HC admits plea to end caste bar on priests in state-run temples
priests
in govt-administered
temples
.
The petition also challenged the constitutionality of the Hindu Shrine and Religious Places (Management & Regulation) Act, 2019.
The petition, filed by Anusuchit Jati-Janjati Adhikari Karmachari Sangh secretary MC Ahirwar, stated that under the Act, about 350 temples have been identified for administration by the state govt.
"The spiritual department has also formulated a policy for appointment of priests in these temples.
Persons from only Brahmin caste can be appointed priests under the policy. The priest is paid honorarium from the public exchequer," it stated.
Appearing for the petitioner, senior counsel Rameshwar P Singh and Puispendra Shah contended that there were several castes and communities in the Hindu religion, "why only Brahmins should be entitled to become priests in the temples". "A person qualified to be a priest from any caste should be entitled to become a priest," he contended.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
El Arenal: Un segundo ingreso para ecuatorianos: prueba Amazon CFD (Inicia hoy).
Empezar ahora
Registrarse
Undo
Appearing on behalf of the state govt, deputy advocate general Abhijeet Awasthi raised the issue of locus standi of the petitioner to raise the issue. Being an organisation representing a section of employees, he contended, it has no locus standi to file such a petition.
However, the bench of chief justice Suresh Kumar Kait and justice Vivek Jain, after hearing both the sides, issued notices to respondents, including GAD, religious endowment department, social justice department and PWD.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump aims to shut trade loopholes China uses to evade tariffs
US President Donald Trump's two-tiered trade deal with Vietnam aims squarely at practices China has long used to skirt US tariffs: The widespread legal shifting of production to Southeast Asian factories and the murkier and illegal 'origin washing' of exports through their ports. The agreement slaps a 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a 40% levy on goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. With details still scarce, economists said much will hinge on the framework Washington establishes to determine what it sees as 'Made in Vietnam' and what it sees as transshipments. Complicating matters is the fact that Chinese businesses have rushed to set up shop across Southeast Asia since Trump launched his first trade war back in 2018. The lion's share of Vietnam's exports to the US are goods like Airpods, phones or other products assembled with Chinese components in a factory in Vietnam and then shipped to America. That's not illegal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Also Read: Beijing wary as US plots quiet trade war to isolate China; India in negotiation room 'A lot will depend on how the 40% tariffs are applied. If the Trump administration keeps it targeted, it should be manageable,' said Roland Rajah, lead economist at the Lowy Institute in Sydney. 'If the approach is too broad and blunt, then it could be quite damaging' for China, Vietnam and for the US, which will have to pay higher import prices, he said. Live Events The think tank estimates that 28% of Vietnamese exports to the US were made up of Chinese content in 2022, up from 9% in 2018. Pham Luu Hung, chief economist at SSI Securities Corp. in Hanoi, said a 40% levy on transshipped goods would have limited impact on Vietnam's economy because they aren't of Vietnamese origin in the first place. Re-routed exports accounted for just 16.5% of Vietnam's shipments to the US in 2021, a share that's likely declined over the past couple of years amid stronger enforcement actions by both governments, Hung said. 'An important caveat is that the rules of origin remain under negotiation,' Hung said. 'In practice, these rules may have a greater impact than the tariff rates themselves.' Devil in Details Duncan Wrigley, chief China economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said he's skeptical the latest deal will be effective in stamping out Chinese exports via Vietnam to the US. 'The devil is in the details, but I think China's exports will either go via other markets to the US, or some value-added will be done in Vietnam so the product counts as made in Vietnam, rather than a transshipment,' he said. As officials across Asia rushed to negotiate lower US tariff levels with their US counterparts this year, Chinese businesses have been just as quick to ramp up their exports through alternative channels in order to skirt punitive US levies. Shipments from China to Southeast Asia have reached record highs in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam this year. And there's been a 'significant increase in correlation' to the region's increase in exports to the US during the same period, Citigroup Inc. economists said in a recent report. Bloomberg Much of that is likely due to the shifting of legitimate production across the region. Goods destined for the US market may be sent from their factories in Southeast Asia, and what they make in their factories in China will be sent to the rest of the world, said Derrick Kam, Asia economist at Morgan Stanley. 'If you try to represent that in the trade data, it will look exactly like rerouting, but it's not,' Kam said. 'It's essentially the supply chain working itself out.' But it's transshipment that's been a major concern for Trump's top trade advisers including Peter Navarro, who described Vietnam as 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News. And it's not just been happening in Vietnam. Not long after Trump unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2, garment makers in Indonesia started receiving offers from Chinese companies to be 'partners in transshipment,' said Redma Gita Wirawasta, chairman of the Indonesian Filament Yarn and Fiber Producers Association. Chinese products would be rerouted to Indonesia, undergo minimal processing like repacking or relabeling, then secure a certification that they were made in the Southeast Asian country, Wirawasta said. Bloomberg When the goods are then exported to the US, they'd be subject to the 10% universal levy that Trump has imposed on nearly all countries, instead of the tariff for China that still equates to an effective level of over 50%, even after a recent 'deal' that lowered levies from a peak of 145%. With the huge scope for arbitrage, coupled with little policing, that process will prove tough to stamp out. 'Chinese exporters and their affiliates and partners in Southeast Asia are highly skilled at adapting to changing rules, identifying loopholes, and sometimes overstating the extent of value-add by non-China countries,' said Gabriel Wildau, managing director at advisory firm Teneo Holdings LLC in New York. Some final assembly or transshipment may shift to rival Southeast Asian transshipment hubs like Cambodia, Thailand and Singapore, or farther afield to Turkey, Hungary or Poland, Wildau said. 'Another possibility is that the definitions and enforcement mechanisms are fuzzy, rendering the latest deal cosmetic and toothless,' he said. 'Rigorous enforcement would also require a significant boost of resources to enable US customs to verify compliance with the tougher rules of origin.' There have been efforts across the region to at least be seen to be making an effort to curb the practice. Indeed, Vietnam has made a big deal about cracking down on trade fraud and illegal activity in recent months. In April, South Korea said it seized more than $20 million worth of goods with falsified origin labels — the majority of which were destined for the US. The Airfreight Forwarders Association of Malaysia issued a warning in May as Chinese brokers promoted illegal rerouting services on social media. Malaysia has centralized the issuance of certificates of origin with its Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry, while tapping its customs agency to help curb transshipment. Thailand has expanded its watch list for high-risk products, including solar panels, cars and parts, and is mulling stricter penalties for violators. Red Tape Casey Barnett, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Cambodia, is already seeing the changes in action. One factory that exports to major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot and Lowe's, said that customs officials were very carefully reviewing their products before being sent to the US, he said. 'It's creating some additional paperwork and a little bit of red tape here,' Barnett said. A senior manager at a logistics company in Cambodia, who asked not to be identified because the matter is sensitive, said export processing time has now stretched to as much as 14 working days — double what it was before. But in Indonesia, getting a certificate of origin is fairly quick and painless when goods are marked for export, often just requiring a product list and a letter to the provincial trade office, according to Wirawasta. Authorities prioritize checking products that enter the country to ensure they pay the right duties and comply with regulations, he explained. It's rare for them to inspect factories where an export good was supposedly made. So much so that sometimes, Chinese companies don't even need to muster up some local processing. 'The T-shirt could be finished in China, with a 'Made in Indonesia' label already sewn on,' Wirawasta said. 'Some traders won't even bother to unload the goods from the shipping container,' he added. 'Unloading costs money.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
European firms in panic over EU's AI Act, 44 CEOs urge Brussels to pause the law
Over 40 CEOs of European companies wrote a letter to the EU urging Brussels to halt its landmark artificial intelligence act, The EU was already considering mellowing down key elements of the law due to come into force in August. read more The Chief Executives of top European companies, including Airbus and BNP Paribas, are urging the European Union (EU) to halt its landmark legislation regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI). The letter is coming at a time when the regional body is already considering watering down some of the key elements of the law. It is pertinent to note that the legislation is due to come into effect in August. In an open letter obtained by the Financial Times, the heads of 44 major firms on the continent called on European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to introduce a two-year pause on the Act. The CEOs warned that some of the regulations are unclear and overlapping and can threaten the bloc's competitiveness in the global AI race. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The letter noted that the EU's complex rules put 'Europe's AI ambitions at risk, as it jeopardises not only the development of European champions, but also the ability of all industries to deploy AI at the scale required by global competition.' According to The Financial Times, co-signatories also included the chiefs of French retailer Carrefour and Dutch healthcare group Philips. EU facing pressure The regional bloc has been facing intense pressure from the US government and Big Tech, as well as European groups, over its AI Act. With the passing of the act earlier this year, the group was considered the world's strictest regime regulating the development of fast-developing technology. In light of this, Brussels held a crunch meeting with big US tech groups on Wednesday to discuss a new, softened draft of its regulations. The current debate revolves around the drafting of a 'code of practice', which will guide AI companies on how to implement the act that applies to powerful AI models such as Google's Gemini, Meta's Llama and OpenAI's GPT-4. However, Brussels has already delayed publishing the code, which was due in May and is now expected to water down the rules. The EU's tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, on Monday said Brussels is finalising the code of practice ahead of the August deadline. 'We will publish the code of practice before that to support our industry and SMEs to comply with our AI Act'. 'This is a classic example of regulitis that doesn't take into account the most important thing for industry, which is legal certainty', said Patrick Van Eecke, co-chair of law firm Cooley's global cyber, data and privacy practice. According to The Financial Times, the letter from CEOs was organised by the EU AI Champions Initiative — a body representing 110 companies on the continent across industries — said a postponement would send 'innovators and investors around the world a strong signal that Europe is serious about its simplification and competitiveness agenda.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, there is also a separate joint letter signed by more than 30 European AI start-up founders and investors this week, which called the legislation 'a rushed ticking time bomb'. Hence, it will be interesting to see how the EU will respond to the letter.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Debate over renaming Dakshina Kannada district resurfaces
- MANGALURU: The Karnataka Cabinet renamed Bengaluru Rural to Bengaluru North, sparking renewed debate over the nomenclature of Dakshina Kannada district. People's representatives, political party leaders, and various organisations are advocating for the coastal district to be renamed 'Mangaluru'. While the demand for a change of the district's name is widely discussed on social media, an online meeting was also held recently involving leaders from political, religious, and social organisations. Dakshina Kannada MP Capt Brijesh Chowta told TOI that normally all districts are named after the name of their district headquarters. 'Mangaluru has its own significance when it comes to its historical background. The city is known as Mangaluru because of Goddess Mangalambike. People across the world identify residents of the coastal district as Mangalureans. Hence, calling our district 'Mangaluru' is better,' the MP said. KPCC General Secretary Padmaraj R Poojary said that the coastal city has several names, including Kudla, Kodiala, Maikala, Mangalapuram, and Mangalore. 'Naming Dakshina Kannada as 'Mangaluru' is an ideal suggestion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pensia Pilon 3 NN Pensia Facultativă NN Vezi oferta Undo Since Tulu is widely spoken in the district and the coastal city is also known as Kudla, the district headquarters may be called 'Kudla'. Many who participated in the Google Meet also expressed similar views, and according to me, 'Mangaluru' is an ideal name for the district as globally we are identified as 'Mangalureans',' he said. The seer of Gurupura Vajradehi Mutt, Sri Rajashekarananda Swamiji, said a new name for Dakshina Kannada should reflect the identity of the region since the district has its own cultural history. Mangaluru City South MLA D Vedavyas Kamath said that renaming Dakshina Kannada as 'Mangaluru' is a necessity. Extending his support to the demand, he also mooted the idea of the region being known as 'Tulunadu' instead of 'Karavali'. Mangaluru City North MLA Dr Y Bharath Shetty, former Chairman of the Karnataka Tulu Sahitya Academy Dayanand Kattalsar, Tulunada Rakshana Vedike founder President Yogish Shetty Jeppu, and others also support the demand for a change in the name of the coastal district.
