Bridget Phillipson: I want more young people to have children
Labour has said it wants more young people to have children, warning that Britain's 'plummeting birth rate' is a danger to society.
Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has raised the alarm about a younger generation who are 'thinking twice about starting a family' because of the rising cost of housing and childcare.
She promised more help for young parents to make it easier for couples to have children, saying that 'families are the bedrock of our society and we need them to succeed'.
Her comments signal growing political alarm about the UK's falling birth rate, which is down to 1.44 children per woman and in 2023 saw the fewest babies born for almost half a century.
Phillipson raised the alarm over the trend, which means a future of fewer workers supporting a rising number of older people.
• Britain needs babies but it will take some pushing
Politicians have traditionally been wary of encouraging people to have more children, despite evidence that many couples have fewer babies than they would like. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, thrust the issue into the mainstream last month when he promised tax breaks and welfare changes to 'help young, working British people who are not on particularly big incomes to have more children'.
Phillipson rejected his focus on marriage, saying 'no opposition party has the answers to our plummeting birth rate — a trend which has worrying repercussions for society but tells a story about the dashed dreams of many families'.
Saying she wanted to give people the 'freedom to choose', Phillipson wrote in the Daily Telegraph: 'It's why I want more young people to have children, if they choose; to realise the ordinary aspiration so many share, to create the moments and memories that make our lives fulfilling: having children, seeing them take their first steps, dropping them off on their first day at school, guiding them on their journey into the world of work or taking them to university for the first time.'
• Falling birthrate to leave UK reliant on immigration until 2100
Support for young children was 'my number one priority', Phillipson said, promising help with issues such as breastfeeding and reading, as well as an expansion of child care.
Experts have pointed to evidence that making it easier or cheaper to have another child can be effective. Under the previous Labour government, Gordon Brown's working families tax credit, which gave extra cash to low-income families, is estimated to have led to an extra 45,000 babies being born.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
MPs to vote on welfare bill as unrest rumbles on
MPs will vote on the government's planned reforms to welfare later - with dozens of Labour MPs still planning to vote against them, despite concessions from ministers. The Conservatives have said they will oppose the plans as they are not "serious reforms".The rebellion's scale has ebbed and flowed. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have killed the proposals outright, an extraordinary threat of defeat for a government with a landslide majority. Now a replacement amendment, supported by disability charities, has attracted around 35 Labour MPs. It suggests that last-minute concessions may have reduced the potential for a government loss - but not comfortably. A number of MPs have expressed concerns about a promised review of personal independence payment (Pip) assessments, after Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced on Monday that it would only report back around the same time that the proposed changes were introduced. Labour Chief Whip Sir Alan Campbell reportedly told a regular meeting of the parliamentary party last night that they should "act as a team" and government efforts at persuasion are expected to continue up until the vote itself, which is due this the current government concessions people who currently receive Pip or the health element of universal credit will continue to do so. But future claimants will still be affected by the reforms. Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job aheadWelfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?'Disability welfare reforms could leave us worse off' The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, told the BBC her party would vote against the measures"The benefits bill is too high," she said."It was 40bn just before Covid. It is now projected to be a 100bn by 2030. And what Labour is doing is not making any savings at all. It's just reducing the rate of increase. That's why we are not supporting it."Other criticism of the government proposals has been diverse, with some saying the reforms will not be as effective as the government hopes. "I strongly believe that these kind of punitive measures of cutting welfare are not going to have the outcomes that we've been told they will," said Olivia Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam, who is disabled and opposes the reforms."I think it will just be about saving money but will actually move spending into areas such as housing services, the NHS and social care," she told BBC added that some MPs were still considering their vote, saying the rebellion would be "more significant than maybe people realise".Kendall defended the bill in the House of Commons on Monday, saying it aligned with MPs' shared values around providing support to those that could work while protecting those that published by Department for Work and Pensions suggested around 150,000 people might be pushed into poverty by 2030 because of the welfare cuts - lower than the original 250,000 figure estimated before the government made the Stephen Timms is slated to conduct the report that was among the concessions. He told BBC Newsnight that the net effect of the government's policies would reduce poverty - including the measures to help people into work. He also stressed the need to make Pip sustainable in the Conservatives have criticised the cost of the bill while the Liberal Democrats have called for proposals to be suspended so they can be further looked government had hoped to save £5bn a year by 2030 before the concessions. These are now likely to cost around £3bn, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank.
Sky News
44 minutes ago
- Sky News
What's in Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 Martha Kelner and Mark Stone break down what's in Donald Trump's huge tax and spending bill. He's trying to sign it into law by the end of the week. They also discuss the State Department's decision to revoke US visas for British band Bob Vylan after their Glastonbury performance. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Defence spending increase will benefit arms dealers but not security
Writing in The Sunday Times over the weekend, Ian Blackford, the former SNP Westminster leader, said 'difficult choices' would need to be made to meet the cost, and that to avoid austerity, the Scottish Government should look to back the sector. 'Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth," he wrote. Ian Blackford said the rise in defence spending could kickstart Scotland's economy (Image: PA) Read more: The SNP has long opposed public money being spent on munitions. The Scottish National Investment Bank's ethical investment policy currently bars organisations 'primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons' from receiving support. Recently, a new welding centre—backed by Rolls-Royce and intended to support Royal Navy submarine construction—was denied funding by Scottish Enterprise. The UK Government has since stepped in to fund the initiative. The SNP has faced accusations of hypocrisy, as the Scottish Government funds Ferguson Marine, which is subcontracted by BAE to work on Royal Navy frigates. Last week, First Minister John Swinney suggested the policy could be 'reconsidered' given the growing threat from Russia. Speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast, he said: 'I'm conscious we are living in a very different context today. I do think the Russian threat is very real. We have to consider these questions.' He added he had no objections if a company wished to set up a munitions factory in Scotland. The First Minister said: 'We do not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions but will support skills and defence companies.' Read more: There is an alternative to massive defence spending: it means a new kind of security Veteran broadcaster Sandy Gall dies aged 97 Roads remain closed due to wildfires in the Highlands Mr Greer disagreed. He told The Herald: 'The only people who would benefit from splurging hundreds of billions of pounds on 'defence' are the arms dealers who have already made obscene profits from the killing of innocent people from Palestine to Yemen to Afghanistan. 'Britain's defence budget is massive as it stands. Spending more money on weapons to please Donald Trump will not decrease international tension or the likelihood of war. We would do far more for our own safety if we increased investment in energy and food security, protection against cyberattacks and countering misinformation.' He continued: 'The dirty secret at the heart of Westminster, which a former senior MP like Ian Blackford is well aware of, is that we could do far more to counter hostile states like Russia and China through targeted economic and political sanctions. 'Of course, arms dealers and their lobbyists would not make any money from actions like shutting down the UK-based companies still supporting Russian gas exports. If there is no profit to be made, the elites dictating UK foreign policy are not interested.' He added: 'The most impactful steps Westminster could take for world peace right now would be to stop arming Israel's genocide in Gaza, send home or arrest the Israeli soldiers currently being trained by the British military, and recognise the state of Palestine. "There will be no peace as long as Labour continues to play an active role in Israel's war crimes.'
