Jacinta Allan rubbishes claims Queensland GST revenue is keeping Victoria's ‘hospital lights on'
A war of words has broken out between two state governments over GST revenue, after Queensland's treasurer claimed his state was keeping Victoria's 'hospital lights on'.
The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, hit back with blunt language on Monday morning, rubbishing the claims as 'just bullshit'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
In a speech in Brisbane on Monday the Queensland treasurer, David Janetzki, declared the sunshine state was 'stripped of $800m to reimburse New South Wales and Victoria for Covid-19 policy failures, five years after the fact'.
Changes to the allocation of tax revenues had left Queensland $5.3bn worse off over three years, he said, the 'largest redistribution' in the 25-year history of the GST.
'Queensland, with its own newly re-established Productivity Commission, is doing the heavy lifting on productivity; our gas is solving the southern states' energy crisis; and our GST revenue is going to Victoria to keep their hospital lights on,' he said.
Victorian premier Jacinta Allan said the complaints were 'nonsense'.
'Well, perhaps let me put it in language and in a way that the Queensland treasurer can understand – it's just bullshit, right?' she said, arguing that Victoria had historically been a net contributor.
'The Queensland budget's black hole – their $8bn-plus black hole – has got nothing to do with the circumstances here in Victoria. Now look, I don't want to quibble with another state. I don't want to quibble with the Queensland treasurer.'
Janetzki handed down his first budget last week. It forecast the state's total debt to top $200bn for the first time, partly due to a reduction in the state's GST allocation and declining coal revenue.
The Queensland treasurer said GST was being increasingly misallocated away from Queensland, partly due to a judgement that southern states had 'no or limited ability' to levy revenues from the gas industry.
'Every other state and territory gets a bigger share,' he said.
'Queensland's GST revenue in 2025–26 is only 28% higher than it was in 2015–16.
'In comparison, New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia are up 58%, 118% and 317%.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Due to its lower population density, Brisbane is assessed as needing 'only a small fraction of the public transport infrastructure of Sydney and Melbourne', but the higher cost of delivering services in a more decentralised state is not taken into account, he said.
'They effectively assume the cost of serving a resident in Ballarat, 113km from Melbourne, is the same as the cost of serving a resident in Mackay, 968km from Brisbane,' Janetzki said.
Allan said it was wrong to compare Victoria and Queensland's public transport networks.
'If you want to compare public transport services, our world-class public transport service here in Melbourne, our huge network of buses, trains and trams is nothing compared to the public transport services you'll find in Brisbane,' she said.
'So I think this just shows what nonsense that claim is and we shouldn't be distracted by this nonsense. I'm not distracted by this nonsense that's coming from the Queensland treasurer, because I'm focused on making the investments in the infrastructure that matter'.
Janetzki made the speech at a Committee for Economic Development of Australia lunch in Brisbane, in South Bank. He has been treasurer of Queensland since the Liberal National party won government at last October's election.
He also argued that Victoria's premier should be replaced by either him or Queensland premier David Crisafulli as the representative of states at a productivity roundtable in August called by the federal treasurer, Jim Chalmers.
'I'm putting forward the case that it should be me or our premier which is at the table,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
3 hours ago
- Time Out
Here's how the U.S. ranked in work-life balance—and we're honestly not surprised
In 2025, work-life balance isn't just a buzzword, it's a lifeline. With tech burnout, economic pressure and blurred lines between work and home, the question isn't if we need balance—it's where we can actually get it. Remote's Global Life-Work Balance Index, launched in 2023 and updated annually, ranks countries based on how well they support both personal well-being and professional fulfillment. The 2025 edition highlights the growing global divide in how nations treat their workers, and the U.S. isn't looking great. New Zealand tops the list this year, scoring big on paid time off, public happiness, personal safety and a near-top-tier minimum wage. Most of the top ten is dominated by European nations that clearly value downtime as much as uptime. Canada stands alone as the only country in the Americas to rank in the top ten. So how did the U.S. fare? Unfortunately, it ranked second to last at number 59 out of 60 countries. Only Nigeria scored lower. America's overall score is a dismal 31.17. While it gets some credit on the happiness index (probably thanks to its cultural resilience and strong community networks), that's where the good news ends. The U.S. scored painfully low on key factors like minimum wage, sick leave, paid maternity leave and healthcare access—all essential ingredients for a healthy work-life balance. The message is loud and clear: long hours, limited support and high stress aren't signs of a thriving workforce. They're signs of burnout. Whether you love the hustle or live for your weekends, balance isn't optional—it's necessary. If the U.S. wants to climb the ranks, it'll need more than just good vibes. It'll need structural change. Ten best countries for work-life balance New Zealand Ireland Belgium Germany Norway Denmark Canada Australia Spain Finland
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Catastrophic failures led to the 'generational slaughter' of the elderly and vulnerable as Covid 'spread like wildfire' through care homes, inquiry hears
COVID-19 infiltrated care homes and 'spread like wildfire', as government failures led to a 'generational slaughter' of the elderly and vulnerable, an inquiry heard. Care home workers described having to carry out heartbreaking final 'visits' with residents and their loved ones over Zoom due to restrictions, while family members wept as they recalled their ordeals at not being able to say goodbye properly. Frontline workers lamented shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE), hospital patients being discharged to them in the middle of the night, and residents feeling frightened and abandoned as the sixth module of the Covid-19 Inquiry opened today looking at challenges faced by the sector. And Alasdair Donaldson, a policy advisor at the British Council who was seconded into Matt Hancock 's Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) at the start of the pandemic, described 'complete chaos' on his arrival in the department in April 2020. In a statement referenced in the inquiry, Mr Donaldson described what went wrong as 'perhaps the greatest Government policy failure of modern times'. He said: 'The civil service I am proud to be part of catastrophically let down the people it was supposed to serve. 'This failure resulted in the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands of British citizens, including a generational slaughter within care homes, many of those victims dying horrible deaths, often without the solace of their loved ones.' Lady Heather Hallett, who is chairing the years-long probe, admitted the module was likely to be upsetting for many. A 20-minute impact film featuring people involved in adult social care explored how money was 'squandered on equipment and processes that failed', while residents were denied spending their final moments with loved ones due to lockdown rules. One woman, referred to only as Ann from north Wales, was in tears as she recalled what happened to her father, who had dementia. She said: 'We had a few window visits but didn't have the understanding of why we were outside the window. 'He couldn't hear us, he would break his heart. 'He would just cry and cry.' Jacqueline Carey KC, counsel to the inquiry, said there was great concern over the decision to discharge hospital patients to care settings without first testing them for Covid. It came after the Telegraph reported that the office of Professor Sir Chris Whitty, England's chief medical officer, signed off guidance for care homes in England, advising them that they could take patients from hospital who had not even been tested. Ms Carey said: 'It's obvious that there were no easy decisions here, but if you cannot test everyone at the outset, and you don't know for certain yet how the virus transmits … but you know that residents in care homes are much more likely to die if infected, then the importance of good infection control measures becomes all the more crucial.' And she referred to the evidence of an unnamed worker at a care home in Durham, who added: 'Once Covid 19 was in our care home, it spread like wildfire and we could not do anything about it.' Dr Jane Townson, chief executive of the Homecare Association which represents domiciliary providers, said 'before, during and after the pandemic, home-based care was often invisible in policy and debate'. She said guidance for home carers was 'chaotic' and 'changed frequently', and said thousands of people 'became isolated with deteriorating health and no access to essential care'. More than 43,000 people died with Covid in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022. The inquiry has previously focused on topics including Government decision-making, vaccines and procurement since evidential hearings began in 2023. There are at least four further modules to come before the inquiry makes its final conclusions in 2027, at an estimated cost of more than £220 million to the taxpayer. This would make it the most expensive inquiry in British history. Mr Hancock is due to give evidence on Wednesday.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Shock to creative ecology': NSW regional art galleries face funding crisis after state pulls financial support
Three out of four regional public art galleries in New South Wales are facing a funding crisis after the state government pulled its financial support as a result of a massive restructure of its cultural funding arm, Create NSW. Wagga Wagga, Orange, Armidale, Broken Hill and Tamworth are among 18 regional centres in NSW with major public art galleries that will no longer receive four-year funding from the state government, worth between about $70,000 and $200,000 a year. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning The decision has prompted two of the state's peak arts bodies to call on the government to conduct an urgent review, warning in a letter to NSW arts minister John Graham in June that the defunding would 'devastate our region's creative life' and significantly weaken cultural tourism, which sees about 3.5 million people visiting regional galleries and museums each year. 'Put simply, it is a shock to the creative ecology that we have worked so hard to establish together,' the letter said. Co-signee of the letter, Regional Arts NSW chief executive Dr Tracy Callinan, told Guardian Australia there was a real risk some galleries could close their doors if local councils are unable to pick up the funding shortfalls. 'I've already been on the phone this morning with at least one, and possibly another, that if they're not … funded, they may have to fold,' she said. 'It seems this minister is very busy looking after the 24-hour economy ... there's $100m in this budget just trying to find a venue for a new film studio, but in the process, he has abandoned the small and medium arts sector. 'I suppose there's not that many votes in the regions for Labor.' Co-signee Brett Adlington, chief executive of Museums & Galleries of NSW, said the success rate for regionally based public galleries applying for recurrent funding had now sunk below 18%, well below the overall success rate of 52%. Only three public galleries in regional NSW were successful in the latest funding round. He said many in the arts sector saw the decision as a way of shifting costs on to local government. Many of the 18 galleries affected by the cuts rely on local councils to fund infrastructure and core staffing costs. However, the galleries rely on state government funding to deliver what Adlington described as the 'lifeblood' of regional cultural life, delivering programs to audiences, and providing employment and commissions to artists and arts workers that are locally relevant, including myriad Indigenous cultural projects. Adlington said regional gallery directors had been advised to lodge fresh applications for two-year funding, scheduled for determination in September. 'But what we're hearing is that's probably going to be just as tight, if not tighter, than the last round,' he said. Guardian Australia has sought a response from the minister and Create NSW. The director of the Maitland Regional Art Gallery, Gerry Bobsien, said the state government's rejection of its application for $110k a year for the next four years had been 'devastating'. 'It's something that I can't keep going back to council for,' she said. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion 'Funding for these cultural programs, particularly in regional areas, is so critical, and the defunding of it appears to be very widespread, spread throughout regional NSW.' Bobsien has already lodged a last-ditch application for two-year funding. '[We] are sweating on this outcome due in September,' she said. 'This process to turn around and re-apply for two-year funding was very difficult as the feedback we received on our multi-year application [has] made it difficult to try and address any shortcomings – we were informed our application was strong, with no suggestions for improvement.' Dr Lee-Anne Hall, director of the Wagga Wagga Art Gallery and the National Art Glass Gallery, said her institutions were now facing a shortfall of about $95,000 per annum, after being informed in June of their unsuccessful grant applications. 'We will not be closing our doors, we are here in the service of the public,' she said. 'However, here in the Riverina, there will be impacts across the board in terms of equity and access for artists, students and community.' Art galleries in urban centres have also been affected by funding cuts. Mosman Art Gallery and Penrith Regional Gallery are among those rejected for four-year funding, and the future of Darlinghurst's Australian Design Centre, which had been reliant on $200,000 in recurrent state government funding, is now uncertain. In January, it also lost $300,000 in federal government funding. 'If we're not funded, NSW will have the distinction of being the only state in Australia without a craft and design organisation,' the centre's director, Lisa Cahill said, referring to Craft Victoria, South Australia's Jam Factory, Craft + Design Canberra, Brisbane's Artisan, and Design Tasmania. The centre has now issued a public appeal to keep its doors open. The board would make a decision on its future towards the end of the year, Cahill said.
