USS Nimitz carrier strike group sailing toward Middle East ahead of schedule, US official says
The Nimitz strike group was previously scheduled to replace the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group, which has been deployed for several months, but is now heading to the Middle East ahead of schedule. The two will now be in the Middle East at the same time.
USS Carl Vinson was the only aircraft carrier in the region as of last Friday, U.S. defense officials told Fox News.
USS Nimitz – commissioned on May 3, 1975 – is the oldest active aircraft carrier in the U.S. Navy. This is possibly its final sea voyage, as the Nimitz is scheduled to be decommissioned in 2026. The deployment is significant because the Nimitz was also deployed in 1980 when its helicopters were part of the failed U.S. effort known as Operation Eagle Claw to rescue the American hostages being held at the US Embassy in Tehran. The U.S. has been in a shadow war against Iran ever since.
USS Nimitz departed the South China Sea on Monday morning and was heading west, Reuters reported, citing data from the ship tracking website Marine Traffic. Two sources, including one diplomat, told Reuters the carrier had been scheduled to attend a formal reception in Danang City, central Vietnam, on June 20.
It has since been canceled.
One of the sources said the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi notified him about the reception being called off due to "an emergent operational requirement."
The United States is shifting military resources, including ships, in the Middle East amid Israel's preemptive attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities and leadership and Iran's retaliatory strikes that have been ongoing for four consecutive days.
American air defense systems and a Navy destroyer helped Israel shoot down ballistic missiles coming in from Iran on Friday, U.S. officials told Fox News.
The U.S. has both ground-based Patriot missile defense systems and Terminal High Altitude Air Defense systems in the Middle East capable of intercepting ballistic missiles.
The U.S. Navy also had the destroyer USS Thomas Hudner, which is capable of defending against ballistic missiles, begin sailing from the western Mediterranean Sea toward the eastern Mediterranean, U.S. officials told Fox News. They said the Navy also had directed another destroyer to move forward so it could be available if requested by the White House.
One of the officials cited the Nimitz, which was in the Indo-Pacific at the time, as well as USS George Washington, which had just left its port in Japan, as assets the Navy could possibly surge to the Middle East if so ordered.
American fighter jets were also patrolling the sky in the Middle East to protect personnel and installations, and air bases in the region are taking additional security precautions, the officials said.
Typically, around 30,000 troops are based in the Middle East, and about 40,000 troops are in the region now, one of the U.S. officials told The Associated Press. That number surged as high as 43,000 last October amid the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran as well as continuous attacks on commercial and military ships in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen.
Former President Joe Biden initially surged ships to protect Israel, a close U.S. ally, following the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks by Iran-backed Hamas terrorists. It was seen at the time as a deterrent against Lebanon-based Hezbollah and Iran.
On Oct. 1, 2024, U.S. Navy destroyers fired about a dozen interceptors in defense of Israel as the country came under attack by more than 200 missiles fired by Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top China official says US defence chief 'inciting conflict'
A senior Chinese official accused the United States defence chief on Thursday of "inciting confrontation and conflict" after he urged American allies to bolster their militaries to counter Beijing. China and the United States last month said they had reached an understanding on a trade deal -- a truce after bruising tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's goods. But the two countries still disagree on issues ranging from technology and security to geopolitics, including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as Beijing's territorial claims in Asia. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that China is preparing to use military force to upend the balance of power in Asia and has urged American allies to achieve "peace through strength". On Thursday, Liu Jianchao, the head of the International Department of China's ruling Communist Party, said Hegseth's remarks constituted "hegemonic thinking". "What he truly wants is force, not dialogue," Liu told the World Peace Forum in Beijing. "What he is inciting is confrontation and conflict, not peace and harmony," he said. China and the United States have long been at odds over Beijing's expansive claims in the strategically crucial South China Sea, and its refusal to rule out using force to seize Taiwan, the self-governed island it claims as its own. "The Chinese government has made it crystal clear that it will never back down on these issues," Liu said. "The Chinese people will do their utmost to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification of the motherland, but we will never allow Taiwan independence," he added. "The United States must respect China's sovereignty on this issue." ll-mjw/oho/lb
CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
You may end up paying for Trump's latest trade deal
Shoes, electronics and clothing are just some of the goods that could get more expensive under the trade agreement President Donald Trump announced with Vietnam on Wednesday. Wait — how's that possible? For the past three months, goods shipped from Vietnam to the United States were tariffed at a minimum 10% rate, a reprieve from the 46% rate that briefly went into effect in April before Trump announced a pause. Trump claimed the delay would give countries more time to negotiate trade deals with the US. As his self-imposed July 9 deadline for deals approaches with few new agreements in place, Trump has threatened to raise tariffs again. But here's the kicker: Inking a deal, or a framework for one, doesn't prevent higher import taxes, either. The agreement Trump announced via social media calls for a minimum 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods exported to the US. That's double the rate US businesses are paying now. In return, Trump said that Vietnam agreed to open its economy to trade with the US, including not tariffing American goods. Many details remain unknown, including whether anything has been finalized. Vietnam's state-run news outlet, Việt Nam News, referred to the agreement on Wednesday as 'a framework.' 'Obviously this is not good news for American consumers,' said Clark Packard, a trade policy research fellow at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute. Vietnam is the sixth-top source of foreign goods shipped to the US, a ranking that's steadily risen over the past few years as shipments from China to the US have declined. Among the top goods the US buys from Vietnam are electronics, apparel, footwear and furniture, according to US Commerce Department data. That makes it all the more likely Americans will be impacted by the higher tariff rates. 'Certainly American consumers will ultimately bear the burden here,' Packard told CNN. Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, making them more expensive to buy. Businesses foot the initial tariff bill for imported goods, but they often pass on some of those costs to consumers by raising prices. But many businesses will absorb some or all of those tariff costs to avoid losing customers. And businesses often stockpile inventory ahead of tariffs, delaying cost increases for themselves and for customers. Eventually, though, they may run out of options to protect consumers from higher prices. 'The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on the American economy, the biggest and best consumer market in the world,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CNN. Desai said recent inflation readings, which have yet to show widespread price increases even as tariffs on virtually everything the US imports have increased since April, are proof of that. Trump's tariffs are intended to 'level the playing field for American industries and workers,' Desai said. In other words, by raising the cost of foreign-made goods, Trump hopes to induce more businesses to produce goods domestically. However, it can take several years for businesses to onshore manufacturing. In the meantime, they may be stuck importing products from places like Vietnam. Caleb Petitt, a research associate at the Independent Institute, a libertarian-leaning think tank, disputed the idea that American businesses will benefit from the tariffs because many rely on components produced abroad, as well as billions of dollars worth of finished goods. 'These tariffs will not help American industry and will burden American consumers with higher costs and uncertainty about the market,' he said.
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
You may end up paying for Trump's latest trade deal
Shoes, electronics and clothing are just some of the goods that could get more expensive under the trade agreement President Donald Trump announced with Vietnam on Wednesday. Wait — how's that possible? For the past three months, goods shipped from Vietnam to the United States were tariffed at a minimum 10% rate, a reprieve from the 46% rate that briefly went into effect in April before Trump announced a pause. Trump claimed the delay would give countries more time to negotiate trade deals with the US. As his self-imposed July 9 deadline for deals approaches with few new agreements in place, Trump has threatened to raise tariffs again. But here's the kicker: Inking a deal, or a framework for one, doesn't prevent higher import taxes, either. The agreement Trump announced via social media calls for a minimum 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods exported to the US. That's double the rate US businesses are paying now. In return, Trump said that Vietnam agreed to open its economy to trade with the US, including not tariffing American goods. Many details remain unknown, including whether anything has been finalized. Vietnam's state-run news outlet, Việt Nam News, referred to the agreement on Wednesday as 'a framework.' 'Obviously this is not good news for American consumers,' said Clark Packard, a trade policy research fellow at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute. Vietnam is the sixth-top source of foreign goods shipped to the US, a ranking that's steadily risen over the past few years as shipments from China to the US have declined. Among the top goods the US buys from Vietnam are electronics, apparel, footwear and furniture, according to US Commerce Department data. That makes it all the more likely Americans will be impacted by the higher tariff rates. 'Certainly American consumers will ultimately bear the burden here,' Packard told CNN. Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, making them more expensive to buy. Businesses foot the initial tariff bill for imported goods, but they often pass on some of those costs to consumers by raising prices. But many businesses will absorb some or all of those tariff costs to avoid losing customers. And businesses often stockpile inventory ahead of tariffs, delaying cost increases for themselves and for customers. Eventually, though, they may run out of options to protect consumers from higher prices. 'The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on the American economy, the biggest and best consumer market in the world,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CNN. Desai said recent inflation readings, which have yet to show widespread price increases even as tariffs on virtually everything the US imports have increased since April, are proof of that. Trump's tariffs are intended to 'level the playing field for American industries and workers,' Desai said. In other words, by raising the cost of foreign-made goods, Trump hopes to induce more businesses to produce goods domestically. However, it can take several years for businesses to onshore manufacturing. In the meantime, they may be stuck importing products from places like Vietnam. Caleb Petitt, a research associate at the Independent Institute, a libertarian-leaning think tank, disputed the idea that American businesses will benefit from the tariffs because many rely on components produced abroad, as well as billions of dollars worth of finished goods. 'These tariffs will not help American industry and will burden American consumers with higher costs and uncertainty about the market,' he said.
