Exclusive: West plans to push IAEA board to find Iran in breach of duties, diplomats say
VIENNA, May 30 (Reuters) - Western powers are preparing to push the U.N. nuclear watchdog's board at its next quarterly meeting to declare Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, a move bound to enrage Tehran, diplomats said.
The step is likely to further complicate talks between the United States and Iran aimed at imposing fresh restrictions on Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme.
Washington and its European allies Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, proposed past resolutions adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation Board of Governors calling on Iran to quickly take steps, opens new tab such as explain uranium traces the IAEA found at undeclared sites.
The IAEA is preparing to send member states its quarterly reports on Iran before the next board meeting, which begins on June 9. One of those will be a longer, "comprehensive" account of issues including Iran's cooperation, as demanded by a board resolution in November, and diplomats expect it to be damning.
"We expect the comprehensive report to be tough, but there were already no doubts over Iran not keeping its non-proliferation commitments," one European official said.
Once that report is issued, the United States will draft a proposed resolution text declaring Iran in breach of its so-called safeguards obligations, three diplomats said. A fourth said the Western powers were preparing a draft resolution without going into specifics.
The text will be discussed with countries on the board in coming days before being formally submitted to the board by the four Western powers during the quarterly meeting as has happened with previous resolutions, diplomats said.
The last time the board took the step of formally declaring Iran in breach of its safeguards obligations was in September 2005 as part of a diplomatic standoff that stemmed from the discovery of clandestine nuclear activities in Iran.
The United States and IAEA now believe Iran had a secret, coordinated nuclear weapons programme that it halted in 2003. Iran denies ever having had a weapons programme and says it is only using nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
A separate IAEA board resolution passed in February 2006 referred Iran's non-compliance to the U.N. Security Council, which later imposed sanctions on Iran.
The diplomats said it had not yet been determined at what point the Western powers would seek to have the matter referred to the Security Council, and it is unclear what action if any the Security Council would then take against Iran.
The most immediate effect of a resolution is likely to be on Tehran's talks with the United States and any further nuclear steps Iran decides to take on the ground.
A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran would react to a resolution by "expanding nuclear work based on (the content of) the resolution".
The board has passed all recent resolutions proposed by the Western powers on Iran, and there is little doubt that this one would go through as well. The only question is how large the majority would be. Russia and China have been the only countries to consistently oppose such resolutions.
Iran bristles at resolutions and other criticism of it at the IAEA board, taking steps such as accelerating and expanding its uranium enrichment programme or barring top IAEA inspectors.
It is already enriching uranium to up to 60% purity, which can easily be further enriched to the roughly 90% of weapons grade. It has enough material at that level, if enriched further, for six nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
34 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Get Ahead of 99% of People by Thinking Backwards : Inversion Theory Explained
What if the secret to getting ahead wasn't about doing more, but about avoiding the wrong moves altogether? Imagine standing at the edge of a maze, not searching for the entrance but tracing your way backward from the exit. This is the essence of inversion, a mental model that flips conventional thinking on its head. Instead of asking how to succeed, it challenges you to ask: 'What could go wrong?' This counterintuitive approach has been used by some of history's greatest minds to solve complex problems, sidestep failure, and uncover hidden opportunities. It's not about pessimism—it's about clarity. And in a world obsessed with forward progress, thinking backwards might just be the edge you've been missing. In this guide by Value Catcher, you'll discover how inversion simplifies decision-making and helps you avoid costly mistakes in work, relationships, and even health. You'll learn how this mindset, rooted in both philosophy and history, can be applied to modern challenges—from improving your personal habits to tackling high-stakes professional dilemmas. Along the way, we'll explore compelling examples, like how a WWII statistician saved lives by focusing on what wasn't there, and practical steps to integrate inversion into your daily life. By the end, you might find yourself questioning not just how to succeed, but how to avoid failure—and that shift could change everything. Mastering Inversion Thinking What Is Inversion? Inversion is the process of reversing your usual way of thinking to gain a fresh perspective. Instead of asking, 'How can I succeed?' you ask, 'What could cause me to fail?' By focusing on potential pitfalls, you can uncover blind spots and anticipate challenges that might otherwise go unnoticed. This method forces you to think critically and approach problems from a new angle, often leading to more effective and innovative solutions. This mental model is not about negativity or pessimism. Instead, it is a proactive strategy that helps you identify and eliminate obstacles, making sure a clearer path toward your goals. By embracing inversion, you can make more informed decisions and reduce the likelihood of failure. Historical Example: Abraham Wald and WWII One of the most compelling examples of inversion comes from World War II. Statistician Abraham Wald was tasked with analyzing returning aircraft to determine where additional armor was needed. At first glance, it seemed logical to reinforce the areas with visible damage. However, Wald approached the problem differently. He realized that the planes that didn't return likely suffered fatal hits in the undamaged areas of the surviving aircraft. By focusing on what was missing—rather than what was visible—Wald identified the true vulnerabilities. His recommendation to reinforce the overlooked areas saved countless lives. This story demonstrates how thinking backwards can lead to new insights and solutions, even in high-stakes situations. Get Ahead of 99% of People by Thinking Backwards Watch this video on YouTube. Here is a selection of other guides from our extensive library of content you may find of interest on thinking methods. How to Apply Inversion Inversion is a versatile tool that can be applied in various ways, depending on the problem you are addressing. Here are two primary approaches: Start with the End in Mind: Begin by visualizing your desired outcome and work backwards to identify the steps needed to achieve it. For example, solving a maze is often easier when you trace it from the finish line to the starting point. Begin by visualizing your desired outcome and work backwards to identify the steps needed to achieve it. For example, solving a maze is often easier when you trace it from the finish line to the starting point. Focus on the Opposite of Your Goal: Instead of asking how to succeed, ask what actions or decisions would lead to failure. By identifying and avoiding these pitfalls, you can improve your chances of success significantly. This dual approach allows you to tackle challenges from multiple angles, making sure a more comprehensive understanding of the problem and its potential solutions. Where Can You Use Inversion? Inversion is not limited to specific fields or situations. Its principles can be applied across various aspects of life to improve decision-making, strengthen relationships, and enhance overall well-being. Below are some practical examples of how inversion can be used effectively: 1. Work and Decision-Making In professional settings, inversion helps you anticipate risks and address them before they escalate into problems. For instance, conducting a 'failure premortem' involves imagining that a project has failed and then identifying the reasons why. This exercise allows teams to proactively address potential issues and refine their strategies. Similarly, some companies use a 'kill the company' exercise, where employees brainstorm scenarios that could lead to the organization's downfall. By identifying vulnerabilities, businesses can take preventive measures to strengthen their operations and long-term resilience. 2. Relationships In personal relationships, inversion encourages you to focus on avoiding harmful behaviors that could damage trust or respect. Instead of assuming that others share your preferences or values, consider what actions might create conflict or misunderstandings. For example, lying, neglect, or disrespect can erode the foundation of any relationship. By identifying and eliminating these negative behaviors, you can foster stronger, healthier connections built on mutual understanding and support. 3. Health When it comes to health, inversion shifts your focus from chasing perfection to eliminating harmful habits. Instead of obsessing over the perfect diet or exercise routine, start by identifying and cutting out behaviors that harm your physical or mental well-being. Examples include smoking, excessive junk food consumption, or neglecting sleep. Similarly, addressing mental health stressors—such as overcommitment, toxic relationships, or chronic stress—can lead to significant improvements in overall well-being. By removing these obstacles, you create a healthier foundation for long-term success. Philosophical Roots of Inversion The concept of inversion has deep philosophical roots, particularly in Stoicism. The Stoics practiced a technique called 'premeditation of evils,' where they envisioned worst-case scenarios to prepare for potential challenges. This practice aligns closely with the principles of inversion, emphasizing the importance of forethought and risk management. By imagining what could go wrong, the Stoics aimed to reduce fear, increase resilience, and make more rational decisions. This ancient wisdom underscores the timeless value of thinking backwards to navigate life's uncertainties. Why Inversion Works Inversion is effective because it simplifies decision-making and clarifies priorities. Instead of being overwhelmed by endless possibilities, you focus on what to avoid. This approach helps you identify the most critical actions needed to achieve your goals while minimizing risks. It's not about being overly cautious or pessimistic—it's about being realistic and proactive. By addressing potential failures before they occur, you position yourself for greater success and reduce the likelihood of costly mistakes. Key Takeaway Success often stems not from extraordinary brilliance but from avoiding obvious mistakes. Inversion provides a practical framework to identify risks, sidestep failure, and make smarter decisions. Whether you're solving problems at work, nurturing relationships, or improving your health, thinking backwards can help you achieve your goals more effectively. By adopting this mindset, you gain a strategic advantage, allowing you to navigate challenges with greater confidence and clarity. In a world where many focus solely on forward progress, thinking backwards can set you apart and position you ahead of the majority. Media Credit: The Value Catcher Filed Under: Guides, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Pam Bondi fires three DOJ prosecutors who were involved in prosecuting January 6 rioters, report says
The Department of Justice has reportedly fired at least three career prosecutors who worked on cases against January 6 rioters. The prosecutors included two supervisors who oversaw the sweeping DOJ case against the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol in early 2021, as well as a third attorney, the Associated Press reports. The attorneys were fired on Friday in a letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi informing them they were 'removed from federal service effective immediately,' NBC News reports. The Independent has contacted the Justice Department for comment. The reported firings come after the administration axed about a dozen lower-level DOJ officials who worked on the January 6 cases, and pardoned more than 1,500 people convicted in Capitol riot cases, including violent offenders. Separately, earlier this year, the administration removed more than a dozen prosecutors involved in prior criminal investigations into Donald Trump, including several who worked for Jack Smith, the special counsel bringing a now-dismissed election subversion case against the Republican. 'You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,' a letter to these officials, obtained by CNN, said. The White House has also sought to penalize law firms tied to perceived opponents of the president, including Smith and prominent Democrats, attempting to strip their security clearances and punish federal contractors that did business with them. On the campaign trail, Trump referred to the mob that stormed the Capitol to overturn the certification of his 2020 election loss, injuring about 150 police officers in a riot that ultimately led to at least seven deaths, as ' hostages.' The January 6 case was the largest in Justice Department history, netting over 1,500 convictions and requiring scores of federal attorneys, many of whom remain with the government. Despite erasing this prosecution against mass disturbance from the books, since taking office, the Trump administration has sought a firm response to civil unrest targeting his policies, deploying federal agents, Marines, and the National Guard for a nearly unprecedented civil law enforcement role in response to Los Angeles protests against immigration raids.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Republican congressman Don Bacon of Nebraska will not seek re-election
Republican congressman and vocal Donald Trump critic Don Bacon is reportedly not going to seek re-election during the midterm races in 2026. The conservative politician represents a swing district in Nebraska that includes Omaha, and word of his plans prompted Democratic figures to signal optimism that they could take the seat as the party tries to regain a House majority it has not had since 2023. Bacon's decision was first reported on Friday by the outlets Punchbowl News and NOTUS before being confirmed on Saturday by the Washington Post. NOTUS and the Post cited anonymous sources familiar with the situation, with the former of those adding that Bacon would make a formal announcement in the coming days. While Bacon had not immediately commented on the reports, his verified social media account did engage with multiple posts expressing 'good riddance' to him. He called the author of one such post 'an idiot' and told another who claimed he was a thinly veiled Democrat that he was 'the real Republican', having supported the party since he was 13 in 1976. The second congressional district of Nebraska that Bacon represents voted for Kamala Harris when she lost to Trump during November's White House race. It also voted for Joe Biden when he took the Oval Office from Trump four years earlier. And in May, Omaha elected its first-ever Black mayor: John Ewing Jr, who defeated three-term Republican incumbent Jean Stothert. Bacon's politics have come to reflect those realities in his district to some extent. The retired US air force brigadier general in May demanded the removal of Trump's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, after he shared information about military strikes on Yemen in a Signal messaging app group chat that inadvertently included the editor of the Atlantic. Though the president chose to keep Hegseth in place despite the so-called Signalgate scandal, Bacon told the Post in an interview that he 'would have been fired' at any point in his military career for doing what Hegseth did. Separately, in a Post opinion column, Bacon criticized the brutal job and spending cuts that the Trump administration has inflicted within the federal government since the president retook office in January. He filed a bill aiming to hand Congress control over tariffs rather than continue leaving that power with the president as Trump upended financial markets by imposing substantial levies on some of the US's largest trading partners. Furthermore, he stood as the lone House Republican to vote against a measure that would take Trump's executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the 'Gulf of America' and make it law. 'I'm not into doing silly stuff,' Bacon, who joined Congress in January 2017, wrote on social media. 'It is sophomoric.' And he has said he and his family endured threats after he opposed Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan's unsuccessful 2023 bid to become House speaker, which at the time had been endorsed by Trump in between his two presidencies. 'I'd rather be a defender of the traditional conservative values than just be a team player,' Bacon said to Omaha's KMTV news station in May. 'I think – a team going in the wrong direction, you need somebody to speak up and try to stand for what's right.' A statement distributed by Democratic congressional campaign committee spokesperson Madison Andrus on Friday said that Bacon's foregoing re-election marked a 'vote of no-confidence for House Republicans and their electoral prospects'. 'The writing has been on the wall for months,' Andrus's statement also said. In a separate statement, the Nebraska Democratic party's chair, Jane Kleeb, said her party's prospective candidates 'truly represent the values of the district' Bacon's seat is in. 'We are ready for change,' Kleeb said.
