logo
Southwest reveals new cost of checked luggage

Southwest reveals new cost of checked luggage

Daily Mail​28-05-2025
By
Southwest Airlines will soon be charging travelers $35 for one checked bag and $45 for two, bringing an end to the company's free baggage policy . The move will take effect tomorrow months after the airline confirmed it would end 'bags fly free' policy by charging some customers to help boost earnings. Southwest was the only major US carrier that allowed customers to check in two bags at no cost.
The airline said it will continue to offer two free checked bags to loyal customers with the A-List Preferred status and to passengers that pay the most premium fare. Customers with the lower loyalty status, A-List, will get one free checked bag. The carrier will also credit one checked bag for passengers who hold its co-branded credit card. Southwest withdrew its financial forecast for the year over uncertainties from President Donald Trump's trade war.
Following the price announcement, fliers expressed their fury and annoyance over the changes in a Reddit post created by a former Southwest employee. 'Good bye Southwest. Audios. Hasta la vista. That means good bye,' a flier wrote. 'I'm A-List Preferred and this is sickening to me. 'Plus imagine how many extra carry-on bags are gonna be tried to be taken on the plane now, slowing down boarding considerably,' another person responded.
Members of the airline's 'A-List' and 'A-List Prefered' programs will still be able to enjoy some free bag perks. The airline, which has built a brand offering a no-frills, customer-focused experiences, has also announced other changes. Southwest is launching a basic economy fare to remain competitive with other major airlines.
It's also launching dynamic pricing models for its rewards program, tracking how much money repeat customers spend on tickets instead of miles traveled. 'We have tremendous opportunity to meet current and future customer needs,' Bob Jordan, the brand's CEO, said. 'We will do all this while remaining focused on what's made us strong — our People and the authentic, friendly, and award-winning customer service only they can provide.'
Southwest's announcement comes amid increased pressure from activist investors , particularly Elliott Investment Management who want to push it to cut costs and boost profits. It also laid off 1,750 corporate jobs as part of a restructuring effort. The mass layoff was the first in the company's history. The end of free bags comes after cuts to routes last year — plus the axing of other perks.
In September, Southwest cut almost a third of its flights to and from Atlanta in a blow to the city and staff based there. In September, Southwest also said it is axing its popular open seating policy after half a century. Instead, it will soon charge passengers a fee to pick a seat. The end of the iconic 'bags fly free' perk was first mooted last year, but bosses denied the rumors.
Southwest, which once boasted a record 47 consecutive years of profit prior to the pandemic, is struggling to regain sustained profitability. A report out earlier this year showed how airlines including Delta, United and American pocketed a staggering $33.3 billion from just baggage fees last year - a sharp 15 percent rise from $29 billion in 2022.
This sum is solely made up of fees from larger carry-on bags, standard checked baggage fees, and fines for overweight or extra large checked bags and accounted for 4.1 percent of global airline revenue last year. Meanwhile, in January there was backlash against Southwest for letting able-bodied flyers use wheelchair assistance to board early.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oreo and Reese's announce sweet collaboration
Oreo and Reese's announce sweet collaboration

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Oreo and Reese's announce sweet collaboration

Oreo and Reese's are introducing two new collaborative sweet products, driven by high consumer demand for mashups of their popular treats. One product is the Reese's Oreo Cup, which will feature Reese's peanut butter blended with Oreo cookie crumbs, encased in Oreo's milk chocolate and white creme. This Reese's Oreo Cup is set to become a permanent addition to the Reese's line-up, hitting store shelves in September. Oreo will also revive its 2014 cookie variant with Reese's peanut butter, now including Oreo cookie crumbs in the filling, available as a limited run from September and permanently from January 2026. The partnership is noteworthy as the brands are direct competitors, with Mondelēz (Oreo's owner) having previously attempted to acquire Hershey (Reese's owner).

Why Starbucks is getting rid of mobile-order and pick-up only stores
Why Starbucks is getting rid of mobile-order and pick-up only stores

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why Starbucks is getting rid of mobile-order and pick-up only stores

Starbucks is discontinuing its mobile-order and pick-up only stores, deeming them 'overly transactional' and lacking 'warmth'. This change will affect 80 to 90 locations across the US, with some potentially being converted into seated stores. The move is part of a broader operational overhaul led by CEO Brian Niccol, who aims to foster more customer-friendly environments and improve service. Starbucks plans to invest over $500 million in staffing for its US company-operated stores and is developing a new 'coffeehouse of the future' prototype featuring 32 seats and a drive-through. These strategic adjustments follow six consecutive quarters of sales decline for Starbucks, despite the CEO expressing optimism about the company's recovery.

Trump does U-turn on insider trading ban
Trump does U-turn on insider trading ban

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump does U-turn on insider trading ban

Published: | Updated: Hours after granting conditional praise for a bill to ban members of Congress, the president, and vice president from trading stocks while in office, President Donald Trump unleashed a vicious broadside against the Senate's sponsor of legislation that does just that. 'I wonder why [Josh] Hawley would pass a bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump ripped on Truth Social, referring to Missouri's senior Republican senator. 'It's a great bill for her, and her "husband," but so bad for our country!' It amounted to a head-snapping U-turn from the president's earlier tacit praise for the new version of Hawley's bill that cleared a key Senate committee on Wednesday. Trump had told a reporter he supported the concept of the legislation, an early signal he was hesitant to fully publicly embrace it following a Punchbowl News report that the White House was lobbying intensely against passage because it could impact the finances of the executive. Senators voted to advance Hawley's bill, with all Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee joining the lone rebel Republican. Hawley's Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act — named after former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has reported a prolific amount of trading disclosures during her time in office — would ban lawmakers from trading or holding stocks. As a part of a deal to gain Democratic support, Hawley agreed to change the measure's name from the PELOSI Act to the HONEST Act. The measure, which passed out of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, now includes presidents and vice presidents from stock trading as well. Hawley celebrated the win speaking with the Daily Mail Wednesday afternoon — touting how President Donald Trump floated support for the legislation earlier in the day. 'We've worked on this for years, and it's really simple. It bans members of Congress from trading stock. It's not that hard,' he said before Trump unloaded on him online. 'And guess what? Members of Congress hate it because they want to trade stock. They make a lot of money doing it — both parties, sadly,' Hawley continued. Apparently, Trump now hates it too. 'I don't think real Republicans want to see their president, who has had unprecedented success, targeted, because of the "whims" of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!,' Trump charged. Behind the scenes, there is a push from the White House to kill Hawley's bill so that those in the executive branch don't have to fork over additional disclosures. 'This was a last-minute deal struck to include the Executive Branch equities without touching base with the White House to discuss potential Article II concerns,' a White House official said in a statement of Hawley's measure before it passed. 'Any pause comes purely from potential Article II infringement, not the Congressional ban,' the official added. For the sitting president and vice president, Hawley's trading ban kicks in only for future administrations, following Trump's term. Republicans in Congress have also voiced their disapproval of Hawley's bill. Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson noted during the vote that the bill, if passed, would deter potential lawmakers from running due to the economic disincentive. 'We make it very unattractive for people to run for office,' he said. Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott said the measure targets the rich. 'Anybody want to be poor? I don't. This idea that we're gonna attack people because they make money is wrong,' Scott said during the committee meeting. 'It's disgusting what is going on here. This is an attack against the president, and an attack against the vice president,' he added. Scott, it should be noted, is estimated to have a net worth over $550 million, much of it held in stocks, according to data compiled by congressional money tracker Quiver Quantitative. Ohio Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno called the bill 'a publicity show', and voted against it in committee despite being Hawley's only co-sponsor. Hawley told the Daily Mail that Moreno's vote came as a 'surprise' to him. The Republicans' change in tune is stark considering how banning stock trading for members has been a popular policy among the party in the past. Earlier this year, for example, Republicans flocked to support a similar ban in the House — called the TRUST in Congress Act — that would ban members and their families from trading stocks. That bill, which has bipartisan support, was co-signed by Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy and over a dozen other GOP members. Notably, it does not ban the president or vice president from trading or owning stocks, like Hawley's legislation does. Democrats, meanwhile, praised the Republican senator's bill. 'I strongly support the measure,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told the Daily Mail. 'I think Senator Hawley has done an excellent job in explaining why this bipartisan effort ought to pass.' 'It's only one step toward, maybe, the credibility of the Congress, and the fact that it's bipartisan makes it very compelling.' Pelosi has decided that after decades of engaging in the trading of stocks while in public office, she now supports banning the practice. 'If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it — no matter what they decide to name it,' Pelosi said in a statement issued by her office Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store