She flew hazardous fighter planes for Britain during WW2. She just turned 106
Nancy Miller Stratford sat alone behind the controls of a Spitfire fighter plane, charting an uncertain course through an impenetrable clot of dark clouds.
On the horizon, the young pilot could see a promising patch of daylight, 'like the devil waving his hand to come on through'. But just as suddenly as the sky opened up, the clouds closed in again.
Her visibility plummeted to zero. She had no idea which way was up and which was down. Far beneath her lay the moody Scottish coastline, where an unplanned landing would be next to impossible.
Fortunately, it was life-or-death scenarios like these when Stratford was the sharpest. In that moment, she felt no fear – this was simply a problem that needed to be solved. Despite having no formal instrument training, she relied solely on the control panel in the cockpit, rather than the view outside her window, to muscle the plane through the wall of clouds and land safely at the nearest airport.
The year was 1944. Stratford was 25 years old.
Last week, Stratford celebrated her 106th birthday at home in California. After eight decades, she and a small group of other female pilots are finally earning more widespread recognition for the critical – and dangerous – roles they played in the second world war. A new book called Spitfires, written by the journalist and author Becky Aikman, chronicles the pilots' vivid wartime stories as the first American women to fly military aircraft.
At the time, women like Stratford were banned from serving in combat roles for the US. So they joined the Air Transport Auxiliary instead: a British civilian group that ferried barely tested bombers and fighter planes to airbases, and then returned damaged wrecks for repair. Because the women often had to contend with shoddy equipment and bad weather, the job was hazardous and unpredictable; one in seven transport pilots died in crashes over the course of the war.
But the role also came with an unprecedented sense of freedom and global importance for female pilots; Stratford once even delivered a Spitfire to a Polish squadron only a few days before they fought in D-Day.
Today, Stratford is the last surviving pilot of the heroic transport group.
Her condo in a picturesque retirement community in Carlsbad, a city on the Pacific coast near San Diego, is filled with mementoes from the war and her long flying career: miniature model airplanes (she has flown 103 different types of aircraft), black-and-photo photos of her in uniform, and even a prized leather flying helmet (used as protection against the elements and deafening engine noise in the early days of aviation).
And last Thursday, that small condo was packed with dozens of other retirees and staff who had come to wish her happy birthday.
At 106, and with such a formidable background, Stratford has become a quasi-celebrity within the retirement community. Friends and family brought her cupcakes and champagne, and a local pet therapy group ushered in a parade of dogs for Stratford to pet. Though she lost her hearing many decades ago from the constant roar of plane engines, visitors wrote down their birthday messages to her on a whiteboard. To mark the occasion, Stratford wore her best pair of dog-themed pyjamas.
The fact that the former pilot has lived longer than most people she knew in her early life is something of a mystery, even to her.
'I'm kind of surprised,' she said, before adding: 'But then I am old.'
For Stratford, the secret to longevity depends on the day. Sometimes, her answer to that question is 'not drinking too much'.
But in a cheekier moment, she told a friend recently: the real key is 'chocolate and vodka tonics'.
Stratford and the other female aviators she flew with during the war – a diverse group nicknamed the 'Attagirls' – now have a defined place in history books. But in the 1940s, Stratford wasn't thinking about any broader, lofty ideals about the advancement of women in aviation.
'I just wanted to fly,' she said frankly, reminiscing one sunny afternoon before her birthday. From a comfortable chair in the living room, she had the best view of her model airplanes that sat atop the TV like a crown.
'In other words,' she said, 'it wasn't exactly the thing to do then, so therefore you have to be pretty positive about what you wanted to do.'
Stratford was born in Los Angeles in 1919, just after the end of the first world war. At 16 years old, she rode in a plane for the first time as a birthday present. That first flight, she wrote in a self-published memoir in 2010, was fairly boring – until the pilot struggled with the landing. Feeling the plane's sudden steep descent, Stratford let out 'a whoop of joy', while her brother froze in terror next to her.
Stratford later chased that feeling as a member of the Air Transport Auxiliary. A few years after her first plane ride, she happened to read about civilian pilot training while she was in college. Her father wasn't happy about it, but he signed a release form for her to take lessons. Later, when Stratford was ready to join the transport unit, her then-fiance forbade her from going. She ended the relationship and went anyway.
Though Stratford had a bit more freedom to fly in the UK, female pilots back in the US dealt not only with discrimination, but intentional sabotage that resulted in death. Male pilots would sometimes stuff rags or sugar in the gas tank of a woman's plane to make them crash, or even slash their tires, as Aikman reported in Spitfires. At least one pilot died after someone added sugar to her plane's gas tank.
Even after Stratford's time serving in the war, Aikman wrote, 'the aviation industry did not open the gates for her' when she returned home. So she took one of the only jobs she could get: flying crop-dusting planes in Oregon.
But eventually, Stratford broke barriers again, becoming the second woman in the United States to earn her commercial helicopter license. She got married and moved with her husband to Alaska, where they ran a helicopter business together, transporting adventurers to high peaks and construction workers to the Trans-Alaska pipeline.
Between then and now, Stratford said it was remarkable to see how far women have come in aviation – although the world has been slow to accept their successes. In the US, major commercial airlines didn't start hiring female pilots until the 1970s, and women were banned from flying in combat roles until the early 1990s: roughly 50 years after Stratford played her part in the second world war.
'Women proved that they could do things, and so the men had to let them in,' Stratford said. 'I think women have proved themselves in aviation, and they're flying airlines and everything now.'
Still, in 2025, women continue to face major obstacles. While the number of women earning their pilot licenses has increased dramatically in recent years, women make up only about 5% of pilots flying with airlines in the UK and the US.
Stratford's advice to female aviators today is simple: 'Keep at it, keep at it, keep at it.'
All told, flying has remained one of the most important parts of her life. As she wrote in her memoir: 'I loved all the flying, the freedom, doing what I liked to do. It was wild and woolly at times. I was a lucky person in my career. I smile. I have absolutely no regrets.'
A decade later, her thoughts on the subject haven't changed.
'I was glad that I could help out,' she said matter-of-factly. 'I think my mother thought I should get married or something, but I didn't feel that way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
At 100, this globetrotting Catholic priest still bakes pies, enjoys opera and performs daily Mass
Throughout his remarkable lifetime, the Rev. James Kelly has baptized thousands of people, married thousands more, ministered to the sick in hospitals, and traveled the world extensively. He became friends with an opera superstar and, yes, even with a saint. The longest-serving priest in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia recently celebrated the 75th anniversary of his ordination and his 100th birthday. He's grateful to have reached these milestones, but nearly didn't after experiencing a health challenge last year that required life-saving surgery. He feels God gave him some extra time and tries to make each day count. 'The Lord was wonderful to me to give me the health and the strength and the energy to travel, to meet beautiful things — God was always giving me surprises,' Kelly says. Born on Jan. 7, 1925, in the Philadelphia neighborhood of Roxborough to a devoutly Catholic family, Kelly's path to the priesthood seems ordained from the start. He loved attending church. Other children dreamt of becoming athletes, doctors, firefighters. He wanted to be a priest. 'When I was 4 or 5 years old, I'd play Mass,' he says, laughing, as he recalls that his parents were his first congregants. 'I always had a little altar in my room, and I'd have a glass, and some flowers in there, and I'd make a vestment, put a scarf on, and have some candy, and give Communion to everybody." Kelly wakes up at dawn to celebrate Mass at the retirement living community that he now calls home. He listens to opera. He bakes pies. Memories, parachute jumps and climbing a bridge to save a life Sitting in his room, Kelly flips through a photo album detailing his journey. He smiles with every page turn, pointing to black-and-white photos of him as a toddler and milestones as a Catholic — his baptism, confirmation and ordination as a priest. 'I turned down Hollywood!' he says, laughing as he points to the portrait of a dapper, young priest, his hair slicked and flashing a wide smile. He also points to the photo published by a Philadelphia newspaper of the time when he climbed in his Roman collar to the top of a bridge and dissuaded a man from jumping to his death. 'Nobody would climb there, so I climbed up — it was 400 feet high. It was a bitter cold day,' he says. 'I was able to talk to him and break him down emotionally, so he wouldn't jump. I told him, 'What's your grandchild going to say one day: Papa, why didn't you take me fishing?'" He points to other photos of the many ceremonies he proudly led during his 19 years as pastor of Saint Pius X Parish in Broomall, Pennsylvania, about 10 miles (16 kilometers) west of Philadelphia. There are images of him during a vacation in Mexico when he made a parachute jump. Or that one time, when he visited the majestic Iguazu Falls on the border between Argentina and Brazil, which he recalls as one of the most beautiful sights of his life. 'Everywhere you turned, there was a rainbow, there was a mist … the water gushing forth and spray and the colors," he says. 'It was, as the kids would say, awesome.' Imagination, friends and being grateful for the simple pleasures Imagination, he says, is one of his favorite words, recalling that he wrote his college thesis on it. 'Jesus used his imagination to teach,' he says, in what became an example when he prepared his own sermons. He treasures other memories, such as traveling to more than 100 countries and meeting Saint Teresa of Kolkata, also known as Mother Theresa. Kelly says the two became friends over the years after meeting in Philadelphia and running into each other at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. The centenarian also shared the time when he took a group of blind children to a live performance of his friend, acclaimed soprano Joan Sutherland. 'I've been fortunate to meet some of the most magnificent, good people in this world, and they've been most generous and gracious to me," Kelly says. These days, he enjoys simple pleasures: the taste of cherries, a beautiful song, or his favorite meal — roast chicken with mashed potatoes, fresh string beans, and corn on the cob. He loves learning and often attends lectures on music, art history and Egyptology at the Normandy Farms Estates retirement community where he resides in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. His apartment is decorated with a painting of the Virgin Mary that he drew with chalk, a portrait of his mother, and a note signed by the late Pope Francis. On his bedside table, he keeps an image of Carlo Acutis, the Catholic Church's first millennial-era saint. Kelly is inspired by Acutis, who died at 15 in 2006. Especially Acutis' devotion and how he used his computer skills to create an online exhibit about scores of eucharistic miracles recognized by the church over centuries. The ritual of a humble daily Mass and the secret to a long life Every morning, he wakes up without the need of an alarm clock and says the same prayer: 'Lord, what surprise do you have for me today?' 'I hope it'll be a nice one that I'll love and enjoy. I never know, but I want to thank you for whatever happens today.' After a cup of coffee, he celebrates Mass in his apartment for a few residents of his community. 'When I moved here, I never thought I was going to have a private chapel!' Kathleen Quigley, a retired nurse, quipped after a recent service. 'I just love my faith, and he's such a stronghold of faith that it's wonderful for me to have. I just come right downstairs, have Mass, we talk, he shares his food.' Kelly once ministered to large congregations, but he feels the daily Mass in his living room is as important. 'It's not in a beautiful chapel or church. But it's here that I can offer my love and efforts to the Heavenly Father,' he says. After the final prayer, he always remembers to be grateful. 'That's all I can say — two words: thank you. It's wonderful that I have another day, and I might be able to eat some delicious cherries today, and meet people, new friends," he says. "God knows what surprises I'll encounter today.' His secret to longevity? 'I drink lots of milk,' he says, laughing. 'And I say lots of prayers.' __ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘You open the fridge – nothing': renewed threat of US hunger as Trump seeks to cut food aid
Jade Johnson has a word to describe the experience of going hungry in one of the world's richest countries. 'Humbling.' The last time she endured the misery of skipping meals was about 18 months ago. She was working two jobs as a home health aide and in childcare, but after paying the rent and bills she still didn't have enough to feed herself and her young daughter Janai. She would always make sure Janai had all she needed and then, when the money ran out, trim her own eating habits accordingly. Three meals a day became one, solids would be replaced with copious amounts of water to dull the hunger pangs. 'It's like you get humbled,' Johnson, 25, says in the apartment where she is raising Janai, six, in Germantown, Maryland. 'You open the fridge, close it, open it again but nothing's gonna change – there's nothing in there.' Those lean times were in the days before Johnson was accepted on to Snap, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, that provides low-income families with help to buy nutritious groceries. Johnson had applied several times, but had been knocked back. She was finally approved, with the help of an adviser whom she met at a parents' evening at Janai's kindergarten. For more than a year now she has received $520 every month to buy good food – equivalent to $8.50 for her and Janai each day, or under $3 a meal. That may not sound much, but it has been transformative. 'Snap has been a blessing for me,' she says. 'I can provide for Janai when I come home, cook dinner for myself. It's improved my relationship with my kid, my friends, my clients.' Now Johnson is bracing herself for a return to those grim days of food insecurity. Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar domestic policy legislation, his 'big, beautiful bill' which is currently battling through Congress, would slash up to $300bn from the Snap program in order to fund extended tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans. The cuts amount to the largest in the program's history. They come at a time when food insecurity is already on the rise in all 50 states. Voting is meant to begin soon in the US Senate, an attempt to clear the bill through the upper chamber in time to meet Trump's ambition to sign it into law by 4 July. Senate Republican leaders are mindful that any revisions they write into the bill must avoid causing further acrimony when the legislation moves back for final approval to the House of Representatives, where the package was passed this spring by an agonising single vote. Under the House version of the bill, parents of children seven and above would become liable for stringent work requirements from which they are currently exempted until their child is 18. Johnson would be affected by the new restriction, as Janai turns seven in November. If that seven-year cutoff remains in the final bill (the Senate is proposing that parents must meet work requirements once their child reaches 14), Johnson will have to prove from Janai's next birthday that she is working at least 20 hours a week. Otherwise she would lose her Snap benefits. That would be a tough burden to meet, given that her hours fluctuate week by week as clients' needs change. She has very little slack in her calendar to work further hours, because on top of her two jobs she is studying part-time at night to become a dialysis technician. So Johnson is nervously following the passage of the bill, and preparing for the worst. Should her food assistance be pulled, it will be back to 'grind mode' and a renewed state of humbling. Johnson is one of millions of struggling Americans who are threatened with losing their Snap benefits under Trump's bill. Most of the political attention in Congress has focused on Medicaid, the health insurance scheme for low-income families which faces even greater cuts of at least $800bn under the House version of the bill. Anti-hunger advocates fear that the potential devastation of Snap cuts is being overlooked. 'I just don't think it's getting the sort of press and general public attention it demands,' said Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, executive director of Children's HealthWatch. She described the proposed cuts as a 'catastrophic attack that will change the structure of Snap, damage children's and parents' health, and have ripple effects that will devastate local economies'. Since it was founded as a permanent program by Lyndon Johnson in 1964, Snap has grown into America's most effective weapon against hunger. It currently helps put food on the table for over 40 million people, almost half of whom are children. Poverty experts have been stunned by the scale of Trump's proposed cuts. They say they would deliver a terrible blow to one of the country's core values – that all Americans should have enough to eat. 'It's like we are throwing in the towel, and saying hunger won,' said Salaam Bhatti, Snap director at the Food Research & Action Center (Frac). 'It's upsetting that one of the wealthiest countries in the world is on the brink of increasing hunger for millions of people.' The proposed cuts fall under several headings. The one that Johnson will feel most immediately is the expanded work requirements that will put about 8 million people at risk of losing some or all of their Snap benefits. In addition to the expanded work requirements for parents of children aged seven to 18, older adults aged 55 to 64 would also now have to meet heavy work stipulations. That cohort includes Johnson's mother, Jámene, who currently receives Snap but might be thrown off it as she is 55 and would be subject to the expanded demands. Jámene currently receives $52 a month in Snap benefits. Again, that might sound minimal, but without it she would be unable to buy fresh vegetables and meat and she would be hard pressed to offer any help to her daughter and granddaughter when reserves are running low. The bill also transfers some of the costs of benefits, for the first time in the program's 61-year history, from the federal government to individual states. Under the House bill, states would be liable for up to 15% of the benefit costs, while the portion of administrative costs they already bear would rise from 50% to 75%. A state like Virginia would have to fork out an extra $500m a year. In Bhatti's estimation, many states are simply going to be unable or unwilling to foot that bill – and will pass on the pain to their poorer citizens. 'States don't have that type of money, and so they would either reduce costs by removing families from the program, or by pulling out of the program entirely.' Were Virginia to bail out of Snap, that would put over 800,000 people at immediate risk of food insecurity, including over 300,000 children. Paradoxically, many of the states that would be most impacted, and by extension a large proportion of the families that could be left struggling to feed themselves, are in the rural Republican heartlands that voted heavily for Trump. One of the hardest hit would be Louisiana, which has 44% of its population on Snap or Medicaid or both. The stakes are almost as high in deep red Arkansas (38%) and Mississippi (37%). 'I don't understand why policymakers are pursuing this bill when this will obviously hurt a large majority of their own constituents for whom Snap is a lifeline,' said Lelaine Bigelow of the Georgetown Center for Poverty and Inequality. West Virginia, with 38% of its population in receipt of Snap or Medicaid, is an especially poignant example. This was the state where the food assistance program was born: John F Kennedy opened a pilot program there following his tour of the economically stricken Appalachian coal country. 'I don't know whether the cuts will give rise to what Kennedy saw – hungry children with bloated bellies,' said Tracy Roof, a political scientist at the University of Richmond who is writing a book on the history of food stamps. 'But I do know that in a country as wealthy as the US, it's unforgivable that you should have people going hungry to bed.' Trump's hydra-headed cuts would also make it harder for low-income families to claim benefits in areas with high unemployment rates. The basket of food against which Snap is calculated would also be frozen, so that over the next 10 years the value of the benefit would decline in real terms from the current average of $6 a day, which many experts already consider inadequate. As a further threat, food assistance will be removed from up to 250,000 refugees and other people granted humanitarian protections in the US. In some ways, the Senate iteration of the bill is even more extreme than the House one. It targets millions of people in special groups, forcing them to meet tough work requirements to which they had been exempted. That includes military veterans, people experiencing homelessness, and young people in foster care. Research by the Georgetown Center exposes the staggering disparity that underpins Trump's plan. Under the House bill, over $1tn would be withdrawn in Snap and Medicaid cuts from 31% of the American people who earn on average $30,000 a year. The money would then be handed over, in the form of tax cuts, to the top 2% of the population, with average incomes of $1.5m a year. The transfer of resources would not only exacerbate America's gaping inequality, it would also have a calamitous effect on the local economies in poorer parts of the country. Disrupting the flow of Snap food deliveries could send shock waves through the entire food supply chain, from farmer to truck driver to grocery store. Numerous studies have also revealed the damage done to the health and prospects of children when they endure food insecurity at a young age. A child's developmental arc for language, hearing, vision and other critical faculties all peak by four, which means that if they receive insufficient nourishment in the early years it can have crushing long-term consequences. 'Small deprivations have outsized impacts,' Ettinger de Cuba said. 'Kids who are food insecure are more likely to be at risk of poor health, hospitalizations, and developmental delays.' In Johnson's case, she knows Janai will be protected from such a disaster because as a parent she will do everything she can to provide for her daughter. Even if that means giving up her dream of getting on in life, or going hungry herself. What puzzles Johnson about the difficult future she is now facing, courtesy of the 'big, beautiful bill', is that it feels like she is being punished for doing everything she can to be a good American. She's raised her daughter right, works two jobs to pay the bills, studies at night at her own cost to improve herself and find more stable work. 'I'm just trying to be a decent, functioning human being,' she says. 'Can't they let me get my life together first, before they start snatching stuff away from me?'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I am torn between my amazing new lover and the father of my children. My ex cheated multiple times but is my happiness or the happiness of my family is more important? BEL MOONEY answers
Dear Bel, I'm writing from the US but my problem is universal. I'm 30 and have two children, four and nine. At the age of 18 I met and moved in with their Pa. He was 20, had a good job and I thought we were in love. At 20 I gave birth to our son – over the moon to have a family of my own.
