
What did Mélanie Joly mean when she called Canada 'the most European of all non-European countries'?
Timothy Sayle, an associate professor in the department of history at the University of Toronto, says recent comments by Carney and others can be interpreted in two ways.
Article content
First is at face value. 'There are some basic historical and cultural connections here,' he said. 'It wasn't that long ago that Canadians stopped being British subjects, and the King of England is also the King of Canada. That's very present in our governance but also in our culture.'
Article content
Article content
He added that Canada's bilingual nature, its connections between Quebec and France, and its social and health programs, which run closer to European models than American ones, all push Canada closer to Europe, comparatively speaking.
Article content
'But there's also a political argument that these leaders are making, in that Canadian governments have often worked closely with European partners in international affairs, partially because Canadian and European governments sometimes see the world through the same lens, that the same international frameworks and cooperation is the best way to deal with the world.'
Article content
Finally, there may be a sense in which Carney and Joly were also talking directly to Canadians. Sayle noted an address given by Secretary of State for External Affairs Louis St. Laurent in 1947, the year before he became prime minister. He called liberty 'an inheritance from both our French and English backgrounds, and through these parent states it has come to us from the whole rich culture of western Europe.'
Article content
Article content
Sayle explained: 'Sometimes Canadian leaders find it useful to talk about Europe as a way of hinting at national unity goals in Canada. I'm not sure if the leaders have that in mind right now, but it's an interesting twist on it.'
Article content
David Soberman, a professor and the Canadian National Chair of the Rotman School of Management, said one audience for whom such remarks were not intended is the rest of the world.
Article content
'I would say they're trying to set us up against the United States in this case,' he said. 'I don't think it's designed as something to say we're more European than the Australians. I've spent time in Australia and New Zealand as well, and they're pretty European.'
Article content
But he agreed the message has a takeaway for Canadians as well.
Article content
'To make us feel a little bit less stressed out, if you will,' he said. 'We are different from the United States, and we're good with that, but we also have friends in Europe that can empathize with the sorts of things that are important to us.'
Article content
Carney also met with King Charles III during his trip to Europe, and has invited the King to formally open parliament on May 27, the first time Canada's monarch has done so since Queen Elizabeth II in her jubilee year of 1977.
Article content
Joly told the BBC that the King's visit was another 'clear signal' of Canada's sovereignty.
Article content
'That's pretty important,' Soberman said. 'He's a European monarch, and here he is coming to deliver what's one of the most important statements that occurs in the Canadian Parliament every year. That's a pretty strong link.'
Article content
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. and NATO allies warn of increasing Iranian threats in Europe, North America
In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in a meeting with judiciary officials in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, July 16, 2025. (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP) WASHINGTON — The United States and many of its NATO allies are accusing Iran of a growing number of threats throughout Europe and North America and demanding that it end its attempts to harm dissidents and others. 'We are united in our opposition to the attempts of Iranian intelligence services to kill, kidnap, and harass people in Europe and North America in clear violation of our sovereignty,' the joint statement released on Thursday said. 'These services are increasingly collaborating with international criminal organizations to target journalists, dissidents, Jewish citizens, and current and former officials in Europe and North America,' it said. 'This is unacceptable.' The joint statement was signed by NATO members Albania, Belgium, Britain, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United States. The only non-NATO member to sign was Austria, headquarters of the U.N. nuclear watchdog. The statement said that any such attacks would be considered 'violations of our sovereignty' and the governments committed to working together to foil any plots while calling on Iran 'to immediately put an end to such illegal activities in our respective territories.' The statement did not identify any particular attack, although the U.S. and others have warned for many years of Iranian-sponsored plots on European and U.S. soil. British intelligence officials have repeatedly warned of the growing scale of Tehran-backed plots in Britain. Three alleged Iranian spies currently face charges that they conducted surveillance on and plotted violence against U.K.-based journalists for an Iranian news outlet. Earlier this month Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee said 'Iran poses a wide-ranging, persistent and unpredictable threat to the U.K.' In early July, German prosecutors announced that a man suspected of gathering information on 'Jewish locations and people in Berlin for Iranian intelligence, possibly with a view to attacks, had been arrested in Denmark. They didn't elaborate. Despite the ongoing threat, the Trump administration earlier this year rescinded government-funded protection for several former officials from U.S. President Donald Trump's first term. That protection had been provided and repeatedly extended during the Biden administration due to threats from Iran against former U.S. national security adviser John Bolton, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former Iran envoy Brian Hook and a number of military officers. ___ Jill Lawless in London and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report. Matthew Lee, The Associated Press


CTV News
14 minutes ago
- CTV News
Hydro-Quebec proposes 4.8% rate hike for businesses, 3% for residents
Hydro-Quebec is proposing annual rate increases of three per cent for residential consumers and 4.8 per cent for commercial and industrial customers over the next three years. The Crown corporation presented its rate requests for 2026, 2027, and 2028 on Thursday, which must be approved by Quebec's energy board, the Régie de l'énergie. For the residential sector, the proposed increase would raise the average electricity bill by approximately $2.40 per month for an apartment and $6.70 for an average-sized house. Hydro-Quebec's request is part of François Legault's government's energy reform, adopted under closure last June. It aims to limit residential electricity rate increases to a maximum of three per cent. In addition, the corporation has announced an increase in its budget for measures to help consumers reduce their bills, including the smart thermostat program, up to $2.5 billion for the next three years. In the business community, the proposed 4.8 per cent increase is already drawing criticism, though Hydro-Quebec denies that it is hurting small and medium businesses. 'Rates in Quebec remain significantly lower than in other jurisdictions,' said Dave Rhéaume, executive vice president of commercial operations and head of customer relations, at a press conference. The Régie de l'énergie is expected to render a decision in March 2026. The new rates would then be scheduled to take effect on April 1 that year. - This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on July 31, 2025.


National Post
14 minutes ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine
There's an axiom that you don't negotiate with terrorists. Give credit where it is due, Prime Minister Mark Carney didn't negotiate with Hamas, he just surrendered to them. Article content Carney's announcement on Wednesday that Canada would recognize the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September is a direct consequence of the butchery, slaughter, rape and abductions carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023. Article content Article content Article content It is a reward for terrorism. Article content Article content To be sure, there has been a lot of death and destruction since that date, and Israel cannot escape all the blame — but that mayhem could have been avoided if Hamas had handed over the hostages they took 21 months ago. Article content At his press conference Wednesday, Carney said, 'The deepening suffering of civilians leaves no room for delay in coordinated international action to support peace, security and the dignity of human life.' Article content Terrific. But what if those fine words had been offered by a Liberal prime minister on October 8, 2023? What if he had been joined by the British prime minister of the time (since the current one, Keith Starmer, is also intent on recognizing a Palestinian state)? What if the UN had joined them? Article content If international action had been mobilized on October 8 against the obscenity that is Hamas, we wouldn't be where we are today. Article content Carney also said, 'Canada is always among the first to stand to defend peace and security around the world.' Article content Article content Not on October 8, 2023 it wasn't. Article content Article content Carney said, 'International cooperation is essential to securing lasting peace and stability in the Middle East and Canada will do its best to help lead that effort.' Article content Carney's official statement reads, 'For decades, it was hoped that this outcome (a two-state solution) would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. Regrettably this approach is no longer credible.' Article content To clarify, it's almost nine decades since a two-state solution was first proposed and then rejected by the Palestinians. Article content It is instructive to look back at that proposal by the Peel Commission which issued a report in 1937 urging the partition of the British Middle East into a Jewish and an Arab homeland. Article content Because almost ninety years later nothing has changed. Article content The Peel Commission said, 'For Partition means that neither will get all it wants. It means that the Arabs must acquiesce in the exclusion from their sovereignty of a piece of territory, long occupied and once ruled by them. It means that the Jews must be content with less than the Land of Israel they once ruled and have hoped to rule again. But it seems possible that on reflection both parties will come to realize that the drawbacks of Partition are outweighed by its advantages. For, if it offers neither party all it wants, it offers each what it wants most, namely freedom and security.'