Critic stripped of automatic right to return to India
An Indian New Zealander has been stripped of her automatic right to return to her home country, being told she has tried to "fuel disharmony" among the community.
GP and filmmaker Dr Sapna Samant was warned in January her Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) status could be revoked, but she was allowed a written appeal.
The decision has now been upheld by the Indian High Commission in Wellington.
It has not replied to requests for comment.
"It has been brought to the notice of the government of India that [Samant] has reportedly involved herself in activities that are inimicable to the sovereignty and integrity of India and the interests of the general public," the High Commission's letter said.
It named her Twitter account, YouTube Channel, and a broadcast on radio station 95bFM.
"Contents used by the foreigner on the said platforms can cause disharmony among various members and sections of the diaspora and Indian society.
"She has been active in anti-India activities, and is often found carrying out anti-India propaganda. She has been issuing posts/tweets extensively, calling India an 'authoritarian country' and a 'majoritarian terrorist regime'. She has been trying to fuel disharmony among various members and sections of the Indian of the India community."
The Commission's decision did not mention one of the more controversial grounds given in January for rescinding her OCI - her involvement with the Green Party, or specifically, her presence on its website.
She stood as a candidate in the 2023 elections.
It said her appeal was "bereft of plausible explanation" and had not clarified or submitted facts which denied her role in the activities it had named.
First in New Zealand
The Indian government has cancelled more than 100 OCI cards over the last decade, but hers is believed to be the first in New Zealand.
The OCI is a status given to Indians who become New Zealand citizens, allowing them to keep certain birthrights - including travelling to India.
Samant said the appeal's outcome was not unexpected but was still disappointing, as she had held onto a little hope of a change of heart.
"It still makes me sad that we have to reach such a stage where India has fallen from being this vibrant democracy where arguing is a national trait," she said.
"And all kinds of perspectives were perfectly valid, because we all knew that we all loved India, and we want this country to flourish.
"India is an authoritarian regime country at this point. It's an electoral autocracy, so you have elections in the name of democracy, but your representatives are actually not about democracy."
It meant she could not visit India unless the Government changed, and she worried about Indians at home and overseas being 'silenced' by the government's approach, she said.
Supporters of Indian PM Narendra Modi deny the administration is a threat to an inclusive society.
Samant said she had been hoping to take her foster son to India this year, and that she had received 'solidarity' from activist colleagues and friends.
"Nothing lasts forever. And I have great faith that I will visit my ancestral temple one day, which is on the west coast of India in a little village. I'm not sad that I can't ever go or I won't ever go, but I am sad in the moment. But I also know that there's a bigger cause. I'm not trying to make myself into a martyr, but it's a collective force."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Oyster farmers' 7-year battle with Watercare
By Victor Waters of RNZ A group of oyster farmers in the north of Auckland have reached breaking point over sewage overflow and want the government to intervene. The 10 marine farms have been in a seven-year battle with council-controlled organisation Watercare to stop sewage overflowing into the Mahurangi Harbour, which contaminates their oyster crops. Watercare provides water and wastewater services to the people of Auckland. At least one farmer is having to close their business, while many fear they will not survive the year, despite a pipe upgrade in September that will provide a short-term fix. At this stage, a long-term solution to the piping problem in Elizabeth St in Warkworth is not expected until 2028. Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones said Watercare had "failed in their statutory duty of care to the Mahurangi oyster farmers". "They are solely responsible for the collapse of the infrastructure that has ruined the businesses of the Mahurangi oyster farmers. "I am astounded that this colossus will not step up to the plate and offer financial compensation to these marine farmers, who through no fault of their own are now penalised because of the failure of water care." Jones said he was looking into what levers the government had over Watercare. "There are many areas where the Auckland City Council wants the assistance of central government. The Auckland Council is in control of Watercare, and it seems extraordinary that we're expected as central government to deliver positive outcomes for the Auckland City Council, yet one of their organisations is driving local marine farmers to penury and offering no assistance, no relief whatsoever. "Watercare is a well-heeled organisation, they're not short of capital. What they're short of, though, is corporate responsibility and obviously, don't place any importance on the maintenance of a social licence to continue to operate. "Their organisation should be renamed Zero Care. But more importantly, this is a comment on their culture," the minister said. "They know and they've known for a long time about how weak the piping system is around Mahurangi. They've chosen to find every excuse in the world to delay fixing it up and now the oyster farmers are the casualties of this corporate delinquency." According to the farmers, the pipe network was originally scheduled to be upgraded in 2021 but never was. Watercare says it had expedited repairs to the wastewater overflow. Chief executive Jamie Sinclair told RNZ's Morning Report programme today it had to build a new wastewater treatment plant and pump station, but will make a short-term fix by September. "The first part is expediting what I'd call an interim solution, which is an over-pumping solution, which will be in place by the end of August, which will reduce those overflows by about 50 percent. "That's not the end solution, there will still be overflows. For the final outcome, we have reorganised our programme - the previous timeline was 2028 - we are now looking to have the outcome, an almost full reduction in overflows by the end of 2026. "So I know that that that's still time. There's still pressure today on on the oyster farmers and their businesses, but that is that is our priority is to fix this issue as quickly as possible." Sinclair said he felt for the affected farmers, their families and livelihoods, but would not comment on whether they could sue Watercare for lost business. "We've been investing for the last six years in this community. We'll be spending about $450 million. And it's really this final piece of the puzzle which will alleviate the overflows at that particular location." The issue of wastewater overflowing into the Mahurangi Harbour has been ongoing since 2018, when farmers first raised it with Watercare. Because oysters are filter feeders, they help remove the pollution in the harbour but by doing so, there was a high risk of food poisoning if they were eaten. Mahurangi Oysters farmer Jim Aitken said his own health working the oyster farms was also at risk. "Yeah, we're cleaning up their mess and we're not receiving any support for literally working in human waste. "This farm is the exception, but most of these farms, you are in knee-deep in mud, waist-deep in water, getting cut on sharp oysters, nails, all kinds of things, and now we have to worry about potentially getting quite serious infections from sewage. "When we get 9mm of rain - which is happening almost weekly - that should not be triggering a spill so easily, and consistently too. Like it's not a random thing, and we're told that the pipes that are connecting storm to wastewater have been disconnected, which should never have been connected in the first place. "But the increase has tripled, so far it's on track to quadruple the number of spills because we've already doubled what we did last year, what they did last year for spills, it's pretty astounding that there isn't even an increase in rainfall compared to last year." "We're wondering what's going on here, why has it suddenly increased so dramatically, is another question too, what we're trying to figure out," Aitken said. Lynette Dunn from Orata Marine Oysters said she had not been able to sell any locally grown produce since Christmas and had to approach Work and Income for financial support. She said MPs needed to take action to save the estimated $8 million oyster industry in Mahurangi Harbour. "They need to start hammering the Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, telling him we need some action. The government's the only person, or the only identity that's going to take Watercare on." Dunn's family business has run for 30 years and has overcome many adversities, but she said this has been the toughest period. "Every day I've been crying, you know? I think to myself, like, I'm not going to cry today... Because it's not our fault, it's their fault - and they're not doing anything about it. "You wail awake at night time, thinking, 'okay, how much sewage is going to go into the harbour'". "We used to have, like, 5 or 10 mils of rain, and we'd be closed for fresh water, or 50 to 60 mils of rain, we'll get closed for 10 days for fresh water, but now we're getting closed 28 days constantly on 5 mils of rain. "In some instances, there's no rain and there's sewage spills, but this last one was 670 cubic metres of sewage pumped into the harbour on Thursday. You know, like, the water in the streets of Warkworth, running down their pipes are overflowing and sewage coming out," she said.
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
In final results Mamdani won by 12%, but faces growing opposition for November's election
The 33-year-old candidate, a democratic socialist who is backed by Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vermont) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat-New York), overtook Cuomo's famed Democratic political dynasty backed by prominent figures from the party's old guard. Cuomo had sought a political resurrection less than four years after leaving the governorship in disgrace amid allegations of sexual harassment. However, in the week since Mamdani's upset, powerful donors, lobbyists, and political consultants in both the Democratic and Republican parties have scrambled to amass a unified opposition to his candidacy - based largely on his support for liberal economic policies and avowed anti-Zionism. Cuomo promised he would run in the general election as an independent even if he lost. But his well-funded campaign, which benefitted from the biggest super PAC in the city's history, was knocked on its heels by Mamdani's youth-powered volunteer army and voters' reservations about Cuomo's past. Cuomo is contacting donors and other groups to gauge their support in the general election, according to three people who have fielded those calls. So far, those donors have been mainly unenthusiastic about his candidacy, according to a dozen political operatives and donors active in city politics, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity. Mamdani's campaign, in a statement released after the results were announced, said he had received the most votes in a Democratic mayoral primary in 36 years, and is 'excited to expand this coalition even further as we defeat Eric Adams and win a city government that puts working people first'. Mamdani prevailed in the primary election by focusing on the affordability crisis faced by many New York residents. He pledged to ease the cost of living by providing free childcare, freezing rent among the city's one million rent-stabilised apartments, opening a collection of city-run grocery stores to provide lower-cost produce and staples, and making city buses free. In a city with the largest population of billionaires in the world, he has proposed to fund his ideas by raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy. And in his effort to become the first Muslim mayor of New York, which has the largest population of Jews outside of Israel, he has run unapologetically as a critic of Israel, saying he would arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he came to the city. Many Democratic voters said those ideas energised them, but they have drawn an array of opponents. Members of his own party in his own state attacked him. Republicans have demonised him with Islamophobic and racist attacks - while also highlighting his progressivism. Many political donors in New York have scrambled to find a way to combat him. In addition to Cuomo's potential independent candidacy, Mamdani will also face Adams, a registered Democrat, who elected not to run in the crowded primary and instead is running as an independent in November. Curtis Sliwa, the Republican primary candidate, could be the fourth candidate on the ballot. Donors and Republican officials launched a national effort to persuade Sliwa to step aside and endorse Adams. Stephen Bannon, a former Trump Administration official and far-right podcast host, appeared on former Representative Matt Gaetz's show on One America News last week and described the effort to get Sliwa to step down so that anti-Mamdani forces could coalesce around a single candidate. Adams also met donors and floated the idea that Sliwa, a longtime fixture in New York and the former leader of the vigilante group the Guardian Angels, could accept a job in the Trump Administration as an incentive to leave the race. But Sliwa loudly resisted those calls. 'The only job I'm focused on is earning your support to be the next Mayor of #NYC,' he wrote on X last week. Adams won the race for mayor in 2021 as a Democrat but has been increasingly distanced from his party following his indictment on corruption charges in September 2024. Those charges were dropped in April, 2½ months after Adams visited President Donald Trump at one of his Florida golf courses. Both Adams and Cuomo are unpopular with voters and face an uphill battle to overcome their respective scandals. And both represent a fundamentally different style of campaigning - with institutional endorsements and big-money donations - to the small-dollar campaign that propelled Mamdani to victory in the primary. 'The outpouring of support that has come to Mayor Adams has been overwhelming and humbling, and we believe that energy is going to translate as an election for Mayor Adams as the leader of New York City,' said Frank Carone, Adams' former chief of staff and a key member of his re-election campaign. Cuomo's campaign said Mamdani's large showing with voters aged under-30 was hard to predict. Cuomo did not commit to campaigning in the general election but reiterated that he was 'continuing conversations with people from all across the city while determining next steps'. Hedge fund managers Dan Loeb and Bill Ackman have both thrown their support behind Adams, as have a variety of the city's business and industry groups. Jewish groups such as the New York Solidarity Network, a pro-Israel non-profit that represents centre-left Jewish New Yorkers concerned about growing anti-Semitism, have held discussions about backing either Cuomo or Adams, according to three people familiar with the various calls and conversations such groups have had. Many are waiting to put their money towards a candidate in the northern autumn until they can see how the race plays out in the coming weeks and months, these people said.
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: RNZ, CGT and Palestine
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the political bullying of RNZ, the perils of adopting a capital gains tax, and Palestinian families living in Ōtepoti. Budget cuts threat to a fearless RNZ The recent $4.6 million Budget cuts (for each of the next four years) to Radio New Zealand's annual $67 million funding should concern all those who value fearless and independent public broadcasting. It raises the possibility that RNZ is being punished for not covering the news to the government's liking. As a result of the cuts RNZ has had to lay off staff and reduce its programming. Legislation blocks politicians from interfering directly with RNZ's programme content but they may have found another way of showing the broadcaster to go easy on them "or else". To those who think this observation is simple paranoia, I offer the following: Recently, in a funding newsletter to supporters, Act New Zealand leader David Seymour spoke of his clashes with the media and his attempt to coerce them in to treating him more kindly. He went on to say " ... taxpayer-funded media don't get the message unless we send it to them. That's why we delivered a significant funding cut to RNZ in this year's Budget." Winston Peters in April, as he was being subjected to a probing interview on RNZ's Morning Report , said to his interviewer: "You're paid by the taxpayer and sooner or later we're going to cut that water off too, because you're an abuse on the taxpayer." In this year's trust survey RNZ was rated by the public as New Zealand's most trusted news brand (The Otago Daily Times was a close second). It would be a pity if our most trusted news brand is cowered by this political bullying. [Bill Southworth is a former executive director of the Journalists' Training Organisation.] Island time Sitting here on a damp Matariki day in the South I reflect on the most Anglo-Polynesian holiday in modern times and one little thing I could do to add to it. I would like to say to the New Zealand Geographic Board that in Lake Te Anau there is a group of seven impressive islands in the Middle Fiord (aka The Seven Sisters) that the Geographic Board recently labelled "Manea". In the spirit of Matariki and Anglo-Polynesians everywhere, they could be named the Matariki Islands instead. Thanks but no thanks May I thank Evan Alty (Letters ODT 23.6.25) for "allowing me to express my strong opinions". I reciprocate by extending to him the privilege of being wrong — again. The short answer to Mr Alty's question of whether I can show that social disintegration is rife (his words) in countries that adopt a capital gains tax indicates to me that he does not receive the ODT nor watches or reads the news. The best performing countries without a CGT are Singapore and Switzerland. The rest who adopt a CGT appear to be economic basket cases, where productivity is declining and debt is rising exponentially, e.g. Australia, USA, UK and Canada. New Zealand is on its way. That is not to say that a CGT is the sole determinant for the decline of social and economic wellbeing throughout the "free" world — but it helps. Countries that adopt a low tax regime appear to succeed in most economic and social aspects. Mr Alty is a retired solicitor who presumably sold his advice. He would then present his clients with a hefty invoice. Those in the business of farming (by way of example) rely on building and growing their asset despite the vagaries of the marketplace. They can't present an invoice to their customers. New Zealand adopts a CGT at its peril. Eschew indifference, embrace doing right thing My grandmother was a nine-months-old baby on an immigrant ship heading to Palestine from East Europe in 1933, escaping the horrors to come. Today Palestinians are facing starvation and death and hardly have anyone to turn to. Palestinian families living here in Ōtepoti have begged the government for visas to let them bring their loved ones to safety, only getting dismissive responses claiming "it's complicated". This is the same government that eased the laws to fast-track wealthy investors into New Zealand. Is this the kind of country we want to be? Turning away desperate people knocking on our door pleading for help? Palestinians in our community can't sleep at night haunted with dread. We live in an extremely cynical and morally bankrupt world, our governments are failing. They are counting on you to stay indifferent. Don't give them the satisfaction. The right thing to do is simple. No big tax changes seem likely Tony Fitchett's response (Letters, 30.6.25) to Gerrard Eckhoff's fevered dissertation on the evils of taxation hits every button and should be required reading for politicians in particular. However, the prognosis for the realisation of Mr Eckhoff's worst nightmares is not good. Earlier this year two senior Labour MPs, Barbara Edmunds and Deborah Russell, embarked on a road trip to enlighten Labour Party members on the subject of capital gains and wealth taxes. The double-act was carefully crafted to make it clear that some form of CGT, but not too extensive, was a possibility, but wealth taxes were off the table. Just too difficult. Don't even ask about inheritance tax, we were instructed as the show began. More recently the Labour finance spokesperson has been noticeably coy about what and when a policy might be revealed, except to suggest that the end result should be fiscally neutral. A depleted tax-pack of cards will be shuffled a bit. How exciting. Clearly the fiscal anorexia that afflicts the present government is unlikely to be addressed by the next one, of whatever stripe. Local body choices White elephant in the room: homeless people camping out in shop doorways and tenting on the Oval. The candidates who honestly intend to care for our most vulnerable citizens will get my vote. Clean waterways, lower rates, new infrastructure and impressive new libraries are all well and good. Society will be judged on how we care for our weakest members. At the moment we're failing miserably. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
