US veteran's wife detained by immigration officers while still breastfeeding baby
A US Marine Corps veteran in Louisiana, US is struggling after his wife was detained by immigration officers while applying for a green card.
Adrian Clouatre, a Marine Corps veteran, said his two children keep asking for their mother. His nearly two-year-old son asks where she is at bedtime, and his three-month-old daughter, who was breastfeeding, now has to be fed with a bottle.
'Mama will be back soon,' Clouatre tells his son. He said he worries about how the baby will bond with her mother while she is away.
Clouatre's wife, Paola, is among thousands of people in custody and at risk of deportation as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers aim to make 3,000 arrests a day under the Trump administration.
Paola Clouatre, 25, is from Mexico. She came to the US with her mother over 10 years ago seeking asylum. She met Adrian, 26, in California in 2022 during the final months of his military service. The two married in 2024 and soon applied for a green card so Paola could live and work legally.
Adrian Clouatre said to AP, 'I'm not very political, but I believe she deserves to live here legally.' He added, 'I'm all for getting the criminals out of the country, but people who are working hard and married to Americans that's always been a way to get a green card.'
Things were going well with the green card process until officials found out there was a deportation order against Paola from 2018. That order was given after her mother missed an immigration hearing. Adrian said Paola had no idea about the order because she and her mother had not been in touch for years.
During a green card appointment on 27 May, officials brought up the deportation order. Adrian said they were asked to wait in the lobby for more paperwork, but he believes it was a way to hold them until ICE officers arrived. Officers then arrested Paola and she handed her husband her wedding ring.
Adrian now drives eight hours round trip to visit his wife at a detention centre in Monroe.
The couple's lawyer, Carey Holliday, told AP, 'It's just a hell of a way to treat a veteran. You take their wives and send them back to Mexico?'
The Clouatres are asking a judge to reopen Paola's case. They are waiting for an answer.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement to AP that Paola is in the country illegally and that the government will not ignore the law. US Citizenship and Immigration Services wrote on X that ignoring a deportation order is 'a bad idea' and that the government will not tolerate defiance.
Adrian said the post was unfair because his wife came as a child seeking asylum and did not know about the order. Experts told AP that military families once had more protection from deportation, but this has changed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
You Should Be Able to Tell Who's an ICE Agent
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Back in March, when masked, hoodie-clad federal immigration agents were caught on camera grabbing a Tufts University student off a sidewalk and forcing her into an unmarked vehicle, it was shocking. 'Why are you hiding your faces?' a bystander can be heard asking. It hasn't taken long for such aggressive tactics to become the norm in many US cities. But perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in and around Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has decided to focus his administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, going so far as to bring in the National Guard and Marines over the objections of California officials. LA is full of agents, from Border Patrol and Immigration to Customs Enforcement to Homeland Security Investigations, many of whom aren't easy to identify. In the resulting confusion, police officers are getting mistaken for those agents. The trust that's so critical for local law enforcement to persuade people to report crimes, regardless of their immigration status, is eroding. And fear and paranoia are high that some of the masked people walking around with guns and chasing people aren't federal agents at all, but criminals pretending to be law enforcement. There's a real worry about the overall impact on public safety. California state Senator Sasha Renee Perez, who is sponsoring a bill to make federal agents display identification, told me police chiefs recognize the 'very dangerous' situation the Trump administration has created with its raids. She says she introduced her bill because she didn't know what to tell constituents after masked agents caused a panic in her district by pulling a high-powered rifle from the trunk of a car in a busy parking lot. 'They were asking, 'How will we be able to identify whether or not somebody's actually an ICE agent?' And 'I'm just supposed to get in a car with any masked person with a gun who claims that they're ICE?'' Numerous elected officials have been asking the same questions, given that criminals have been known to impersonate ICE agents. Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger is convinced that a staffer's Latino godson was approached by two impersonators in an unmarked car. They told him he had a 'nice truck for someone with that surname' and tried to open the door. Lately, not a day seems to pass without a new viral video showing armed men in ski masks or neck gaiters climbing out of unmarked vehicles with out-of-state plates. Sometimes they wear tactical vests that say 'POLICE,' but almost never with name tags or badge numbers. And when bystanders ask whether they are federal agents, which agency they work for and whether they have a warrant, the men – and it's mostly men – typically refuse to answer. There are many reasons these tactics are problematic, including the basic affront to civil liberties. Americans, after all, are accustomed to seeing the faces of law enforcement and being able to demand identification. That transparency goes a long way toward creating the conditions for public safety. What's required is not just trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve, but also some level of communication and coordination among government agencies. Little of the latter is happening though, California Democrats continue to say. The Trump administration would likely blame the state's 'sanctuary' law for that. But nothing prohibits notifications to city or state officials about upcoming operations. Nevertheless, in that vacuum of information, tension and confusion have been allowed to build between the public and federal immigration agents. In suburban Pasadena, for example, elected officials have been left to guess about the identity of a man in a 'POLICE' vest who aimed a gun at a group of pedestrians. They assume he was a federal agent because he turned on the car's red and blue emergency lights before driving away. But local police weren't told of any operations. 'One question is this a law enforcement agent or someone pretending to be a law enforcement agent, and there is no good answer here,' Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo told the Los Angeles Times. Elsewhere, protesters have confronted undercover police detectives, thinking they were federal agents. 'It is not safe for our officers, or for others involved in any active police operations if misrepresentations or misunderstandings lead to inappropriate engagement,' Michael Dorsey, police chief of the city of Fontana, wrote on Facebook. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department reported that its fleet of unmarked vehicles has been targeted, too. 'All white vehicles are NOT ICE,' it posted -- and then deleted – on X. And the mayor of Huntington Park has gone so far as to propose directing his city's police to make federal agents identify themselves before raids, which he called 'state-sanctioned intimidation.' California state Senator Scott Wiener, who has introduced a bill to prohibit federal agents from covering their faces, called the situation 'combustible.' (If enacted, such a bill, much like Perez's, would probably be impossible to enforce.) Why the secrecy? Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, insists it's not about 'intimidation.' It's 'because they've been doxxed by the thousands,' he recently told the New York Times podcast The Daily. 'Their families have been doxxed. ICE officers' pictures have shown up on trees and telephone poles. Death threats are sky high.' That is probably true, and if so, it's a problem. Nevertheless, letting law enforcement operate in masked secrecy, chasing down people without having to provide warrants or identification, is not a viable solution. 'Who are these people?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass asked at a recent press conference. 'And frankly, the vests that they have on look like they ordered them from Amazon. Are they bounty hunters? Are they vigilantes? If they're federal officials, why is it that they do not identify themselves?' These are questions that deserve answers. That there are none forthcoming from the Trump administration is just further evidence that despite what Trump says about upholding 'law and order,' the administration's deportations of random dishwashers, day laborers and landscapers has nothing to do with public safety. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Erika D. Smith is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. She is a former Los Angeles Times columnist and Sacramento Bee editorial board member. More stories like this are available on
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Houthi rebels claim missile launch at Israel following Gaza conflict
Warning sirens were heard in multiple areas of Israel before the military announced that the missile was 'most likely successfully intercepted.' read more Houthi supporters raise their machine guns during an anti-Israel rally in Sanaa, Yemen. AP Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi group stated on Saturday that it launched a ballistic missile toward Israel, citing Israel's actions in Gaza as the reason. Warning sirens were heard in multiple areas of Israel before the military announced that the missile was 'most likely successfully intercepted.' This marks the first Houthi-claimed missile attack on Israel since the June 24 ceasefire between Israel and Iran, which followed a 12-day conflict. Rebel military spokesperson Yahya Saree said in a statement that the group targeted a 'sensitive Israeli enemy target in the occupied area of Beersheba using a Dhu al-Fiqar ballistic missile'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The attack was in 'response to the crimes of the criminal Zionist enemy against civilians in the Gaza Strip', Saree added. The Houthis have launched repeated missile and drone attacks against Israel since their Palestinian ally Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel sparked the Gaza war. The Iran-backed rebels, who say they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians, paused their attacks during a two-month ceasefire that ended in March, but renewed them after Israel resumed its offensive. Israel has carried out several retaliatory strikes in Yemen, targeting Houthi-held ports and the airport in the rebel-held capital Sanaa. Saree said the rebel administration would 'continue its supportive operations until the aggression against Gaza stops and the siege is lifted'.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump says Iran warned of missile strike at Al Udeid base: ‘They asked if 1 o'clock was OK — I said fine'
Donald Trump Says Iran Warned US Ahead of Missile Strike Discrepancy Emerges Between Donald Trump's Tone and Top Military Official Live Events Pentagon Praises Troops, Defends Trump and Pete Hegseth Donald Trump Suggests Base Was Evacuated Before Strike FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As US president Donald prepared to leave a NATO summit on Wednesday, he said something surprising and unexpected, that Iran had warned the United States in advance of a missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and that he personally told them to go ahead, as per a report. Iran's attack on a US military base was in retaliation for the United States' strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites amid the conflict between Israel and described Iranians as they "were very nice," and revealed that, "They gave us warning," as quoted in report. The US president said that Iranians asked Trump, "We're going to shoot 'em. Is one o'clock OK?," and Trump admitted that he replied, saying, "It's fine," as quoted in the READ: Who is Hariana Veras, the woman Trump flirted with? President says she is beautiful and wishes more were like her However, Trump's remark regarding Iran's strike on US forces at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, an attack that involved more than a dozen Iranian missiles, was in stark contrast to what Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine told reporters the next day, according to the said it was potentially the largest single use of the Patriot air defense system in US history, explaining that "there was a lot of metal flying around, and yet our U.S. air defenders had only seconds to make complex decisions with strategic impact," as quoted in the went on to praise the US military, as he said, "These awesome humans, along with their Qatari brothers and sisters in arms, stood between a salvo of Iranian missiles and the safety of Al Udeid," and he also called them the "unsung heroes of the 21st-century United States Army," as quoted in the READ: Could Disney stock surge? Analysts raise price targets after strong earnings While, Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson pointed out that, "The safety of our service members is of the utmost importance to Secretary Hegseth, and he couldn't be prouder of the troops who put their lives on the line every day to keep Americans safe," as quoted in the on, even chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said, 'Thanks to President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's leadership, our troops know that their commander-in-chief and secretary of defense have their back. Any insinuation to the contrary is absurd,' as quoted in the READ: Pornhub, XNXX in panic? US Supreme Court ruling lets states crack down on online adult content access However, there is speculation that Trump might have been aware of the danger that the Iranian attack posed because just after saying he gave Iran permission to strike, he also pointed out that "everyone was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt except for the gunners," quoted even Caine had revealed that only two Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries remained on base, leaving "roughly 44 American soldiers responsible for defending the entire base," which includes the forward headquarters for US Central Command, as reported by said, "The oldest soldier was a 28-year-old captain. The youngest was a 21-year-old private who'd been in the military for less than two years," as quoted in the according to his claims, Trump said Iran warned of the strike and asked if 1 o'clock was acceptable. He replied, 'It's fine.'It was in retaliation for US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites during tensions involving Iran and Israel, as per the report.
