Colombian Parliament Reiterates Support for Morocco's Territorial Integrity
He emphasized that the Algerian representative had, as usual, engaged in his favorite exercise of distorting realities and misrepresenting evidence regarding the populations in the Tindouf camps. In this letter, Hilale first expressed Morocco's deep regret at the biased statement made by Algeria's Permanent Representative, Amar Bendjama, during the Security Council meeting held this Monday on "The Challenges of Forced Displacement around the World."
In his remarks, the Algerian ambassador took advantage of the presence of the High Commissioner for Refugees, Filippo Grandi, to peddle lies, distort realities, and misrepresent the facts regarding the populations in the Tindouf camps in Algeria.
In this regard, Ambassador Hilale provided elements to debunk the fallacious statements made by the Algerian representative, who was the only one to address the issue of the Moroccan Sahara during this briefing.
The Moroccan diplomat affirmed that the populations of the Tindouf camps are in no way "forcibly displaced persons," as claimed by the Algerian representative, but rather populations held against their will for half a century, noting that Algeria deprives them of their most basic rights, including the choice to return to their motherland, Morocco, or to settle in a third country, or even to integrate into the host country, Algeria, as advocated by the durable solutions of the High Commissioner for Refugees.
He pointed out that Algeria is also violating the rights granted to them by the legal instruments of international humanitarian law, the Geneva Convention and its Additional Protocols, including the rights to freedom of expression, movement, and demonstration.
He added that these populations are living in camps whose jurisdiction, control, and management have been entrusted by Algeria to the armed separatist group "polisario," in violation of international law and contrary to its obligations as a host country, as denounced by the Human Rights Committee in its report CCPR/C/DZA/CO/4 of August 17, 2018, paragraph 9.
In response to the Algerian ambassador's allusion to a so-called "occupation" of the Sahara by Morocco, Hilale recalled, to the Algerian representative's great displeasure, that the occupation of the Sahara ended with the return of these provinces to their motherland, Morocco, under the Madrid Accords of November 1975, of which the General Assembly took note in its resolution 34/58 B of December 1975.
"The Algerian representative pretends to ignore that the Security Council is considering the question of the Moroccan Sahara under Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter, for the peaceful settlement of this regional dispute, wholly created and maintained for half a century by his country, with incalculable consequences for the peace, security, and stability of the Maghreb and the African continent," the Moroccan diplomat emphasized.
Hilale further noted that Algeria is not cooperating with United Nations agencies or humanitarian partners to ensure access to basic services for the populations of the Tindouf camps. He added that Algeria has refused to allow the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to conduct a census and registration of the populations held captive in the Tindouf camps for over 50 years, despite clear instructions from the Security Council in successive resolutions since 2011.
"The lack of a census encourages the misappropriation of humanitarian assistance, which has forced agencies and NGOs to reduce the volume of their aid," he continued.
In this response letter to the Security Council, Morocco's Permanent Representative to the UN also pointed out that the misappropriation of humanitarian aid by the "polisario" and Algerian officials has been proven and noted in the reports of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the Office of the Inspector General of the UNHCR, the World Food Programme, as well as several NGOs and international organisations.
Reacting to Algeria's so-called call for "a lasting solution" to the Moroccan Sahara issue, Hilale denounced this action as nothing more than window dressing, explaining that a lasting solution "requires compliance with Security Council resolutions, which call for the resumption of the political process and roundtable discussions. Algeria has refused to do this since the appointment of the Secretary-General's Personal Envoy to the Moroccan Sahara, Staffan de Mistura, in October 2021."
Such a behavior condemns this process to immobility and stalemate, with its attendant humanitarian consequences for the populations held captive in the Tindouf camps, the ambassador lamented.
He also affirmed that the lasting solution lies in the implementation of the Moroccan Autonomy Initiative, which the Security Council has described as serious and credible for 18 years. He emphasized that this Initiative is widely considered by the international community as the sole basis for resolving this dispute, while respecting the Kingdom's national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
He added that "Algeria's blindness prevents it from realizing that this Initiative is supported by more than 100 United Nations Member States, including two permanent members of the Security Council, the former occupying power of the Moroccan Sahara, and 23 Member States of the European Union."
In this context, he recalled the latest Security Council Resolution 2756 (2024), which welcomed the international momentum in favor of the Moroccan Autonomy Initiative and urged that it be used to its full potential in the search for a definitive political solution to this dispute. This, he said, demonstrates the Autonomy Initiative's compliance with the right to self-determination.
Regarding the Algerian ambassador's mention of holding a referendum, Hilale denounced Algeria's "obsessive fixation," noting that the Algerian Permanent Representative is well aware that the Security Council and the General Assembly have definitively shelved the referendum, in 2002 and 2003 respectively.
In conclusion, Hilale emphasized that "the Algerian ambassador also forgets that the resolutions his country supported during his previous term on the Security Council, as well as those he submits annually to the Fourth Committee of the General Assembly, no longer make any reference to the referendum."
Ambassador Hilale's letter to the President and members of the UN Security Council will be published as an official document of the UN body.
It should be noted that the Algerian diplomat's fallacious and mendacious allegations were completely ignored in the response presented to members by the High Commissioner for Refugees during this briefing.
MAP: 29 avril 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
28 minutes ago
- Morocco World
Airbnb Alters Listings on Morocco's Southern Provinces After Foreign Interference
Home-sharing platform Airbnb has recently bowed to pressure from a foreign activist group, removing legitimate references to Morocco from accommodation listings located in the country's southern provinces. The move represents a troubling capitulation to political manipulation that ignores the reality on the ground, as the platform quietly updated its website after receiving a letter from Western Sahara Resource Watch (WSRW). Responding to WSRW, a network of foreign activists with no connection to the region, Airbnb has removed cities like Laayoune, Dakhla, and Boujdour, which have been integral parts of Morocco for decades. Foreign interference in Morocco's domestic affairs WSRW's letter to Airbnb on June 13, 2025, represents yet another attempt by foreign activists to interfere in Morocco's internal affairs. The organization, which operates from European capitals, has no legitimate status to dictate how international companies should label Moroccan territory. Erik Hagen of WSRW has celebrated what he called a 'first step,' revealing the group's ultimate goal: to economically isolate Morocco's southern provinces and undermine the development projects that have transformed the region. The move reveals foreign lobbied interference seeking to undermine Morocco's territorial integrity. Algeria's regime continues to lead lobbying efforts, spending billions of dollars to challenge Morocco's territorial integrity by backing the Polisario Front. WSRW's celebration of Airbnb's decision as aligning with 'international court rulings' ignores the growing international recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over its southern provinces. Read also: Kenya-Morocco Relations Strengthen Following Nairobi's Newfound Sahara Position Morocco has been garnering increasing international support for its sovereignty over provinces in Western Sahara. A growing number of countries have endorsed Morocco's autonomy initiative, exceeding 115 countries, including major international powers like the US, UK, France, and Spain. Multiple countries have opened consulates in the region, and major international agreements acknowledge Morocco's administrative control. Airbnb's decision is likely to receive a response, not only from the government but also from Moroccans. Many Moroccans use Airbnb to book accommodations across the country. Moroccans are known to respond swiftly to such moves, often launching campaigns that don't go unnoticed. Recently, Glovo drivers in Morocco staged protests after the company displayed a map that excluded the country's southern provinces. The demonstrations gained traction both online and on the ground, prompting Glovo to issue a statement blaming the incident on a technical error and claiming the issue had been resolved. The incident echoes Morocco's consistent stance, emphasizing that the Sahara dossier is the lens through which the country views all international relations and national priorities.
Morocco World
5 hours ago
- Morocco World
Morocco's Amina Bouayach Named Among Africa's Most Inspiring Women
Amina Bouayach, President of Morocco's National Human Rights Council (CNDH), has earned recognition on Pour Elle's 2025 list of '50 Inspiring African Women.' In the 2025 list, Bouayach features along with nine other inspiring African activist women and has been selected for her dedication to defending human rights, equality, and social justice throughout her career in Morocco. 'Pour Elle' celebrates African women with lasting impacts The African media platform 'Pour Elle' focuses on women's and girls' issues across Africa. This year's honorees list marks International African Women's Day 2025. The platform has a mission of celebrating prominent African women who leave lasting impacts on their communities and the continent. This year's list features African women from 20 African countries and African diaspora communities abroad. The honorees have demonstrated a growing influence of female leadership in shaping a more just and inclusive future for the African continent. The theme of this year, 'African Women Active in Achieving Justice and Reparations for an Inclusive Africa,' honors women who take the lead in change in politics, economics, business, activism, culture, arts, and society. Bouayach's achievements and legacy Bouayach has devoted her life to defending human rights, human dignity, and fundamental freedoms at national, regional, African, and international levels. Today, she stands as one of Africa's prominent human rights voices and serves as an active figure within the network of leading African women. This latest recognition adds to the Moroccan human rights female activist's series of significant achievements in 2025. In March, the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) elected her as president by unanimous vote, cementing her position as a leading voice in the global human rights community. Earlier in the year, Bouayach received the 2025 Mediterranean Foundation Award for her contributions to promoting human rights both in Morocco and internationally. King Mohammed VI reappointed Bouayach as president of Morocco's CNDH in March 2025, marking a continuation of her leadership role that began in December 2018. Tags: Amina BouayachCNDHPour Elle
Morocco World
6 hours ago
- Morocco World
Algeria Still Trapped by its Dogmas
On the occasion of the 26th anniversary of the Throne Day, King Mohammed VI reiterated, once again, his call to Algerian leaders to turn to a new page between the two countries. He recalled, with regret, the current state of relations and reaffirmed the Kingdom's willingness to engage in frank, sincere and responsible dialogue to end this impasse, which has now lasted for half a century. Already in 2018, he proposed the creation of a joint political dialogue mechanism, and in 2021 he also affirmed that the problems would never come from Morocco. This renewed offer of openness and empathy towards our eastern neighbor certainly honors the kingdom, which remains faithful to its traditions and its constant willingness to engage in sincere dialogue. It is hoped that it will enable Algerian leaders to choose this path and initiate the long-awaited direct dialogue needed to break the political deadlock that is hampering the entire Maghreb region. However, for those who know Algeria, its political-military system remains frozen in the outdated dogmas of a bygone era. For the leaders of this country, any compromise with Morocco is seen as a failure and a betrayal. To understand this phenomenon, it is necessary to look back at the history of this country. Since Algeria's independence, the National Liberation Front (FLN) and the National People's Army (ANP) have imposed a revolutionary and Third Wordlist narrative on the young, and nascent state. To this day, these two institutions monopolize power and present themselves as the sole legitimate representatives of the people, speaking on their behalf and defending their ideals. They have become the embodiment of this revolution, which sees itself as infallible and above criticism. They have imposed themselves on the people as the guarantors of national unity and the defenders of a revolutionary internationalist ideology that has not evolved since then. Over the years, this dogma, which has become a national ideology by force, prohibits any opposition to the Algerian state. Any voice criticizing this deep state is considered treasonous and a threat to national cohesion. The FLN and the ANP have thus become the heart and lungs of the country, centralizing and disseminating the state's ideology. They both provide after-sales service for this ideology, including its obsessions with Morocco and many other countries. These two institutions have taken over the entire state, controlling the army, diplomacy, the media, and entire sections of society such as education, management, and propaganda. Through this policy of monopolizing public space, the FLN and the ANP have enshrined a narrow vision of Algerian politics and history, which over time has become deeply ingrained in the collective subconscious. Algiers became anti-imperialist, a Mecca for revolutionaries, defending all causes, just and unjust, and forgetting that of the Algerian people. This international aura, which lasted during the heyday of the Cold War, quickly melted away like snow in the sun with the popular uprising of 1988 and the collapse of the Eastern Bloc. In 1988, the Algerian population took to the streets to protest against oppression, corruption and unemployment. The army took a major step by temporarily easing its grip, adopting a façade of pluralism through a constitutional overhaul in 1989 and the organization of new elections. These were held in 1991 and resulted in the Islamic Salvation Front winning the first round with 48% of the vote. The FLN then lost its monopoly and the army, fearing it would lose its power, put an end to the democratic process. This marked the beginning of the civil war and the dark decade that caused thousands of deaths and displaced persons. The military intervened again to restore the FLN to power despite popular rejection. At the same time, the system helped new parties to emerge, which joined the new government, sometimes with an Islamic slant, but without any real popular base. All the changes made after the political tsunami of 1988 led to the fall of some figures and the rise of others. But the dogmas and ideology of the deep state remained unchanged. Paradoxically, the revolutionary socialist dogma of the 20th century, on which the Algerian military relied, fell into disuse throughout the world, except in Algeria. Algerian voices were raised to denounce this suffocation of society, which destroyed individual freedoms. The government then introduced liberal reforms that enriched one caste but frustrated the others. In the countries of the former Eastern Bloc, several adopted the liberal system, with varying degrees of success, including Russia. Even in China, the Communist Party also reformed to adopt market laws and modernize its economy to become the power it is today. As a result of these failures to adapt, the Algerian political system has become even more rigid due to a lack of genuine openness to its regional and international environment. The popular protest movement known as Hirak has intensified, continues to simmer, and prevents the adoption of fundamental reforms. The regime is entrenched in its hardline stance, repressing opponents and persecuting journalists. It is increasingly tense and isolated on the international stage, and on bad terms with many states. These contradictions came to light during President Tebboune's recent interview with representatives of the national media. One of the journalists asked him the awkward question of whether the country's foreign policy was based on immutable principles, or on interests and pragmatism. The president asked him to provide an example to support his reasoning, while indicating that he understood the meaning of his question. 'To please others, should I stop helping the Sahrawis?' the president asked him in response. As a result, Algerian leaders remain trapped in the same political logic and culture that still shapes their thinking today and prevents Algeria from adapting to the world around it. Their dogmas have become so rigid and dangerous for their own country, as well as for the entire region. It is this paralysis that prevents any serious internal debate and any questioning of the choices made since independence. And it is this immobility that explains their refusal of any helping hand or assistance from outside. This blockage stems from the revolutionary narrative with which the army has imbued the whole of society. The army considers itself the legitimate representative of the people and their spokesperson in defending the ideals that once gave the country its aura. It is therefore the guardian of the temple, the guarantor of national unity as inherited from the period of liberation. Any criticism of its dogmas, which have been elevated to absolute values, is therefore seen as opposition to the army and is likely to be considered treason against the nation. Such a system, which blocks the progress of its own country and controls the lives of its citizens, cannot respond to appeals to reason and outstretched hands. The Algerian military will never opt for appeasement, except under necessity or duress. But the royal gesture, reiterated during the Throne Day celebrations, is primarily addressed to the Algerian people and its driving forces, who do not necessarily share the warmongering vision of the generals who want to make Morocco their existential and eternal enemy. The Sovereign's outstretched hand goes beyond the current situation to simply become part of Morocco's history and traditions.
