Uber makes major change to how customers pay for rides in UK first
Now though, a major part of this process is going analog, as the ride-sharing firm has announced it's accepting cash for the first time ever.
Following trials in Birmingham, Stoke, Nottingham and Leicester, cash payments have been extended to all UK cities except London, where the move is being reviewed by authorities.
Customers can select cash as their payment option on the app, requesting rides as normal but handing over physical money at the end of the journey instead of the usual automatic card transaction.
However, drivers can choose to opt out of this payment method altogether – for example, if they're worried about the safety of carrying notes and coins or the potential for passengers to attempt to evade fares by running away (known as 'bilking').
For those that do take cash, they'll log and rate the trip on the app as usual – and if they don't have enough change, it will be credited to the customer through their Uber account.
It comes after a report from the Treasury Committee suggested vulnerable people are at risk of social exclusion as the country transitions further towards a cashless economy. More Trending
While it stopped short of recommending a change in the law, it said 'there may come a time in the future' where cash acceptance is mandated, 'if appropriate safeguards have not been implemented' for those who cannot pay by card.
Committee chair, Dame Meg Hillier, commented: 'The Government is in the dark on how widely cash is being accepted and that is completely unsustainable… this needs to be a wake-up call.'
Ron Delnevo from the Payment Choice Alliance claimed Uber's latest move 'demonstrates that they now believe in the future of cash in the UK', bringing its operations into line with other countries where it allows cash payments.
View More »
A spokesperson for the company echoed this in a statement, saying: 'We believe that movement should be accessible to everyone, so following successful pilots in some UK cities over the last 18 months, we have decided to give passengers outside of London the option to pay for trips with cash.'
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
28 minutes ago
- Metro
UK's sewage-clogged water sector set for total overhaul after landmark report
A major report is expected to call for dramatic reform of the beleagured water sector in England and Wales when it is published later this morning. The Independent Water Commission, pulled together by ex-banker Sir Jon Cunliffe, will set out recommendations to get the industry back on its feet after years of controversy over bills and sewage. But campaigners including one-time Undertones frontman Feargal Sharkey have said they are sceptical of whether the report can make a difference. Environment Secretary Steve Reed promised yesterday to halve the sewage pollution in British rivers, lakes and seas by the end of this decade, and make them the cleanest since records began. In an appearance on Laura Kuenssberg's BBC show, he said he would step down from his role if he failed to achieve this target. Reed said: 'Politicians come and say we're going to do things. Of course our job should be on the line if we don't.' He is set to describe the water industry as 'broken' and welcome the recommendations of the report when they drop later today. It is expected that the abolition of floundering regulator Ofwat will be among those recommendations. The body has failed to stop record amounts of sewage being pumped into English and Welsh waterways, as executives' pay and dividends soar at the private water companies. On Sunday, Reed said Ofwat was 'clearly failing' though he would not confirm it was destined for the scrap heap. Scotland and Northern Ireland both have nationalised water systems. Sir Jon said: 'In this report, I have considered what is best for the long-term future of water. More Trending 'This is a complex sector with a highly integrated system, responsible for the second-largest infrastructure programme in the UK.' However, water campaigner Feargal Sharkey has voiced doubt over whether the Commission will change the dire situation, saying he fears it will prove to be a 'flat pancake'. He argued: 'Sir Jon's job is to make the current system better, but so many things have not been considered in his review, such as the ownership of the water companies. 'I also don't think you can talk about abolishing Ofwat without considering the future of the Environment Agency – and taking a long, hard look at the Environment Department (Defra), as well as the lack of action from government ministers for many years. They are just as culpable.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Afghan veteran warns data breach poses shadow threat 'for years to come' MORE: Plane crashes at Olympic National Park killing one and injuring two MORE: One leaked government email could put my family in grave danger
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Britain faces a revolutionary moment. Labour must respond
LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 8: New UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre front) stands with Labour Party MPs, including some who won seats in the recent general election, at Church House in Westminster on July 8, 2024 in London, England. Labour won 411 seats in last week's general election, giving them a majority of 172. (Photo by) In the summer of 1942, at the height of the Second World War, in a country reeling from the trauma of Dunkirk and battered by the Blitz, noted economist William Beveridge put the finishing touches to his now-famous report. In its pages he set out a blueprint for a radical overhaul of the British state, one that would offer every citizen protection from the devastating social ills that gripped the society of his time. He wrote 'a revolutionary moment in the world's history is a time for revolutions, not for patching.' The Moment We are In Britain now faces another revolutionary moment but of a very different character. Beveridge's work imagined the architecture of the welfare state. Today's momentous task is that of fixing our economic fundamentals so that his creation might survive to the next generation. Under the last government our political and economic institutions became systemically incapable of meeting the basic demands of the British people; higher wages, bills that don't spiral out of control, thriving & cohesive communities and public services which function when they need them. Since 2008 the real wages of a typical full-time worker have been flat and they have no more spending power than they would have had 16 years ago. Unaltered this path leads only to collapse. Public consent for the contract which underpins our democratic system is stretched to breaking point. That contract is simple but profound. The people entrust their representatives with power so long as that power serves their interests and addresses their concerns. Yet, over many years, the political class ignored this pact. They placed party loyalty, special interests, or personal gain above those who put them in office. They ignored difficult realities while lending their ears only to the loudest, most organised voices in local or factional politics. They placed a higher premium on getting a headline in a newspaper than the exercise of power in service of the electorate. The majority were left silent until that silence became a roar of indignation. One year ago, diagnosing this profound dysfunction, a group of Labour MPs came together with a shared recognition: that national renewal would demand disruption, honesty about the difficult trade-offs ahead and the courage to face them. In the last week of July 2024, we penned a letter to the Prime Minister committing to these values, to stand behind him and the Chancellor in pursuing them and restoring trust in government to look after British families' finances. We announced that we had formed the Labour Growth Group. The Roots of the Crisis When Labour swept to power in July 2024, commentators excitably compared the result to the triumph of 1997. In truth, beyond the size of the majority, the two moments couldn't have been more different. In 1997 Britain had a public-sector debt-to-GDP ratio of around 35%, when this Government took office, it was nearing 100 per cent. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Many in politics and the media had spent years pining for a return to the halcyon 'normality' of this era but it is precisely there that the seeds of the current crisis can be found. The fall of the Soviet Union pre-empted a period of elite overconfidence in globalisation, liberal capitalism and the primacy of technocratic consensus. New Labour's 'Third Way' was highly effective in taking advantage of the proceeds of this period to deliver hugely important progressive reforms like a national minimum wage. But underlying structural weaknesses in the economy simmered even as a booming City of London kept tax receipts high. The tectonic plates of political and economic dysfunction had begun, slowly but surely to drift toward one another. The rupture occurred in 2008; the global financial crisis shook national economies to their core. Over-indexed on financial services and incredibly economically imbalanced. Britain was particularly exposed. The Cameron government responded with austerity; an economic choice as foolish as it was cruel. Slashing an already faltering public sector when investment was desperately needed and credit was cheap. Gutting everything from towns across Britain but baseline services. A decade of drift followed in which successive Tory governments doubled down on every external constraint to the economy imaginable. Quangos boomed as ministers merrily handed over democratic accountability for political decisions. MPs bemoaned levels of regulation and the size of the welfare bill while allowing both to balloon to record levels. Rock bottom wages were offered for essential work as the economy became utterly reliant on unsustainable levels of low-skilled migration. This failure of politics deepened social fractures. The Brexit vote in 2016 was a warning from voters to political elites seemingly unable or unwilling to respond to the public's pain. The immense economic cost of leaving didn't however result in the British people 'taking back control' but rather to power transferring from an unaccountable bureaucracy in Brussels to an equally dysfunctional one in Whitehall. The Conservative Party presided over this disgraceful period of British history and has rightfully been relegated to a position of political irrelevance as a result. But we must be clear that the same fate will await the Labour Party if we do not create a radical break from their legacy of failure. The hangover of the wilderness years leaves us too ready to be defined by opposition: anti-cruelty, anti-chaos, anti-Tory. This is fighting the last war; we must pursue a politics shaped by addressing what matters here and now. Our Vision: Strategic Disruption The dysfunction gripping Britain is not an unavoidable tragedy. It stems from a clear political failure and a catastrophic absence of moral courage. Our founding principle is that decline is neither inevitable nor acceptable; Britain's best days are ahead, but only if we choose purpose over complacency and disruption over caution. For too long politicians were content to accept the things they could not change, we instead set out to change those things which we cannot accept. We must smash the status quo. We reject the exhausted politics of technocratic incrementalism and trickle-down 'meritocracy' that favours those privileged enough to start the game of life three-nil up. The belief that 'grown-up' management will be enough to right the ship of Britain's institutions has not so much collided with reality as been obliterated by it. At the same time, we are in open conflict with populist nihilism, which diagnoses the failure of the current system but offers only embittered rage and dangerous fantasy in response. This is exemplified by the opportunism of Nigel Farage's promise of up to £80 billion of unfunded tax cuts to disproportionately benefit the country's highest earners. We stake claim to the politics of strategic disruption, reforming ruthlessly yet with recognition of fiscal reality, and absolute clarity about the trade-offs involved. All measured by a single standard: does this serve to make the working people of Britain better off? We put a strong economy at heart of our politics because it is a necessary condition to fund public services, reduce inequality and make all our constituents better off. Aneurin Bevan captured this truth: 'Freedom is the by-product of economic surplus'. If the centre-left fails to deliver abundance, then it will fall to the radical right on the barren grounds of scarcity. We stand proudly in a Labour tradition of radicalism that runs through Attlee's creation of the welfare state, Crosland's radical reshaping of left economics, and Bevan's fearless assault on entrenched interests to establish the NHS. Labour Growth Group is not just another faction, it is a political and moral project to rebuild Britain's broken systems in service of the many. Tony Blair once described New Labour as the 'political wing of the British people'. We take up that standard, not as insiders but insurgents relentlessly dedicated to placing the British people's needs above politics as usual. The National Renewal Compact: A Modern Beveridge Model to Rebuild Britain Britain urgently requires a framework for national economic renewal as bold and transformative as Beveridge's original vision was for welfare. Over the next year the Labour Growth Group will deliver our own comprehensive blueprint in the form of the National Renewal Compact, a set of accords underpinned by practical, costed plans to slay each of the giants holding Britain back. Just as Beveridge confronted the ills of his era, we currently identify five modern giants strangling Britain's economy and society: ● A Paralysed State: A machinery of government so risk‑averse and inward‑looking that it cannot confront hard choices or deliver lasting reform. ● A Nation Divided: A deeply imbalanced economy that concentrates wealth and opportunity in a few postcodes while vast regions are left behind. ● Building Banned: A planning and delivery system so clogged that Britain cannot build the homes, transport links, and infrastructure a modern economy demands. ● Enterprise Smothered: A regime of regulation and culture of hesitation that saps investment, dulls innovation, and turns ambition into retreat. ● Energy Constrained: A failure to secure abundant, affordable power—leaving households exposed, industry uncompetitive, and our future unprepared. This will not be a dry review or an endless discussion exercise. It is a deliberate and provocative act in developing political economy involving leading policy organisations – the Centre for British Progress, Britain Remade and Labour Together among others – as well as thinkers from across the political spectrum. Our own members will bring to bear their expertise from business, energy, law, engineering, trade unionism, technology, economics and more. With their collective energy and experience we will refine our analysis. We are clear that this government has made great strides to confront many of these problems, from the most radical reforms to the planning system in a generation to raising public investment to the highest level for over a decade, to removing barriers to building new nuclear reactors, to rolling back the dominance of quangos. But the gravity of this moment demands an extra injection of radicalism. Each of these giants requires difficult, courageous trade-offs. Fixing our planning system, for example, means confronting entrenched interests resistant to housebuilding and infrastructure expansion. Addressing regional division requires tough choices on fiscal redistribution and decentralisation of power. We are clear-eyed that disruption is uncomfortable, but necessary. Britain has run out of easy options and an increasingly unstable world makes the future hard to plan for. That is why, in the words of the American technologist Alan Kay, we hold simply that 'the best way to predict the future is to invent it'. Our aim is practical, radical, and achievable proposals, not a wish list but a blueprint designed explicitly for implementation. This will not be another policy pamphlet shuffled around desks in Westminster, but instead a rallying point for all those who recognise the urgency of national renewal. It will serve not just as a call to action but as a binding compact, ensuring we do everything we can to see this Government deliver on its promise of transformation. The Cost of Failure Our fight is inherently political rather than technocratic. Regional rebalancing, for instance, is not simply about efficiency or even fairness. It is a democratic necessity. A country divided against itself, in which one region thrives while the potential of others is squandered, is a country that will fracture. The people have been patient, but their latitude has been tested to the limit and will not hold much longer. If we as a party and as a government fail to come together now and reckon with this, then Nigel Farage as Prime Minister is what awaits. The Office for Budget Responsibility has recently warned that the country is effectively sitting atop a fiscal timebomb. Debt climbing constantly until it breaks 270 % of GDP by the 2070s while a collapse in long‑gilt demand could add £20 billion a year to interest bills and an ageing population doubles health spending from its current rate. A man peddling unfunded £80 billion tax giveaways in this environment is playing with matches in a tinder‑dry forest. A chaotic Reform administration could well set it ablaze in short order, driving a severe fiscal crisis in the form of a debt interest spiral. The ramifications for the very fabric of British society of that final act of political betrayal should make blood run cold right across our movement. The Call One year ago, we committed to a simple but revolutionary conviction: Britain cannot afford another generation of timid politics and managed decline. In just twelve months, the Labour Growth Group has evolved from a name on a letter into a determined force of reformers in Parliament, united by the urgency of the moment and a clarity about the hard choices required. Today, as we embark on the next phase of this project, in the form of the National Renewal Compact, we invite all who share our commitment to join us, from business leaders, civic organisations, unions, thinkers, and doers. We will work together to refine our analysis and reveal the answers the country needs. This effort goes beyond party politics; it is about rebuilding Britain's economy and salvaging her democracy. The hour is late, and there is no point in denying the scale of the challenge, but this country which we love has beaten greater odds before. The British people sense another revolutionary moment at hand. Together, let us honour that, and forge a future worthy of them. Chris Curtis MP: Co-Chair, Labour Growth Group Lola McEvoy MP: Co-Chair, Labour Growth Group Mark McVitie: Director, Labour Growth Group Related
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool transfer news: Hugo Ekitike next steps as Arne Slot already plotting 2026 move
Liverpool will take their summer expenditure close to the £300million mark once they complete the signing of Hugo Ekitike but the Premier League champions are already focussing on next year's business Liverpool are about to make another huge splash in the transfer market by signing Hugo Ekitike - and their chequebook will be open again next summer. The Reds have been boasting their new-found status as Premier League champions to help bolster Arne Slot's squad. June saw the lucrative arrivals of Jeremie Frimpong, Milos Kerkez and Florian Wirtz, the latter of whom broke the British transfer record. The trio cost the Reds a combined £186million and add to that Giorgi Mamardashvili, Armin Pecsi and Freddie Woodman, they've spent more than £210m so far this summer. Liverpool are planning offset their outlay by selling a number of players, potentially Darwin Nunez and Luis Diaz, whose futures were more uncertain until their pursuit of Ekitike. Jarell Quansah joined Bayer Leverkusen for £35m at the start of the month while the sales of Trent Alexander-Arnold, Caoimhin Kelleher and Nat Phillips accumulated another £31m. Ekitike's arrival on Merseyside is understood to be imminent after Liverpool made progress over the weekend and it's also emerged that they've identified a target for 2026 who'd cost them a similarly large sum. Plus, there's been movement on Diaz. Here's a round-up of the latest transfer news from Anfield. Ekitike deal imminent Liverpool are on the verge of reaching a full agreement with Eintracht Frankfurt to sign Hugo Ekitike. The Reds have already agreed personal terms with the striker, whose contract will run until 2031. According to the Athletic, Liverpool and Frankfurt have agreed the outline of a deal and are now working on the final details before Ekitike, 23, is given permission to have a medical and join up with Arne Slot's squad. The sum could exceed the German club's record sale of £82.3m - when Randal Kolo Muani joined Paris Saint-Germain in 2023 - if all add-ons are met. Wharton makes decision Liverpool are working on a deal to sign Adam Wharton next summer after the midfielder decided to stay at Crystal Palace for another season. Wharton, 21, has been touted for a big-money move throughout his stellar 18-month spell with the Eagles. But the Sun report that he'll shun interest and remain with Palace for the 2025-26 campaign. It's added that Liverpool have been working on a deal for 'some time' but they've prioritised other areas this year. Bayern focussing on Diaz Bayern Munich have paused negotiations with Stuttgart over striker Nick Woltemade in order to focus on signing Luis Diaz. Earlier this week, Liverpool rejected £58.5million bid from Bayern, who - according to Bild - remain optimistic that they can strike a deal for the winger. The Bundesliga champions have been given a free run at Diaz, 28, after Barcelona shifted their attention to Manchester United wantaway Marcus Rashford. The Colombian has already informed Liverpool that he wants to leave. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
