logo
Oranga Tamariki report finds stark outcomes for Māori in state care system

Oranga Tamariki report finds stark outcomes for Māori in state care system

RNZ News11-06-2025
Independent Children's Monitor chief executive Arran Jones said the report was a "story of consequence" and of needs not addressed
Photo:
RNZ
The Independent Children's Monitor has found Māori children in the Oranga Tamariki system are overrepresented and being let down; and the outcomes for Māori adults involved in the system when they were younger "paint a stark picture", with higher mortality rates over time than those not involved.
Those same adults who had experience in custody or in care were nine times more likely to have used emergency housing as an adult and half as likely to be in employment, Children's Monitor chief executive Arran Jones said.
He said the report was a "story of consequence" and of needs not addressed by a system that could not always get the right support in place at the right time.
"The needs of tamariki and rangatahi then multiply as they escalate through the system."
The inaugural report in a new annual series, focused on whether the system was delivering outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori, looked at the period between 1 July 2023, to 30 June 2024.
What this report did, compared to the usual monitoring of Oranga Tamariki operational activities, was "lifting up and looking at outcomes in terms of the life course for young people and their experiences", Jones said.
The report emphasised that most young Māori had no involvement in the Oranga Tamariki system. Jones said this context was important because narratives can "get away on us."
A third of those aged between zero and 18 in New Zealand were Māori - around 330,000 young people.
In the 2023/24 reporting year:
But when young Māori are involved in the system, "there are increasing levels of over-representations" Jones said.
The report stated the over-representation of Māori at every level within the care and protection system was a "clear indicator the system is not performing".
Around half of the reports of concern made to Oranga Tamariki were about tamariki and rangatahi Māori, the report showed. They also made up two-thirds of young people in state care, and more than three-quarters of those in youth justice custody.
In 2022, young Māori in care or custody achieved education qualifications at almost half the rate of Māori with no involvement in the system; those in the Oranga Tamariki system were significantly more likely to be hospitalised for self-harm than those not; those in care used mental health and addiction services at nearly five times the rate of those not involved, and rangatahi Māori in youth justice custody used those services at 15 times the rate.
"Considering 92 percent of these rangatahi had reports of concern made about their safety and wellbeing when they were younger, this is no surprise," said Jones.
When it came to involvement with the police, data showed a difference in the severity of proceedings against tamariki and rangatahi Māori in 2023/24:
Jones said the further these young people went into care, the worse their short- and long-term outcomes.
For older Māori between 27 and 30 who had been through the care and protection system, the report said their outcomes were "sobering".
"The data paints a stark picture of the consequence of the Oranga Tamariki system not doing more to help."
"Māori adults who had been in the system as children are less likely to be employed, less likely to have a driver licence, more likely to be on a benefit, more likely to be in emergency housing, and more likely to be hospitalised for self-harm than Māori who had no involvement.
"Mortality rates are double or triple those of Māori with no involvement in the Oranga Tamariki system for vehicle accidents and for self-harm (including suicide)."
Jones said 10 in 1000 of those young Māori will have taken their own lives by the age of 27 to 30.
And for Māori parents between 27 and 30 who had previously been in care themselves, 68 percent had children involved with Oranga Tamariki in some way and one in eight have had one or more children in care at some point.
It acknowledged some progress was being made, but "barriers" remained. Improving outcomes would require tough decisions on where to prioritise services and sharing power and funding, it said.
ACT MP and Children's Minister Karen Chhour.
Photo:
NZME / Mark Mitchell
Other key findings:
The focus to date for the Independent Children's Monitor had been the experiences of young people in state care, but it was mandated to look at the whole Oranga Tamariki system, including youth justice and intervention services.
"Our legislation requires that we also do an annual report on outcomes for tamariki and rangatahi Māori and their whanau for the very reason that they are over represented in the system," Jones said.
He acknowledged some of this data had been reported about young people generally, but this was the first time a lot of it had been focused on young people with experience in the system. He said what was important was the extent of the disparity and outcomes.
The report looked at the aspirations of those in the system, and found those were not "that much different from all children in New Zealand", Jones said.
"They all want to aspire, to be healthy and happy, to have jobs, to be well-educated and to have children that they can keep safe and secure and go on [and live] happy lives."
The report showed that was not happening, he said, and made a strong case for investing early before the impact of what brought them to Oranga Tamariki's attention multiplied as they went through the system.
He acknowledged Oranga Tamariki had made progress in terms of frameworks and approaches to work better with tamariki Māori and their whānau, but there were operational barriers that remained preventing staff from working in the way they wanted.
The report also pointed to changes in funding and contracts impacting on relationships or the ability to maintain a trusted relationship. Jones said he had heard from families, providers and Oranga Tamariki's own staff about the cuts to funding and services making it harder for them to get the help that young people need.
"That's a message that's come through clearly."
Jones acknowledged Oranga Tamariki could not control the reports of concern that come to the agency, but once it became aware, "it's about what level of investment is made right across the system to support these families so things don't escalate, and hopefully that young people can go on and lead good lives".
He stressed the finding that 92 percent of young Māori involved in the youth justice system had concerns raised about their safety and wellbeing when they were younger, and said there was opportunity for the system to prevent some of the later behaviours that led to offending if the right support was put in place at an early stage.
"It creates this decision to be made about whether you build more ambulances at the bottom of the cliff and you deal with the harm that results, both to young people but also to communities, or whether there's an opportunity to invest much earlier."
The report highlighted various partnerships with iwi as positive examples of intervention, particularly in the space of youth justice.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
The report highlighted various partnerships with iwi as positive examples of intervention, particularly in the space of youth justice.
It described Oranga Tamariki delegating powers and functions to Best Care (Whakapai Hauora) Charitable Trust - a subsidiary of the iwi authority for Rangitāne o Manawatū - since 2020, allowing for a youth justice social worker in this particular role.
The report said Whakapai Hauora worked to prevent rangatahi from reoffending. The Trust could facilitate FGCs, as well as engage rangatahi involved in youth justice in a range of initiatives. These included Mana Wahine (life skills for female rangatahi who have offended), Mana Taiohi (restorative FGC plans) and Whakapai te Waka (where rangatahi work to pay for their reparations).
Other wraparound services included gym visits or community-based clinical support for mental health issues and alcohol and drug use. Many of the programmes were run in groups, with whānau included, which the Children's Monitor heard were more successful than conventional approaches and led to better outcomes.
The report said it was hard to measure the impact of different approaches, but Oranga Tamariki said one marker of success for the youth justice delegation in Rangitāne was that for many years only one rangatahi referred to Whakapai Hauora had been proceeded to a court order.
Another example it gave was that some rangatahi who had completed youth justice programmes with Whakapai Hauora had returned as mentors. It also described the case of a young man who had committed retail crime, but was now employed by the company he had stolen from.
"This transformation is the result of the Whakapai Hauora whakaoranga process, where all parties met to hold the tāne accountable for his offending.
"We heard that this was made possible by "the aunties" who build and maintain strong community relationships and work in a te ao Māori way that meets the requirements of the Oranga Tamariki Act and Oranga Tamariki practice standards."
Wayne Blissett, executive director at Whakapai Hauora, told RNZ the devolution of those powers meant they carried on with the statutory obligations but were able to do so in a way that allowed "culture and meaning to be delivered in a conducive environment to healing and change".
"The opportunity for whanāu to take the chance for change is a lot more conducive in an environment which is supportive, acknowledging, and I think fair."
He said when those processes were delivered in a "mana-enhancing" way, it empowered whānau to make positive choices about some of the changes they wanted to make.
He referenced the example of the young man gaining employment where he had offended, saying when the victim saw the opportunity to be a part of the solution and work with the person that offended against them "that's pretty amazing".
Blissett believed the best way of improving outcomes for young Māori overall was to prevent them coming into care in the first place, which required earlier intervention and assessment, building communities, "as well as getting in sooner, better, faster, to create a wraparound support for whānau".
"Some of the challenges at the moment is that we're focusing on the individual, I don't like the word, but perpetrator, as opposed to looking at the whole whānau system, and what's created this environment."
He said the cycle had to be broken, and to do that required real opportunities with real solutions in a realistic setting for whānau.
"If we just keep working with the young people in isolation, we're not actually creating the chance for the whole whānau to break out of the cycle."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Chris Hipkins' over National's FamilyBoost 'flop'
Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Chris Hipkins' over National's FamilyBoost 'flop'

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Chris Hipkins' over National's FamilyBoost 'flop'

Photo: RNZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has challenged Labour to front up with any policy at all as he comes under pressure over National's struggling childcare support scheme. It comes after Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate, well short of National's pre-election promise that 21,000 families would be eligible for the full amount. Speaking on his way into a Tuesday morning caucus meeting, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure. "I'm not taking any any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess. "You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour." Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings . "Isn't that great?" he said. "We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders." The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free ECE. On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme - a weekly rebate on childcare costs. Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out-of-touch. "They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record." Hipkins defended Labour's lack of public policy and said that would all be laid out in full before next year's election. "We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," he said. "But unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have, add up." Labour wanted to see the government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, Hipkins said, and suggested a lot of policy work was underway in the background. "The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment, because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone." National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year , but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

NZ and allies condemn 'inhumane', 'horrifying' killings in Gaza and 'drip feeding' of aid
NZ and allies condemn 'inhumane', 'horrifying' killings in Gaza and 'drip feeding' of aid

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

NZ and allies condemn 'inhumane', 'horrifying' killings in Gaza and 'drip feeding' of aid

Palestinian children queue for a portion of hot food distributed by a charity kitchen at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on 15 July. Photo: Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty Images via CNN Newsource New Zealand has joined 24 other countries in calling for an end to the war in Gaza, and criticising what they call the inhumane killing of Palestinians . The countries - including Britain, France, Canada and Australia - also condemed the Israeli government's aid delivery model in Gaza as "dangerous". "We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food " They said it was "horrifying" that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid, the majority at food distribution sites run by a US- and Israeli-backed foundation. "We call on the Israeli government to immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid and to urgently enable the UN and humanitarian NGOs to do their life saving work safely and effectively," it said. Winston Peters. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii "Proposals to remove the Palestinian population into a 'humanitarian city' are completely unacceptable. Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law." The statement said the countries were "prepared to take further action" to support an immediate ceasefire. Reuters reported Israel's foreign ministry said the statement was "disconnected from reality" and it would send the wrong message to Hamas. "The statement fails to focus the pressure on Hamas and fails to recognise Hamas's role and responsibility for the situation," the Israeli statement said. Foreign affairs minister Winston Peters told Morning Report , New Zealand had chosen to be part of the statement as a way to have its voice heard on the "dire" humanitarian situation in Gaza. "The tipping point was some time ago... it's gotten to the stage where we've just lost our patience..." Peters said he wanted to see what the response to the condemnation was. "The conflict in the Middle East goes on and on... It's gone from a situation where it was excusable, due to the October 7 conflict, to inexcusable as innocent people are being swept into it," he said. "I do think there has to be change. It must happen now." The war in Gaza was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on 7 October , 2023, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Israel's subsequent air and ground war in Gaza has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, according to its Hamas-run health ministry, while displacing almost the entire population of more than 2 million and spreading a hunger crisis. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mining claim off Pātea, Taranaki
Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mining claim off Pātea, Taranaki

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mining claim off Pātea, Taranaki

The Crown argued a panel has not even been appointed – and that iwi will contribute to that selection and get a say once the decision-making panel is working. The Waitangi Tribunal grants urgent hearings in exceptional circumstances: applicants must be suffering – or likely to suffer – significant and irreversible prejudice from current or pending Crown actions. Judge Reeves: 'I do not agree that the risk of significant and irreversible prejudice has crystallised, and the application is premature. 'The application does not yet meet the high threshold required to divert the resources and disrupt the tribunal's inquiry programme that would result by granting an urgent inquiry,' she ruled. 'However, leave is reserved for the applicants to renew their application if circumstances change.' Claimants said they had already suffered prejudice from their decade-long fight against TTR's mining application, through to defeating the company in the Supreme Court. Mana whenua said Government bias made the fast-track process unjust. Judge Reeves said the claimants believed 'the Crown's vocal support of the [seabed mining] project and the FTAA appears to make meaningful engagement with the applicants or delay of the project to pursue alternative remedies 'highly unlikely''. On Friday in New Plymouth Shane Jones – the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, and of Resources – called opponents a 'belligerent, well-organised, rowdy bunch of activists'. He had previously dismissed mana whenua objectors as 'pixie-like hapūs' – which many felt was an insult that still rankles in South Taranaki. Taranaki mana whenua claimants to the tribunal are Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Ruanui and associated Ruanui hapū, hapū of Ngāruahine iwi, Te Korowai o Ngāruahine and Parihaka Papakainga Trust. Other parties include Climate Justice Taranaki, Ngāruahine's school Te Kura o Ngāruahinerangi and, from outside the region, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki, which also faces an FTAA application. For the fast-track bid to be rejected, the mine's negative impacts must significantly outweigh national and regional benefits – meaning environmental and cultural damage must be deemed greater than the money the mine makes for Taranaki and New Zealand. Last Thursday, the organisers of the fast-track decision process ordered TTR to show where it had updated its evidence since losing in the courts. 'Almost all of the technical appendices are dated 2015 and were obviously prepared to support the 2016 application. Only a handful of those reports were updated in 2023 or 2024,' panel convener Jennifer Caldwell noted. 'The Cultural Values Assessment report, prepared by an independent consultant in 2017, was not updated despite what must have been new information as to the Māori concerns.' A month earlier, panel conveners ordered the Environmental Protection Authority to dig into the proposed seabed mine's environmental and economic impacts. Every day of operation for at least 20 years, the mining ship would discharge 180,000 tonnes of unwanted seabed sediment, a recognised pollutant, into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. TTR claims regional benefits of: 305 jobs directly with the miner. 1125 Taranaki-based jobs indirectly. $250 million annual Taranaki operational spend. Port upgrades at New Plymouth and Whanganui. A TTR charitable grants trust. A report for the miners predicted annual national gains of $55 million in royalties, $136m in corporate tax and $855m in foreign exchange earnings. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store