Heritage pushback for Old Goa police station project
Panaji:
Activists have flagged govt's plan to reconstruct Old Goa's police station as a ground-plus-two structure in the buffer zone of the world heritage site. They have stated that construction of the project will impact the sanctity and ambience of the historic place.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
A site with a small area cannot accommodate a police station to cater to two constituencies, they've said while suggesting that govt consider an alternative place for the police station in order to safeguard the Unesco designated site.
'Renovation of the police station is okay, but construction as planned will add to traffic congestion at the spot,' Jacquelin Fernandes of the Save Old Goa Action Committee told reporters.
The committee has petitioned the chief minister to reconsider the plan in the buffer zone, stating that they have, in the past, submitted memoranda opposing projects detrimental to the world heritage site. One of them was a petition signed by more than 34,000 persons that pressed for proper planning at Old Goa.
Another local activist, Glean Cabral has stated that the construction would fall within 300m of the regulated zone of the Bom Jesus basilica.
The monument is governed under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, as amended in 2010. Pursuing the project would be in breach of the Act and rules. Under Section 20D(2) of the Act, 'heritage bylaws' must regulate all construction. But to date, no bylaws have been finalised for any monument in Old Goa, despite the Act and rules coming into force from 2010 and 2011 respectively.
Further, the basilica has been facing several problems due to dampness caused by waterlogging.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The project, with its plans for excavation, may irreversibly impact the local drainage flow, the activist said in his plea to govt.
He further cautioned about the height of the proposed structure in this area, stating that approval to such a tall building would have an abrupt impact on the area's architectural character, and would also set a dangerous precedent in the heritage zone, opening the doors for other similar scale private projects in future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Major protest marks fee exploitation by private schools
Gadwal: In a show of resistance, student organisations came together on Saturday to protest the alleged fee exploitation and irregularities being carried out by private schools in Aiza Mandal of the Alampur constituency, Jogulamba Gadwal district. The protest rally, which began at Telangana Chowrasta and concluded at the New Bus Stand, saw students raising slogans and holding placards condemning what they described as 'commercialization of education.' Following the rally, a delegation of student leaders submitted a memorandum to the Mandal Revenue Officer (MRO), urging immediate intervention and strict action against erring schools, particularly the Sri Krishnaveni Private School, which was singled out for multiple alleged violations. Student leaders alleged that private schools in the region were collecting exorbitant and unregulated fees, in clear violation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act and existing fee regulation laws. They claimed that the Sri Krishnaveni School was forcing parents to purchase uniforms, textbooks, and notebooks at inflated prices from a shop operated illegally beside the school. The school's management had set up a fake certificate-backed book centre and was openly selling books on the roadside, yet no action was taken by education officials despite earlier complaints to the District Collector. The Mandal Education Officer (MEO) allegedly ignored direct instructions from the District Education Officer (DEO) to seize the illegal book stock, and even remarked that he would only take action 'if provided protection.' Furthermore, the students claimed that Bonafide and Transfer Certificates (TCs) were being issued only after collecting up to Rs 2,000 from Class 10 students. The school fee for Class 10 was increased from Rs 28,000 in the academic year 2024–25 to Rs 34,000 for 2025–26 without any justification. School staff, including drivers and teachers, were reportedly forced by the management to protest in front of the MEO office, allegedly with the support of the MEO himself. The situation escalated when student union leaders visited another school, Sri Chaitanya, after receiving reports about similar irregularities. They were allegedly assaulted by men linked to Krishnaveni School owner Madhusudan Reddy, who reportedly sent his drivers to threaten and attack the students. Demanding justice, the protestors urged the authorities to suspend the MEO for negligence and bias; cancel the recognition of Sri Krishnaveni School for repeated violations; file criminal charges against the school owner Madhusudan Reddy and the individuals involved in the assault; and enforce the RTE Act to ensure that 25% of seatsare reserved for underprivileged students.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Burnt cash case: Why SC panel recommended Justice Varma's impeachment
When Parliament convenes for its monsoon session on July 21, one issue on which there ought to be wide consensus is the impeachment of former Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma. Sacks of partially burnt Rs500 currency notes found in the storeroom of his official residence, 30, Tughlaq Crescent, New Delhi during an accidental fire -- captured on camera on the intervening night of March 14-15 -- threw up questions of judicial integrity. One of the videos has an audio referring to the burning currency as 'Mahatma Gandhi me aag lag rahi hai.' That the storeroom was cleaned up and the notes went missing the next morning, but some burnt fragments of the bank notes were later found on the Tughlaq Crescent lane by lay people added to the mystery. Justice Varma, his family and personal staff flatly denied there was any currency note in the room. But by then the photos and videos had reached the then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna. The CJI took the extraordinary decision of putting the visuals and Justice Varma's denial in public domain. However, when an in-house probe panel's report indicted the judge, he recommended his impeachment but refrained from placing the report in public domain. The media got hold of the 64-page report which possibly built a watertight case against Justice Varma. Curiously, no first information report (FIR) has been filed against the crime yet. Also, no committee has been constituted to investigate the allegations against Justice Varma under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, which is mandatory. At a recent meeting of a parliamentary committee on law and justice, several MPs asked why no FIR has been lodged over the matter. While the government is trying to build parliamentary consensus for impeachment, the Opposition is yet to take a final call. There are divergent views on whether another probe panel under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 needs to be constituted. While one section considers the in-house panel's report as just a fact-finding exercise, others see it differently. The bigger question is the source of the ill-gotten wealth, which the panel did not answer. The matter will not get quietus unless the source of the funds is outed.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' clears first Senate hurdle: Republican race for votes, criticism, proposals
The Republican majority-held United States Senate voted on and pushed through US President Donald Trump's much touted tax-cuts and spending proposal, dubbed as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act today (late Saturday local time), according to reports. The US Senate voted 51-49 to pass the first Senate hurdle, and Donald Trump took to social media to celebrate, calling it a 'great victory' and crediting Republican lawmakers Rick Scott, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, and Cynthia Lummis for 'fantastic work'. In his 'victory' post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said he will work on growing the US economy, 'reduce wasteful spending, secure our border, fight for our military and veterans, ensure that our medicaid system helps those who truly need it, protect our second amendment, and more…' The 'rare' weekend session began with a debate on the 940-page sweeping bill, with opposition from Democrats and two Republicans. The legislation seeks to fund Donald Trump's campaign promises on border control, military spending, immigration, and tax-cuts. After hours of delay US Vice President JD Vance worked to pursuade Republican lawmakers on the fence and delivered the 'tie-breaking vote', according to reports by Reuters and AP, respectively. Democrats have demanded that the Bill be read out in Chamber, and will be followed by 20 hours of debate, followed by amendment sessions before the bill is complete. The full process is expected to end by June 30. A senior White House official told Reuters that Donald Trump was monitoring the vote from the Oval Office late into the night. According to an analysis by the nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee, the Senate version of the bill's tax provisions would reduce government revenue by $4.5 trillion over the next decade, increasing the $36.2-trillion US government debt. The White House said this month the legislation would reduce the annual deficit by $1.4 trillion. As per the AP report, an estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office showed that the House-passed version of Trump's tax bill would cost around 10.9 million more people their healthcare, and at least 3 million food aid. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. Meanwhile, Elon Musk has renewed his criticism of Donald Trump's tax plan in a scathing post on social media platform X. He called the bill 'utterly insane and destructive.' He wrote: 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. (With inputs from AP and Reuters)
