Lodi police remind community of motorcycle safety
Video Above: Driving safely in work zones
Police said that as the weather starts to warm, more motorcycles will be on the road, increasing the importance of staying alert to help reduce crashes and save lives.
LPD cited data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that showed that 6,218 motorcyclists were killed in traffic crashes in 2022. This represents 15 percent of total highway deaths that year.
Meanwhile, California statistics showed that 634 motorcyclists were killed in 2022, a 3.8 percent increase from 2021.
'Motorcycles may be difficult to spot, so be extra careful before changing lanes,' Sergeant Dan Bristow said. 'A simple double take can make a life-saving difference. Motorcycle riders do not have the same protections drivers and passengers do. Let's all do our part to keep each other safe out there.'
DUI checkpoint to be conducted in Stanislaus County
Police remind drivers to:
Check mirrors and blind spots before changing lanes.
Keep a safe distance from motorcyclists and do not follow them too closely.
Remain cautious when a motorcyclist turns on their signal and make sure the rider is turning before moving ahead.
Police remind motorcyclists to:
Wear a U.S. DOT-compliant helmet with eye protection.
Wear sturdy clothes such as a jacket, pants, boots with nonskid soles and gloves.
Add reflective elements to the clothing and motorcycle so drivers can easily see.
Avoid riding in a driver's blind spot and never assume a driver can see the motorcycle.
Keep the lights on at night and during the day.
Police also remind the community that neither the driver nor the motorcyclist should drive distracted or under the influence.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The History of How the Car Seat Made American Kids Safer
Today, a child is involved in a vehicle crash every 33 seconds in the United States. However, when they are, child safety seats usually provide protection. This represents a remarkable sea change since the mid-20th century. Between 1975 and 2022, child fatalities in road accidents declined by 61%. While it is easy to take something commonplace like children's car seats for granted, their normalization is an under-recognized public health achievement. Behind this success were a group of politically savvy characters whose relentless focus on improving the designs, awareness, and usage of child safety seats is an important model of citizen activism and public health advocacy. The postwar economic boom built suburbs and federal highways and made family cars more affordable. But it also increased risks for child passengers. Typically, children rode in parents' laps, or on their own in back seats without any safety protections. In 1965, lawyer and advocate Ralph Nader published Unsafe at Any Speed, detailing safety concerns about automobiles. Nader's advocacy led to the creation of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). It also spurred a wider movement for legislated consumer protections. Read More: Making Safer Drivers Within this movement were Physicians for Automotive Safety (PAS), a group of doctors who formed via a 'dignified protest' at the 1965 New York Auto Show. The 30 members called on other doctors to advocate against the 'epidemic' of automobile accidents. They called for 'preventive countermeasures' to avert injuries, including for children, laying the foundation for a robust child passenger safety movement. The issue gained broader recognition through pioneering motoring journalist Julie Candler. Writing for Women's Day in 1970, she reflected on the 58,000 children under 5 years old who had been killed or injured in car crashes over the previous year. Candler wrote movingly of the 'the fragile bundle of humanity' who, left unprotected, would 'for the remainder of her days… be paralyzed' by an accident. Candler sparked a nascent interest in child passenger safety among parents, especially mothers. Simultaneously, pushed in part by Nader's consumer protection movement, the federal government had developed a design standard for child safety seats, known as 'Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 213' (FMVSS213). The standard focused on how child seats attached to vehicles. But it didn't address the mechanisms of protection such as absorbing crash forces and preventing ejection. As a result, many experts believe the regulation didn't do enough to protect children. Advocates came forward to argue for improvements to car seat design and to raise public awareness about the importance of child safety seats. They included Annemarie Shelness, the executive director of PAS and Stephanie Tombrello, a social worker from Los Angeles. Shelness, Tombrello, and others worked to improve child safety seat designs, engaged in public education, and advocated for legislation. By 1972, their primary focus was pushing for improvements to the federal standard. Tombrello was working with Women for Political and Social Action (WPSA), recording and reporting on childhood injuries, while Shelness was lobbying the government to recognize the shortcomings of the FMVSS213 standard. Consumers Union, a nonprofit watchdog organization (now Consumer Reports) published results of crash tests of 15 child safety restraints. In the tests, 12 failed. These tests helped illustrate the need for better regulation, while showcasing what effective child safety seat design looked like. The next year, GM dealers began offering the seats to consumers, some even giving them away with the purchase of a family car. Shelness and Tombrello astutely demonstrated the codependency of market and state to improve public health. They recognized what the market could offer—safe products from American industry—but also what it mostly provided: unsafe designs. They therefore highlighted the need for government intervention. Without improved standards, the market lacked the incentive to deliver better consumer protections. In 1981, their efforts resulted in the national FMVSS213 standard being made more rigorous. However, child passenger safety advocates knew improved designs based on better standards was only half the battle. American drivers still had to actually use the seats. Mandating their use would be necessary—but this was not without resistance. A close friend of Shelness, pediatrician and PAS member Dr. Robert Sanders, frequently faced pushback in his efforts to pass child seat usage laws. Working throughout Tennessee during the mid-1970s, he heard arguments that babies belonged in their mother's arms, that kids had a right to sit in truck beds, and that parenting choices were a matter of personal liberties. Only a small fraction of families in the U.S. had or used a child car seat and state legislatures were hesitant to require it. But Sanders persisted. He relied on fellow doctors for support, met calmly with legislators, and always took a child seat with him to meetings for a demonstration. Sanders emphasized statistics, gave out fact sheets, and even told stories of signing death certificates of children in traffic accidents. His approach was to show that child passenger safety seats were a form of preventative healthcare. When dissenting voices brought up the cost of child seats, Sanders compared that to medical costs: worth it to save and improve lives. He also floated ideas to establish funds to provide federally approved child seats to families unable to afford them. His efforts were rewarded in 1977 when the Tennessee legislature passed America's first child seat usage law requiring any child under four years of age to be in a child safety seat starting in 1978. It set an important precedent. While federal law set standards for child seat design, the states became responsible for ensuring their use. By 1985 all states had child seat use laws. Read More: If Cars Can Monitor Left-On Headlights and Rear Obstructions, They Should Be Able To Save Trapped Kids' Lives Shelness, Tombrello, and others, had successfully improved legislation regarding both design and use, and they had done so at federal and state levels. Now they kept up the work by turning to education for caregivers, who still needed to be convinced to use child safety seats, and police officers, who would need to help enforce laws requiring child safety seats. This meant distilling science, law, and statistics to be straightforward to these audiences. Leaflets were illustrated with minimal words. Parents were informed about free services they could access, while police officers were given power over new accident report forms which included information on child seat use. They sought to empower Americans to be agents of public health, allies in the fight for child safety, rather than passive consumers and obedient law followers. By the mid-1980s, these educational materials were a de facto curriculum based around the 'three Es'—education, engineering, and enforcement. The idea that simplification and invitation would strengthen and embed a national culture of child seat use reflected the movement's practical agility and political savviness. Shelness and Tombrello showed how science supported law, how law guided the market, and how the market provided for investment in science. The approach was so successful that by 1984 NHTSA reported national car seat usage had reached 46%—an increase of over 500% in under a decade. Today, that legacy remains as the NHTSA-authored National Child Passenger Safety Technician (CPST) training. There are approximately 39,000 CPSTs nationwide who hold the qualification, who provide caregivers with child seat education for all ages of children whether at hospitals, fire stations, or through county public health outreach programs. Each car seat check is a testament to the work of advocates like Shelness and Tombrello, people who believed that public health works best with the democratization of complex science and medical knowledge. Their political agility allowed them to channel expertise directly and efficiently to those who would benefit the most. Gary Scales earned his Ph.D. from Temple University before founding the Child Passenger Safety Online Museum & Archive. Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Southbound Route 18 in East Brunswick will be closed overnights this week
EAST BRUNSWICK - Southbound Route 18 is scheduled to be closed and detoured beginning Monday night and continuing through Friday night as the pavement project continues. Beginning at 10 p.m. Monday, Aug, 4 until 5 a.m. Tuesday, southbound Route 18 is scheduled to be closed from Hope Street to Arthur Street to install drainage and remove an old gas main. The following detour will be in place: From southbound Route 18, take the ramp before the Hope Street/Fountain Street intersection to Spotswood, turn right onto Hope Street, left onto Summerhill Road, then left on Arthur Street back to Route 18. Beginning at 10 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 5, until 5 a.m. Wednesday and continuing each night through Friday at the same times, Route 18 southbound is scheduled to be closed from West Ferris Street to Arthur Street also for the installation of drainage and removal of an old gas main. More: Here's what's coming next in the massive Route 18 redevelopment project in East Brunswick The following detour will be in place: Motorists on southbound Route 18 will be directed to take the jughandle to West Ferris Street, then left on West Ferris Street, cross Route 18, then right on Old Bridge Turnpike (County Route 527), then right on Arthur Street back to Route 18. This work is part of the $86.1 million federally funded Route 18 Drainage and Pavement Rehabilitation project that will make repairs on approximately four and a half miles of the highway. The work includes milling and paving, improvements to the drainage systems and storm water basins, utility relocation, installation of new sidewalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps and upgrading guiderails. Improvements will also be made to various intersections. The project is expected to be completed in late 2027. Email: mdeak@ This article originally appeared on Southbound Route 18 in East Brunswick will be closed overnights this week Solve the daily Crossword


Time Business News
6 days ago
- Time Business News
What is the DOT SAP Program?
If you are a commercial driver regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) and have failed or refused a DOT drug or alcohol test, you are likely to hear about the DOT SAP Program. But what exactly is it? Why is it important? And most importantly—how can you get through it smoothly and legally? The DOT Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) Program is a federally mandated process managed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). It is designed for employees in safety-sensitive positions—such as truck drivers, bus drivers, and other commercial motor vehicle operators—who have: Failed a DOT drug or alcohol test Refused to take a test Violated drug and alcohol program regulations In such cases, drivers are immediately removed from their safety-sensitive duties and cannot resume work until they successfully complete the SAP return-to-duty (RTD) process. Here are the main steps of the DOT SAP Program: Initial Evaluation: You'll meet with a qualified SAP professional who will assess your condition and determine the appropriate treatment or education plan. Treatment and/or Education: Based on the evaluation, you'll be required to complete a specific program (counseling, classes, etc.). Follow-Up Evaluation: After completing the program, you'll meet with the SAP again for re-evaluation. If they determine you're compliant, they will provide a report to your employer or prospective employer. Return-to-Duty Test: You must pass a directly observed drug and/or alcohol test to return to work. Follow-Up Testing Plan: You will be subject to unannounced follow-up testing for up to 5 years. This process is not just a formality—it's a legal requirement. Failing to complete it means: You cannot work in a safety-sensitive role Your Clearinghouse record will reflect non-compliance You'll face long-term career limitations in the transportation industry Navigating the SAP process can be overwhelming and confusing, especially when your career and income are on the line. That's where AACS Counseling comes in. ✅ DOT-Qualified SAP Professionals AACS Counseling has DOT-qualified SAPs who are experienced, certified, and understand the complexities of federal regulations. ✅ Quick Appointments & Nationwide Access Whether you need help urgently or are in a remote area, AACS offers telehealth appointments and nationwide availability, making the process fast and convenient. ✅ Personalized Return-to-Duty Plans No two situations are alike. AACS provides customized treatment and education recommendations based on your specific case and lifestyle. ✅ Full Compliance Assistance From Clearinghouse reporting to follow-up schedules, AACS ensures 100% compliance with FMCSA regulations, protecting both your license and your livelihood. ✅ Employer Communication Support If needed, AACS Counseling can communicate directly with employers or prospective companies to ensure a smooth transition back to work. Take the First Step with Confidence Failing or refusing a DOT drug or alcohol test doesn't have to be the end of your career. With the right support, you can return to duty legally, safely, and confidently. Let AACS Counseling guide you through every step of the DOT SAP Program—from the first evaluation to your successful return to work. Visit or call their support line to book your SAP evaluation today. TIME BUSINESS NEWS