logo
Funding to protect oceans falls far short of what UN says is needed

Funding to protect oceans falls far short of what UN says is needed

CBC17-06-2025

Social Sharing
A UN push for investment to protect the world's oceans yielded around $10 billion US ($13.6 billion Cdn) in deals at a conference last week, way below the estimated annual need as many investors sought clearer regulations on ocean management before committing funds.
While political leaders at the United Nations conference in Nice took steps to tackle overfishing and pollution threatening delicate ecosystems and the people who depend on them, getting countries to agree to better governance has proven tough.
Only 50 countries ratify High Seas Treaty so far
Just 50 countries have so far ratified a new High Seas treaty that sets out rules agreed to by more than 130 nations in 2023 to govern international waters and clamp down on harmful practices.
Neither Canada nor the United States have ratified the treaty.
The lack of a clear governing framework and robust ocean-related data has stymied private sector finance to date, said Oliver Withers, head of nature at British lender Standard Chartered.
"The high seas don't belong to any one individual sovereign," he said. "It is a significant challenge."
WATCH | World leaders, scientists gather in France for UN Ocean Conference
World leaders, scientists gather in France for UN Ocean Conference
9 days ago
Duration 1:57
Funding mostly from public sector banks
The bulk of deals made in France came from public sector banks, including $2.5 billion from the Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean and $3.5 billion from a group of other development banks to fight plastic pollution.
While a step up, the total figure falls far short of what the UN says is needed. Between 2015 and 2019, only $10 billion US was invested against the UN estimate of $175 billion US in annual funding that the world body says is needed to meet the sustainable development goals set out in 2015.
Those goals included ending illegal fishing and banning subsidies that encourage it by 2020, conserving 10 per cent of marine areas by 2020 and significantly reducing marine pollution by 2025.
"Public finance isn't enough, but private finance is even less. So I think it's a space in its infancy," said Francine Pickup of the UN Development Programme.
Pickup said improving policies and regulation, including removing subsidies she said encouraged harmful practices such as overfishing, was key, followed by the creation of a pipeline of investments, including in start-ups focused on ocean-related technology.
WATCH | Scientists want a ban on deep-sea mining. Trump wants to fast-track it
Scientists want a ban on deep-sea mining. Trump wants to fast-track it
13 days ago
Duration 1:59
A group of leading ocean and climate scientists, including Canadians, is calling for a ban on deep-sea mining just as U.S. President Donald Trump moves to fast-track undersea mining approvals.
Between 2020 and 2025, ocean tech received just 0.4 per cent of the $202 billion US invested across all sectors during that period, data shared with Reuters by industry tracker Sightline Climate showed, although the data showed a stronger start to 2025.
Investors seek treaty enforcement mechanisms
"What we seek as investors is that governments and the policymakers address systemic risks," said Robert-Alexandre Poujade, biodiversity lead at BNP Paribas Asset Management.
He said he would welcome the treaty "if it has lots of teeth and enforcement mechanisms."
Fixing the funding shortfall also requires a concerted effort by policymakers and investors to tackle challenges that impede the protection of marine biodiversity and ocean health.
A warming planet is heating up the oceans, exacerbating effects such as water acidification and coral bleaching that climate scientists say will be improved if the world manages to cut carbon emissions as planned.
Overfishing and polluting sea vessels, offshore oil drilling and, potentially, deep-sea mining that collectively damage ocean health also require firmer policy action, scientists, ocean experts and investors say.
While action has hitherto been slow, there were signs of progress in Nice, as more than 20 countries backed a call by France to prevent deep sea mining; and a number of new marine protected areas were created.
"In a sense, the ocean is the last area that we have been pillaging without thinking about tomorrow," said Flavien Jouber, Seychelles minister for agriculture climate change and environment, describing a "sense of free-for-all."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate
'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

National Post

timean hour ago

  • National Post

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

Article content The Carney government is under growing pressure to drop what is known as the 'EV mandate.' This is a policy first introduced in 2022 wherein Canadian auto manufacturers will be mandated to sell a minimum quantity of EVs each year until 2035, when the sale of new gas-powered cars will be banned entirely. Article content The singular problem with the mandate is that nobody wants to buy EVs. Even with Canada having the highest fuel prices in the hemisphere, sales of EVs have only ever peaked at about 20 per cent of new vehicle sales. And even that has been in freefall in recent months. Article content In Dear Diary, the National Post satirically re-imagines a week in the life of a newsmaker. This week, Tristin Hopper takes a journey inside the thoughts of the EV mandate. Article content Monday Article content One of the most pressing challenges of modern governance is how to compel ones' citizenry to meet a rote, inconsistent and often contradictory picture of ideal behaviour. We have identified the perfect Canadian life: The specific pattern of development milestones, core values and consumer choices that will yield a citizen best attuned to the interests of the collective. Article content The only problem is to how to take this average Canadian — a scared, superstitious and mostly obese bipedal primate — and mould them into the rational, inclusive, evidence-based form that we have decreed for them. Article content Because it is here where we are weakest. I need not remind you that China is nipping at our heels. If we are to stay competitive, I'm afraid that we risk too much by sticking to archaic models of 'letting people buy the vehicles they would like to buy.' Article content I admit the EV mandate may look draconian in isolation. If presented as a stark dichotomy of 'freedom' versus 'compulsion,' a sentimental public will naturally favour the former. Article content But if we start from the premise that the Canadian public must obviously be compelled to cease purchasing internal combustion engines within 10 years, then the only question is how to go about it. Article content My sober and reasonable offer is that private businesses be obliged to meet an objective, and the details are left to them … as would be expected of any free society. Article content Would a better solution be to incarcerate the owners of gas-powered cars? To mandate gasoline additives that prematurely wear the engines of ICE vehicles? To make highways more dangerous to facilitate higher attrition of the existing vehicle fleet? I think you'll agree that mine is the most humane and inobtrusive option. Article content Wednesday Article content In this line of work, one quickly grows weary of the bottomless mendacity of the auto sector. Their chief criticism of the EV mandate, to my read, is that it stands in defiance of 'consumer preferences.' They say the Canadian auto buyer does not want to purchase EVs at the 'arbitrary' rates we are setting, and thus the program is unworkable. Article content I find their lack of imagination insulting, if not traitorous. These are companies that routinely convince chartered accountants that their daily driver needs to be a Ford F-350. Or that a 700-horsepower sedan is an appropriate vehicle to pick up their kids from school. There are people out there driving Cybertrucks, Pontiac Azteks and Hummer H2s, all of them brainwashed by clever marketing into thinking that they made a smart decision. Article content Tell the public that the gas cars cause impotence. Shoot a couple commercials with Jason Statham. Offer the cars with a free Spotify subscription. It's not my fault you're not trying hard enough to sell EVs. Article content The public has an unfortunate habit of obsessing over the alleged downsides of green policy. This came up often in regards to carbon pricing. Joe and Sally Taxpayer would complain endlessly about the extra $10 or $20 at their fill-up, without a thought as to how their government had won the acclaim of closing plenary delegates at multiple U.N. climate change summits. Article content But these boors miss the opportunity inherent in the mandate. Remember when we made it unbelievably difficult to build houses, thus causing a housing shortage that caused the existing housing stock to perpetually skyrocket in value? In a world with no new gas-powered cars, your 2009 Jetta could become a luxury commodity sooner than you think. Article content The worst thing about all this current controversy is that when the policy is inevitably a smashing success, all of today's critics will pretend they supported it all along. But any cursory reading of history reveals that true progress comes only from government telling private firms the precise share of their sales that should be filled by a politically desirable consumer product. Article content Did the fisherman not swap out row boats for motor vessels because a government told him to? Did we not transition from VHS to DVDs based on the sage yet mandatory advice of a centralized bureaucracy? Forcing people to purchase things is the Canadian way. Article content

Bold Prediction: 2 Bank Stocks That Will Be Worth More Than JPMorgan Chase 20 Years From Now
Bold Prediction: 2 Bank Stocks That Will Be Worth More Than JPMorgan Chase 20 Years From Now

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Bold Prediction: 2 Bank Stocks That Will Be Worth More Than JPMorgan Chase 20 Years From Now

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) is a massive financial institution with more assets than any other U.S. bank and an $804 billion market cap. To be perfectly clear, it is a remarkable business with fantastic leadership. Having said that, while I think JPMorgan Chase will continue to grow over the coming years, I don't necessarily think it will be on top of the industry forever. While there's no way to know what the banking industry or U.S. economy will look like in a couple of decades, there are some companies that have massive opportunities and the potential to grow rapidly. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » I realize this is a bold prediction. There's a lot that needs to go right for any other bank stock to get close to JPMorgan Chase's market cap. But if we're looking at a time frame of 20 years, these two have a better chance than many experts think. A highly profitable bank with some interesting possibilities As of this writing, Capital One (NYSE: COF) has a $135 billion market cap, so it would have to outpace JPMorgan Chase by about 500% to overtake it. But in a 20-year period, that's certainly within the realm of possibilities. For one thing, Capital One doesn't necessarily need to grow its business to the size of JPMorgan Chase. Because of its credit card and auto lending focus, Capital One has far better net-interest margins. The bank has done an excellent job of innovating and is the third-largest player in the credit card industry with about $850 billion in credit card purchase volume last year. But after its recent acquisition of Discover, it has the number one share in credit card loans. Over the past decade alone, Capital One's credit card spending volume has more than tripled, so there's excellent growth momentum here. Furthermore, Capital One has about $470 billion in total deposits, about one-fourth of what JPMorgan Chase has today. Capital One has done an excellent job of not only modernizing the branch-based banking experience but has also been the first major bank to offer high-yield deposit products to branch customers. I could see its deposit growth outpacing its big-bank competitors over the coming years. Finally, one factor that could help catapult Capital One to the next level is that it is now the only large U.S. consumer-facing bank to have its own payment network. At first, this will be mostly useful to avoid paying companies like Visa and Mastercard interchange fees on its own card products, but over time there could be interesting possibilities to build out the Discover network as a truly competitive alternative to the payment-processing giants. An app that could replace your bank, broker, and more The Capital One prediction is certainly bold, but there's a clear path to get there, especially if the Discover network truly gains traction as a globally competitive payment network. But this next one is admittedly a bit of a stretch. SoFi (NASDAQ: SOFI) has a market cap of about $18.4 billion today, which means that JPMorgan Chase is roughly 44 times as valuable. But if SoFi can keep its momentum going, grow its brand recognition, and continue to build out its ecosystem, it could be a massive long-term winner. Management has said that the goal is to become a top 10 financial institution, which would require it to grow more than 10X from its current asset size, so the bank's leadership team is certainly aiming high. While other personal finance apps aim to do one or two things better than traditional banks, such as offering high-yield savings accounts or a stock-trading platform, SoFi is building a true bank replacement. The ultimate goal is for SoFi to be able to do everything your current bank, brokerage, insurance agent, and other financial services businesses do -- all in one app and better than the legacy providers. The company's growth momentum has been impressive to say the least. Its membership base has tripled over the past three years, and SoFi (which only received a banking charter in 2022) has grown its deposit base from zero to $27 billion. There are several major catalysts that could take SoFi to the next level. The third-party loan platform is one big example that is growing fast. It's where SoFi originates loans on behalf of third-party partners and makes applicant referrals, generating a low-risk stream of fee income from the massive personal loan industry. SoFi's home loan business is another example. Even in a terribly slow real estate market with elevated interest rates, SoFi originated nearly six times the home loan volume in the first quarter than it did two years ago. With Americans sitting on more equity ($35 trillion) and pent-up home-buying demand than ever, this could be a massive opportunity. Cryptocurrency is a recent development that could bring more customers into SoFi's ecosystem. The bank recently announced that not only will it be bringing crypto trading back to its app by the end of the year but will use blockchain technology to facilitate cross-border money transfers quicker and more cost effectively than peers, and this is a $93 billion market. These are meant to be bold predictions As a final thought, keep in mind that these are meant to be two bold predictions. There's a lot that would need to go well for either of these companies to overtake JPMorgan Chase's position as the most valuable U.S. bank. It's possible, but it's not especially likely. However, even if JPMorgan Chase remains the largest U.S. bank in two decades, that's OK. These are two well-run banks with massive market opportunities, and I'm quite confident that they'll deliver strong returns for investors over the long term. I own both in my personal stock portfolio and can't wait to watch their next chapters unfold. Should you invest $1,000 in Capital One Financial right now? Before you buy stock in Capital One Financial, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Capital One Financial wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Matt Frankel has positions in Capital One Financial and SoFi Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool recommends Capital One Financial. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Windsor-Essex businesses turning to AI for a digital edge
Windsor-Essex businesses turning to AI for a digital edge

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Windsor-Essex businesses turning to AI for a digital edge

Joe Klinger, seen on June 27, 2025, says AI has become a handy tool in managing his bicycle shop. (Travis Fortnum/CTV News Windsor) From bike shops to comedy clubs, small business owners across Windsor-Essex are finding new ways to bring artificial intelligence into their day-to-day operations — and some may be using it without even knowing it. At Kingsville Cycle Works, Joe Klinger sells, services, and rents bikes and e-bikes. Recently, he's found a unique support tool for managing tasks like inventory and program planning — an AI chatbot. 'It's invaluable, actually,' Klinger said. 'Sometimes ideas can take years right, to come together… and all of a sudden it gives you like a full business in moments.' He said he was introduced to the technology by a friend and started using it casually — even asking it for cucumber salad recipes — before realizing how effective it could be in his business. 'Try it from a personal basis first,' Klinger said. From there, Klinger leaned on resources offered by the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Centre at Invest WindsorEssex, which hosts AI seminars and one-on-one support sessions for local entrepreneurs. AI SEMINAR An AI information seminar hosted by Invest WindsorEssex at the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Centre. (Source: Invest WindsorEssex) 'A lot of our small business clients… they're very curious about it,' said Natasha Marar, who manages marketing and entrepreneurship programs at the centre. She said the organization is working to help business owners incorporate AI tools more intentionally — not just in their marketing, but in automating tasks like generating invoices, responding to client emails and analyzing customer feedback. 'We're hoping to provide individual guidance and support and implementing these easy to use tools,' Marar said. She added that many businesses are already using AI-integrated software without realizing it. 'It's a lot of existing software they're using that already has AI embedded into it,' she said. While AI chatbots are among the most common tools being adopted, they're far from the only ones. In Windsor, comedy promoter CJ Erwin uses generative AI to design posters and promo materials for shows at Rose City Comedy. AI IMAGE An AI generated poster. (Source: CJ Erwin) 'There's plug-ins in Photoshop that let you just select pieces and then just generate AI for those pieces,' Erwin said. He said while generative AI has its critics, it fits naturally with the kind of playful, outlandish content he's creating. 'It's silly. It's not meant to be taken too seriously,' he said. 'So no one's going to complain.' Back in Kingsville, Klinger said AI is now a regular part of his business planning — and that he's working on a new project using the technology, though he's not quite ready to reveal the details. Invest WindsorEssex is preparing to launch a new Digital Adopt Accelerator Program later this summer, aimed at helping even more local business owners assess their digital readiness and begin integrating AI in ways that make sense for them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store