'Farcical' row over estate's unfinished road leaves residents at 'wits end'
Residents living on an Anglesey estate say a row over responsibility for their pothole-filled road has left them at their "wits end". Bin wagons and delivery drivers are said to be unwilling to enter a section of Llys Tegeirian in Llangristiolus due to its uneven surface.
Resident Richard Beckmann said elderly residents struggled to haul their bins to a collection point, youngsters tripped whilst playing, cars risked damage, and some people had found it "almost impossible" to sell homes.
The estate was developed by Hughes Bros. Ltd, but the road, which serves 11 homes, was never adopted by Anglesey Council, and has been the subject of legal wrangling since then.
The developer blames the council for the situation, while the council says the developer is at fault. Mr Beckmann, a member of the 13 - 23 Llys Tegeirian Residents' Association, described the situation as a "miserable mess".
The married dad-of-two was one of the first to buy on the site about 12 years ago. Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday
(Image: 13-23 Llys Tegeirian Residents' Association/R Beckmann)
The council said it had served Breach of Condition Notices and there had been several prosecutions against the developer, but the situation remained unresolved. In response, developer John Hughes claimed he had been unfairly blamed, saying the issue was down to the council "dragging its feet" and failing to adopt the road.
He said going to court had cost the company more than £5,000, and felt their side of the story had not been understood, and that the situation with the council was a "farce".
Mr Beckmann said the consequence of the ongoing dispute had been "awful" for residents. He said: "Young children and people fall over potholes, it's a nightmare for elderly residents dragging bins to where the lorry can collect.
(Image: Courtesy of 13-23 Llys Tegeirian Residents' Association)
"Some people are at their wits end, others are sad the situation has blighted their dream homes. Others have tried to sell, but found it almost impossible."
Mr Beckmann recently launched a Senedd petition entitled 'Stop the Plague of Unadopted Roads' - calling for a change in the law over unadopted roads.
He also submitted a Freedom of Information Request to the council on behalf of residents asking for more information about the issue. MS Rhun ap Iorwerth, who represents Ynys Môn, has also been asked to help.
He said: 'I've long made enquiries on behalf of and continue to campaign alongside residents at Llys Tregeirian for the necessary works to be completed on the road.
'This issue has blighted residents for too long and they've been badly let down by the developers. There's something fundamentally wrong with a system that allows a developer to walk away without finishing their work.
(Image: Google Map)
'I'll keep working closely with residents to explore every avenue to get the work done, so they can live on a road that is safe and accessible for all.'
Isle of Anglesey County Council chief executive Dylan J Williams said: "This matter has been a cause of concern for us as the Local Planning Authority (LPA).
"Despite our best efforts - including serving Breach of Condition Notices and multiple prosecutions against the developer - progress has been frustrating for all parties.
(Image: Courtesy 13-23 Llys Tegeirian Residents' Association)
'As a Local Planning Authority, our powers are limited. While we fully understand residents' frustration, we believe that they should continue to engage with their Senedd representatives as means of moving this matter forward.
"We have also suggested that they could pursue their own legal action through the civil courts. We have no powers to carry out work on the developer's land without permission.
"Moreover, if we attempted to complete the works and claim the money back, there is no guarantee that we could successfully recover any public funds used.
'While we are committed to transparency, the LPA will respond to residents' FOI request at the appropriate time to avoid prejudicing ongoing investigations and enforcement actions. We will, of course, disclose all permissible information."
Mr Hughes claimed the situation had started after the council failed to inspect pipe work, but then requested for them to be dug up.
"There was nothing wrong with the pipe work, the job was spot on, there has never been any problems, so we refused to dig them up," he said.
"What should have happened was that the council needed to issue a Section 38, so that funds could be released to finish the work.
"By now, there will be a shortfall, we believe the council should pay. It has ended up costing us over £5000 in fines, which will have to be deducted from our costs.
"We are happy to sit down with whoever we need to, to resolve the situation. We strongly believe it's the council who should pay the shortfall, they are the ones that dragged their feet with the legalities.
"We are willing to do the road, but we are not digging up pipes and we can't do anything until we get a Section 38 - it is like a chicken and egg situation, it's just been a farce." Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
08-07-2025
- Daily Record
You've been using washing machine detergent drawer all wrong say laundry experts
Many people admitted not knowing how to work their washing machines properly. If you have no idea what to put in each section of your washing machine drawers, then you're not alone. According to recent research by Dr. Beckmann, 46% of British householders admitted to not knowing how to properly work their own machines. When it comes to laundry confusion, the washing machine drawers are top of the pile, with 56% of people saying they don't use it because it's overly complicated – making it the most underused household item. Washing machines differ from one model to another, however, the drawer's compartments are normally labelled with a 1, 2 and 3. A small star symbol might be in place of the number 3 in some cases. Here's what you should be putting in each section. Compartment 1 This section is for pre-wash detergent and should be saved for when clothes are particularly dirty. Doing this makes sure that the clothes are cleaned thoroughly, by utilising the pre-wash cycle for an extra deep clean. Compartment 2 This is the main wash compartment and should be filled with laundry detergent or powder. No matter what cycle the wash is on, or the setting on the machine, this is the compartment that will get used. Compartment 3 This is usually the smallest section, and might sometimes be marked with a star instead. It's for fabric softener and should never be overfilled, so remember to read the guidance on the bottle carefully. Natasha Brook, a spokesperson for Dr. Beckmann, said: 'We're witnessing a shift in how people do their washing. The drawer has been around for decades, but it's become a source of mess and frustration. 'People don't want to second guess which compartment does what, they want quick, clean, effective solutions they can trust. "The fact that over half of Brits are skipping the drawer altogether says it all.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. TV presenter Dilly Carter, known for helping families transform their cluttered homes into calming spaces, said: "Ditching the drawer is more than just a laundry hack – it reflects a collective desire for a more streamlined and manageable way of living. "People are craving simplicity in every part of their homes, including their laundry routines. 'The detergent drawer might seem minor, but it symbolises that kind of unnecessary hassle that busy households are trying to eliminate. "It leaks, it's hard to clean, and most people have no idea what compartment does what.' To avoid any confusion, Dr. Beckmann's Magic Leaves Fabric Conditioner Sheets offer no pouring, no measuring and the washing machine drawer isn't even needed. Shoppers claim they are easy and convenient to use and store and have a good, long-lasting fragrance. Natalie added: "Using our innovative Magic Leaves formula, these new sheets are specially formulated to preserve both the ability to absorb water and breathability for fabric, while infusing clothes with a fragrance that lasts up to seven days." They are currently on offer for £3 from Amazon with 14% off.
North Wales Chronicle
06-06-2025
- North Wales Chronicle
Anglesey: Bid for 'ancillary annexe' in Moelfre approved
Anglesey Council's planning committee approved plans for an ancillary annexe to The Old Crown building in Moelfre during a meeting on Wednesday, June 4. The application, lodged by Kiran Purewal, was brought to the committee at the request of the local member Cllr Margaret Murley Roberts. It was felt the development would have a 'negative visual impact' on the picturesque area. Plan for the existing dwelling was a two-storey terraced property within the development boundary of Moelfre in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Planning officer Rhys Jones said the proposal consisted of erecting an ancillary annexe to its rear. MORE NEWS: Incredible photos as imposing 55-metre-long ship with six decks docks in Caernarfon Anglesey man had sex with woman in public toilet and threatened to kill her partner Drink-driving Gwynedd trainee GP allowed back to work after suspension It was situated in an elevated position at the top of the site adjacent to Lon Ty Powdr overlooking the Moelfre coast. Planners considered it met policy, as it was a smaller, improved proposal to that of a previous, larger application which had permission on the site, and they recommended it be approved. A report said the application had resulted in 32 letters being received. The objections 'were all similar in relation to what concerned the local people of Moelfre,' it had noted. They included the 'negative visual impact on the landscape, traffic and parking, drainage, second homes/holiday let uncertainty, and structurally a weak foundation base'. They had 'emphasised' how erecting a new building would 'significantly impact the overall panorama and aesthetics of the landscape' and 'destroy the character and quality of the village scene presenting an overbearing and visually intrusive element'. Objectors added: 'The design would be unsympathetic and harmful to the appearance and character of the village.' They also felt the design and scale of the annexe would be 'out of keeping' with the main dwelling and surrounding properties. Concerns that the annexe 'should not be sold separately to the main dwelling' and that 'second homes and holiday lets are a big issue in Moelfre,' had also been noted. Cllr Euryn Morris read out Cllr Murley-Roberts' comments, on behalf of the community council. He also spoke for himself, and Cllr Ieuan Williams. Among comments raised, it was felt the annexe would 'change the image of the village'. He said the Old Crown Building was 'an iconic building' which featured on postcards and pictures and they were 'ignoring the importance of historical buildings' which 'could have a detrimental effect on the area'. The impact on neighbours was also highlighted, and the effect of a concrete lorry accessing the property, via a 'horse and cart' road. There was also a query over the need for an annexe. 'The last thing Moelfre needs is more holiday lets,' he said. The planning officer said permission existed already for an annexe and the principal of development had been 'safeguarded'. It was smaller than what was already permitted, and the plan was considered an 'improvement,' of modern build, with 'smart windows'. He agreed it was 'a picturesque area' and important to protect, but reiterated planning permission already existed. Lon Pwdwr was narrow, but no issues were raised by highways, and until the council adopted Article 4, its potential future use as holiday accommodation was not material to the application. An Article 4 Direction is a planning tool which can remove or restrict permitted development rights on houses. It has recently been adopted by Cyngor Gwynedd, to control the use of houses as second homes and holiday lets. Councillor Robin Williams noted that Cllr Murley-Roberts had called the matter in after community council concerns, but queried why there was no response received. He urged all community councils to raise issues if they had them. Describing the plan as 'the lesser of two evils' he added: 'I can't see any reason to refuse this, due to the existing planning permission from 2013.' He added that he 'respected' comments raised. 'Without the fall back situation of the permission, it would be different,' he added. Following a vote, the application was passed.
North Wales Live
05-06-2025
- North Wales Live
Annexe plan 'lesser of two evils' for 'picture postcard' Anglesey village
Plans to build an annexe in a "picture postcard" Anglesey village have been approved after being described as "the lesser of two evils". Anglesey Council's planning committee approved plans for an ancillary annexe to The Old Crown building in Moelfre during a meeting on Wednesday, June 4. The application, lodged by Kiran Purewal, was brought to the committee at the request of the local member Cllr Margaret Murley Roberts. It was felt the development would have a "negative visual impact" on the picturesque area. Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday The existing dwelling was a two-storey terraced property within the development boundary of Moelfre in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Planning officer Rhys Jones said the proposal consisted of erecting an ancillary annexe to its rear. It was situated in an elevated position at the top of the site adjacent to Lon Ty Powdr overlooking the Moelfre coast. Planners considered it met policy, as it was a smaller, improved proposal to that of a previous, larger application which had permission on the site, and they recommended it be approved. A report said the application had resulted in 32 letters being received. The objections "were all similar in relation to what concerned the local people of Moelfre," it had noted. They included the "negative visual impact on the landscape, traffic and parking, drainage, second homes/holiday let uncertainty, and structurally a weak foundation base". They had "emphasised" how erecting a new building would "significantly impact the overall panorama and aesthetics of the landscape" and "destroy the character and quality of the village scene presenting an overbearing and visually intrusive element". Objectors added: "The design would be unsympathetic and harmful to the appearance and character of the village." They also felt the design and scale of the annexe would be "out of keeping" with the main dwelling and surrounding properties. Concerns that the annexe "should not be sold separately to the main dwelling" and that "second homes and holiday lets are a big issue in Moelfre," had also been noted. Cllr Euryn Morris read out Cllr Murley-Roberts' comments, on behalf of the community council. He also spoke for himself, and Cllr Ieuan Williams. Among comments raised, it was felt the annexe would "change the image of the village". He said the Old Crown Building was "an iconic building" which featured on postcards and pictures and they were "ignoring the importance of historical buildings" which "could have a detrimental effect on the area". The impact on neighbours was also highlighted, and the effect of a concrete lorry accessing the property, via a "horse and cart" road. There was also a query over the need for an annexe. "The last thing Moelfre needs is more holiday lets," he said. The planning officer said permission existed already for an annexe and the principal of development had been "safeguarded". It was smaller than what was already permitted, and the plan was considered an "improvement," of modern build, with "smart windows". He agreed it was "a picturesque area" and important to protect, but reiterated planning permission already existed. Lon Pwdwr was narrow, but no issues were raised by highways, and until the council adopted Article 4, its potential future use as holiday accommodation was not material to the application. An Article 4 Direction is a planning tool which can remove or restrict permitted development rights on houses. It has recently been adopted by Cyngor Gwynedd, to control the use of houses as second homes and holiday lets. Councillor Robin Williams noted that Cllr Murley-Roberts had called the matter in after community council concerns, but queried why there was no response received. He urged all community councils to raise issues if they had them. Describing the plan as "the lesser of two evils" he added: "I can't see any reason to refuse this, due to the existing planning permission from 2013." He added that he "respected" comments raised.
