logo
Planned Parenthood turns to states for a lifeline

Planned Parenthood turns to states for a lifeline

Politico3 days ago

Planned Parenthood is pushing governors and legislators in California, New York and other blue states to cobble together emergency funding that will allow them to keep the lights on should the spigot of federal money run dry.
The Republican budget proposal moving through Congress would in one fell swoop prohibit most abortion providers from getting any federal funding, including Medicaid dollars.
The push to defund Planned Parenthood in this way is only the latest existential threat to the organization that has been in Republican cross hairs for decades.
Although not mentioned by name in the mega-spending bill being pushed by Congressional Republicans, Planned Parenthood, the country's largest abortion provider, see it as a clear, intentional target. The proposed law would prohibit federal Medicaid funding from going to 'prohibited entities,' a category that includes tax-exempt organizations that primarily provide family planning but also abortions and receive over $800,000 per year from the government.
'All they needed to add was 'if your organization rhymes with wood,'' said Fabiola De Liban, the director of sexual and reproductive health at the National Health Law Program.
The stakes are particularly high for Planned Parenthood in California, where its leaders have conveyed to Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers that they'll need more than $25 million each month in stopgap funds if the federal cuts are enacted. Planned Parenthood chapters in other states where abortion is legal would be left reeling as well: In Massachusetts, the group's clinics stand to lose $14 million, roughly half of their operating budget. In Oregon, they receive between $15 million and $18 million each year in Medicaid payments.
Federal law already prohibits states from using Medicaid dollars to pay for abortions. California, like other states, uses its own funds to cover the procedures. Now, by trying to block all Medicaid funds to abortion providers, Congressional Republicans are pursuing what critics say amounts to a 'backdoor abortion ban' in states where it remains legal.
'I don't think we need to be funding abortions, anything to do with it,' Rep. Tim Burchett (R- Tenn.) " I'd like to see us eliminate any funding for it. Let's roll. We need to do it.'
Planned Parenthood has said about a third of its 600 clinics would be at risk of closing if it could no longer bill Medicaid, most of which are in states where abortion is legal.
As they've fanned out in state capitols to hit up elected officials for help, Planned Parenthood leaders and other advocates for abortion access are running into mismatched deadlines and state budgets already stretched thin.
In California and Massachusetts, there are still a few weeks left to possibly shoehorn in some contingency funds before their budgets are finalized at the end of this month. But in New York and other states that have already passed budgets for the coming fiscal year, the groups have been left hoping state officials will step up with additional funding outside of the regular budget process.
Complicating matters for advocates in California is another budget battle they've fought over the state's $12 billion budget deficit that Newsom proposed closing in part by diverting over $500 million that was supposed to be reserved for Planned Parenthood. The group successfully lobbied the Legislature to restore the money in its budget plan and voiced optimism that the final budget hammered out between the governor and lawmakers won't include the funds shuffle.
'In a normal year that would be great, we'd consider all of that a win,' said Jodi Hicks, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California. 'Unfortunately, we are having to plan at the same time for being defunded at the federal level.'
Hicks said she'd need about $27 million a month from state coffers to keep the group's 115 clinics open. She said she's talking to Newsom's office and the Legislature on plans for a short-term infusion that would give clinics a few weeks or months reprieve while Hicks and her team figure out a longer term solution that would also require at least some state funding. Newsom's office declined to comment.
Planned Parenthood clinics in New York asked for a similar emergency fund, but Gov. Kathy Hochul and legislative leaders rejected the idea, saying they would respond to the federal cuts if they are passed. New York stands to lose a total of more than $13 billion in Medicaid funding from cuts currently called for in Congress' bill, a number Hochul says the state would be unable to backfill.
Robin Chapelle Golston, president of Planned Parenthood Empire State Acts, said her advocacy group is working with the Hochul administration to determine what type of support the state could provide for reproductive health services if the federal cuts come down.
'If they kick us out of the Medicaid program, we are going to have to work closely with the state,' Golston said to POLITICO. 'We're already starting to push to have conversations with the [Department of Health] and Department of Budget, to really kind of discuss next steps…they know that we serve in a lot of healthcare deserts that will really devastate access to sexual reproductive healthcare across the state.'
The New York state budget included a $25 million grant to bolster access to medication abortion and an additional $4 million to support training clinics' staff. Dominique Lee, CEO of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said she is discussing the potential for a similar fund in the state.
Lee, Hicks, Golston and Planned Parenthood leaders in other states where abortion is legal have attended regular conference calls to discuss strategies for convincing state officials to come to their aid. While reproductive health systems in each state are different, Lee said there is a lot they have to learn from one another.
'My colleagues bring a great sense of community when we need it most, it's talking about practices, learning about public health policies,' Lee said. 'I think the biggest thing is just how we make sure that our doors stay open, we certainly don't want to abandon our patients, so we're like, 'How do we activate other funding sources?' '
The likelihood of Planned Parenthood being cut from federal funding remains uncertain. Congress is attempting to defund the group through budget reconciliation, a legislative process that can expedite budget decisions, but comes with restrictions on how it can be used. When Republicans attempted a similar move against Planned Parenthood in 2017, it was found to be outside the bounds of reconciliation. Rep. Eric Burlinson (R-Mo.) told POLITICO the decision was 'not just a policy.'
'It's an important part of the bill has a serious financial impact,' Burlison said.
Arizona's Rep. Andy Biggs agreed, saying the defund was necessary to pay for other programs.
'I think certainly you have to have it in, because it's a pay for, right?' Biggs said. 'There's a whole lot of spending going on, so there needs to be a whole lot of payfors going on.'
The threat to defund Planned Parenthood is part of a broader effort to restrict abortion access through the spending bill. Elsewhere in it are provisions to boot out private insurers that include abortion in their coverage plans from insurance marketplaces.
It's a little more complicated than just asking for money. Clinics will have to figure out how to provide care without billing one of their main payers, but will also have to untangle a host of other federal funding streams like grants and proceeds from provider taxes currently being used to fund family planning services.
In Oregon, Planned Parenthood is the main provider of all reproductive health care, and around 70 percent of its patients are on Medicaid. Already, state reimbursement rates only pay for about 45 percent of the cost of care, said Sara Kennedy, the CEO of Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette in Oregon. She's spent the legislative session, which ends in June, trying to advocate for increased rates.
'I can understand why people are reluctant to have really detailed conversations or make any promises or pledges until we know for sure what's happening,' Kennedy said.
For now she's bracing for a period of uncertainty if the bill passes, when there are likely to be legal challenges and her clinics will continue to see patients while not being paid. Long term, she's hoping state agencies can pull together a funding program outside of Medicaid to cover low-income Oregonians.
In the long run, if clinics can't bill Medicaid, De Liban said there's no way states would be able to make up for all the lost money, especially not on an ongoing basis.
'The answer is very easy and it's also very complicated,' De Liban said. 'It's easy in the sense that they just need more money, and it's very complicated in that I don't know where the money's going to be coming from.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

Chicago Tribune

time32 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

WASHINGTON — The Senate launched a rare weekend session Saturday as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators are expected to grind through the days ahead with procedural vote Saturday to begin considering the legislation, but the timing was uncertain. There would still be a long path ahead, with hours of potentially all-night debate and eventually voting on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, opened the day's session with an impassioned defense of the package that he said has been misrepresented by its critics. 'Here's what American workers get out of 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Moreno said as he began outlining the provisions. 'Read it for yourself.' The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he remains concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, had said that would be insufficient. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans dropped the bill 'in the dead of night' and are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, had said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.

Pat Williams, Last Montana Democrat to Serve in the House, Dies at 87
Pat Williams, Last Montana Democrat to Serve in the House, Dies at 87

New York Times

time39 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Pat Williams, Last Montana Democrat to Serve in the House, Dies at 87

Pat Williams, a retired Montana congressman whose left-leaning politics were forged in the hard-rock mining town of Butte, and who, to date, was the last Democrat to serve in the House of Representatives from Montana, died on Wednesday in Missoula, Mont. He was 87. His death, in a hospital, was announced by his family. Mr. Williams championed wilderness protection, federal arts funding and family-friendly social policies. He retired from the House in 1997 after 18 years, the longest consecutive tenure by a Montana congressman. His most notable election came in 1992, when Montana had been chiseled down to a single congressional seat, from two, after the 1990 census. Mr. Williams, who represented the state's more liberal forested western half, faced Representative Ron Marlenee, a Republican who served the conservative ranchland of eastern Montana. The left-versus-right showdown was fought over the use of the state's vast natural resources and whether the New Deal-era safety net for the vulnerable still mattered. Mr. Williams won narrowly, with 51 percent of the vote. In Washington, he was a co-sponsor of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which gave workers 12 weeks of unpaid time off to care for a newborn or a sick family member. Multiple attempts to enact the law under the Republican presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush had failed. Mr. Williams called those administrations 'frozen in the ice of their own indifference' to working people. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Texas politicians lead effort to study a psychedelic drug. What is ibogaine?
Texas politicians lead effort to study a psychedelic drug. What is ibogaine?

USA Today

time39 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Texas politicians lead effort to study a psychedelic drug. What is ibogaine?

Ibogaine is illegal in the U.S., but growing evidence shows its promise treating the effects of traumatic brain injury and substance use disorder. A once obscure traditional psychedelic plant from Africa has made headlines recently as Texas pushes for more research and a prominent Republican wrote a vigorous endorsement of its possible use for the treatment of addiction and for veterans experiencing mental health issues. Ibogaine is illegal for use in the United States, but a growing body of evidence has shown its promise treating the effects of traumatic brain injury and substance use disorder. Earlier in June, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed legislation to allocate $50 million for clinical trials approved by the Food and Drug Administration to study ibogaine. Texas is set to lead research into the drug's benefits treating mental health issues and addiction as a potential medication. Former Energy Secretary Rick Perry, also a former Texas governor, wrote a June 27 Washington Post op-ed supporting ibogaine research and criticizing the legacy of the war on drugs, started by President Richard Nixon and touted by President Ronald Reagan. Perry said he has 'come to realize just how wrong that narrative was.' 'That fear-based messaging kept us from exploring treatments that could have saved countless lives,' Perry wrote. Perry and a growing number of conservatives have argued ibogaine could be one of those treatments. Here's what to know about the drug. What is ibogaine? Ibogaine derives from the root of the iboga plant native to western-central Africa. It's been used in ceremonial rituals for centuries. It has hallucinogenic properties. The United States outlawed ibogaine in 1967 along with other psychotropic drugs. The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 placed it as a schedule I hallucinogenic drug, along with marijuana. Ibogaine's classification prevented researchers from studying its effects. But unlike other schedule 1 drugs such as heroin, ibogaine has anti-addictive properties. There are risks since ibogaine can delay the body's normal electrical signals that control heart rhythm, which could lead to death. Other countries, such as Mexico, have allowed its use. American veterans and others have traveled to smaller, clandestine clinics for treatment to deal with depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and addiction. Many clinics are along the border and around cities such as Tijuana. Why is it in the news? At the state and federal level, there is growing interest in studying psychedelic drugs to treat veterans and others. Texas passed legislation earlier in June to study the drug with a public university alongside a company and hospital, Abbott's office said. Dr. Marty Makary, the FDA commissioner, has said expanding research on psychedelic drugs is a top priority for the Trump administration. In his op-ed, Perry cited the experiences of Morgan and Marcus Luttrell, twin combat veterans, who used ibogaine for recovery. Morgan Luttrell is now a Republican congressman from Texas who has advocated for ibogaine and other psychedelic drugs as treatment options. In January 2025, Perry and W. Bryan Hubbard, an advocate for ibogaine treatment, appeared on Joe Rogan's podcast to discuss ibogaine's benefits as a plant-based medicine. Hubbard led a Kentucky task force that sought to use opioid settlement funds to research ibogaine's effects to treat addiction, but the initiative failed to gain support in the state. Hubbard and Perry eventually launched the Texas Ibogaine Initiative, which helped spur the state funding. What has research shown? Research, such as a Stanford University study of 30 male combat veterans, has shown ibogaine's promise. Coupled with magnesium sulfate to address heart effects, ibogaine appeared to reduce symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and depression, and improve cognitive function from traumatic brain injury, according to the study, published in 2024 in the eminent journal Nature Medicine. Other studies have shown benefits treating addiction and depression. What do critics say? One issue with ibogaine is the ability to produce it, because it is derived from a rare plant and has mostly been used for ceremonial purposes. There is research to help innovate its safe production, but it could be difficult for the drug to be more widely available, as researchers at the University of California, Davis, Institute for Psychedelics and Neurotherapeutics have said. And while it's shown benefits with combat veterans, questions remain on its efficacy among randomized participants. With Texas' research, ibogaine could get closer to FDA approval for its use as a medication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store