logo
'Good day for patients': cheaper medicines on the way

'Good day for patients': cheaper medicines on the way

The Advertiser5 days ago
Anthony Albanese says he still has his eye on cost-of-living pressures as a promised reduction in medicine costs nears fruition.
As parliament resumed on Monday, the prime minister touted his government's promise to bring down the maximum amount Australians will pay on medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from $31.60 to $25.
The change to the PBS co-payment cap, which sets the maximum out-of-pocket costs pharmacists can charge customers for approved scripts, is set to be introduced to the House of Representatives on Wednesday.
With the opposition signalling their support for the bill, it's likely to be waved through parliament in the coming weeks, with the changes due to take effect on pharmacy shelves from January 1, 2026.
"Now, there's an old saying. Nothing comes down in price," Mr Albanese said in question time.
"Well, this is coming down in price. Not just that, but we've frozen the cost of scripts for pensioners and concession card holders to just $7.70; not just for this term, but for the end of the decade.
"Real cost-of-living relief, taking pressure off Australians and backing in Medicare for the future."
Although the government has declared fixing stalled productivity growth as the priority of its second term, Mr Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers reiterated their commitment to ease cost-of-living pressures, with many Australians still feeling the after-effects of high inflation.
"Cost-of-living relief is at the core of everything we do," Dr Chalmers said.
"It's the same when it comes to legislation to protect penalty rates, slash student debt, the medicines policy we're introducing this week as well, the minimum wage, paid parental leave, the super guarantee, cheaper batteries, prac payments.
"All of this is about recognising that even though we've made that progress in the economy, there's more to do to help ease the cost of living."
First promised by the Albanese government ahead of the May election, the cheaper medicines bill has been forecast to cost the budget $690 million over four years.
It marks the second cut to the cap introduced by the Albanese government in three years, after it slashed the maximum price of PBS prescriptions from $42.50 to $30 in 2023.
Without the government's interventions, some 20 million Australians would have been paying up to $50 for essential medicines like insulin, blood thinners and osteoporosis injections, said Trent Twomey, national president of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
"Indeed, it is a good day for patients," he told reporters.
The government's move to strengthen the PBS comes amid concerns the scheme will be targeted as a bargaining chip in US trade negotiations to ward off threatened pharmaceutical tariffs.
The US pharmaceutical lobby has been pushing President Donald Trump to place tariffs on Australian pharmaceutical imports in retaliation to the "egregious and discriminatory" PBS.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the government's position on the PBS was "unshakeable".
"We won't be negotiating the elements of our PBS with any other country. It's one of the great cornerstones of Australia's healthcare system," he said.
Australia eased its biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports last week, but the prime minister has denied the move was linked to trade talks, noting it followed a 10-year review of Australian biosecurity rules.
Parliamentarians also formally paid their respects to Pope Francis, with Mr Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley delivering condolence motions to the late pontiff, who died in April.
"I am not a Catholic, but I found inspiration in the way Pope Francis lived out his faith with humility, strength and compassion," Ms Ley said.
"His example was a powerful reminder that service to others is at the heart of everything we do, especially in public life."
Anthony Albanese says he still has his eye on cost-of-living pressures as a promised reduction in medicine costs nears fruition.
As parliament resumed on Monday, the prime minister touted his government's promise to bring down the maximum amount Australians will pay on medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from $31.60 to $25.
The change to the PBS co-payment cap, which sets the maximum out-of-pocket costs pharmacists can charge customers for approved scripts, is set to be introduced to the House of Representatives on Wednesday.
With the opposition signalling their support for the bill, it's likely to be waved through parliament in the coming weeks, with the changes due to take effect on pharmacy shelves from January 1, 2026.
"Now, there's an old saying. Nothing comes down in price," Mr Albanese said in question time.
"Well, this is coming down in price. Not just that, but we've frozen the cost of scripts for pensioners and concession card holders to just $7.70; not just for this term, but for the end of the decade.
"Real cost-of-living relief, taking pressure off Australians and backing in Medicare for the future."
Although the government has declared fixing stalled productivity growth as the priority of its second term, Mr Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers reiterated their commitment to ease cost-of-living pressures, with many Australians still feeling the after-effects of high inflation.
"Cost-of-living relief is at the core of everything we do," Dr Chalmers said.
"It's the same when it comes to legislation to protect penalty rates, slash student debt, the medicines policy we're introducing this week as well, the minimum wage, paid parental leave, the super guarantee, cheaper batteries, prac payments.
"All of this is about recognising that even though we've made that progress in the economy, there's more to do to help ease the cost of living."
First promised by the Albanese government ahead of the May election, the cheaper medicines bill has been forecast to cost the budget $690 million over four years.
It marks the second cut to the cap introduced by the Albanese government in three years, after it slashed the maximum price of PBS prescriptions from $42.50 to $30 in 2023.
Without the government's interventions, some 20 million Australians would have been paying up to $50 for essential medicines like insulin, blood thinners and osteoporosis injections, said Trent Twomey, national president of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
"Indeed, it is a good day for patients," he told reporters.
The government's move to strengthen the PBS comes amid concerns the scheme will be targeted as a bargaining chip in US trade negotiations to ward off threatened pharmaceutical tariffs.
The US pharmaceutical lobby has been pushing President Donald Trump to place tariffs on Australian pharmaceutical imports in retaliation to the "egregious and discriminatory" PBS.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the government's position on the PBS was "unshakeable".
"We won't be negotiating the elements of our PBS with any other country. It's one of the great cornerstones of Australia's healthcare system," he said.
Australia eased its biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports last week, but the prime minister has denied the move was linked to trade talks, noting it followed a 10-year review of Australian biosecurity rules.
Parliamentarians also formally paid their respects to Pope Francis, with Mr Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley delivering condolence motions to the late pontiff, who died in April.
"I am not a Catholic, but I found inspiration in the way Pope Francis lived out his faith with humility, strength and compassion," Ms Ley said.
"His example was a powerful reminder that service to others is at the heart of everything we do, especially in public life."
Anthony Albanese says he still has his eye on cost-of-living pressures as a promised reduction in medicine costs nears fruition.
As parliament resumed on Monday, the prime minister touted his government's promise to bring down the maximum amount Australians will pay on medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from $31.60 to $25.
The change to the PBS co-payment cap, which sets the maximum out-of-pocket costs pharmacists can charge customers for approved scripts, is set to be introduced to the House of Representatives on Wednesday.
With the opposition signalling their support for the bill, it's likely to be waved through parliament in the coming weeks, with the changes due to take effect on pharmacy shelves from January 1, 2026.
"Now, there's an old saying. Nothing comes down in price," Mr Albanese said in question time.
"Well, this is coming down in price. Not just that, but we've frozen the cost of scripts for pensioners and concession card holders to just $7.70; not just for this term, but for the end of the decade.
"Real cost-of-living relief, taking pressure off Australians and backing in Medicare for the future."
Although the government has declared fixing stalled productivity growth as the priority of its second term, Mr Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers reiterated their commitment to ease cost-of-living pressures, with many Australians still feeling the after-effects of high inflation.
"Cost-of-living relief is at the core of everything we do," Dr Chalmers said.
"It's the same when it comes to legislation to protect penalty rates, slash student debt, the medicines policy we're introducing this week as well, the minimum wage, paid parental leave, the super guarantee, cheaper batteries, prac payments.
"All of this is about recognising that even though we've made that progress in the economy, there's more to do to help ease the cost of living."
First promised by the Albanese government ahead of the May election, the cheaper medicines bill has been forecast to cost the budget $690 million over four years.
It marks the second cut to the cap introduced by the Albanese government in three years, after it slashed the maximum price of PBS prescriptions from $42.50 to $30 in 2023.
Without the government's interventions, some 20 million Australians would have been paying up to $50 for essential medicines like insulin, blood thinners and osteoporosis injections, said Trent Twomey, national president of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
"Indeed, it is a good day for patients," he told reporters.
The government's move to strengthen the PBS comes amid concerns the scheme will be targeted as a bargaining chip in US trade negotiations to ward off threatened pharmaceutical tariffs.
The US pharmaceutical lobby has been pushing President Donald Trump to place tariffs on Australian pharmaceutical imports in retaliation to the "egregious and discriminatory" PBS.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the government's position on the PBS was "unshakeable".
"We won't be negotiating the elements of our PBS with any other country. It's one of the great cornerstones of Australia's healthcare system," he said.
Australia eased its biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports last week, but the prime minister has denied the move was linked to trade talks, noting it followed a 10-year review of Australian biosecurity rules.
Parliamentarians also formally paid their respects to Pope Francis, with Mr Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley delivering condolence motions to the late pontiff, who died in April.
"I am not a Catholic, but I found inspiration in the way Pope Francis lived out his faith with humility, strength and compassion," Ms Ley said.
"His example was a powerful reminder that service to others is at the heart of everything we do, especially in public life."
Anthony Albanese says he still has his eye on cost-of-living pressures as a promised reduction in medicine costs nears fruition.
As parliament resumed on Monday, the prime minister touted his government's promise to bring down the maximum amount Australians will pay on medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from $31.60 to $25.
The change to the PBS co-payment cap, which sets the maximum out-of-pocket costs pharmacists can charge customers for approved scripts, is set to be introduced to the House of Representatives on Wednesday.
With the opposition signalling their support for the bill, it's likely to be waved through parliament in the coming weeks, with the changes due to take effect on pharmacy shelves from January 1, 2026.
"Now, there's an old saying. Nothing comes down in price," Mr Albanese said in question time.
"Well, this is coming down in price. Not just that, but we've frozen the cost of scripts for pensioners and concession card holders to just $7.70; not just for this term, but for the end of the decade.
"Real cost-of-living relief, taking pressure off Australians and backing in Medicare for the future."
Although the government has declared fixing stalled productivity growth as the priority of its second term, Mr Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers reiterated their commitment to ease cost-of-living pressures, with many Australians still feeling the after-effects of high inflation.
"Cost-of-living relief is at the core of everything we do," Dr Chalmers said.
"It's the same when it comes to legislation to protect penalty rates, slash student debt, the medicines policy we're introducing this week as well, the minimum wage, paid parental leave, the super guarantee, cheaper batteries, prac payments.
"All of this is about recognising that even though we've made that progress in the economy, there's more to do to help ease the cost of living."
First promised by the Albanese government ahead of the May election, the cheaper medicines bill has been forecast to cost the budget $690 million over four years.
It marks the second cut to the cap introduced by the Albanese government in three years, after it slashed the maximum price of PBS prescriptions from $42.50 to $30 in 2023.
Without the government's interventions, some 20 million Australians would have been paying up to $50 for essential medicines like insulin, blood thinners and osteoporosis injections, said Trent Twomey, national president of the Pharmacy Guild of Australia.
"Indeed, it is a good day for patients," he told reporters.
The government's move to strengthen the PBS comes amid concerns the scheme will be targeted as a bargaining chip in US trade negotiations to ward off threatened pharmaceutical tariffs.
The US pharmaceutical lobby has been pushing President Donald Trump to place tariffs on Australian pharmaceutical imports in retaliation to the "egregious and discriminatory" PBS.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the government's position on the PBS was "unshakeable".
"We won't be negotiating the elements of our PBS with any other country. It's one of the great cornerstones of Australia's healthcare system," he said.
Australia eased its biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports last week, but the prime minister has denied the move was linked to trade talks, noting it followed a 10-year review of Australian biosecurity rules.
Parliamentarians also formally paid their respects to Pope Francis, with Mr Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley delivering condolence motions to the late pontiff, who died in April.
"I am not a Catholic, but I found inspiration in the way Pope Francis lived out his faith with humility, strength and compassion," Ms Ley said.
"His example was a powerful reminder that service to others is at the heart of everything we do, especially in public life."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack
Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack

Sydney Morning Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack

London: Swiss companies are reeling from a shock move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 39 per cent tariff on their exports, stunning brand-name suppliers of luxury watches, jewellery, cheese and chocolate. Swiss chocolate makers have declared the move 'incomprehensible' and are warning it will hit them hard, as the changes flow through to higher prices for American customers. The biggest names in luxury watches, already suffering a slowdown in America after Trump's previous trade decisions, now confront extraordinary price hikes that could lead them to expand sales in other markets. Trump spared Australia from higher penalties in his sweeping trade decision on Thursday, leaving tariffs at 10 per cent for most Australian exports, but he singled out Switzerland with the biggest blow to any European country. At 39 per cent, the new rate is higher than the 31 per cent tariff the president proposed in April – and much worse than Swiss leaders expected. The decision puts the Swiss exporters at a grave disadvantage to competitors in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and other countries that will incur the 15 per cent tariff applied to the European Union. While Americans may have to pay steeper prices for Bally fashion made in Switzerland, they would incur a more modest price hike for a Dior item made in France or Armani product made in Italy. 'It is incomprehensible why Switzerland is affected by these tariffs, as reciprocity is out of the question,' industry group Chocosuisse said, repeating concerns it aired in April.

Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack
Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack

The Age

time27 minutes ago

  • The Age

Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack

London: Swiss companies are reeling from a shock move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 39 per cent tariff on their exports, stunning brand-name suppliers of luxury watches, jewellery, cheese and chocolate. Swiss chocolate makers have declared the move 'incomprehensible' and are warning it will hit them hard, as the changes flow through to higher prices for American customers. The biggest names in luxury watches, already suffering a slowdown in America after Trump's previous trade decisions, now confront extraordinary price hikes that could lead them to expand sales in other markets. Trump spared Australia from higher penalties in his sweeping trade decision on Thursday, leaving tariffs at 10 per cent for most Australian exports, but he singled out Switzerland with the biggest blow to any European country. At 39 per cent, the new rate is higher than the 31 per cent tariff the president proposed in April – and much worse than Swiss leaders expected. The decision puts the Swiss exporters at a grave disadvantage to competitors in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and other countries that will incur the 15 per cent tariff applied to the European Union. While Americans may have to pay steeper prices for Bally fashion made in Switzerland, they would incur a more modest price hike for a Dior item made in France or Armani product made in Italy. 'It is incomprehensible why Switzerland is affected by these tariffs, as reciprocity is out of the question,' industry group Chocosuisse said, repeating concerns it aired in April.

Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform

The Advertiser

time41 minutes ago

  • The Advertiser

Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform

Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store