Algoma Steel Group Inc. Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter 2025
Net Loss of $110.6 Million and Adjusted EBITDA Loss of $32.4 Million
Achieved First Arc and First Steel Production from Transformative Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) Project
SAULT STE. MARIE, Ontario, July 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTL; TSX: ASTL) ('Algoma' or 'the Company'), a leading Canadian producer of hot and cold rolled steel sheet and plate products, today announced results for its second quarter ended June 30, 2025.
Unless otherwise specified, all amounts are in Canadian dollars.
Business Highlights and Second Quarter 2025 to Second Quarter 2024 Comparisons
Consolidated revenue of $589.7 million, compared to $650.5 million in the prior-year quarter.
Consolidated loss from operations of $85.1 million, compared to a loss from operations of $12.5 million in the prior-year quarter.
Net loss of $110.6 million, compared to net income of $6.1 million in the prior-year quarter.
Adjusted EBITDA loss of $32.4 million and Adjusted EBITDA margin of (5.5%), compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $37.7 million and 5.8% in the prior-year quarter (see 'Non-GAAP Measures' below).
Cash used in operating activities of $37.9 million, compared to cash generated by operating activities of $12.5 million in the prior-year quarter.
Shipments of 472,056 tons, compared to 503,152 tons in the prior-year quarter.
Tariffs paid in the quarter totaled $64.1M vs nil in the prior-year quarter.
Michael Garcia, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, commented, 'The second quarter of 2025 was a pivotal period for Algoma, during which we completed the preparations for our first production of Volta™—Algoma's trademarked green steel. This milestone was realized in early July with the successful production of our inaugural steel in the first of our two state-of-the-art EAFs. While we delivered operational results for the quarter that were in line with our expectations, our financial performance continued to be impacted by ongoing tariff uncertainty and persistent weak steel market demand and pricing pressures. The uncertain market environment has created headwinds for shipments and pricing across the industry, but we remain focused on executing our strategic transformation.'
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Mr. Garcia continued, 'Achieving first arc and producing our first steel from the EAF in early July represents a historic accomplishment that marks the true beginning of our transition from a legacy higher-cost traditional steelmaker to one of the lowest-cost green steel producers in North America. While we can't control market volatility and macro or geopolitical uncertainties, we are focused on what we can control: the safe operation of our assets and the completion of the EAF project, which provides us with a structural cost advantage that will serve us well through market cycles, creating lasting value for all stakeholders.'
Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results
Second quarter revenue totaled $589.7 million, compared to $650.5 million in the prior-year quarter. As compared with the prior-year quarter, steel revenue was $534.4 million, compared to $597.4 million, and revenue per ton of steel sold was $1,249, compared to $1,293. Lower pricing was due to weakening market conditions, particularly due to the Section 232 Tariffs, which impacted the Company's export sales and resulted in over-supply of the Canadian market at lower prices.
Loss from operations was $85.1 million, compared to a loss from operations of $12.5 million in the prior-year quarter. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to the lower revenues associated with lower prices and volumes, as well as higher cost of sales from tariffs. For the second quarter of 2025, tariff costs were $64.1 million.
Net loss in the second quarter was $110.6 million, compared to net income of $6.1 million in the prior-year quarter. The decrease was driven primarily by lower steel shipment volumes, lower realized pricing, and tariff-related costs as detailed above.
Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter was a loss of $32.4 million, compared with Adjusted EBITDA of $37.7 million for the prior-year quarter. This resulted in an Adjusted EBITDA margin of (5.5%). The average realized price of steel net of freight and non-steel revenue was $1,132 per ton, compared to $1,187 per ton in the prior-year quarter. Cost per ton of steel products sold was $1,144 compared to $1,069 in the prior-year quarter. Shipments for the second quarter were 472,056 tons, compared to 503,152 tons in the prior-year quarter.
See 'Non-GAAP Measures' below for an explanation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin and a reconciliation of net (loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Electric Arc Furnace
In November 2021, the Company's Board of Directors (the 'Board') authorized the Company to construct two new state of the art EAFs to replace the Company's existing blast furnace and basic oxygen steelmaking operations. Record days of snowfall at the site in late November and early December 2024 impacted project work, but due to the hard work of the entire team to mitigate these impacts, the Company achieved first arc and first steel production in early July.
As of June 30, 2025, the cumulative investment was $881 million and the Company continues to expect the completion of the EAF project will be funded with cash-on-hand, cash generated through operations, and available borrowings under the Company's existing credit facility.
Following the transformation to EAF steelmaking, Algoma's facility is anticipated to have an annual raw steel production capacity of approximately 3.7 million tons, matching its downstream finishing capacity, which is expected to reduce the Company's annual carbon emissions by approximately 70%.
Tariffs
On March 4, 2025, the United States imposed tariffs on Canadian imports, including a 25% duty under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. These tariffs were briefly paused on March 6, reinstated on March 12, and further expanded on April 2, when a minimum 10% 'Reciprocal Tariff' was announced on all U.S. imports, excluding Canada. As of June 4, 2025, the Section 232 tariff on steel and aluminum imports was increased to 50%.
While Canada remains exempt from the Reciprocal Tariff and overlapping duties do not apply to USMCA-compliant goods, the Company is currently subject to the 50% Section 232 tariff on steel exports to the United States. These measures have caused significant market disruption, with Canadian spot pricing falling below U.S. contract pricing due to increased supply, U.S. imports, and offshore offers. For the three months ended June 30, 2025, Canadian net sales realizations were up to 40% lower than U.S. levels, contributing to an estimated $30 million revenue impact.
Tariff-related costs totaled $64.1 million in the second quarter and $74.6 million for the first half of 2025. U.S. shipments represented 54% and 53% of total volumes during those periods, respectively. Given the ongoing uncertainty caused by the U.S. tariffs resulting in a structural imbalance in the Canadian market, the Company is exploring liquidity tools and funding programs that could support its current operations and enable strategic diversification. This includes an application to the federal Large Enterprise Tariff Loan (LETL) program for $500 million, ongoing discussion of potential terms of LETL support and an evaluation of capital investments that align with long-term domestic demand in sectors such as defense and construction, while reinforcing Canada's industrial resilience and low carbon transformation.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Liquidity
At quarter end, the Company had cash of $82.5 million and unused availability under its Revolving Credit Facility of $329.1 million.
Quarterly Dividend
In light of ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, including increased volatility in steel markets and uncertainty surrounding trade policy and tariffs, the Board of Directors has decided to suspend the regular quarterly dividend on the Company's common shares, totaling approximately US$5.2 million. This decision reflects the Board's prudent approach to capital allocation and its commitment to preserving liquidity and financial flexibility in the face of evolving market conditions. The Board will continue to evaluate future dividend declarations in the context of capital requirements, strategic priorities, and overall financial performance.
Conference Call and Webcast Details
A webcast and conference call will be held on Wednesday, July 30, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. EDT to review the Company's results for the three months ended June 30, 2025, discuss recent events, and conduct a question-and-answer session.
The live webcast and archived replay of the conference call can be accessed on the Investors section of the Company's website at www.ir.algoma.com. For those unable to access the webcast, the conference call will be accessible domestically or internationally by dialing 877-425-9470 or 201-389-0878, respectively. Upon dialing in, please request to join the Algoma Steel Second Quarter Conference Call. To access the replay of the call, dial 844-512-2921 (domestic) or 412-317-6671 (international) with passcode 13754580.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis
The Company's unaudited condensed interim financial statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and Management's Discussion & Analysis thereon are available under the Company's profile on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ('SEC') EDGAR website at www.sec.gov and under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com. These documents are also available on the Company's website, www.algoma.com, and shareholders may receive hard copies of such documents free of charge upon request by contacting IR@algoma.com.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains 'forward-looking information' under applicable Canadian securities legislation and 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, 'forward-looking statements'), including statements regarding imposed and threatened tariffs, including the impact, timing and resolution thereof, trends in the pricing of steel, Algoma's transition to EAF steelmaking, including the progress, costs and timing of completion of the Company's EAF project, the Company's expected annual raw steel production capacity and reduction in carbon emissions following completion of the EAF project, Algoma's future as a leading producer of green steel, the potential impacts of inflationary pressures, the Company's ability to access liquidity tools and funding programs, such as the LETL, labor availability, global supply chain disruptions on costs, Algoma's modernization of its plate mill facilities (including annual plate capacity going forward), transformation journey, ability to deliver greater and long-term value, ability to offer North America a secure steel supply and a sustainable future, and investment in its people, and processes, and statements regarding potential borrowings under the Company's credit facilities, and the Company's strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words 'believe,' 'project,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'hope,' 'strategy,' 'future,' 'opportunity,' 'plan,' 'design,' 'pipeline,' 'may,' 'should,' 'will,' 'would,' 'will be,' 'will continue,' 'will likely result,' and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this document. Readers should also consider the other risks and uncertainties set forth in the section entitled 'Risk Factors' and 'Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information' in Algoma's Annual Information Form, filed by Algoma with applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities (available under the Company's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.com) and with the SEC, as part of Algoma's Annual Report on Form 40-F (available at www.sec.gov), as well as in Algoma's current reports with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and Algoma assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement our financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with IFRS® Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB') ('IFRS Accounting Standards'), we use certain non-GAAP measures to evaluate the performance of Algoma. These terms do not have any standardized meaning prescribed within IFRS Accounting Standards and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Rather, these measures are provided as additional information to complement those IFRS Accounting Standards measures by providing a further understanding of our financial performance from management's perspective. Accordingly, they should not be considered in isolation nor as a substitute for analysis of our financial information reported under IFRS Accounting Standards.
Adjusted EBITDA, as we define it, refers to net income (loss) before amortization of property, plant, equipment and amortization of intangible assets, finance costs, interest on pension and other post-employment benefit obligations, income taxes, foreign exchange loss (gain), finance income, carbon tax, changes in fair value of warrant, earnout and share-based compensation liabilities, share-based compensation related to the Company's Omnibus Long Term Incentive Plan, certain inventory write-downs and legal settlement. Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by revenue for the corresponding period. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations, as defined by IFRS Accounting Standards, and should not be considered as alternatives to net profit (loss) from operations, or any other measure of performance prescribed by IFRS Accounting Standards. Adjusted EBITDA, as we define and use it, may not be comparable to Adjusted EBITDA as defined and used by other companies. We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a meaningful measure to assess our operating performance in addition to IFRS Accounting Standards. It is included because we believe it can be useful in measuring our operating performance and our ability to expand our business and provide management and investors with additional information for comparison of our operating results across different time periods and to the operating results of other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is also used by analysts and our lenders as a measure of our financial performance. In addition, we consider Adjusted EBITDA margin to be a useful measure of our operating performance and profitability across different time periods that enhance the comparability of our results. However, these measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation from, or as alternatives to, net income, cash flow from operations or other data prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards. Because of these limitations, such measures should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to invest in business growth or to reduce indebtedness. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our IFRS Accounting Standards results using such measures only as supplements to such results. See the financial tables below for a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA.
About Algoma Steel Group Inc.
Based in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada, Algoma is a fully integrated producer of hot and cold rolled steel products including sheet and plate. Driven by a purpose to build better lives and a greener future, Algoma is positioned to deliver responsive, customer-driven product solutions to applications in the automotive, construction, energy, defense, and manufacturing sectors. Algoma is a key supplier of steel products to customers in North America and is the only producer of discrete plate products in Canada. Its state-of-the-art Direct Strip Production Complex ('DSPC') is one of the lowest-cost producers of hot rolled sheet steel (HRC) in North America.
Algoma is on a transformation journey, modernizing its plate mill and adopting electric arc technology that builds on the strong principles of recycling and environmental stewardship to significantly lower carbon emissions. Today Algoma is investing in its people and processes, working safely, as a team to become one of North America's leading producers of green steel.
As a founding industry in their community, Algoma is drawing on the best of its rich steelmaking tradition to deliver greater value, offering North America the comfort of a secure steel supply and a sustainable future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
This Quantum Computing Company Just Unlocked a New AI Breakthrough
Key Points Rigetti has achieved a significant error rate reduction with a 36-qubit system. This could pave the way for quantum computers with more qubits that can be used for AI. There's still a long way to go, though -- and Rigetti's stock remains a speculative bet. 10 stocks we like better than Rigetti Computing › What are currently the two hottest technologies? Artificial intelligence (AI) deserves a spot at the top, for sure. There's a strong case for quantum computing taking second place. Not so coincidentally, these two technologies are joined at the hip in some ways. When a key milestone is achieved in quantum computing, it can translate to a step forward for AI, too. That appears to be the case with a recent announcement from Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI). This quantum computing company arguably just unlocked a new AI breakthrough. Rigetti's breakthrough On July 16, 2025, Rigetti Computing revealed that it had achieved 99.5% median 2-qubit gate fidelity with its modular 36-qubit quantum computing system. This reflected a halving of the company's best 2-qubit gate error rate with its 84-qubit Ankaa-3 system. If all that sounds like techno-gobbledygook to you, you're not alone. Quantum computing is complicated, with jargon that can be confusing. Let's try to make sense of Rigetti's breakthrough. First, qubits (short for "quantum bits") are similar to the binary bits 0 and 1 used in traditional computers. The big difference is that qubits can be 0, 1, or even both simultaneously. Quantum gates are the building blocks of quantum circuits. They're like logic gates used in traditional computers (such as AND, OR, and NOT) to perform operations. What does it mean that Rigetti achieved 99.5% median 2-qubit gate fidelity? When 2 qubits interact in a "gate" operation, the result is correct 99.5% of the time, with an error rate of five in 1,000 operations. The fewer errors, the more useful a quantum computer is. What does improved quantum gate error rates mean for AI? Rigetti didn't mention AI at all in its announcement. However, its quantum computing breakthrough could have important ramifications for AI. Error correction ranks as one of the biggest problems with quantum computers today. Too many errors make a quantum computer useless in practical applications. That's especially the case with AI, which requires multiple iterations and a high degree of precision in its under-the-hood processing. However, lower error rates allow quantum computers to run longer and use more quantum gates before the accumulated errors cause major problems. It also paves the way for quantum computers with more qubits, which will be a must for training and deploying large-scale AI models. We're seeing this with Rigetti already. The company made its breakthrough on a 36-qubit system. However, it plans to release a 100-plus-qubit system that will have 99.5% median 2-qubit gate fidelity before the end of this year. CEO Subodh Kulkarni stated, "By leveraging well-known techniques from the semiconductor industry, we've developed proprietary technology that we believe is critical to enable scaling to higher qubit count systems." Now for a reality check: Five errors in 1,000 operations isn't nearly good enough. The error rate needs to fall to around one in a million for quantum computers to run useful applications. Some more complex applications will need error rates of one in a billion or better. However, Rigetti's achievement is nonetheless an important milestone in getting to these lower error rates. Is Rigetti Computing stock a smart pick to buy now? If you want to know how significant investors viewed Rigetti's breakthrough, just look at its stock chart. The quantum computing company's share price soared after its announcement earlier this month. Over the last three months, Rigetti stock is up close to 80%. Is this quantum computing stock a smart pick to buy now? Not for risk-averse investors. Rigetti remains unprofitable. It also faces stiff competition from both large and small companies scrambling to develop quantum computers. There's no guarantee that Rigetti will be among the winners in quantum computing over the long run. However, aggressive investors who are willing to take on considerable risk might find Rigetti appealing. It's a speculative stock, to be sure. But if Rigetti can continue to make the technological advances needed to build a practical, large-scale quantum computer, it's likely to be a huge winner over the next decade and beyond. Should you invest $1,000 in Rigetti Computing right now? Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Rigetti Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Wall Street Is Watching This One Metric in Nvidia's Q2 -- Can It Deliver?
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) recently became the world's first $4 trillion tech titan -- but the second quarter could be the spark for its next mega move. With quantum computing breakthroughs, artificial intelligence (AI) networking dominance, and a stealth China rebound on the horizon, this earnings report might deliver more than Wall Street expects. *Stock prices used were the market prices of July 28, 2025. The video was published on Aug. 2, 2025. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Rick Orford has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rick Orford
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Canada weighs retaliation cost against Trump tariffs as analysts warn hitting back isn't worth it
Published Aug 02, 2025 • Last updated 10 minutes ago • 4 minute read Tractor trailers entering the U.S. from Canada at the Pacific Highway Border Crossing in Blaine, Washington, on Monday, March 3, 2025. Photo by David Ryder / Bloomberg Canada's decision to retaliate against U.S. tariffs earlier this year appears to be driving a divergence in how President Donald Trump is dealing with America's neighbours. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Until this week, Canada and Mexico received similar treatment in White House trade actions. Each was subject to a 25% base tariff, with a large exemption for goods shipped under the North American free trade pact known as CUSMA (or USMCA). That changed on Thursday, when Trump granted Mexico a 90-day pause on tariff hikes while jacking up its tax on Canadian products to 35%. The administration said Canada's higher rate was a response to fentanyl trafficking and its moves to hit back with counter-tariffs. The situation leaves Prime Minister Mark Carney with a political dilemma. On one hand, he won an election by promising a muscular approach to the trade war, saying the government would use tariffs to cause 'maximum pain' in the US. His voters remember that, and some want him to punch back. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Yet the retaliatory measures already undertaken failed to prevent further escalations. Instead, they appear to have emboldened Trump's team to hit even harder. U.S. administration officials including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick frequently talk about how only two countries retaliated against Trump's tariffs — the other was China. 'Canada's retaliatory trade measures against the United States further complicate bilateral efforts to address this escalating drug crisis,' the White House said in a fact sheet, referencing fentanyl. But Mexico is a much larger source of shipments of the drug into the U.S., according to Customs and Border Protection data. Carney, an economist and former central banker, has also made it plain he believes retaliation can only go so far. In fact, his government has watered down Canada's counter-tariffs with a number of exemptions, declined to increase them when the U.S. lifted steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% and scrapped a tax on technology services at Trump's request. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister in charge of trade talks, told Radio-Canada on Friday the government hasn't made any decisions about further retaliation. But Carney is clearly reluctant to do so — which 'reflects the reality that counter-tariffs are understood to be economically harmful to the country which imposes them,' said David Collins, a professor specializing in international trade at City St George's, University of London. The government's priority is to keep the CUSMA carve-out that dramatically lowers the real tax on Canadian goods. The effective U.S. tariff rate on Canada is about 6.3%, according to Bank of Nova Scotia economists. 'A more diplomatic approach is likely to bear more fruit with the Americans,' Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada imposed two rounds of counter-tariffs in March, when Justin Trudeau was in his final days as prime minister. The first placed 25% levies on about $30 billion of imports from the U.S. that included food items, clothing and motorcycles. The second came when Trump put tariffs on steel and aluminum. Then, when Trump added tariffs to foreign automobiles, Carney essentially matched that move, imposing similar fees on U.S. cars and trucks. But in mid-April, the government unveiled a series of exemptions for business inputs — goods imported for use in manufacturing and food packaging, as well as things needed for health care, public safety and security. Automakers such as General Motors Co. and Honda Motor Co. that make vehicles at Canadian plants were also made eligible for relief from import taxes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The large majority of U.S. products can still enter Canada tariff-free. U.S. companies and other entities exported about $440 billion of goods and services to Canada last year — more than to any other nation. For Canada, 'the logic for escalation over cooperation is just weak,' said Oliver Lavelle, global macro strategist at Thiel Macro LLC. Mexico's Way Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, in contrast, has never imposed counter-tariffs on the U.S. Sheinbaum's position is also supported by her high approval ratings, which have remained above 75% in most polls. 'It's worth saying: President Trump treats us with respect in all the calls we've had, and we do too,' she said during a new conference. 'We may not agree, but the treatment is respectful.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A statement issued late Thursday night by Carney's office expressed disappointment in Trump's tariff hike on Canada, but made no mention of retaliation. A spokesperson for Carney declined to comment further. LeBlanc said he met with Lutnick on Tuesday night, and that Canadian officials held other meetings throughout the week, but a deal acceptable to both sides 'was not yet visible.' In his statement, Carney acknowledged that lumber, steel, aluminum and autos are still subject to U.S. levies, and said his government 'will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian, and diversify its export markets.' 'Jitters' But while the CUSMA exemption gives Canada some breathing room, the sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminum are still harmful and will affect economic growth if they're in place for long, Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, said the idea that Canada is getting off lightly is 'both overstated and potentially premature.' Canadian industries are more reliant on U.S. exports than their overseas competitors, and Trump could also chose to weaken the CUSMA exemption at any time, he said in a note to investors. 'We are still hopeful for a deal that relieves at least some of the pressure on base metal exporters,' Shenfeld said. 'But whether any of this lasts will depend on Trump's word, and we've seen how shaky that foundation can be, leaving jitters that could impact business capital spending and confidence ahead.' —With assistance from Mario Baker Ramirez and Carolina Millan. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA Canada
