Zhipu AI ramps up overseas expansion strategy ahead of IPO
The Beijing-headquartered startup is pitching governments globally to help them launch localised sovereign AI agents, vice-president Carol Lin told an audience at tech conference GITEX Asia.
The company now has offices in the Middle East, Singapore, the United Kingdom and Malaysia, and is running joint 'innovation centers' across Asia, including in Indonesia and Vietnam, she said.
Founded in 2019 as a Tsinghua University spinoff, Zhipu AI has emerged among China's front-runners in the artificial intelligence race, alongside AI-focused startups Moonshot AI, Minimax, 01.AI, and Baichuan, while also competing with tech giants such as ByteDance and Alibaba (9988.HK), opens new tab.
It initiated preliminary steps toward an initial public offering this month, according to filings posted on the Chinese securities regulator's website, aiming to become the first of China's emerging AI companies to go public. The company secured three rounds of state-backed funding within weeks in March, including a 300 million yuan ($41.5 million) investment from the Chengdu municipal government.
Zhipu was added to the U.S. Commerce Department's export control entity list in January, barring it from procuring U.S. components.
An advertisement for Zhipu's GLM shown during the presentation depicted a foreigner arriving in Beijing and using the firm's AI agent to send a WhatsApp message and search on Google Maps and Reddit for Beijing recommendations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
ScotWind: Mingyang Smart Energy wind power project creates double-edged dilemma over security
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... When the West of Orkney Wind Farm received planning permission from the Scottish Government last month, it was a rare bright spot for a sector that's been bruised by global economic headwinds and domestic regulatory uncertainty for over a year. The decision marks a key step forward in the project's plan for 125 wind turbines to be fixed to the seabed about 30 kilometres west of the Orkney mainland, allowing the generation of enough electricity to power two million homes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It also makes West of Orkney the first of 20 wind farms – collectively known as ScotWind – to be given such consent since Crown Estate Scotland awarded options to develop seabed acreage in the North Sea in 2022. The granting of onshore consent is a significant planning milestone for the Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm project. Yet while the decision will be welcomed by the project's backers – TotalEnergies of France, Renewables Infrastructure Development Group of the UK, and Corio Generation, part of Australia's Macquarie – the mood among most of the other ScotWind developers is anxious. That's because, a thousand miles away in London, consent of a different kind is pending that has greater consequences for the future of ScotWind. Westminster has for months been grappling with whether to allow a Chinese wind turbine manufacturer, Mingyang Smart Energy, to build a wind turbine blade factory in the Inverness area. The deliberations have widened to whether the Chinese company's kit should be used in the UK's offshore wind supply chain at all. The case in favour is economically compelling. Mingyang, like many businesses in China's green tech juggernaut, produces turbines more cheaply than its European rivals. Mingyang's factory would also create hundreds of green jobs in the North-east of Scotland. Small wonder that Holyrood has earmarked £30 million for the project. The investment from Mingyang would be around £120m, attractive for Labour as it tries to attract foreign investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The case against boils down to two issues: perceived security threats to the UK's critical national energy infrastructure and supply chain dependency. An aerial view shows wind turbine blades stored on the quayside ready for shipping at the Siemens Gamesa blade factory in Hull. Picture: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images Concerns have been raised by MPs including Andrew Bowie, Nick Timothy, Christine Jardine and Harriet Cross that because the operational software embedded in a turbine remains in the control of the manufacturer after installation, the risk exists that a wind farm using Chinese turbines could be switched off, causing damage to downstream transmission and grid. Cyber espionage is another worry. Germany has already raised a red flag. A paper commissioned from the German Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies by the country's defence ministry this year said that the Waterkant wind farm off the German coast should not go ahead on the grounds of public safety, citing planned use of Chinese wind turbines. For anyone who still thinks this is far-fetched, it's worth reading two recently published government policy documents that lay out the stark geopolitical reality of our times. China is assessed in the Strategic Defence Review as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge', while the National Security Strategy says: 'Economic coercion will become more common as other states weaponise trade or use export controls and supply chain dependencies to gain advantage." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dependency stems from the fact that more than 60 per cent of ScotWind's wind farms are designed to be floating units in deep waters, unlike the fixed bottom technology used by West of Orkney. Mingyang specialises in floating turbines. The only other manufacturers in the game, Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa, are too financially constrained to develop floating turbines at scale any time soon. They are also busy fulfilling existing orders for fixed-bottom projects. This means that, without Mingyang, much of ScotWind is less likely to materialise, jeopardising the UK's overall offshore wind targets. The government now finds itself on the horns of a geopolitical dilemma. Sir Keir Starmer, on whose desk the Mingyang decision likely now sits, must now navigate between the White House's antipathy towards wind power – expressed yesterday in the gutting of Biden-era tax credits for wind and solar in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' – and China's desire to expand its wind power champions in Europe. Tension flared last month when China's embassy in London slammed as 'groundless' any 'so-called security concerns' over the use of Chinese wind equipment in the UK's energy infrastructure. This came after a report that Washington had warned London about national security risks associated with allowing Mingyang to build a plant in the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The dilemma is complicated by the fact that another Scottish offshore wind project, Green Volt, backed by Eni of Italy and Tokyo Electric Power Company, reportedly intends to use Mingyang turbines. It was the only successful bidder from Scotland at the last government auction that allocates offtake prices, meaning it is well advanced. Allowing Mingyang in with technical and legal safeguards would be one option. Another would be to incentivise Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa to ramp up floating wind turbine technology, providing more flexibility to developers. I understand one measure under consideration is sweetening the terms of the next auction to make it more viable to incorporate Siemens-Gamesa turbines in project plans. Germany might also look at channelling some of the up to €1 trillion recently approved as part of relaxing the 'debt brake' to upgrade its military and infrastructure for its own offshore wind champion, Siemens-Gamesa.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Chinese sales of foreign phone makers, including Apple, drop 9.7% in May
BEIJING, July 4 (Reuters) - Sales of foreign-branded mobile phones in China, including those of Apple Inc (AAPL.O), opens new tab, fell 9.7% year-on-year in May, according to data released by a government-affiliated research company on Friday. Calculations based on the data from the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT) showed that May shipments of foreign-branded phones in China fell to 4.54 million handsets from the same month last year. As the largest foreign mobile phone maker in China's smartphone-dominated market, Apple's performance plays a significant role in the overall data on foreign-branded phone sales in the country. Apple has faced increased competition from domestic rivals and has cut prices to stay competitive. Chinese e-commerce platforms offered discounts of up to 2,530 yuan ($351) on Apple's latest iPhone 16 models in May. The CAICT data did not give specific figures for Apple. Shipments of phones within China were down 21.8% year-on-year to 23.72 million handsets for the month, the data showed.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Popular restaurant chain announces sudden closure of all UK branches
In a sad update on Instagram, the chain confirmed all its restaurants have now been shut down - and diners have been left devastated by the news A popular restaurant chain has closed down after 20 years and has shuttered all its UK locations. Chinese dim sum restaurant Ping Pong was founded in 2005 by restaurateur Kurt Zdesar. But in a sad update on Instagram, the chain confirmed all its restaurants have now been shut down. Ping Pong said: "It's a wrap. After 20 unforgettable years, all Ping Pong locations are now permanently closed. 'We're incredibly proud of what we built, an independent hospitality brand full of creativity, flavour and soul. To everyone who joined us over the years, for dim sum dates, happy hours, bottomless brunches, and just-because catch-ups – thank you. 'You shared your moments with us, passed around little parcels of deliciousness, and helped make Ping Pong what it was. To our collaborators, suppliers, and the incredible team who kept the steam going, thank you. It's been sum-thing truly special.' Devastated diners have been responding to the social media post, with one person saying: "Noooo, we've made some amazing memories there, birthdays, anniversaries , you name it. The food was always so amazing" Another commented: "This is very very sad. Will be sorely missed." A third said: "WHAT?? WE HAD NO CHANCE TO SAY GOODBYE! NO WARNING." A fourth posted: "We had so many good times there. The food and the lychee cocktails will be sorely missed." Another said: "Omgggggggggg nooooooooooo!!!!!!!! If I knew I'd have made one last trip. So sad." It comes after Ping Pong received backlash last year after it replaced its service charge with a discretionary 15% "brand charge" that it said covered franchise fees and other brand-related expenses. Ping Pong said at the time that it was trialling the charge ahead of new legislation which made it illegal for employers to hold back service charges from their staff. It came against a backdrop of higher inflation and energy costs for businesses. Ping Pong reported trading losses of £1.4million in the year to March 2020. Art Sagiryan, Ping Pong chief executive, told The Times: 'Everyone in the industry is waiting to see who does what. There will be people introducing cover charges, there will be people introducing higher bills or menu prices, and we in the interim are trying to decide where we will go.' It comes after restaurant chain Browns closed its first ever branch in Brighton last month. The brasserie and bar chain is known for its traditional British menu, alongside its breakfasts, lunches, afternoon teas, and traditional Sunday roasts. This specific Browns branch was the first to open in 1973. The restaurant chain currently has 26 sites across the UK, with branches in London, Bristol, and Cambridge.
