Councillor suspended after making 'inappropriate' comments about Gypsy Travellers
Wendy Agnew was thought to have suggested that 'gypsies are not British people' at a Kincardine and Mearns area committee meeting back in November 2023.
Her comments were made during discussions around retrospective plans to change the use of the Findon Park football pitch near Portlethen into a Gypsy Travellers site.
The incident sparked some controversy and resulted in Agnew stepping down as committee chairwoman.
A councillor colleague made a complaint about her comments the following month and an investigation was carried out by the ethical standards commissioner.
In April, the Standards Commission was sent a report that suggested that Agnew had breached the Councillor's Code of Conduct.
The Stonehaven member faced the Standards Commission on Tuesday to face the consequences of her comments.
Ethical standards commissioner Ian Bruce said: 'The respondent made inappropriate comments about Gypsy Travellers and the appropriateness of granting a retrospective planning application for a Gypsy Traveller site, including insinuating that they are not British.
'This was deemed a failure to treat everyone with courtesy or respect, and also a failure to advance equality of opportunity and to seek to foster good relations between different people.' Aberdeenshire Council Wendy Agnew, Aberdeenshire Council
At the meeting, Agnew admitted she didn't 'feel hatred' towards Gypsy Travellers and blamed her comments on 'clumsy language'.
The councillor also stated that she had 'no intent to be disrespectful'.
Before the recording of the meeting was published online to YouTube, it had been edited to remove Agnew's comments.
The council's head of legal and people, Karen Wiles, admitted this had been done to prevent the local authority from facing any potential legal challenges.
She said: 'It was apparent to me that people of a Gypsy Traveller community may have seen themselves as being differentiated from British people.
'That could be offensive since the two terms are not mutually exclusive.'
Standards Commission member and chair of the hearing panel, Helen Donaldson, said members found Agnew had treated the applicant 'less favourably' because she was a Gypsy Traveller.
They based this on Agnew's suggested knowledge of unauthorised use of a different site and an assumption that travellers were 'more likely to breach planning conditions'.
Ms Donaldson added: 'The provisions that state councillors must be respectful, must foster good relations between different people and must avoid any perception that they are not acting fairly and without bias when making decisions on quasi-judicial matters, such as planning applications, are key requirements of the Councillors' Code.
'The panel noted that a failure to comply with the code's provisions in this regard can have a detrimental impact on the right of an applicant to be treated fairly, and can erode public confidence in the role of a councillor.
'Such a failure also had the potential to bring the committee, the council and its decisions into disrepute and open it up to the risk of a successful legal challenge.'
The panel found that Agnew had breached paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 7.4a, 7.4c and 7.5a of the councillor's code of conduct.
Members then decided to hand the Stonehaven councillor a two-month suspension.
This means she will not be allowed to attend any meetings or represent Aberdeenshire Council during this time.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Farage is the pacesetter of British politics
For the past year, Nigel Farage has served as the great pace setter of British politics. Reform UK has shot to the top of the polls, as Labour and the Tories languish behind. On immigration, the economy and much else, it is his five-man band that sets the tune. It is the inverse of Norman Lamont's jibe about 'being in office but not in power'. From his new base on the 24th floor of Millbank Tower, Farage enjoys a commanding view of Westminster. The office, an explosion of teal decor, has a large press briefing room, which aides liken to the one in the White House. At a desk adorned with a porcelain Union Jack bulldog, Farage plots his next steps. He sees his role as 'a little bit more [like] the general – not in the front lines so much, but a little bit behind the lines, sort of trying to take some strategic oversight as to what the rest of the party's doing'. Election planning is to be handled by former Ukip leader Paul Nuttall, the party's new vice chairman. A six-week summer offensive will begin on 21 July. Such machinations matter because of their impact on the government. Keir Starmer says publicly that the next general election will be fought between his party and Reform. Under his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, Labour is trying to pitch itself to patriotic, immigration-sceptic 'hero voters'. Yet many on Starmer's benches want him to switch to a more soft-left approach. Farage, who has never met McSweeney, says that 'probably politically, what he's advocating is right – but the Labour party can't swallow it'. He cites a surge in support for the Greens, arguing that there is a 'drag to the left that is going on in British politics' which only pulls 'the kind of undecideds on the Labour benches in one direction'. Reform's success often confounds opponents who try to place the party on a traditional left-right axis. Yet some within Reform think of it more like a business, hungry for market share, wherever available. Rather than ponder deep philosophical questions, or muse about how to interpret its political heritage, Reform pivots from lifting the two-child benefit cap one month to introducing a 'Britannia card' for the super-rich the next. Farage himself prefers to talk in post-ideological terms: 'I would like to think that people would look at me and look at us and say we're realistic and pragmatic. I think the benefits stuff that we said surprised a few people, but, you know, we're not finished on that. There's a lot more to come out on that agenda over time.' The debate in April over nationalising steel exemplified this approach. While the shadow cabinet were split over questions about state interventionism, Reform simply pledged nationalisation. For long-established political parties, history can be a bulwark, but it also brings baggage. Like any general, Farage likes having a free hand to respond to events nimbly. Critics jibe that this leaves Reform rudderless, constantly scrambling to board the next bandwagon. Allies argue that, in a world where a social media post by Donald Trump can blow up the markets, there is much merit in this approach. For them, the fact that much of Reform HQ has little Westminster hinterland beyond Farage is not a weakness but a positive. The staff are 'quite normal people', says one aide. Talks around strategy often reference sport, not politics. Wrestling is a shared love in the office and WWE-style razzmatazz has become a hallmark of the party's election rallies. Next May's regional elections represent the ultimate Wrestlemania for Reform. If Reform wins 30 seats in the new 96-strong Senedd, will Plaid Cymru and Labour cut a deal to keep them out? Six new mayoralties are also up for grabs and Reform is after local celebrities in the mould of Hull boxer Luke Campbell to stand as candidates. 'Essex is a slam dunk,' says one insider. There have even been talks about the prospect of attracting DUP grandees ahead of the Northern Ireland elections in 2027. The two main parties, though, will not go down without a fight. Some within Labour are putting their faith in the New Media Unit. This 28-strong, £1.3 million innovation sits in the Cabinet Office. It aims to help McSweeney 'take back control' of communications by targeting government messages at millions of voters online. The insights gleaned here could prove crucial to Labour strategists, as they try to reach key voters ahead of the 2029 general election. Labour's backbencher revolt over welfare, meanwhile, gave the Tories some reason to cheer this week. Conservative MPs allowed themselves an 'evening of fun' with Gyles Brandreth on Tuesday at the Albert pub in Victoria. Rishi Sunak, now a humble backbencher, enlivened things by debating with the compere about which of the many recent Tory chancellors was truly the 'shortest-serving'. At CCHQ there were several encouraging signs too. First, Mark McInnes, the former boss of the Scottish Conservatives, was named as the new Tory chief executive. Then longtime donor Lord Bamford, whom some speculated was about to switch to backing Farage, gave Kemi Badenoch £150,000. Both men are indicative of the arms race in personnel on the right of British politics, as the Tories and Reform battle it out for talent and donations. At present, there are plenty in the world of media and politics happy to keep a foot in both parties' camps. As the wine flows this summer, there will be much talk about the future of the right. Many Tories hope that Farage has peaked too early. 'This parliament is a marathon not a sprint,' says one MP. 'There are still four years left to go.' Such comments will not bother Farage, of course. He and his team believe they are exactly where they need to be: leading the pack, on course for both office and power come 2029.
Leader Live
5 hours ago
- Leader Live
MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers
The Commons voted overwhelmingly in favour of a change to the law by Labour which would allow foreign firms to buy minority stakes. It is the latest turn in a tumultuous two-year takeover process for the 170-year-old newspaper business. It comes after the previous Conservative government put a block in place amid fears the Telegraph could be bought by a majority-owned UAE company, RedBird IMI. The investment vehicle is a joint venture with US financiers. The regulation was approved by 338 votes to 79, majority 259. Labour was boosted in the voting lobbies by four Reform UK MPs, including its leader Nigel Farage (Clacton), and seven Independent MPs. Meanwhile former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith, a vocal critic of China, was among those to vote against it. The Liberal Democrats, who forced the vote over fears foreign ownership would compromise editorial independence, also opposed it. The result will give the green light to RedBird IMI, with the cap in place now being supported by MPs. RedBird Capital, the US junior partner in RedBird IMI, agreed a deal in May to buy a majority stake in the newspaper for £500 million. Abu-Dhabi's IMI will look to buy a minority stake as part of the consortium. RedBird has investments in AC Milan, film production giant Skydance and Liverpool FC owner Fenway Sports Group. It is also understood that the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT) – which owns the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, the i, and the Metro – is also looking to buy a stake. This is in addition to Sir Len Blavatnik, who owns the Theatre Royal Haymarket in the West End, who is considering a minority stake, according to Sky News reports. The rules were introduced after RedBird IMI looked to buy the Telegraph Media Group (TMG) from the Barclay Brothers. Then-Conservative culture secretary Lucy Frazer told a Society of Editors Conference in April 2024: 'I had concerns about the potential impacts of this deal on free expression and accurate presentation of news and that's why I issued a public interest intervention.' Culture minister Stephanie Peacock told MPs last month that appropriate safeguards had been introduced. She said: 'Government need to balance the importance of creating certainty and sustainability for our newspaper industry with the need to protect against the risk of foreign state influence by setting a clear threshold for exceptions within the regime at 15%. We believe that we have done that effectively.' Speaking after the vote, the Liberal Democrats' spokesman on media Max Wilkinson said: 'Freedom of the press is an historic and inviolable cornerstone of our democracy. That the Government is pushing to sell off stakes in our British papers to foreign governments is astonishing. 'It's outrageous that Labour and the Conservative MPs failed to stand up, do their patriotic duty and block this legislation. The leader of the opposition sponsored the Bill that restricted foreign states owning British newspapers last year – yet even she failed to vote against the measure. 'Liberal Democrats have already successfully forced the Government to backtrack on their senseless plan to let multiple states club together to buy whatever sized stake in a British outlet they fancied. Now my colleagues in the Lords and I will deliver a showdown to overturn this Bill entirely – rallying Conservative and crossbench peers to defeat the Government on this misguided policy.' The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has been approached for comment.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
A performer was mean at Glastonbury? Well, cry me a river and the sea
The backlash has been swift and predictable. The duo has had their US visas revoked, been dropped by their agents, lost festival bookings, and now prosecution is on the table. But forgive me, and anyone else, if I don't care a jot what Bob Vylan happened to say on a festival stage. Read more: Kneecap's crimes of terror? Waving a flag while Britain arms a genocide On Monday, the IDF killed 74 people. With 30 left dead from a bomb dropped on a seaside café, and 23 Palestinians shot down while seeking food. The number of children killed by the IDF is over the 50,000 mark, not counting those children who have been maimed, displaced, lost family, or experienced life-ruining trauma. Just try to imagine 50,000 dead children for a second, it is not some abstract number untied to our reality. Words said on the Glastonbury stage, regardless of how inflammatory they are, become hilariously insignificant in the face of those facts. Israel's siege on Gaza is a situation so morbid, so catastrophic, so filled with horrors beyond our comprehension that grasping onto distraction after distraction is the only way for them to save face on any of it. Whatever happens on the Glastonbury stage simply cannot measure up to the immeasurable cruelty and devastation suffered by the Palestinians. Believe it or not, a crowd chanting at a British music festival does not actually result in the death of an IDF soldier. Sticks and stones. A café that was damaged in an Israeli airstrike, killing more than 30 people near the port in Gaza City (Image: PA) Glastonbury, the BBC, and any other organisation caught in the crossfire of platforming the performance, must be naïve or stupid if they were hoping to avoid such an incident. Their assumptions seem to rest on other performers witnessing the axe fall on Kneecap (whose set at the festival was banned from BBC broadcast and is also being sought for possible prosecution), and in turn becoming scared to rock any boats. But given the amount of attention and publicity that came Kneecap's way as a result, is it any wonder that those performing felt compelled to up their ante even more and speak out against a genocide we are all observing in real time? It scarcely matters how many festival bookings are cancelled or what industry ties vanish into the night. Bob Vylan, a niche act with a strong anti-establishment ethos, can forego the luxuries of the mainstream music industry, where there is space to survive and grow, and complete their artistic goals. If they don't find themselves in jail for speaking their minds, then they really have nothing to lose. Modern-day artists sink or swim in an attention economy. By speaking out and causing a rupture, it has generated more popularity for themselves than their music and festival appearances could ever do on their own. It's clear that the duo knows all this and are not just merchants of provocation. 'We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine,' they said. They added that 'we, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story, and whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction'. Read more: The First Minister does not get to decide who plays TRNSMT festival Anyone who genuinely feels up in arms over a festival crowd chanting death towards a military carrying out the actions of a genocidal government should really take a step back and consider what transgressions are truly being breached. Because it is a mindset stuffed with meaningless decorum, where words are always taken at face value, and considered with great seriousness, while actions are obfuscated and swept under the rug. It is too easy a game to shift the conversation towards words and their efficacy rather than to consider the horrible reality unfolding on the ground and in front of our eyes. And it is a wonderful opportunity for the condemnation class. Politicians, the police, and the media love to fan the flames of these distractions in cheap, cynical ploys to be seen as proactive and righteous. If these types truly cared about the death toll of war, then their silence wouldn't be so deafening on the part of dead Palestinians. Maybe, just maybe, the reports of the IDF meeting its end following Bob Vylan's incitement were missed in the headlines. Or perhaps it is currently quite busy increasing the shelling of Gaza before a possible Trump-enforced ceasefire. Go figures.
