Amazon and Microsoft harming competition in cloud computing, finds CMA
The final report from an independent inquiry group of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found that Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are hurting competition in the cloud computing sector.
Microsoft came under particular fire, with the panel's report saying it has 'significant market power' with some of its software products.
It raised concerns over the way Microsoft charges Amazon and Google to use its software, which it said is driving up costs.
The report recommends that the CMA uses new powers to give Microsoft and AWS so-called strategic market status in order to 'remedy the harms to competition that we have found'.
'This would enable the CMA to impose targeted and bespoke interventions to address the concerns we have identified, including with respect to features where there are specification risks around the design of effective market interventions,' according to the report.
The CMA will now consider launching a probe into whether to hand them 'strategic market status', but this would not start until 2026 as it focuses efforts on proposals announced last week to assign this status to Google and Apple over their mobile platforms.
The panel found that a lack of competition in the £9 billion cloud sector could be leading to higher costs, less choice and innovation, and a lower quality of services for businesses across the UK.
AWS and Microsoft's Azure each have up to around a 40% share of consumer spend in the market, with Google lagging behind in third place.
On Microsoft, the report said: 'Microsoft's licensing practices are adversely impacting the competitiveness of AWS and Google in the supply of cloud services, particularly in competing for customers that purchase cloud services which use the relevant Microsoft software as an input.
'As a result, Microsoft faces weaker competitive constraints from AWS and Google, its most significant competitors, which is reducing competition in cloud services markets.'
Annual results from Microsoft on Wednesday showed booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business, with revenues for the division surpassing 75 billion US dollars (£57 billion) on an annual basis.
A Microsoft spokesperson said: 'The CMA panel's most recent publication misses the mark again, ignoring that the cloud market has never been so dynamic and competitive, with record investment and rapid, AI-driven changes.
'Its recommendations fail to cover Google, one of the fastest-growing cloud market participants.
'Microsoft looks forward to working with the digital markets unit toward an outcome that more accurately reflects the current competition in cloud that benefits UK customers.'
A spokesperson for AWS said the report 'disregards clear evidence of robust competition in the UK's IT services industry'.
They added: 'The action proposed by the inquiry group is unwarranted and undermines the substantial investment and innovation that have already benefited hundreds of thousands of UK businesses.
'It risks making the UK a global outlier at a time when businesses need regulatory predictability for the UK to maintain international competitiveness.'
But Google welcomed the findings and called for 'swift action'.
Chris Lindsay, Google Cloud's vice president of customer engineering in the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region, said: 'The conclusive finding that restrictive licensing harms cloud customers and competition is a watershed moment for the UK.
'Swift action from the (CMA's) Digital Markets Unit is essential to ensure British businesses pay a fair price and to unleash choice, innovation and economic growth in the UK.'
The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) cautioned there was a risk that the 'overly broad and prescriptive intervention' recommended could hamper investment in the UK and access to new technology.
Matthew Sinclair, CCIA UK senior director, said: 'If the CMA goes ahead with these changes it would undermine the UK's competitiveness as business users here no longer get access to the latest cloud services.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fabrizio Romano confirms Liverpool striker talks as deal moves closer
Liverpool's first official bid for Alexander Isak was swiftly rejected by Newcastle United. It's no secret that the Swede is top of Liverpool's striker wishlist - with Richard Hughes prepared to pay ANOTHER British transfer record fee. 🔴 Shop the LFC Store 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! Having paid £116m for Florian Wirtz earlier this summer, Liverpool's sporting director will have to top that fee for Isak. And while reports have been suggesting that Liverpool WON'T be back - the signs are there that the opposite in fact is true. Firstly, the Geordies are pressing on with plans to sign Benjamin Sesko. Why else would they be adding an €80m first-choice striker to their squad? Liverpool UNLOCK Isak funding And, secondly, Liverpool are keen to sell Darwin Nunez. It would be negligent if the Reds left themselves short in the centre-forward position through the sale of the Uruguayan. Liverpool need the money. Having sold Luis Diaz to Bayern Munich, the Anfield club are building a transfer bundle for the Isak deal - and Darwin's exit will be key to unlocking more funds. Hughes is hopeful of gaining around £70m or so for the 26-year-old - which can then be channelled into a bid for Isak. Liverpool remain open to Nunez deal And it has now been claimed by Fabrizio Romano that Liverpool are still OPEN to selling Nunez with Al-Hilal now emerging a frontrunners. Liverpool declined to sell Nunez to the Saudi Pro League club back in January owing to a lack of alternative but Isak is being primed to come to Anfield this summer. Al-Hilal manager Simone Inzaghi is reportedly a big fan of Nunez - with Romano confirming talks between the player's entourage and the Riyadh club.
Tom's Guide
6 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X vs Lenovo Legion Go 2 vs MSI Claw A8: Which next-gen gaming handheld should you buy?
When it comes to the best handheld gaming consoles for 2025, you're going to choose between three: the Asus ROG Xbox Ally X, the Lenovo Legion Go 2 and the MSI Claw A8. All three run AMD's Ryzen Z2 Extreme chipset (Asus getting the AI-injected version), a bucket full of RAM, a giant battery and gaming ergonomics at their core. Out of all the handhelds announced this year (there's a lot of them), these are the three atop the next-gen mountain, and that begs a question — which one should you buy? There are key differences that make this a very closely-fought bout between the three. The Legion Go 2 aces the others in the display department with an OLED screen, whereas the MSI Claw packs a bigger battery, and thanks to the power pairing between Asus and Microsoft, the ROG Xbox Ally X could beat both in terms of performance. So let's try to get an understanding of these three, look at all the specs and leaks, take our hands-on time into context and help you pick the right one for you. Spec ROG Xbox Ally X Lenovo Legion Go 2 MSI Claw A8 Processor AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU AMD Radeon 890M AMD Radeon 890M AMD Radeon 890M RAM 24GB LPDDR5X 32GB LPDDR5X 24GB LPDDR5X Display 7-inch LCD, 1080p, 120Hz 8.8-inch OLED, 1080p, 144Hz 8-inch LCD, 1080p, 120Hz Storage 1TB PCIe SSD 1TB PCIe SSD 1TB PCIe SSD Battery 80Wh 74Wh 80Wh Dimensions 11.45 × 4.78 × 2.00 inches 11.64 x 5.38 x 1.66 inches 11.79 x 4.97 x 0.94 inches Weight 1.6 pounds 2.1 pounds 1.7 pounds Out of all the categories, this is probably going to be the one that's most divisive, because each company has a different approach to design and display. Let's start with the ROG Xbox Ally X. It focuses on portability and ergonomics. It's the smallest of the bunch, and that's reflected in a 7-inch LCD panel. But it's also the thickest on account of improved ergonomics, with side grips that do have that cylindrical shape of a traditional game pad. We've yet to go fully hands-on with this system ourselves (trust me, it's coming soon), but we like the design, even if it's the smallest of the bunch. If you want the best screen, that's where the Legion Go 2 comes in — alongside that choice to make the controllers detachable, which is going to be great for local multiplayer or just setting down that gorgeous 8.8-inch OLED display. However, with a bigger screen and more mechanical parts to detach the controllers, it's slightly bigger and a lot heavier, at over 2 pounds. Finally, there's the middle ground in the MSI Claw A8. Ergonomically, its more sound than the previous Claw with blockier controller grips to get your hands around. It's only 1.6 ounces heavier than the Xbox handheld and in return, you get an 8-inch display (LCD though, not OLED). So really, this is a bit of a three-way tie and comes down to what you're looking for. If you want the best display and don't mind the heft, the Legion Go 2 is your go-to. Want the most portable? ROG Xbox Ally X is the one to choose, and the MSI Claw sits nicely in between for those looking for balance. Just because both these handhelds sport identical internals doesn't mean there isn't a clear winner in the performance department. All of them run a version of AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, which in turn shares a lot in common with the Z1 Extreme before it (8 cores/16 threads). In testing the MSI Claw A8, I was able to get some impressive frame rates of 60+ FPS across some key AAA titles like Spider-Man 2. Of course, this was just a quick test and not a full lab benchmarking. But the superpower comes in moving up to a Zen 5 architecture that unlocks RDNA 3.5. This is what that upgrade does to the performance from leaked testing. Of course, this is ignoring the elephant in the room — AI. The ROG Xbox Ally X packs a Ryzen AI X2 Extreme, which is essentially the same chip but with an NPU bolted on. What this does for game performance, I'm not sure. But developers could accommodate this for smoother machine-learned frame generation or fidelity in the future. As for battery, this is one area where MSI and Microsoft might have a bigger edge. The Claw A8 and ROG Xbox Ally both sport an 80Wh cell, while the Legion Go 2 has a 74Wh battery. That's a small difference, but given the bigger power draw of a bigger screen, that could mean a drop in stamina. But there is one key advantage that the ROG Xbox Ally X will have over these other two — the software. Not just in the UI of opening directly into the Xbox experience rather than to Windows 11, but also in efficiency too. On this Xbox handheld, Microsoft will stop all the background processes of Windows running, which have often been the key reason behind bad battery life on handhelds when compared to those rocking SteamOS. How much of an impact this has, we're not sure, but at the very least, I'm seeing performance improvements in other hands-on tests from my friends. So it's definitely reason to be a little optimistic! And so far, that's where we stand with these — look out for comprehensive hands-on reviews on these three soon enough! But whichever way you go, you're sure to get a powerhouse of a handheld. Early vibes are pointing me towards the ROG Xbox Ally X in terms of the tailor-made software that should improve efficiency and performance over the other two. That being said, Microsoft has confirmed that this gaming handheld-centric version of Windows 11 is coming to other handhelds soon, as has been leaked in a recent beta build. That means those who seek the best display will get the benefits of this in the Legion Go 2, or if you want a slightly bigger screen, the MSI Claw A8 would be a strong contender too. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Android Authority
6 minutes ago
- Android Authority
More is less: I can't make myself use Nothing's Glyph Matrix
Nothing's original Glyph Interface was the perfect level of gimmick — it added a bit of flair to the back of its first few phones, but always felt like it had a purpose. I trusted it for everything from following the charge of my battery to watching for an incoming phone call, and it was one cool thing I could always show off to my iPhone-toting friends. Unfortunately, the Nothing Phone 3 took everything I loved about the original Glyph Interface and sent it back to the drawing board. It replaced the simple LED bars with a circular Glyph Matrix, and it's made me stop using the light-up feature altogether. Here's what I think Nothing got wrong by fixing what wasn't broken. It's not a substitute for screen time Prakhar Khanna / Android Authority I know I just finished calling the Glyph Interface a gimmick — and it is, I stand by that — but at least it's a gimmick that knew what it wanted to be. Its purpose was to complement the overall experience by making it so you didn't always have to look at your phone screen. You could get a general idea of incoming notifications and countdown timers without boosting your daily screen time. And yet, you could just as easily go a whole day without using it. The Glyph Matrix… isn't so simple. It's more detailed than the Glyph Interface, so you have to pay more attention to it than the Glyph Interface, ultimately pushing you to use your phone more than you might have wanted. Yes, sometimes it's helpful as a way to check the current time without flipping your phone over, but because you already have to press the button on the back panel to activate the Matrix (which I don't like, either), it makes the whole process take just as long as picking up your phone to check in the first place. Unfortunately, as soon as I have my Phone 3 in my hand, I'll probably check it. It's kind of like the children's book 'If You Give a Mouse a Cookie,' in that it's a slippery slope for me to start out checking my remaining battery on the back of my phone and very, very quickly end up scrolling the day away on Instagram or Reddit. With the Glyph Interface? Not a chance. It automatically kicked on for timers, notifications, and charging indicators, which meant I could leave my phone sit face down while I worked my way around the kitchen. Nothing's 'toys' don't add to the experience Ryan Haines / Android Authority If, in theory, you can get me to use the Glyph Matrix without being distracted by my phone, I think you'll quickly find that I don't know what to do with it. See, outside of the digital clock, every little feature, which Nothing calls Toys, feels useless. I like to be able to glance at the time, but I can also do that from my watch, which is always, always, always going to be on my wrist, so I rarely toggle the Matrix to show the time. And, when I need to set it to something besides the time, I usually end up on the battery indicator. Unfortunately, Nothing's original decision to make the battery indicator look like a glass half full (or empty, take your pick) made it very hard to know the remaining charge. I could press the Glyph button to light it up, but then I'm left guessing whether my phone is at 25% or 40%, and then I flip it over to light up the display and find out. Thankfully, a recent update (to Nothing OS 3.5) made this better by adding a visible percentage to the Matrix, but you've given this mouse his cookie, and now he wants to scroll social media. Unless it's a timer or a clock, I have no need for it on the back of my phone. That update to Nothing OS 3.5 also added a bunch of other Glyph Matrix toys to explore, but I'm not sure they're better. They're mostly childhood games like spin the bottle and a magic eight ball that feel like they're just kind of there. I haven't found a situation where I've seriously wanted to use any of them, so I've mostly pulled them from the rotation. Cleaning up my active toys has made it easier to cycle through them with the Matrix Button, but also feels like it's pulled out any remaining functionality from the feature itself. I suppose a toy or two is cool, like the solar clock that can help you find the sunset, but again, it's not quite precise enough. Nothing's Glyph Mirror is a neat idea, too, unless you want to use it as a mirror. The idea is pretty simple: it uses your camera to project a black and white live image of yourself, but there's not enough detail to use as a mirror. I tried it for about 30 seconds before I decided it was probably using more battery life than it was worth. Also, if you're the official @nothingindia account on Instagram, you turn the rock, paper, scissors toy into… well, just the grossest joke. If you don't get it, consider yourself lucky. Yes, seriously, this was from the official account. Can I really expect other developers to give this a try? Prakhar Khanna / Android Authority The one thing that still gives me a little bit of hope for the Glyph Matrix is third-party support. Like the original Glyph Interface, Nothing has opened up the freedom to create new toys and integrate app capabilities through a Glyph Developer Kit, which you can explore through GitHub. In theory, it's a great idea, but if it's anything like the third-party support on the Phone 1 and 2, I won't hold my breath. The problem is that Nothing's Glyph Developer Kit has been available for over a year now, but it's barely been used. If I open the Glyph Interface settings on my Phone 2 and look for third-party options, I get two: Google Calendar and Uber. The former gives me a five-minute countdown until the start of an event, while the latter can show the progress of my ride. I wouldn't mind a five-minute timer for a Zoom meeting, but it's not so helpful for a dinner reservation, a concert, or an appointment — if I'm running that late, five minutes won't save me. Nothing has a third-party developer kit... but nobody uses it. Other integrations? Yeah, there aren't any. There's Zomato for food delivery, but I don't use it with GrubHub and Doordash being so much more popular in the US. Maybe the slightly more complex interface of the Glyph Matrix will drive developers to support it — it would be easier to follow the status of a meal delivery, display current Spotify information, or get a more in-depth look at a Slack message — but I won't hold my breath. After all, Samsung's beloved notification LED died off after a few underserved years. Why shouldn't I expect the same from a gimmick that uses a hardware button and makes it hard to buy a phone case? Nothing Phone 3 Nothing Phone 3 MSRP: $799.99 Nothing's first 'true flagship.' The Phone 3 is a stylish reinvention of Nothing's Android phone series, now with flagship specs, including a large silicon-carbon battery, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, and a periscope zoom lens with macro photography support. See price at Amazon Follow
