BBC says it is ‘untenable' for Gregg Wallace to host MasterChef after sexual misconduct report
The report, led by a law firm, said many of the allegations related to 'inappropriate sexual language and humor,' with one incident of unwelcome physical contact.
Wallace, 60, stepped away from hosting the BBC reality show last year while an investigation was launched into allegations made by multiple women that he made inappropriate sexual comments and behaved inappropriately over 17 years.
The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gregg Wallace breaks silence after report upholds 45 complaints against BBC MasterChef presenter
Gregg Wallace has broken his silence after 45 out of 83 allegations of inappropriate behaviour were upheld following a seven-month investigation. The 60-year-old MasterChef presenter was sacked from the BBC following the findings of the inquiry, with allegations including claims of inappropriate sexual language and one incident of unwelcome physical contact. A 'smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated.' Read more: Midlands areas named on new list of 'poorest' places in England Wallace has now issued a statement on the report's findings, saying he is "deeply sorry for any distress caused." He said: "For eight months, my family and I have lived under a cloud. Trial by media, fuelled by rumour and clickbait. None of the serious allegations against me were upheld. "I challenged the remaining issue of unwanted touching but have had to accept a difference in perception, and I am deeply sorry for any distress caused. It was never intended." Regarding his autism spectrum diagnosis during the investigation, he added: "A late autism diagnosis has helped me understand how I communicate and how I'm perceived. I'm still learning." Despite his recent diagnosis of autism, the production company Banijay behind MasterChef, along with the BBC, said the number of sustained allegations made Wallace's return to MasterChef "untenable". The "vast majority" of the complaints (94% ) were relating to behaviour that happened between 2005 and 2018. This is when Wallace was given a 90-minute reprimand by former head of unscripted Kate Philips, who is now the BBC's director of content. The findings come after law firm Lewis Silkin spent seven months speaking to 41 complainants who were among the total of 78 witnesses. This was in a bid to try and substantiate the 83 allegations made against Wallace. The report said: 'Mr Wallace was consistently described as energetic, humorous, and generally able to put contestants at ease, which contributed to the show's success. "However, these interactions and some comments made within earshot of contestants or colleagues sometimes resulted in offence and/or left people feeling uncomfortable. Sometimes other people who were present laughed along. "Occasionally these comments were called out in the moment by people who heard them, but very often they were not.' It added: 'Mr Wallace's neurodiversity diagnosis is considered highly relevant in the context of the findings made, particularly regarding his use of humour as a 'masking' technique and his difficulty in reading social cues. "Mr Wallace accepts that his diagnosis may help to explain some of his actions, but he does not wish to hide behind it.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who Leaked the Secret Meeeting Between King Charles and Prince Harry's Staff? Sussex Source Speaks Out
A secret meeting between royal aides representing the Sussexes and King Charles was photographed by paparazzi and reported on in the Daily Mail, and neither side is thrilled about how it went down. According to The Telegraph, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are "understood to be frustrated" and deny it was them "behind the leak"—which included pictures, not to mention topics of conversation and timing details. And while Buckingham Palace didn't comment, sources close to Prince Harry told the outlet that they were "not responsible," and acknowledged that the leak was "not an ideal way" to start peace talks. The Telegraph also notes that the leak has "jeopardized the fragile peace operation" and created even more "suspicion and distrust on both sides." Quick reminder: His Majesty's communications secretary and Prince Harry's chief communications officer and head of PR met for a secret meeting last week. And again, not only was it photographed, but the Daily Mail spoke to a source who had a lot to say, including that "There's a long road ahead, but a channel of communication is now open for the first time in years. There was no formal agenda, just casual drinks. There were things both sides wanted to talk about." Oh, and they noted that the meeting is just a "first step towards reconciliation between Harry and his father, but at least it is a step in the right direction. Everyone just wants to move on and move forward now. It was finally the right time for the two sides to talk." You Might Also Like Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prosecutor reflects on ‘long road' to justice for baby Victoria
A senior prosecutor has reflected on the 'long road' to justice for baby Victoria, saying nothing was too much for the child unable to 'stick up' for herself. On Monday, Victoria's parents, Constance Marten and Mark Gordon, were convicted of her manslaughter following two lengthy trials spanning two years. Samantha Yelland, senior Crown prosecutor for CPS London, told the PA news agency: 'I feel that justice has been done. 'It's been a long road, it's been a lot of work, but, you know, no work is too much when anyone's died, but particularly a young child who wasn't able to stick up for herself or fight for herself.' Last year, a jury failed to reach verdicts on whether the defendants were responsible to Victoria's death but did convict them of concealing her birth, child cruelty and perverting the course of justice by hiding her body in a shed. Ms Yelland sought a retrial on charges of manslaughter and causing or allowing Victoria's death in the public interest, even though it meant a second six-month trial. Explaining the decision, she said: 'A baby died in circumstances which she absolutely didn't need to and could have been avoided. 'That is why it's serious and it needs to be prosecuted. Obviously none of us expected it to take this long.' Dealing with a case involving the death of a baby is 'always upsetting' even for an experienced team, she said. Ms Yelland said: 'I consider it a privilege to prosecute baby cases. It is very upsetting, it could be harrowing, but usually the people charged with their killing is someone who is supposed to look after them. 'Some of the evidence in is not very nice, but we're just looking at the whole picture and wanting to get justice for the person who has died.' Images of Victoria's body found rotting amid rubbish in a Lidl bag in a shed near Brighton have stuck in her mind throughout the case. She said: 'I've seen what baby Victoria looks like inside of that bag. I've seen the post-mortem photos. 'We didn't subject the jury to that because that is not a nice thing to see. But the baby is in that bag, which we know she was carried around in when she died, but also when she was alive. It is probably what stays with me the most. And what was on top, the rubbish, the Coke can and the sandwich wrapper. 'And the two police officers finding it. You can see how moved they are when they realise that they found it. Obviously, that had been a manhunt been going on for a couple of days by that stage.' On the defendants' actions after four other children were taken into care, Ms Yelland said: 'We never said that they didn't love their children, but when it comes to decision making, it's the prosecution view that they think of themselves above the children. 'And that's why they got themselves into the predicament they did. And that's why Victoria died, and that's why they continued to keep her there in that bag for however long it was after she died and not go to the police and not explain the situation. 'And that's why I charged perverting the course of justice rather than preventing the lawful for burial, which is another offence I could have considered. 'For me, it was more than that because they kept it for such a long time that the state that she was in was such that we couldn't be sure if there had been an injury – not that we're saying there was for a minute – but we wouldn't have been able to tell because at the amount of time that she'd been in there. 'I do accept that there were experts that said that everyone grieves differently and everyone deals with things differently, but I think the whole theme of this case is that they think about themselves more than they think about their children and other people.' Ms Yelland said the case had presented multiple challenges for the prosecution before baby Victoria was found dead on March 1 2023. Discussions had already started about charging Gordon and Marten even in the absence of a body. The CPS pressed ahead with charges despite a post-mortem examination failing to ascertain exactly how Victoria died. With no pathological cause of death, the jury was asked to look at other evidence that Victoria died from hypothermia or smothering, as the defendants claimed. Ms Yelland said: 'We decided that although there were two distinct ways in which she may have died, our main case is that she died of hypothermia. 'The defendants raised that she was smothered and in response to that, we say, while we don't accept that, even if that were to be the case, the circumstances in which she was smothered are such it still amounts to grossly negligence manslaughter. 'It's our case that hypothermia would have been heavily involved in any smothering anyway, because she's been subjected to very cold conditions with the items that she was wearing and would not have been as healthy.' In a change from the original trial, an expert replicated cold and damp conditions in the tent where Victoria died and examined her inadequate clothes pointing to hypothermia being the likely cause. Other challenges involved piecing together and assessing sightings of the defendants from across England in the seven weeks they were on the run with baby Victoria. Mr Yelland said that the prosecution was able to narrow the timeline in the second trial although the prosecution still asserted Victoria survived for longer than the defendants had said. Towards the end of the retrial, Gordon, who by then was representing himself, provided the prosecution with the chance to lift the lid on his 1989 rape conviction in the United States after he gave a misleading impression of his childhood. When he refuted the convictions, the prosecution moved swiftly to produce an embossed certificate from a Florida court to prove it.
