
Massive fortune Terry Wogan's widow left in her will revealed
The couple were married for 50 years
The massive fortune Terry Wogan's widow left in her will was almost five times more than that passed on by her husband.
Former top model Lady Helen Wogan died last year aged 88 nine years after the Irish BBC broadcasting legend passed away.
The total amount of money she bequeathed to her sons and daughter was revealed in documents signed off by the High Court last week.
According to the figures published by The Sun, Lady Wogan left a total of £4,948,334 (approx €5,819,000).
After costs and fees, this was reduced by £31,000 to £4,917,989.
She also left two tax-free gifts, in the form of £850,000 to son Alan, named as an executor on the estate, and £750,000 to daughter Katherine.
The rest of the money and her possessions were split between all three living children, including son Mark.
The couple were married for 50 years
Each of Lady Wogan's grandchildren will be the beneficiaries of a £100,000 trust that was set up for to be made available to them when they turn 25.
Lady Wogan, who was married to the late broadcaster for more than 50 years, signed her final will in February 2023, seven years after her husband had died in 2016 aged 77.
Sir Terry, who thought to be worth £20million at the height of his career, passed on £1million in his estate.
Lady Helen Wogan and Sir Terry in 2015
News in 90 June 4th
In a tribute to a 'beautiful' mother and grandmother as he announced her passing, son Mark wrote about her 'fantastic life.'.
'From a young Irish rose to Lady Wogan, she was the epitome of style and grace,' he wrote.
'A Mother, Grandmother and Wife, with love and kindness at her core. A strength and a belief that saw her through many of life's trials.
'A sense of humour and a turn of phrase that would have you in fits of laughter.
'A proper lady in every sense of the word. Her and Dad are hopefully sharing a vodka martini and hoping we don't make too much of fuss. We love you Mum, now and forever.'
Lady Wogan was a top Irish model in the 1960s born in a Dublin suburb and she met her husband while he was an up-and-coming star on Irish radio.
The pair, both born in Ireland, married in a local parish church in Dublin in April 1965.
Between 1993 and his semi-retirement in December 2009, Sir Terry's BBC Radio 2 breakfast show drew in an average of eight million listeners.
Sir Terry died just months after hosting his final show on Radio 2, during which he revealed he had prostate cancer. His health issues led to his withdrawal from presenting Children In Need later that month.
Following his death, the BBC renamed Radio 2's studios Wogan House as a mark of respect.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
3 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
CAP battle starts as EU plans to overhaul farmer payments
The European Commission this week outlined long-anticipated proposals to radically overhaul the system of financial supports for the agricultural sector across the European Union. The top-line changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) would see ringfenced funding for farming cut by more than a fifth, with supports for agriculture merged with those for rural areas into a single fund. In brass tax, this would mean a fall in guaranteed CAP funding from €387 billion down to €300 billion over the course of the EU budget cycle from 2028. Around 120,000 Irish farmers receive roughly €2bn annually in CAP payments, and much of this money essentially makes a huge cohort of Irish farms viable. Given this, it was no surprise to see farming organisations here quickly coming out of the blocks to condemn the proposals. The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) warned the move would put food security at risk, while the group representing dairy farmers, the ICMSA, said there would be immediate upward pressure on food prices. A number of Irish MEPs also came out against the plans, which the Commission argues would allow for "stronger synergies between policies", and create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget. Now the horse-trading really gets going as member states, through the Council of Ministers, start the long process of agreeing on an approach to the proposals, before painstaking talks with the parliament in Brussels and the Commission begin. Ultimately, it could take over two years before any agreement is in place for the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028. Ireland will likely play a key role in this process, as we will hold the rolling six-month EU presidency for the second half of next year. This means that what the EU Commission is proposing and what eventually ends up happening might well be very different. Based on what I've written so far, it might seem the changes suggested are largely negative, but are there any positives in there for farmers across the bloc? Well, from what the Commission has outlined, it wants to make a strong play to encourage more young farmers into the profession. And this is in response to one of the major issues threatening the future of family farms both here in Ireland and across the EU. The average age of a farmer in Ireland is pushing 60, and with high income volatility and increased regulation farming isn't seen as an attractive career path in the way it would have to previous generations. A recent Teagasc report showed farm incomes were up across the board last year, but it also highlighted severe differences in farmer earnings from one year to the next. Paired with that, the level of environmental regulations farmers have to adhere to, and biodiversity and other targets that need to be met is only rising. These are welcome moves to protect our environment but they come at a price, and add layers of complexity to the job. In an attempt to address the challenge of generational renewal, the Commission has recommended that CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity". This would mean that farmers who are of pension age would no longer receive supports under CAP. In addition, the proposals would hugely increase supports for young farmers starting out, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000. The changes would also give individual member states more autonomy when it comes to doling out funds to farmers and rural areas, and can steer money in one direction of the other based on what is deemed more necessary. This could bring a shift in the well-worn path of supports going directly to farmers in less-well-off regions, as opposed to the areas themselves getting the money. So farmers could still benefit from rural EU funding, just not directly. However, the Commission's proposals are just proposals at this stage and will need approval at various stages of the EU decision-making process if they are to become part of the EU budget. The Irish Government hasn't wasted any time in putting domestic structures in place to decide on the country's stance on all this. On Thursday, the day after the EU proposals, Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon held the first meeting of what he calls the "CAP Consultation Committee". He called the Commission's CAP recommendations a "starting point", adding "we have been through considerable reforms before and we've managed to negotiate through them in the past and we'll do the same again". The minister's positive take might given some of the stakeholders at that CAP committee some reassurance. Ireland's response to this will be pretty much an all-inclusive one. The stakeholders gathered together by the minister include five Government departments, a host of State agencies, farmer organisations, business groups, as well as academics. IFA President Francie Gorman was giving his reaction to the Commission's CAP proposals on Wednesday's RTÉ Six-One News, in which he summed up the complexities associated with finding the right funding model for farmers. He welcomed the EU's renewed focus on bringing along more young farmers but pointed out: "If you want the next generation of farmers coming home, along with all the measures that we bring in to support young farmers, we still have to have viable farms for them to come into." Essentially, however well-intentioned it is, the idea of giving newer farmers more financial support at the expense of older ones could prove to be a misguided one if it kills off the very farms its trying to protect. Like most budget-related considerations, it will come down to finding a balance. And with the next EU budget not kicking in until 2028, at least there is sufficient time to try and get this balance right. But there's no doubt that between now and 2028, many battles will be fought as competing interests vie for pieces of a potentially smaller pie of EU funding.


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Sunday Independent's View: Ministers cannot afford to squander Apple billions
Too many ministers in decades past have been forced to make the more painful decisions of where to impose cuts rather than splash the cash. With great riches comes great responsibility, however, and the Cabinet's failure to agree the figures on Friday was a telling insight into the strength of the competing demands made by ministers to ensure their departments do not miss out on the billions — not least from the Apple windfall. Time is tight, with the Government expected to approve the plan on Tuesday. The Taoiseach and Tánaiste accordingly met again this weekend to thrash out the final details, but negotiations are clearly continuing until the last moment. Housing, health and transport are among the areas where agreement has yet to be reached. From the outside, it appears a no-brainer. Housing remains far and away the biggest concern in every opinion poll. Our EU partners are looking to Ireland to shoulder a fair share of collective security Even if there were no political self-interest for the Government to answer that call, some basic empathy for people struggling to meet the cost of rents and mortgages — or even get a toe on the property ladder in the first place — would demand they allocate as much as possible of the money to alleviating that crisis. Health is, likewise, an area where increased investment remains an irrefutable necessity. The one area that stands out this time around is defence. When TDs with euro signs in their eyes were salivating over how to spend the unexpected Apple windfall before November's general election, defence did not really get a look-in. Things are different now. With no end in sight to the war in Ukraine, our EU partners are increasingly looking to Ireland to shoulder a fair share of the burden of collective security. That may prove a hard sell to the public, who did not expect those extra billions to go on jets and an expanded Naval Service, but the days when Ireland could rely on others to protect our seas and shores are surely coming to an end. There are always other unwelcome expenses too. The European Court of Justice is expected to rule soon that asylum-seekers are entitled to sue the State if they are denied accommodation on arrival in the country. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan said this would be 'very hard to justify' to Irish citizens whose own homeless people have no such legal right, but it is probably not a battle Ireland can win. As every household knows, finding the money for such unforeseen expenses can stretch the family budget to breaking point. Regrettably, the old proverb also holds true: eaten bread is soon forgotten. Excited politicians were minded to view money from Apple as the answer to all their dearest wishes. Once spent, the demands on the public purse will start again. With Donald Trump's tariffs still set to bite, it could be that the revenue available for any future development plans will be significantly down.


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Government starts fund to help businesses hardest hit by US trade war as 15pc-20pc tariffs loom
Coalition scrambling to avoid recession as jobs and businesses in the firing line The Government is planning to do 'everything it possibly can' to avoid a recession, as the Sunday Independent can reveal details of a new fund for those Irish businesses worst affected by US tariffs. With US president Donald Trump pushing to impose a 15pc minimum tariff rate on all EU goods, the Government is now bracing for 'quite stark' impacts on the Irish economy — even if the new rate is lower than the 'devastating' 30pc tariffs Trump previously floated.