Most of UK stranded in 'junk bond' territory as London dominates, research says
The paper, published in the Fiscal Studies, opens new tab journal, underlined flaws in Britain's financial architecture that help to explain inequalities between London and other regions that are among the worst among similar economies, opens new tab.
Investors in British cities other than the capital demand a big risk premium of around 250-300 basis points above projects in London and other European cities, according to the research, which analysed thousands of real estate investments.
The gap is similar to that between British sovereign bond yields and those of Romania or Hungary.
A bigger risk premium means investors seek higher returns, making projects less likely to happen.
"Until now we have had no understanding regarding the extent to which the UK is not perceived by investors as being a single market area," said Philip McCann, chair of urban and regional economics at the Productivity Institute at Alliance Manchester Business School, who co-authored the paper.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer plans to devolve more power to Britain's regions and boost skills training, but the authors of the report said financial system reforms were missing.
Previous governments have tried to reduce Britain's regional divide, with limited success, including former Prime Minister Boris Johnson's "levelling up" agenda.
The paper showed much of Britain entered "junk bond" territory after the global financial crisis of 2007-08.
Past rounds of monetary easing by the Bank of England, including quantitative easing bond-buying, appeared to affect only London and deepened regional divides - a finding at odds with the BoE's view that its policies helped the entire country.
"We now know that this is profoundly not the case, especially with QE, which appears to have had no beneficial commercial investment effects whatsoever outside of London and its immediate hinterland," added McCann, who has previously advised the European Commission and various governments.
The BoE's mandate is to set policy for the British economy as a whole. Its officials say regional inequality is an issue for the government.
A Reuters analysis last year showed London's share of the national economy has surged by more than 3 percentage points since 2000 to 24%, with no other British region increasing its share.
Comparable data from the EU statistics agency Eurostat show far less polarisation between regions in Germany and France.
The new research said the disappearance of local banking lay behind the increased risk premium in Britain's second- and third-tier cities - in contrast to the United States and Germany, where lenders operate with far more regional autonomy.
"The result is that UK financial markets now have little presence, finance or engagement in the regions of Britain and the commercial opportunities that might exist there," the paper said.
The authors said revived local capital markets and banking networks, led by organisations such as the British Business Bank and the UK National Wealth Fund, would encourage private investment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
ECB policymakers set high bar for Sept rate cut, sources say
FRANKFURT, July 24 (Reuters) - European Central Bank policymakers are setting a high bar for an interest rate cut in September and they would need to see a significant deterioration in growth and inflation before backing further easing, two sources told Reuters. The European Central Bank left interest rates unchanged on Thursday after cutting eight times in a year, biding its time while Brussels and Washington try to negotiate a trade deal that could ease persistent uncertainty over tariffs. But sources at the meeting said that policymakers would not be spurred into action by the mere announcement of U.S. duties on European Union imports. Instead, they would need to see an actual weakening in the inflation and growth data as well as lower projections from ECB staff in September if they are to back a rate cut. An ECB spokesperson declined to comment. While the discussion on Thursday was harmonious, a few policymakers wanted to send out a warning about inflation coming in lower than expected. Instead, the ECB said that risks to economic growth were "tilted to the downside" while "the outlook for inflation (was) more uncertain than usual". ECB President Christine Lagarde hinted at this division, saying that, while the decision to keep rates on hold was unanimous, the risk assessment was "broadly shared". The sources said that policymakers mostly agreed on how the economy would behave in the ECB's baseline scenario, in which the U.S. administration imposes a 10% tariff rate on European Union imports. But they differed about the adverse scenario, in which the tariff rate is higher. Policy hawks, who favour higher interest rates, saw risks that inflation would get a boost from supply disruptions related to tariffs and possible retaliation. Doves saw downside risks from slower economic activity prevailing. Lagarde, who said her job was to present the view of the Governing Council rather than her own, listed both types of risks in her news conference.
Auto Express
37 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Car Deal of the Day: Thanks Elon! Tesla Model 3 now under £280 a month
Easy to drive; minimalist interior 323-mile range Just £278.50 a month Tesla may have turned in a disappointing set of sales results for the last quarter of 2025 this week, but there's no denying that the Model 3 is still a very capable and desirable electric car. Happily, there are deals to be had, too. Advertisement - Article continues below AA Lease is offering the electric saloon for just £278.50 a month right now. This two-year deal only requires a £3,612 initial deposit to get the ball rolling, while mileage is capped at 5,000 a year. We suspect you might want to raise this annual mileage limit; doing so won't break the bank, as an 8,000-mile allowance will only cost an extra £18.29 a month. This deal gets you the Standard model, so that's the entry-level rear-wheel drive version of the Model 3, in other words. A 60kWh battery pack opens up a range of 323 miles WLTP, and in our experience Teslas are very efficient so a real-world range in the high 200s is easily achievable. Of course, having a Tesla gives you access to the firm's Supercharger network, ensuring quick and convenient top-ups. Standard equipment is pretty high on the Tesla Model 3, with power-adjustable and heated front seats, a heated steering wheel, 18-inch wheels, a massive 15.4-inch touchscreen, and metallic paint all being thrown in. Inside is a very minimalist place, with hardly any buttons, plenty of plain surfaces and no indicator stalks, while the latest Model 3 has been tweaked on the outside with sleeker styling to give a more modern look. The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top Tesla Model 3 leasing offers from leading providers on our Tesla Model 3 page. Check out the Tesla Model 3 deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here…
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australians lost $1bn through collapsed investment funds. What happened and how can workers keep their super safe?
Thousands of Australians recently lost more than $1bn in retirement savings after the collapse of funds linked to their superannuation platforms, sparking warnings from the corporate regulator about risky investment schemes. While only a small share of the population has been affected, some investors have seen their entire super balances wiped. Here is how the collapses happened, and what Australian workers can do to avoid a similar situation. Over the past year or so, more than 12,000 Australians have been exposed to three major collapsed or frozen investment schemes: First Guardian, Shield Master Fund and Australian Fiduciaries. The failures have so far led to collective losses of up to $1.2bn. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) blocked investment in Shield in February 2024 and froze the assets of First Guardian in February 2025 after its managers blocked most investors from accessing their funds in May the previous year. The corporate regulator is also investigating concerns about Australian Fiduciaries including alleged inadequate management of conflicts of interest. First Guardian, which held $505m for about 6,000 investors, described its investments as focused on shares, property, private equity and fixed income, according to federal court-appointed liquidators. The liquidators found the company had put nearly $70m into businesses connected to its directors while more than $240m was invested offshore. One director also allegedly bought a Lamborghini with nearly $550,000 of company money. Investors have been warned they will probably only get a portion of an outstanding $446m back, and not until 2027 at the earliest, after liquidators said they expected to conclude directors breached their duties, the value of investments may have been overstated and funds may not have been properly recorded. The fund's May 2024 balance sheet indicated it had grown that to $525m but more than half of that was in question and investors were not likely to recover their entire investment, receivers for Shield reported in November 2024. They found managers had overstated the value of investments in a real estate fund and nearly $7m had been spent on a former director's personal expenses. Some investments would not be recovered for more than two years, the receivers said in December. In these cases, investors switched to superannuation products that would let them invest in First Guardian or in Shield with financial advisers' help, after being cold-called by salespeople, Asic says. The corporate regulator has put the spotlight on salespeople pressuring customers to invest in specific products. Red flags for consumers include cold calling and high-pressure sales tactics, or offers of prizes, free superannuation health checks, or free consolidation of lost super, according to Asic's deputy chair, Sarah Court. 'These calls don't have the hallmarks of a typical scam. The caller will seemingly have your best interests at heart, and they say they want to help you find a better super product or locate lost super for free,' she says. 'If you are unsure or are feeling pressured, just hang up.' Customers and financial advisers reached the products through superannuation platforms, including one operated by an arm of Macquarie Group, that temporarily chose to offer one or both products, Asic says. Super funds are highly regulated and they are discouraged from investing in schemes that are risky or opaque, according to Xavier O'Halloran, the chief executive of advocacy group Super Consumers Australia. Nearly 15 million among the 18 million accounts in Australia are in MySuper products, default super funds that employers offer workers, which did not invest in the collapsed schemes, he says. While all investment carries risk, MySuper products are diversified, and so not reliant on a single investment or asset class. Some Australians invest in less scrutinised schemes, especially through self-managed super funds. Asic recently warned it had growing concerns that peoplewere being encouraged by salespeople and cold-callers to switch from safe investments into complex and risky schemes. Phil Anderson, the general manager of policy, advocacy and standards at the Financial Advice Association Australia, encourages people to research their investments and check details with their financial advisers if they're worried they might be in an inappropriate investment. 'It is quite evident that there's failings in the system,' Anderson says. 'Don't be rushed into doing something. Challenge the adviser: Why is this the right thing for me? … What track record do these investment options have?' Investors can also spread their superannuation between different investment options within or across funds to limit the chance of a single collapse knocking out their entire savings, Anderson says. Customers can check what assets their super is invested in and how it is performing when superannuation funds release their annual statements for 2024-25 in coming months. People who have been told to swap from a MySuper product can also ask their adviser if their prospective fund has been checked by the regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. Asic has encouraged those who have lost money in a collapse to make a complaint about their adviser to the sector's independent ombudsman, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. If a customer has lost money but their advice firm has gone into liquidation or insolvency, they may be able to appeal to the sector's compensation scheme of last resort. However, not all of the losses may be recompensed. Last resort compensation payouts are capped at $150,000 per individual and would only cover any clients who accessed the products under the guidance of an adviser, meaning any customer who made the decision without advice would not be eligible. The compensator is expecting claims against advisers linked to the funds but has received no claims for Shield and only one for First Guardian, according to the scheme's chief executive, David Berry. That has made it impossible to determine how many investors will be eligible, how much they might be paid or when they might be compensated, he said. This shortfall has led to calls for increased regulation of the products responsible for the losses, known as managed investment schemes, but also for reform of the compensation scheme of last resort so it covers those who invested without advice. Guardian Australia attempted to reach representatives of the funds Shield, First Guardian and Australian Fiduciaries, including through the firms' liquidators or administrators where applicable. Financial advice firm Interprac and superannuation platform trustees Macquarie, Equity Trustees, Diversa and Netwealth each declined to comment.
