people, power bills they cannot afford," he said.
"Cost of living is beyond them ... Small businesses are saying 'I can no longer afford to run like this, it's just not viable'."
Australia's net zero target was no more than "a virtue signal", he said, arguing it would not make a difference in the global scheme of things.
"I'm not here to say I deny climate change. It's not about that. It's about what you're doing now is not working," he said.
"I want the honest cheapest form of power - and if that's coal, okay, it's coal .. if that is nuclear, it's nuclear," he said, acknowledging a role for renewables, which he calls "intermittent power".
Mr Joyce's lastest move, which included giving a joint interview to The Australian with former Nationals leader Michael McCormack - sparking renewed speculation of a leadership challenge - has created a headache for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley as she seeks to reunite a fractured Coalition.
She told the ABC when asked about the coverage: "Nobody's getting under my skin."
Mr Joyce rejected any suggestion his bill was intended to lay the groundwork for a leadership challenge to Nationals Leader David Littleproud.
"People are trying to attack me on this net zero, so they throw in red herrings," he told this masthead.
"It's about him going for leadership. No, it's not."
Ms Ley on Wednesday declined to recommit to net zero, saying only that the Coalition's review of policies it took to the election was probing the commitment through an energy working group led by opposition spokesman Dan Tehan.
READ MORE: Nationals net-zero pushback intensifies, Littleproud open to dropping policy
"Every single person in our party rooms can feed into that," she told Channel 9's Today.
"Our policy will be underpinned by two goals, playing our part internationally in reducing emissions transparently and producing a reliable stable energy grid, so we've got affordable energy for households and businesses."
Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie, the party's leader in the Senate, told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday it was "important to recognise the difference between recognising climate change is real [and] how we deal with that challenge."
"We have a problem with how the Labor Party is addressing this question," Senator McKenzie said.
"We actually care about the jobs [and] our communities, the businesses and the humans ... impacted by this government's policies."
Nationals senator Matt Canavan said: "We need to tell Australian people that if we want to keep these jobs, we want to keep these industries, we actually have to return to a planet called reality and stop and stop telling ourselves fairy tales that we can keep these jobs while still pursuing these fantastical objectives."
Mr Tehan told Sky on Wednesday: "We can reconcile this, and we can work through it like we always do."
He said Australia needed "energy abundance" and noted state governments were "looking to extend the life of coal-fired power stations."
Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said both parties had gone to the election with a commitment to net zero and that "now the Coalition, held hostage by Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, has walked away from that commitment."
"Even Peter Dutton backed net zero," Mr Bowen said.
Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie described Mr Joyce's push to repeal net zero as " disgraceful, delusional, and totally out of step with the Parliament and the country."
"It's a stunt and it'll be swiftly squashed in Federal Parliament."
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce insists that he's not railing against the science of climate change.
As the former deputy prime minister prepares to table a private member's bill to abolish Australia's net zero by 2050 emissions reduction target, the backbencher says he is squarely focused on advocating for the powerless.
In his regional NSW electorate of New England, Mr Joyce tells this masthead, people are suffering with the soaring cost of living, chiefly high electricity prices.
"We represent the poorest people, power bills they cannot afford," he said.
"Cost of living is beyond them ... Small businesses are saying 'I can no longer afford to run like this, it's just not viable'."
Australia's net zero target was no more than "a virtue signal", he said, arguing it would not make a difference in the global scheme of things.
"I'm not here to say I deny climate change. It's not about that. It's about what you're doing now is not working," he said.
"I want the honest cheapest form of power - and if that's coal, okay, it's coal .. if that is nuclear, it's nuclear," he said, acknowledging a role for renewables, which he calls "intermittent power".
Mr Joyce's lastest move, which included giving a joint interview to The Australian with former Nationals leader Michael McCormack - sparking renewed speculation of a leadership challenge - has created a headache for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley as she seeks to reunite a fractured Coalition.
She told the ABC when asked about the coverage: "Nobody's getting under my skin."
Mr Joyce rejected any suggestion his bill was intended to lay the groundwork for a leadership challenge to Nationals Leader David Littleproud.
"People are trying to attack me on this net zero, so they throw in red herrings," he told this masthead.
"It's about him going for leadership. No, it's not."
Ms Ley on Wednesday declined to recommit to net zero, saying only that the Coalition's review of policies it took to the election was probing the commitment through an energy working group led by opposition spokesman Dan Tehan.
READ MORE: Nationals net-zero pushback intensifies, Littleproud open to dropping policy
"Every single person in our party rooms can feed into that," she told Channel 9's Today.
"Our policy will be underpinned by two goals, playing our part internationally in reducing emissions transparently and producing a reliable stable energy grid, so we've got affordable energy for households and businesses."
Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie, the party's leader in the Senate, told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday it was "important to recognise the difference between recognising climate change is real [and] how we deal with that challenge."
"We have a problem with how the Labor Party is addressing this question," Senator McKenzie said.
"We actually care about the jobs [and] our communities, the businesses and the humans ... impacted by this government's policies."
Nationals senator Matt Canavan said: "We need to tell Australian people that if we want to keep these jobs, we want to keep these industries, we actually have to return to a planet called reality and stop and stop telling ourselves fairy tales that we can keep these jobs while still pursuing these fantastical objectives."
Mr Tehan told Sky on Wednesday: "We can reconcile this, and we can work through it like we always do."
He said Australia needed "energy abundance" and noted state governments were "looking to extend the life of coal-fired power stations."
Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said both parties had gone to the election with a commitment to net zero and that "now the Coalition, held hostage by Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, has walked away from that commitment."
"Even Peter Dutton backed net zero," Mr Bowen said.
Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie described Mr Joyce's push to repeal net zero as " disgraceful, delusional, and totally out of step with the Parliament and the country."
"It's a stunt and it'll be swiftly squashed in Federal Parliament."
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce insists that he's not railing against the science of climate change.
As the former deputy prime minister prepares to table a private member's bill to abolish Australia's net zero by 2050 emissions reduction target, the backbencher says he is squarely focused on advocating for the powerless.
In his regional NSW electorate of New England, Mr Joyce tells this masthead, people are suffering with the soaring cost of living, chiefly high electricity prices.
"We represent the poorest people, power bills they cannot afford," he said.
"Cost of living is beyond them ... Small businesses are saying 'I can no longer afford to run like this, it's just not viable'."
Australia's net zero target was no more than "a virtue signal", he said, arguing it would not make a difference in the global scheme of things.
"I'm not here to say I deny climate change. It's not about that. It's about what you're doing now is not working," he said.
"I want the honest cheapest form of power - and if that's coal, okay, it's coal .. if that is nuclear, it's nuclear," he said, acknowledging a role for renewables, which he calls "intermittent power".
Mr Joyce's lastest move, which included giving a joint interview to The Australian with former Nationals leader Michael McCormack - sparking renewed speculation of a leadership challenge - has created a headache for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley as she seeks to reunite a fractured Coalition.
She told the ABC when asked about the coverage: "Nobody's getting under my skin."
Mr Joyce rejected any suggestion his bill was intended to lay the groundwork for a leadership challenge to Nationals Leader David Littleproud.
"People are trying to attack me on this net zero, so they throw in red herrings," he told this masthead.
"It's about him going for leadership. No, it's not."
Ms Ley on Wednesday declined to recommit to net zero, saying only that the Coalition's review of policies it took to the election was probing the commitment through an energy working group led by opposition spokesman Dan Tehan.
READ MORE: Nationals net-zero pushback intensifies, Littleproud open to dropping policy
"Every single person in our party rooms can feed into that," she told Channel 9's Today.
"Our policy will be underpinned by two goals, playing our part internationally in reducing emissions transparently and producing a reliable stable energy grid, so we've got affordable energy for households and businesses."
Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie, the party's leader in the Senate, told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday it was "important to recognise the difference between recognising climate change is real [and] how we deal with that challenge."
"We have a problem with how the Labor Party is addressing this question," Senator McKenzie said.
"We actually care about the jobs [and] our communities, the businesses and the humans ... impacted by this government's policies."
Nationals senator Matt Canavan said: "We need to tell Australian people that if we want to keep these jobs, we want to keep these industries, we actually have to return to a planet called reality and stop and stop telling ourselves fairy tales that we can keep these jobs while still pursuing these fantastical objectives."
Mr Tehan told Sky on Wednesday: "We can reconcile this, and we can work through it like we always do."
He said Australia needed "energy abundance" and noted state governments were "looking to extend the life of coal-fired power stations."
Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said both parties had gone to the election with a commitment to net zero and that "now the Coalition, held hostage by Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, has walked away from that commitment."
"Even Peter Dutton backed net zero," Mr Bowen said.
Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie described Mr Joyce's push to repeal net zero as " disgraceful, delusional, and totally out of step with the Parliament and the country."
"It's a stunt and it'll be swiftly squashed in Federal Parliament."
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce insists that he's not railing against the science of climate change.
As the former deputy prime minister prepares to table a private member's bill to abolish Australia's net zero by 2050 emissions reduction target, the backbencher says he is squarely focused on advocating for the powerless.
In his regional NSW electorate of New England, Mr Joyce tells this masthead, people are suffering with the soaring cost of living, chiefly high electricity prices.
"We represent the poorest people, power bills they cannot afford," he said.
"Cost of living is beyond them ... Small businesses are saying 'I can no longer afford to run like this, it's just not viable'."
Australia's net zero target was no more than "a virtue signal", he said, arguing it would not make a difference in the global scheme of things.
"I'm not here to say I deny climate change. It's not about that. It's about what you're doing now is not working," he said.
"I want the honest cheapest form of power - and if that's coal, okay, it's coal .. if that is nuclear, it's nuclear," he said, acknowledging a role for renewables, which he calls "intermittent power".
Mr Joyce's lastest move, which included giving a joint interview to The Australian with former Nationals leader Michael McCormack - sparking renewed speculation of a leadership challenge - has created a headache for Opposition Leader Sussan Ley as she seeks to reunite a fractured Coalition.
She told the ABC when asked about the coverage: "Nobody's getting under my skin."
Mr Joyce rejected any suggestion his bill was intended to lay the groundwork for a leadership challenge to Nationals Leader David Littleproud.
"People are trying to attack me on this net zero, so they throw in red herrings," he told this masthead.
"It's about him going for leadership. No, it's not."
Ms Ley on Wednesday declined to recommit to net zero, saying only that the Coalition's review of policies it took to the election was probing the commitment through an energy working group led by opposition spokesman Dan Tehan.
READ MORE: Nationals net-zero pushback intensifies, Littleproud open to dropping policy
"Every single person in our party rooms can feed into that," she told Channel 9's Today.
"Our policy will be underpinned by two goals, playing our part internationally in reducing emissions transparently and producing a reliable stable energy grid, so we've got affordable energy for households and businesses."
Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie, the party's leader in the Senate, told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday it was "important to recognise the difference between recognising climate change is real [and] how we deal with that challenge."
"We have a problem with how the Labor Party is addressing this question," Senator McKenzie said.
"We actually care about the jobs [and] our communities, the businesses and the humans ... impacted by this government's policies."
Nationals senator Matt Canavan said: "We need to tell Australian people that if we want to keep these jobs, we want to keep these industries, we actually have to return to a planet called reality and stop and stop telling ourselves fairy tales that we can keep these jobs while still pursuing these fantastical objectives."
Mr Tehan told Sky on Wednesday: "We can reconcile this, and we can work through it like we always do."
He said Australia needed "energy abundance" and noted state governments were "looking to extend the life of coal-fired power stations."
Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said both parties had gone to the election with a commitment to net zero and that "now the Coalition, held hostage by Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, has walked away from that commitment."
"Even Peter Dutton backed net zero," Mr Bowen said.
Climate Council chief executive Amanda McKenzie described Mr Joyce's push to repeal net zero as " disgraceful, delusional, and totally out of step with the Parliament and the country."
"It's a stunt and it'll be swiftly squashed in Federal Parliament."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
6 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
The Age
6 minutes ago
- The Age
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
Sky News AU
6 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Drew Hutton ousting: Expulsion of Greens co-founder shows party is unashamedly at odds with men who raise concerns about biological realities and the trans agenda
The expulsion of co-founder Drew Hutton from the Greens is more than a warning shot to anyone in the party who thinks they can question gender ideology without consequence. It is bigger than trashing the legacy of a thoughtful 78-year-old who has dedicated his life to environmental causes. It is, I would argue, about every rational and reasonable man watching this circus and realising he could be next. Young decent Australian men, in particular, have been crucified over the past decade for the crime of being male, forced to routinely defend themselves from the toxic masculinity label. Now the Greens have declared war on men and they are not even hiding it. Men like Mr Hutton who built movements and stood for free speech are now rebranded as bigots and silenced as liabilities. And the male 'crime' is daring to raise concerns about biological reality and more broadly issues like parents' consent for puberty blockers and fairness in women's sport when females are being injured. Mr Hutton lost his life membership of the very party he helped build because he wouldn't toe the line on censoring alleged transphobic remarks made by other people on his Facebook page post from 2022. Exiled not for what he wrote but for 'failing' to censor what others wrote. This is not about discriminating against trans people either. In fact in those posts he said, amongst other things, that he of course supported their full human rights. But now in modern Australia, defending biological sex is seen as an act of hate. The new Greens believe you are what you say you are and if a man, especially an older one, dares to question that, he is dangerous. Yes, the irony here is suffocating. Mr Hutton said the party stymied open discussion about its transgender policy which declares that individuals have 'the right to their self-identified gender'. He called their beliefs 'a closed language, which they understand but nobody else does'. In an interview with ABC's 7.30 after his expulsion, Mr Hutton said: 'The main things they think are important are we get rid of the notion of biological sex and replace it with gender identity… 'What I disagree with vehemently is the way that anybody who actually voices any dissent with that policy and does so from a credible position, that there is such a thing as biological sex and there are two sexes, is forced out of the party.' That is correct. In this ideological revolution, men do not get a say. They effectively get told to shut up and go away. He also told Sky News host Chris Kenny that a 'transgender and queer cult' were at the wheel and driving the Greens off a cliff, effectively taking any environment-focussed party faithful with them. 'Their vision is one where particular identities prevail and the rights of those particular identities are far more important than any other issue that the party addresses,' Mr Hutton said. What was also very telling in this mess was the reluctance of Larissa Waters, the woman who replaced Adam Bandt as leader, to defend Mr Hutton. Ms Waters washed her hands of the whole episode except to say the result showed 'good governance' and claimed she had not read the documents that engineered her former party colleague's exile because she was busy preparing for Parliament with a focus on climate and tax. She added that any future decision about Mr Hutton's potential return to the party was 'not up to me'. In other words, defending him would mean challenging the mob. The Greens' purge of Mr Hutton sets a dangerously low bar of how Australian men are treated and ultimately silenced. The message to men is that your history, contributions and your view are null and void if you dare to question, even factually and politely, the new order. And that is not progress. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work.
