logo
Expert reveals the only two places that would be safe in a nuclear war

Expert reveals the only two places that would be safe in a nuclear war

Daily Mail​25-06-2025
An expert has revealed the one region of the world where you may be able to survive a nuclear war.
Investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen explained why Americans looking to avoid the consequences of a potential World War III should considering escaping to Australia or New Zealand.
On The Diary Of A CEO podcast, Jacobsen said that neighboring countries in the Southern Hemisphere would be the only place that could 'sustain agriculture' following a nuclear catastrophe in the northern portion of the world.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
As the conflict in the Middle East drags on, fears of Iranian sleeper cells in the U.S. have Americans becoming increasingly worried that a weapon of mass destruction could go off at any minute.
Nuclear powers Russia and China, allies of Iran, have already warned that the U.S. involving itself in the Middle East conflict could send the entire world spiraling into an all-out war leading to Armageddon.
Jacobsen discussed the chilling consequences of a nuclear war while speaking with podcast host Steven Bartlett.
She said: 'Places like Iowa and Ukraine would be just snow for 10 years. So agriculture would fail and when agriculture fails, people just die.'
Jacobsen continued: 'On top of that, you have the radiation poisoning because the ozone layer will be so damaged and destroyed that you can't be outside in the sunlight.
'People will be forced to live underground. So you have to imagine people living underground, fighting for food everywhere except for in New Zealand and Australia.'
Before the crisis in the Middle East had escalated, Jacobsen had released a book, Nuclear War: A Scenario, which laid out in shocking detail how the end of the world would play out if World War III were to kick off.
Speaking to Bartlett, Jacobsen said: 'Hundreds of millions of people die in the fireballs, no question.'
However she added that a 2022 study by Professor Owen Toon in Nature Food claimed that the death toll would quickly consume the majority of the world's population.
The expert said: 'Professor Toon and his team... sort of updated [the] nuclear winter idea based around food, and the number that they have is five billion people would be dead.'
Nuclear winter describes the severe, long-lasting global cooling that could happen after a large-scale nuclear war.
In a full-scale war, where many cities are hit by nuclear bombs, those explosions would cause huge fires, burning buildings, forests, and other structures.
The smoke and soot from these fires would rise high into the sky and into a part of the atmosphere called the stratosphere, where it can stay for years as rain can't wash it away.
This thick layer of soot would block sunlight from reaching the Earth's surface, like a giant shade over the planet.
With less sunlight, the Earth would get much colder. The experts Jacobsen spoke to in her book predicted that temperatures in the U.S. would plunge by roughly 40 degrees Fahrenheit, making farming impossible.
The cold and darkness would lead to huge food shortages and eventually starvation. Animals and fish would also struggle to survive, making food even scarcer.
Bartlett weighed in and said: 'The population of the planet currently is what, eight billion?
'So there'd be three billion people still alive. Where shall I go to be one of the three billion? I was just in New Zealand and Australia.'
Jacobsen replied: 'That's exactly where you'd go. According to Toon, those are the only places that could actually sustain agriculture.'
Along with both nations being capable of producing food once the dust settles on a nuclear war, Australia and New Zealand have several other factors which make this part of the world safer from global destruction.
They are far from the major nuclear powers which would likely spark a world war, the U.S., Russia, and China.
Also, being island nations, their isolation in the Pacific and Southern Oceans limits fallout from nuclear detonations up north.
This is because prevailing winds and ocean currents would carry much of the radioactive material away from these regions.
The renewed threat of a global nuclear war has sparked a nationwide search to locate America's long-forgotten fallout shelters.
Although they're not built to withstand the initial blast, extreme heat, and shockwaves of a nuclear explosion, they can act as a safe room for anyone who lives through the explosion to see the aftermath.
As for what makes a good fallout shelter, shielding is the most important factor. Thick walls and a roof made of concrete or steel are necessary to block out the radiation produced by a nuclear explosion.
Fallout shelters also need good ventilation with proper filters to trap radioactive particles in the air.
Those inside will need enough food and clean water to last for weeks or months while waiting for the radiation to clear from the air, an area for waste disposal so clean supplies are not contaminated, and a comfortable place to sit or sleep.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caitlin Clark still has no timetable for return following further medical evaluation this week
Caitlin Clark still has no timetable for return following further medical evaluation this week

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Caitlin Clark still has no timetable for return following further medical evaluation this week

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'
Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

Leader Live

time2 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

Iran is set to meet on Friday in Istanbul with the UK, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, and the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner. They will be the first talks since Iran's 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US B-52 bombers striking nuclear-related facilities in Iran. Mr Gharibabadi said in a social media post on Thursday that to enter negotiations, Iran sought 'several key principles' to be upheld. He said these included 'rebuilding Iran's trust — as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States — avoiding the use of talks as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action, though Iran remains fully prepared for any scenario; respecting and recognising Iran's rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including enrichment in line with its legitimate needs; and the lifting of sanctions'. Friday's talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. European leaders have threatened to trigger a 'snapback' mechanism included in a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which would reimpose sanctions that were lifted in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal. The US withdrew in 2018 during the first term of President Donald Trump, who insisted the agreement was not tough enough. Iranian officials have warned that a move to reimpose sanctions would have consequences. Mr Gharibabadi said earlier this week that it could force Tehran to withdraw from key non-proliferation agreements. In a letter to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations under the 2015 deal while supporting Israel's recent strikes on Iran. In the recent conflict, US B-52 bombers struck Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel's air campaign. Iran responded with missile attacks, including a strike on a US base in Qatar, which President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted was not directed at the Qatari state. In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired on Wednesday, Mr Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and accused Israel of attempting to assassinate him during a June 15 meeting of Iran's national security council in Tehran. Mr Pezeshkian reiterated that Iran's nuclear programme will continue within the framework of international law and insisted the country has no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons. 'Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists,' he said, emphasising Iran's position that future negotiations must be rooted in mutual respect, not threats. According to the official judicial news agency Mizan, at least 13 Iranian nuclear scientists were killed during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel. A spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said on Thursday the country's nuclear industry would recover from the recent attacks by Israel and the US. 'Our nuclear industry is deeply rooted. What has roots cannot be harmed by attack or pressure — it will grow back and thrive again,' state TV quoted Behrouz Kamalvandi as saying. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% had grown to over 400 kilogrammes (882 pounds). That material, just below weapons-grade level, remains a central concern for the West. Despite the growing stockpile, Iran has said it remains open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended co-operation with the IAEA following legislation signed by Mr Pezeshkian. While European officials say they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out.

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'
Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

South Wales Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Iran ‘ready for nuclear talks with US but only if Washington rebuilds trust'

Iran is set to meet on Friday in Istanbul with the UK, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, and the European Union's deputy foreign policy commissioner. They will be the first talks since Iran's 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US B-52 bombers striking nuclear-related facilities in Iran. Mr Gharibabadi said in a social media post on Thursday that to enter negotiations, Iran sought 'several key principles' to be upheld. He said these included 'rebuilding Iran's trust — as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States — avoiding the use of talks as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action, though Iran remains fully prepared for any scenario; respecting and recognising Iran's rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, including enrichment in line with its legitimate needs; and the lifting of sanctions'. Friday's talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. European leaders have threatened to trigger a 'snapback' mechanism included in a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which would reimpose sanctions that were lifted in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear programme. The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal. The US withdrew in 2018 during the first term of President Donald Trump, who insisted the agreement was not tough enough. Iranian officials have warned that a move to reimpose sanctions would have consequences. Mr Gharibabadi said earlier this week that it could force Tehran to withdraw from key non-proliferation agreements. In a letter to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations under the 2015 deal while supporting Israel's recent strikes on Iran. In the recent conflict, US B-52 bombers struck Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel's air campaign. Iran responded with missile attacks, including a strike on a US base in Qatar, which President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted was not directed at the Qatari state. In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired on Wednesday, Mr Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and accused Israel of attempting to assassinate him during a June 15 meeting of Iran's national security council in Tehran. Mr Pezeshkian reiterated that Iran's nuclear programme will continue within the framework of international law and insisted the country has no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons. 'Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists,' he said, emphasising Iran's position that future negotiations must be rooted in mutual respect, not threats. According to the official judicial news agency Mizan, at least 13 Iranian nuclear scientists were killed during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel. A spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said on Thursday the country's nuclear industry would recover from the recent attacks by Israel and the US. 'Our nuclear industry is deeply rooted. What has roots cannot be harmed by attack or pressure — it will grow back and thrive again,' state TV quoted Behrouz Kamalvandi as saying. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in May that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% had grown to over 400 kilogrammes (882 pounds). That material, just below weapons-grade level, remains a central concern for the West. Despite the growing stockpile, Iran has said it remains open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended co-operation with the IAEA following legislation signed by Mr Pezeshkian. While European officials say they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store