Australia's Anthony Albanese in China to boost trade despite regional angst
Relations between Beijing and Canberra have charted a bumpy course over the past decade, a period marked by repeated disagreements over national security and competing interests across the vast Pacific region.
Affairs improved in December, when China called off a ban on imported Australian rock lobster, removing the final obstacle in a damaging trade war waged between the countries after ties plummeted in 2017.
'Trade is now flowing freely, to the benefit of both countries and to people and businesses on both sides,' Albanese said ahead of the trip.
The Labor Party leader hailed a 'very warm welcome' in brief comments to reporters shortly after touching down in the eastern metropolis of Shanghai.
But Albanese's trip — scheduled to last through Friday — comes as China's sweeping territorial claims ruffle feathers in the region, particularly pertaining to the South China Sea.
The Australian leader said upon arrival that 'the full range of issues' would be on the table during discussions with Chinese leaders including President Xi Jinping, making the visit a tricky balancing act as economic and security priorities compete.
'We cooperate where we can, we disagree where we must, and we're able to have those honest conversations about some of the disagreements that are there,' Albanese told reporters ahead of the trip.
The two countries 'have different political systems' and 'different values', he said, adding: 'But we've got to be able to have that engagement directly.'
Beijing's foreign ministry said earlier this week that ties between the countries 'have continued to improve and grow'.
'China hopes that through this visit, the two sides will strengthen communication, enhance mutual trust (and) expand practical cooperation,' ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said.
'No walk in the park'
Albanese's visit to Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu comes at a fraught moment.
US President Donald Trump's global tariff blitz has left Australia and other traditional allies of Washington puzzled about their relationship with the world's top economy, spurring calls to diversify trade ties.
'The visit will not be a walk in the park, especially since Australia also needs to carefully manage its alliance with Trump's America and emerging disagreements about trade,' said Huong Le Thu, Asia deputy director at the International Crisis Group.
His trip will be aimed at 'striking a balance', she said.
'Ultimately, Albanese and Xi will need to address the security elephant in the room.'
Mutual suspicions have been difficult to shake despite the countries' recent rapprochement on trade, with Canberra wary of potential national security risks posed by the presence of Chinese technology in the country.
In February, Australia announced a ban on Chinese artificial intelligence-powered chatbot DeepSeek from all government devices, citing privacy and malware risks.
Beijing criticised the move as 'politicisation of economic, trade and technological issues'.
Cautious dealings
Regional anxieties have also remained high since the end of the countries' trade war last year, with a tense encounter between military planes in February sparking sharp rebukes from both sides.
Another key point of contention is the fate of Darwin Port, whose Chinese-owned controller could be forced to sell it to a local buyer by Albanese's government.
'Overall, China wants to present the optic that Australia-China has returned to normal, if not friendly,' Jingdong Yuan, an expert on China at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, told AFP.
'Beijing probably wants the Darwin issue to go away,' said Yuan.
'China would like to use Trump's rather abrasive ways in treating friends and foes… to prod Australia to keep some distance from the United States,' he added.
Despite the tensions, China is one of Australia's most important economic partners, accounting for nearly one third of its total trade.
The prime minister is accompanied on his visit by a delegation of key business leaders who will attend a CEO roundtable in Beijing.
Albanese will also address tourism and sport during visits to economic hub Shanghai and cultural hotspot Chengdu in the southwest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
5 hours ago
- HKFP
China hails ‘strategically valuable' Russia ties in Lavrov visit
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi hailed Beijing's 'strategically valuable' relations with Moscow as he met his Russian counterpart against the backdrop of the war in Ukraine and turbulent ties with the United States. Russia's top diplomat Sergei Lavrov was visiting Beijing after a trip to North Korea, where he received assurances of support for Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. Wang told Lavrov on Sunday that 'China-Russia are the most stable, most mature and most strategically valuable relationship between major powers in the world today', according to a Chinese foreign ministry readout of their meeting. 'The current focus is to… deepen comprehensive strategic cooperation, promote each side's development and revitalisation, and jointly respond to the challenges brought by a turbulent and changing world,' Wang said. The two ministers 'exchanged views on the Korean peninsula, the Ukraine crisis, the Iranian nuclear issue and other matters', the Chinese statement said. It did not mention ties with Washington, which Moscow said was also on the agenda. The Russian foreign ministry said Lavrov and Wang also discussed other 'burning issues', including the war in Gaza. China, a diplomatic and economic ally of Moscow, claims to be neutral in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. However, it has never denounced Russia's 2022 invasion nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies believe that China has provided support for Russia. Beijing regularly calls for an end to the fighting, while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.
South China Morning Post
10 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China and Serbia gear up for first joint military training exercise
China will hold its first joint military training exercise with the Serbian military this month as defence ties deepen between Beijing and the Balkan country. Chinese defence ministry spokesman Jiang Bin said on Monday that army special forces from China and Serbia would hold the joint training exercise Peace Defenders-2025 in Hebei in late July. 'This will be the first joint training between the Chinese and Serbian militaries. It will help strengthen the combat skills of participating troops and deepen cooperation between the two militaries,' Jiang said. Similar joint exercises are usually hosted on a rotating basis, but neither side has said whether Serbia will host such a drill in the future. This will also be the first time for China to conduct exercises with European forces since it held joint counterterrorism training with Belarus near the border with Poland and Ukraine last July. Serbia is considered one of China's closest partners in Europe, particularly since Nato's 1999 bombing of the former Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part. It is one of six Western Balkan countries waiting to join the European Union, but it has no plans to join Nato.
AllAfrica
12 hours ago
- AllAfrica
America asks its allies the tough questions
The United States wants to know what Japan and Australia would do in the event of a conflict over Taiwan. Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby is under fire, as he sometimes is these days. But the US has asked a reasonable question since the Americans are expected to do the heavy-lifting over Taiwan, and they need help. The United States is also treaty-obligated to defend both Japan and Australia in event of a fight unrelated to Taiwan. The question appears to have been asked behind closed doors – which is good – but also appears to have been leaked. Which is not good – no matter who leaked it. Even friends don't like being ordered around. And another reason to keep it out of public eye? If Japan and Australia equivocate on support for Taiwan, which they undoubtedly will, that's surely a signal to Beijing to press ahead. Washington absolutely needs those commitments – but privately. Ironically, even the US isn't entirely clear on Taiwan – although it's reasonably expected to fight since it does more than everyone else put together to bolster Taiwan's defense.. And if Washington is going to war, it's helpful to know who else is coming – and with what. As for Japanese, they understand that a PRC-controlled Taiwan is an existential risk. There's no sense of urgency, however. War planning and preparations are lagging – beyond plans to evacuate Japan's southern islands and building bomb shelters. Tokyo has almost no security relationship with Taiwan. On the plus side, Japan's considerable support to the Philippines – radars, patrol boats, six retired destroyers and dual use infrastructure – is done with an eye toward a Taiwan fight. And one Japanese official explained that the long-range missiles (current and more advanced versions) that Japan has based on its southernmost island can reach quite a ways towards Taiwan and potentially beyond. But it still appears Japan expects the US to handle things if Taiwan goes 'hot' while Japan does what it feels like. Washington is wise to get this ironed out beforehand. Australia? Will Australia play a role, let alone fight, if there is a conflict over Taiwan? Don't be so sure. The Australian military is game, but undersized and lacking capabilities and direction. And a powerful constituency in Australia is both anti-military and anti-American. Prime Minister Albanese is in Beijing this week and is cozying up to China more than ever. The PRC banned exports of Australian lobster and wine a few years ago, and the possibility Beijing will do it again appears to have rattled Canberra. The Australian Broadcast Corporation (ABC) said: 'It's entirely appropriate that Anthony Albanese is meeting Xi again before he meets Trump for the first time. Xi is more important than Trump now.' Washington may be overestimating Australian support. Today's Australia seems different from the one that stopped the Imperial Japanese Army in New Guinea in 1942. Best to clear it up sooner than later. More money The Americans – as they've done for years – are also asking Japan and Australia to spend more on defense. But even upping the budget doesn't mean more capability and a willingness to use it – which is what the Pentagon is really asking for. US requests need to include some well-thought-out advice on what to spend money on so as to be a more useful partner. Otherwise it's just nagging. As an exasperated Japanese Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka relayed to the Americans over 50 years ago: 'Tell us what you need … and don't back down.' Getting heard These hard questions are asked at the defense secretary / minister level. But that's not where they are decided. Washington would do well to quietly summon the Japanese and Australian ambassadors, one at a time, to the White House and explain things with President Trump in the room. Maybe even slide a 'non-paper' across the table. That's the diplomatic equivalent of telling someone what you want, but without formally telling them what you want. And don't publicize it, if you can help it. Just make it clear you're serious. There is of course the added challenge of America's partners thinking they can wait out the Trump administration. Such is life.. These questions should have been asked and answers received from America's allies a decade ago. To its credit, the Trump administration is at least asking. And it's a fair question to ask when Americans are expected to do most of the dying in a fight over Taiwan – which is just as important to Japan and Australia as to the United States. America needs help, and it needs to know where its friends stand long before the shooting starts. 'Winging it' means losing. Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He was the first Marine liaison officer to the Japan Self-Defense Force, and is a fellow at the Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute. He is the author of the book When China Attacks: A Warning to America.
