logo
DOC defends parking charges at Punakaiki Pancake Rocks

DOC defends parking charges at Punakaiki Pancake Rocks

1News3 days ago
The Conservation Department is defending its plan to charge for parking at Punakaiki's Pancake Rocks and other tourist hotspots in National Parks.
DOC is about to trial paid parking in its carpark next to the new Punangairi Visitor Centre in Punakaiki, and at Franz Josef and Aoraki Mt Cook.
Punakaiki café owner Grant Parrett has objected, telling the West Coast Tai Poutini Conservation Board this month that DOC would be effectively charging people to visit a National Park.
But DOC's senior project manager John Dore said the parking charges would not contravene the National Parks Act.
"The Conservation Act 1987 allows for charging fair and reasonable fees for the use of facilities within conservation areas, which includes DOC car parks, backcountry huts, and campsites."
ADVERTISEMENT
Charging for carparks was common practice in National Parks around the world, Dore said.
"It's considered a practical way for visitors to contribute to the facilities and nature they enjoy… it can also help manage demand and improve safety.'
Parrett said Dolomite Point, the location of the Pancake Rocks and the visitor centre, was a special case.
The carpark can get busy in the summer months. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
"It's on State Highway 6, the Coast Road, and people like to stop off there on a long drive and stretch their legs. But, if you force them to use the DOC carpark, you're effectively charging them an entry fee to the National Park."
Until a couple of months ago, there were 12 free car park spaces on the side of the highway heading north, but they had since been removed, Parrett said.
NZTA Waka Kotahi has confirmed the removal of the parks last month was initiated by DOC, as a part of the Dolomite Point redevelopment.
ADVERTISEMENT
"DOC completed a traffic safety assessment in 2020 which, in conjunction with the development of parking facilities off the state highway, recommended the removal of the on-road state highway parking to improve safety.
"NZTA endorsed the recommendations of this assessment in 2022," a spokesperson told LDR.
NZTA had assessed the 12 roadside parks in the context of the new visitor centre development, and concluded that removing them would improve safety for all road users, especially pedestrians, a spokesperson said.
It meant fewer people would be crossing the road to get to their cars, giving drivers better visibility of people on the pedestrian crossing between the visitor centre and the Pancake Rocks track, NZTA said.
But Parrett said the speed limit through the area was 40km/h and the roadside parks had not been considered a safety risk in the past.
"Fair enough, remove them if you're going to offer free parking on the other side but they're not. It's pretty poor because those free parks allowed 12 West Coast locals or other New Zealanders to pull up and just go for a walk around the rocks.
"You're not going to go to the visitor centre every time you pass through."
ADVERTISEMENT
Parrett said the issue was fairness rather than safety.
Punakaiki café owner Grant Parrett says DOC is effectively charging people to visit a National Park. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
People would not be able to visit the famous Pancake Rocks and blowholes without paying, he said.
"That makes it a quasi-entry fee to a National Park. Sure, if you can manage a 20-minute walk you could find a free park down the road. But you shouldn't have to. DOC should not have a monopoly on parking," Parrett said.
NZTA Waka Kotahi said the paid parking trial did "alter the parking environment" in Punakaiki, but the recommendations of the traffic safety assessment did not change because of that.
"If the paid parking trial does contribute to unsafe operating conditions on the state highway, we would expect DOC to address this," the NZTA spokesperson said.
By Lois Williams, LDR Reporter
ADVERTISEMENT
Local Democracy Reporting is local-body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The perils of picking the perfect plane movie
The perils of picking the perfect plane movie

The Spinoff

time5 hours ago

  • The Spinoff

The perils of picking the perfect plane movie

The most important part of any holiday is what you choose to watch on the flight there and back, writes Alex Casey. I cannot even begin to express to you how much the guy across the aisle was fanging to watch The Crow (2024). Most of us were still finding our seats, stowing our carry-on and steeling our wills for the 17-hour flight ahead of us, but he was already somehow into double digits on the duration, utterly transfixed by last year's ' unfathomably awful ' Bill Skarsgård reboot. Far from ridiculing this man, I envied him. He demonstrated the same self-assuredness of another passenger I had encountered accidentally sitting in my seat on a previous flight. The screen revealed he was already deep into Michael Jackson's greatest hits playlist and, after the smooth criminal soon found his allocated seat, we all celebrated with an extremely tinny 'Billie Jean' leaking through his flimsy Emirates headphones once more. In-flight entertainment is particularly crucial for New Zealanders. If you are woke enough to know what the hell it even says on those confusing little black books, you probably also know that we require at least the duration of two feature length films to fly anywhere deemed 'overseas'. To get to Japan you will need 11 hours. To get to New York you will need 16 hours. To reach London Heathrow, you'll need at least a full 24 hour day. We're gonna need more than just quizzes to get us through. You'd think this type of long-haul endurance flying would make us savvier than most when it comes to curating our in-flight entertainment. Alas, on a recent 17-hour flight from Auckland to Dubai, I witnessed dozens of New Zealanders completely lose their minds in a prison of indecision. One person watched an entire season of The White Lotus, but completely out of order. Another watched two minutes of Iron Man, then two minutes of Frozen 2, then immediately fell asleep to Avatar 2. To be absolutely clear, I am also one of these people (made a 40+ hour watchlist including Beetlejuice Beetlejuice and Joker 2: Folie a Deux, watched five minutes of Lilo and Stitch chased down by an episode of… Scare Tactics??). If you too find yourself riddled with indecision and neuroses, here are eight simple rules to successfully select movies for your next long haul flight. 1. Horror seldom works out One of the craziest mistakes among the many that I made was popping on Steven Soderbergh's Presence, a slow-burning spooky thriller shot from the POV of a ghost, right as the lights went up and the trolleys of sweaty omelettes started trundling past for breakfast. Anything remotely scary requires the right atmosphere to build tension, and hurtling through the sky in a sealed fart tube is simply not it. I also watched the opening scene of The Monkey, and promptly turned it off following the first disembowelment because the children in the row behind me were crying. 2. Backfill the critical darlings If there's a festival, foreign, or Oscar-nominated film on offer, or any film that you nearly paid cold hard cash to see at the cinema: watch it on the plane. You are earning back the price of a $20 ticket with every choice, and given that I put away The Apprentice, Kneecap, The Last Showgirl and The Outrun on just one leg, I earned back a tidy $80 entirely through sitting on my arse. That's not 'girl math' by the way, that's just math. Girl math is the fact that I watched all of The Last Showgirl even though I found it to be quite a bore, all because I still feel bad for how we all treated Pamela Anderson. 3. Beware the boxset I saw a couple of confident folks immediately ripping into franchises like Star Wars and The Lord of the Rings from the very beginning, implicitly committing to watching the full boxset for the entirety of the flight. Again, I admire and envy the conviction, but I worry about this avenue. What if you fall asleep before they've even taken the hobbits to Isengard? There's also a question of legacy: do you want to forever remember your trip to Europe where you got surprise engaged under the Eiffel Tower as 'The Harry Potter holiday'? Just something to think about. 4. Avoid novelty choices I know a long haul flight is a liminal space, and sometimes crossing certain time zones means you are gifted extra hours on the clock, but that doesn't mean you have to watch Air Fryers: Are They Worth It? because it might make for a funny joke one day. Same goes for buzzed-about stinkers like Megalopolis and It Ends With Us, which I hovered over thinking 'well if not now, then when?' In the immortal words of Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park, which the person next to me watched half of before switching to Encanto: 'your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.' 5. Old is often gold Guy Montgomery has a joke about watching 2001: A Space Odyssey for the first time on a tiny screen on a long-haul flight, just as Stanley Kubrick intended. While it does feel hugely disrespectful and discordant to experience the classics of cinema on a plane, there's something thrilling about watching something a relic of the past while propelling through the skies in anticipation of the near future. There's also a hallucinogenic quality to so many old movies that they can also work as a drug-free trip when you are sleep-deprived and dehydrated. For example, I watched Whatever Happened To Baby Jane (1967) and had cool dreams of crazed Bette Davis in a nightie waiting for me at immigration. 6. Animal anything always Whenever I got up to stroll the cabins, one thing was abundantly clear: people of all stripes really, really love that movie featuring Steve Coogan and an animated penguin. Any film that could have a pull quote describing 'a true story of wit, warmth, and cute [insert any animal] antics' is always going to over well when you are feeling vulnerable, anxious or homesick in the skies. My personal highlights from this genre were Paddington in Peru and a National Geographic documentary about the close relationship between a Scottish man and a river otter named Molly. Five stars. 7. Let the tears flow freely Being on a long flight strips you of all distractions and reduces you to your base elements: you eat, you sleep, you excrete. It always means you are likely to feel your emotions more deeply, whether that be boiling rage at the nearby passenger picking their nose and eating it, or unbridled joy at the sight of a single slice of fresh fruit. It can also mean you are more prone to tears: and lots of them. I was in full shoulder-shaking sobs during Bridget Jones 4: Mad About the Boy and the cabin crew didn't even blink, ditto during We Live in Time. Beware though: at 30,000 feet, even Harry and the Hendersons will make you weep (reminded me of my dog). 8. Short on time? Go sitcom Find yourself with less than 90 mins before landing? Don't start a movie and promise to finish it when you get home, because you will either forget entirely or have to watch the whole thing from the start again. Instead, beloved sitcoms are your best friend here. With 20 minutes until landing, I cracked open season five of The Office US and watched the weight loss episode, instantly giddy with silent laughter and trails of tears down my cheeks. Sure, much of the episode would be cancelled in 2025, but you're not in 2025 in the sky. You're on plane time.

Calls to road cone hot line drop off, latest Worksafe data shows
Calls to road cone hot line drop off, latest Worksafe data shows

RNZ News

time17 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Calls to road cone hot line drop off, latest Worksafe data shows

Photo: Photo / 123RF The latest Worksafe data shows calls into the road cone hotline has dropped dramatically since its launch. The data showed in the month of July Worksafe received 217 reports of excessive road cone use, down from 641 in June. The hotline was set up as part of changes to health and safety, following a directive by workplace relations and safety minister Brooke van Velden telling Worksafe to shift its focus from enforcement to advice. Most of the 217 reports were lodged with Auckland Transport (79) and NZTA (62), with a heat map showing the Auckland, Wellington and Canterbury regions as some of the most reported on. The over first seven days the online hotline was active there were 406 reports, nearly double the total number reported in July. The minister has been asked for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Tourism levy set to aid region
Tourism levy set to aid region

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Tourism levy set to aid region

The South has won some money via the international visitor levy. Minister of Conservation Tama Potaka made some announcements yesterday about using levy funding to support conservation and tourism across the country. The levy was increased from $35 to $100 in October last year and Mr Potaka made announcements yesterday across various tourism sectors. Some of the money would come south to get on top of pest plants in Stewart Island/Rakiura, to expand Tohu Whenua experiences in Southland and improve facilities and the visitor experience at Milford Sound. The funding covers work over the next three years. Southland and Manawatū-Whanganui were the two areas targeted with a $4.5million investment to develop Tohu Whenua experience at places with unique cultural heritage will help create jobs and boost incomes in rural economies. Mr Potaka said sites which received Tohu Whenua status previously had had increases of up to 150% in visitation in their first year in the programme. Tohu Whenua is a partnership between Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and the Department of Conservation (Doc), with support from Te Puni Kōkiri, Manatū Taonga — Ministry for Culture & Heritage and MBIE. Tohu Whenua includes 39 sites. Many of these are in public conservation areas. Launched in 2016, the programme is successfully operating in four regions. Mr Potaka said $10m over the next three years would ensure popular mountains, parks and islands would remain beautiful for years to come. "Locations include Abel Tasman, Mt Cook, Tongariro, Stewart Island, Mackenzie Basin, Molesworth and Te Paki and North Cape near Cape Reinga. An extra $3m would go to the national wilding conifer control programme, led by Biosecurity New Zealand, for important control work in the Molesworth and Mackenzie Basin areas. A further $7.45m will go towards managing other significant weeds. "When it comes to tackling invasive weeds, taking early action is essential. IVL funding will also go towards the development and rollout of an innovative, smart software tool to detect weeds when they first invade." There will be $13.6m over three years to improve visitor planning and management at the Aoraki/Mount Cook National Park, Milford Sound and Somes Island on Wellington's doorstep. "This investment ensures the conservation areas and facilities that attract tourists to our regions continues to deliver on its promise of stunning nature." There would also be $3.9m over two years to improve service and management of some of New Zealand's popular Great Walks and Doc campsites.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store