
Watch the birth of a new PLANET: Incredible images show a distant world sculpting spirals of dust around it
The planet orbits the star HD 135344B, which is located around 440 light–years from Earth.
The stunning snaps show the planet beginning to sculpt spirals of dust and gas around its home star.
The scientists who made the discovery say that the planet is likely twice the size of Jupiter and is as far from its star as Neptune is from the Sun.
Planets are formed from spinning halos of hot material known as protoplanetary discs, which form around very young stars.
As planets start to form, they 'sweep' their orbits to produce intricate patterns of rings, gaps, and spirals in the dust.
Although astronomers have spotted these patterns in the past, this is the first time anyone has caught one of these planetary sculptures in the act.
Lead author Francesco Maio, a doctoral researcher at the University of Florence, says: 'We will never witness the formation of Earth, but here, around a young star 440 light–years away, we may be watching a planet come into existence in real time.'
The star HD 135344B has a distinctive spiral pattern, which astronomers believe is caused by a young planet starting to disturb the cloud of gas and dust which spins around young stars
The European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope (VLT) first spotted the spiral patterns around HD 135344B back in 2016.
However, the equipment used in those early studies wasn't sensitive enough to confirm whether there was a protoplanet – the first stage of planetary formation – within the rings.
In a new study, published today in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, researchers have used the VLT's new Enhanced Resolution Imager and Spectrograph (ERIS) to pinpoint the planet's likely location.
Mr Maio and his co–authors spotted a 'planet candidate' – something strongly believed to be a planet – right at the base of one of the disc's spiral arms.
If these spirals were caused by a planet disturbing the ring of dust, that is exactly where astronomers would expect the planet to be.
What makes these observations so special is that the astronomers were actually able to capture light coming directly from the planet itself.
This is a significant piece of evidence in favour of the theory that gaps and rings in protoplanetary disks around other stars are hiding protoplanets of their own.
Mr Maio says: 'What makes this detection potentially a turning point is that, unlike many previous observations, we are able to directly detect the signal of the protoplanet, which is still highly embedded in the disc.
These observations could also help shed light on how the planets in our own solar system formed over four billion years ago.
At the same time, a second group of researchers have used ERIS to spot another potential planet forming around another young, distant star.
V960 Mon sits roughly 5,000 light years from Earth and is believed to be extremely young.
When astronomers first found captured images of it in 2023, they found that the star was spitting out arms of gas and dust wider than our entire Milky Way.
In this new study, astronomers found that the spiral arms are 'fragmenting' in a way that suggests a process known as 'gravitational instability' is at play.
Planets normally form like snowballs rolling down a hill, as matter collides and clumps together into ever bigger lumps – this is known as core accretion.
But sometimes, when the gas and dust are cooler and further from the host star, matter will slowly pull itself together under gravity and form clumps that collapse into the core of a planet.
Scientists believe this is how gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn typically form.
Researchers have also spotted an object around the star V960 Mons. They believe this may be a planet or brown dwarf forming through a process called gravitational instability. This would be the first time that anyone has seen this process in action
If this is what has caused the fragmentation around V960 Mons, it would be the first time that anyone has ever seen a planet forming via gravitational instability.
However, astronomers now say that something even stranger could be lurking around V960 Mons.
The researchers believe that the object could be a 'brown dwarf', an object bigger than a planet that didn't gain enough mass to shine as a star.
These giant planets can be between 13 and 80 times the size of Jupiter and typically orbit far out from their companion stars.
Likewise, no one has yet captured the exact moment that one of these mysterious objects comes into existence.
Planets are formed from a cloud of dust and gas within a nebula
According to our current understanding, a star and its planets form out of a collapsing cloud of dust and gas within a larger cloud called a nebula.
As gravity pulls material in the collapsing cloud closer together, the centre of the cloud gets more and more compressed and, in turn, gets hotter.
This dense, hot core becomes the kernel of a new star.
Meanwhile, inherent motions within the collapsing cloud cause it to churn.
As the cloud gets exceedingly compressed, much of the cloud begins rotating in the same direction.
The rotating cloud eventually flattens into a disk that gets thinner as it spins, kind of like a spinning clump of dough flattening into the shape of a pizza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Exact date 'hostile alien probe' could strike Earth revealed as Harvard scientist issues chilling warning
A Harvard scientist has issued a chilling warning about a mysterious interstellar object hurtling through our solar system, and says it could spell disaster for Earth. Professor Avi Loeb, who is well-known for pushing bold and often polarizing theories about extraterrestrial life, has been tracking the object, named 3I/ATLAS, since it was first spotted on July 1. If the object is an alien craft, Loeb warned it could be carrying a probe or even a weapon. He predicted that such an intercept vehicle would reach Earth between November 21 and December 5, 2025. The timeline is based on calculations that 3I/ATLAS will pass behind the sun from Earth's perspective this October, a time he ominously suggested could be used to prepare the attack. Referring to the object as a 'mothership,' he explained that its position would be an efficient way to seed habitable planets with probes. This strategy would allow the devices to 'intercept the planets while the mothership continues on its journey to the next star.' 'It may come to save us or destroy us. We'd better be ready for both options and check whether all interstellar objects are rocks,' said Loeb. Chris Lintott, an astronomer at the University of Oxford, has dismissed Loeb's claims as 'nonsense on stilts,' telling Live Science that the alien probe theory is an 'insult to the exciting work going on to understand this object.' Loeb has remained adamant that something about 3I/ATLAS does not add up. He said its retrograde orbit, meaning it's moving against the flow of the solar system, is oddly aligned with Earth's path. '3I/ATLAS might be an alien probe,' he said, citing its 'unusually rare trajectory,' which just so happens to align closely with the orbital plane of the inner planets, including Earth. He puts the odds of that happening naturally at just 0.2 percent. 'At its closest point to the sun on October 29, fears of an alien invasion could send stock markets crashing,' Loeb said. 'In that scenario, citizens would lose their trust in governments to protect them.' He went so far as to compare the potential chaos to a military ambush, saying: 'Facing a high-tech alien visitor could feel like Iran's air defenses when US B-2 bombers appeared, silent, unstoppable, and overwhelmingly powerful.' The object, believed to be about 12 miles wide, is unusually large for something hurtling in from outside the solar system. According to Loeb, if it were natural, we would have already spotted millions of similar objects. 'But we haven't,' he said. He has published three pre-print papers laying out the case and has even suggested that NASA attempt an interception using its Juno spacecraft when the object passes near Jupiter. 'In my view, we need a risk scale for interstellar objects,' Loeb said. 'A zero would be a natural comet. 'A 10 would be a verified technological object, possibly powered by an engine or emitting artificial light.' He also believes governments should already be forming task forces, including scientists, policymakers and even psychologists, to determine how to respond and how to break the news to the public without triggering panic. Loeb's warnings have grown increasingly urgent, culminating in one dramatic statement: 'It may come to save us or destroy us. We'd better be ready for both options.' If 3I/ATLAS is more than just a rock, he said Earth is woefully unprepared. 'The visitor,' he warned, 'is already in our backyard.' Even if the object turns out to be artificial, Loeb admitted there's little humanity could do. At nearly 60 miles per second relative to Earth, it's moving far too fast for any of our current rockets to reach. 'If the hypothesis that 3I/ATLAS is a technological artifact proves correct, there are two possible implications: either its intentions are entirely benign, or they are malign, said Loeb. 'In the first case, humanity need only wait and welcome this interstellar messenger with open arms. It is the second scenario that causes serious concern.' He added that because the second possibility has serious consequences, we can use the idea behind Pascal's wager. 'Blaise Pascal argued that it's smarter to believe in God because the possible benefits of believing are much greater than the losses if you're wrong,' Loeb explained. 'Similarly, in our case, it makes sense to warn humanity about the risk from 3I/ATLAS, even if it turns out to be just a theory.


Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The Shroud of Turin was not laid on Jesus' body, scientists reveal
For centuries, devout Christians have flocked to the Italian city of Turin to pay their respects to one of the most famous relics in the world. The Shroud of Turin is a piece of linen, measuring 14ft 5in by 3ft 7in, that bears a faint image of the front and back of a man. Many believe that this image was created when Jesus was wrapped in the venerated shroud shortly after his death on the cross 2,000 years ago. However, according to a new study, the Shroud of Turin was never laid on Jesus' body. Brazilian 3D designer and researcher Cicero Moraes, an expert in reconstructing historical faces, says that the shroud is nothing more than a 'masterpiece of Christian art'. Mr Moraes used digital modelling software to examine how cloth drapes over the human body compared to a low, flat sculpture of a body. These results, published this week in the journal Archaeometry, show that the shroud's distinctive pattern could only have been produced by a sculpture. In his paper, Mr Moraes wrote: 'The Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body.' To understand how the image on the Shroud of Turin might have been created, Mr Moraes created two digital 3D sculptures. The first was of a complete human body, while the second was of a type of flat sculpture known as relief. Using various 3D simulation tools, Mr Moraes digitally draped fabric over these two sculptures and measured where the fabric touched the material. Mr Moraes then compared the images left on the virtual fabric to pictures taken of the Shroud of Turin in 1931. This revealed that the fabric draped over the relief sculpture was a near-perfect match for the Shroud. Meanwhile, the image created by draping fabric over a real human appeared to be wide and distorted. Mr Moraes says this is due to something called the 'Agamemnon Mask effect' - named for the unusually wide death mask found in a tomb in Mycenae in Greece. When you try to project a 3D surface like the human face onto a flat plane like a piece of fabric, the result is extremely distorted. Imagine covering your own face with paint and pressing it into a paper napkin. The image left on the napkin would not resemble a portrait of you, but rather appear stretched and warped. For this reason, Mr Moraes believes that the images on the Shroud of Turin could not have been produced by laying it over the body of Jesus. Mr Moraes told Live Science: 'The image on the Shroud of Turin is more consistent with a low-relief matrix. 'Such a matrix could have been made of wood, stone or metal and pigmented - or even heated - only in the areas of contact, producing the observed pattern.' The first recorded mention of the Shroud of Turin dates back to the 14th century, and the relic was almost immediately accused of being a fake. Modern carbon dating, a way of measuring the age of natural materials using radioactive isotopes of carbon, carried out in 1989, placed the Shroud's creation between 1260 and 1390 AD. That would mean the linen in the Shroud was still growing over 1,000 years after Jesus' death, making it impossible that the Shroud is a genuine relic. During this part of the Medieval period, low-relief depictions of religious figures were extremely popular decorations for structures such as tombstones. According to Mr Moraes, this makes it much more likely that the shroud was created as a piece of art during medieval funerary practices and later came to be considered a genuine relic. An analysis carried out in 2022 claimed to have shown that the Shroud could actually be dated back to the time of Jesus' death. However, the methods used by these researchers were entirely unreliable and were created by the authors for the specific purpose of proving the Shroud was a genuine artefact. Although their results were widely publicised, even the Center for Sindonology in Turin, an organisation dedicated to proving the shroud's authenticity, urged people to be cautious of these conclusions. WHY IS JESUS DEPICTED IN DIFFERENT WAYS? No physical description of Jesus is found in the Bible. He's typically depicted as Caucasian in Western works of art, but has also been painted to look as if he was Latino or Aboriginal. It's thought this is so people in different parts of the world can more easily relate to the Biblical figure. The earliest depictions show him as a typical Roman man, with short hair and no beard, wearing a tunic. It is thought that it wasn't until 400AD that Jesus appears with a beard. This is perhaps to show he was a wise teacher, because philosophers at the time were typically depicted with facial hair. The conventional image of a fully bearded Jesus with long hair did not become established until the sixth century in Eastern Christianity, and much later in the West Medieval art in Europe typically showed him with brown hair and pale skin. This image was strengthened during the Italian Renaissance, with famous paintings such as The Last Supper by Leonardo da Vinci showing Christ. Modern depictions of Jesus in films tend to uphold the long-haired, bearded stereotype, while some abstract works show him as a spirit or light.


BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
Oxford chemists find honey offering in 2,500 year old shrine
Chemists have identified a residue found in 2,500-year-old bronze jars as honey, solving a "decades-old archaeological puzzle".The discovery was made by the University of Oxford's chemistry department, who reinvestigated jars excavated from a 6th Century BE Greek shrine in Paestum, southern a study published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, researchers said biomolecular evidence showed the residue was likely in the form of bronze jars were originally found in an underground shrine, an hour and a half's drive away from Pompeii, in 1954. They contained an orange-brown sticky substance archaeologists assumed was honey, as it was often left as an offering to gods or buried alongside the Luciana da Costa Carvalho, project co-lead, said: "This research is a reminder that archaeological collections hold untapped scientific potential and how new information can be revealed when modern analytical techniques and multidisciplinary collaborations are combined." For 30 years, three different teams analysed the residue, but failed to confirm the presence of honey and said it was some sort of animal or vegetable fat contaminated with pollen and insect chemists have used modern techniques to examine the contents of the bronze jar, through a partnership with the University of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and the Archaeological Park of Pompeii. Professor James McCullagh, director of Oxford's mass spectrometry research facility in the department of chemistry, co-led the project. He said the number of analytical techniques used for the study were "key to the success of this study"."By applying several mass spectrometry and spectroscopic approaches we were able to reveal a comprehensive picture of the residue's molecular composition — enabling us to distinguish between contaminants, degradation products, and original biomarkers," he said.A university statement added that the authors of the study now hoped their work would inspire further re-analysis of legacy materials, including those held in museum collections. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.