Air India pilots' medical records are being examined over mental health fears after report reveals fuel switches 'were turned off in cockpit'
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, an experienced pilot with more than 8,200 hours in the cockpit, was piloting the Boeing 787 Dreamliner when it plummeted into a residential area, called Meghani Nagar, killing 241 people on board and claiming 19 more lives of those on the ground.
Seconds after taking off on June 12, two fuel switches in the cockpit of Air India Flight 171 were turned off shortly after take off, resulting in a catastrophic loss of power and the aircraft crashing to the ground.
The switches' 'locking feature' meant pilots had to lift them up before changing their position, they are not simple push buttons which can be accidentally turned off.
Now, investigations into the tragic crash have begun to analyse the behaviour of the pilot.
Captain Mohan Ranganathan, a leading aviation safety expert in India, has revealed that 'several' Air India pilots had allegedly confirmed that the well-experienced pilot had suffered from poor mental health.
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, he claimed: 'He had taken time off from flying in the last three to four years. He had taken medical leave for that.
Captain Sabharwal is also understood to have taken bereavement leave after the death of his mother, though it is believed by Mr Ranganathan that he had been 'medically cleared' by Air India prior to the fatal crash last month.
In Powai, Mumbai, one of Captain Sabharwal's former colleagues described him as a 'thorough gentlemen' telling the publication that he believed 'he was actually considering early retirement in the next couple of years', with plans to look after his elderly father, aged 90.
In his short career, co-pilot Clive Kunder, 28, had logged more than 3,400 hours.
The Telegraph said that while Air India declined to comment, an official working with their parent company, Tata Group, told the publication that Captain Sabharwal had not taken any medical leave, with the preliminary report failing to obtain any significant findings.
They added that within the last two years, both pilots onboard the flight had passed the Class I medical exam, which makes an evaluation of their psycho-physical capabilities.
On Sunday, a preliminary report released by the Indian authorities led to questions about why the pilot would have manually turned the switches off - and whether it was a deliberate act or a catastrophic mistake.
The report said: 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other: why did he cut off? The other pilot responded that he did not do so.'
Pilots will turn the fuel switches on and off at the correct times in every flight, but this time the fuel was cut off straight after takeoff and the landing gear was not raised.
The co-pilot was flying the aircraft at the time of takeoff while the captain was monitoring.
The report added that the switches were flipped back to 'run' seconds afterwards, which started the process of relighting the engines.
The plane momentarily disappeared from view behind trees and buildings before a massive fireball erupted on the horizon in this horrifying clip
One of the engines had relit but had not gained power while the other was in the process of regaining power.
At the crash site, but switches were found in the 'run' position.
Before the flight, both pilots had an adequate rest period and were found 'fit to operate' following a breath analyser test, the report said.
There were no dangerous goods on the plane and the weight was 'within allowable limits'.
Fuel samples taken from the tanks were tested and found to be 'satisfactory' and there was 'no significant bird activity' observed in and around the flight path of the aircraft.
But Mr Ranganthan previously suggested it may have been deliberate.
Each lever has to be pulled upwards to be unlocked, before it can be flipped and they also have further protective guard brackets to safeguard against any bumps and nudges.
Explaining that he believed it 'had to be done manually', Mr Ranganathan told NDTV of the fuel levers: 'The fuel selectors they aren't the sliding type they are always in a slot.
'They are to pull them out or move them up or down, so the question of them moving inadvertently out of off position doesn't happen. It's a case of deliberate manual selection.'
He later said 'nothing else' would explain why both switches were moved into the off position just after take off, alleging: 'It had to be deliberately done.'
When questioned if he was suggesting one of the pilots 'deliberately' switched off the fuel lever, while fully aware of the possibility of a crash, he answered: 'Absolutely', before asserting they were looking at a potential 'pilot-induced crash'.
But relatives of some of the victims of the crash have accused the airline and the Indian government of trying to blame the pilots for the crash.
Ameen Siddiqui, 28, whose brother-in-law, Akeel Nanabawa, died alongside his wife and their four-year-old daughter said: 'This report is wrong. We don't accept it.'
'It's a cover-up to protect Air India and the government,' Mr Siddiqui told The Telegraph from Surat, south of Ahmedabad, where the plane crashed.
'They want to blame dead pilots who can't defend themselves. How can the fuel switches end up turning off at a critical moment, either through pilot error or a mechanical fault?
CCTV footage from the airport showed that the ram air turbine, known as the RAT, was deployed shortly after takeoff.
The RAT acts as a backup power source during emergencies and will deploy in cases of complete power failure.
The report said two minutes after takeoff, one of the pilots transmitted: 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday'.
In December 2018 the US air regulator Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned airlines that fuel switches had been installed in some Boeing 737s 'with the locking feature disengaged'.
'If the locking feature is disengaged, the switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting the switch during transition, and the switch would be exposed to the potential of inadvertent operation,' the FAA warned in a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin.
'Inadvertent operation of the switch could result in an unintended consequence, such as an in-flight engine shutdown.'
It recommended airlines inspect the switches, including 'whether the fuel control switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting up the switch'.
The airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant a legally enforceable regulation to correct unsafe conditions.
Air India has suggested such inspections were not carried out because the FAA's bulletin was 'advisory and not mandatory'.
Sole survivor Vishwash Kumar Ramesh had been in the country on a business trip with his brother Ajaykumar, 35, before they boarded the doomed flight travelling from Ahmedabad to Gatwick on Thursday.
In what has been described as a miracle, Viswash - seated in 11A by the exit - survived, but his sibling who was sat on the other side of the aisle in seat 11J perished in the fireball explosion.
Before the discovery of the British survivor, authorities said that they believed no one had escaped the flight alive.
Eleven of those on board were children, including two newborns.
An Air India spokesperson previously said: 'Air India stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident. We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time. We acknowledge receipt of the preliminary report released by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) today, 12 July 2025.
'Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses.
'Given the active nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment on specific details and refer all such enquiries to the AAIB.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Air India captain cut fuel seconds before crash, US experts say
The senior pilot of the Air India jet that crashed and and killed 260 people last month was responsible for cutting the flow of fuel to the plane's engines shortly after take-off, US authorities believe. Sumeet Sabharwal, the captain of the doomed Boeing 787 Dreamliner, was asked by his panicked co-pilot why he had moved the fuel-control switches to the 'cut-off' position, sources told the Wall Street Journal. The captain was said to have remained calm during the exchange, which was captured by the cockpit's voice recorders, before the London-bound plane crashed into a hostel block in Ahmedabad about 30 seconds after take-off. All but one of the 230 passengers and all 12 crew members died. An additional 19 people were killed on the ground. A preliminary report released last week by Indian investigators also concluded that the plane's fuel-control switches had been flipped almost simultaneously but did not identify the pilot responsible. Nor did it say whether the action was accidental or deliberate. The report, by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), said one pilot had asked the other why he had moved the switches. The other denied having done so. It is likely that the co-pilot, first officer Clive Kunder, 32, would have had his hands pulling back on the plane's controls at the point of take-off, said US pilots who had read the Indian authorities' report. Sabharwal, 56, would have been more likely to have had his hands free because he was the monitoring pilot. The fuel control switches were turned off one second apart,then flicked back on ten seconds later, according to the preliminary report. The switches, which toggle between 'run' and 'cut-off', are used for the engine start and stop in every flight. They are positioned on the console between the pilots and are impossible to manipulate accidentally because they are guarded and require deliberate actions to move. • Who were the Air India pilots who flew the jet that crashed? A press officer for India's Ministry of Civil Aviation and AAIB called the Journal's reporting one-sided and declined to comment further. The Indian Commercial Pilots' Association said that the crew 'acted in line with their training and responsibilities under challenging conditions and the pilots shouldn't be vilified based on conjecture'. 'To casually suggest pilot suicide without verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession,' it said. Campbell Wilson, the chief executive of Air India, told employees in an internal memo that the pilots had passed mandatory pre-flight breathalyser tests and health checks before the flight took off. • Air India victim families bewildered by crash report He has also confirmed there were no mechanical or maintenance faults in the jet. This was the first fatal crash involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. However, the preliminary report released by Indian authorities did not rule out possible design flaws, malfunctions or maintenance issues. Sabharwal was a pilot of decades' standing with 15,638 hours of flying experience, of which 8,596 hours were on a Boeing 787. He had promised to call his family when the flight arrived in London, the Times of India reported. Kunder had 3,403 hours of flying experience.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Tomás Gormley's cod en papillote recipe
Cooking fish en papillote — wrapping it up and steaming it gently — sounds more technical than it is. While parchment paper or tin foil is the modern go-to, people have been cooking this way for ever, from banana-leaf steaming in South America to clay-pot cooking in Asia. Here, sweet, slow-cooked leeks and wild garlic create a mellow, allium-rich base that makes everything taste better, while romesco — a smoky, nutty sauce born from Spanish fishermen making the most of what they had — brings contrast. Traditionally, romesco was about stretching ingredients, thickened with stale bread and ground nuts rather than just olive oil. This version keeps that spirit alive, with a touch of dark chocolate for extra depth. I first came across romesco while cooking in Catalonia during the summer months as a private chef early in my career. I was pretty out of my depth — or at least it felt that way at the time — so I stuck to recipes I knew I could get the ingredients for. Most of them came from the outstanding cookbook Catalan Cuisine by Colman Andrews, a deeply researched and practical guide filled with recipes, stories, and anecdotes about the region's rich history, language, and culture. It became an essential resource, not just for its insightful recipes, but for helping me to understand the context behind the food — which, in Catalonia, means everything. Serves 2For the cod en papillote • 2 fillets of cod (about 150g each)• 1 medium leek, thinly sliced• 1 small handful wild garlic, roughly chopped• 1 tbsp olive oil• 1 tbsp white wine• ½ Amalfi lemon, zest and juice• Salt and black pepper• Tin foil sheets For the romesco • 30g blanched almonds• 1 small slice stale bread, torn into pieces• 2 roasted red peppers (jarred or freshly roasted)• 1 garlic clove, peeled• 1 tsp smoked paprika• ½ tsp sherry vinegar• 3 tbsp olive oil• 10g dark chocolate (85 per cent cocoa or higher), finely chopped• Salt and black pepper 1. To make the romesco, toast the almonds in a dry pan over medium heat until golden, then set aside. Toast the bread in the same pan with a drizzle of olive oil until crisp. 2. Blend together the roasted red peppers, toasted bread, almonds, garlic, smoked paprika and sherry vinegar until mostly smooth. With the blender running, drizzle in the olive oil to emulsify. Stir in the dark chocolate while the sauce is still slightly warm, letting it melt into the mixture. Season to taste with salt and black pepper. Set aside. 3. Now prepare the cod. Preheat the oven to 180C fan/gas 6, lay out two sheets of parchment paper and divide the sliced leeks and wild garlic between them. Drizzle with olive oil and season with salt. Place a cod fillet on top of each pile of leeks. Drizzle with white wine, lemon juice and a little olive oil. Season with salt, pepper and lemon zest. Fold the parchment over the fish and crimp the edges tightly to form a sealed parcel. Place on a baking tray and bake for 12-15 min, until the fish is opaque and flakes easily. • Read more restaurant reviews and recipes from our food experts 4. To assemble, open the cod parcels carefully and transfer the fish with its leeks to a plate. Spoon the stale bread romesco over or alongside the fish. Drizzle with extra virgin olive oil and scatter with a few wild garlic leaves for freshness. Tomás Gormley is owner and head chef at Cardinal in Edinburgh's Eyre Place (
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Passengers reach settlement in $1 billion lawsuit over Alaska Airlines flight where door plug blew out at 16,000 feet
Three passengers who sued Alaska Airlines and Boeing after a door plug fell out of their plane at 16,000 feet have settled out of court. These passengers were on board Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 from Portland to Ontario, California on January 5, 2024, when a door plug suddenly flew off the Boeing 737 Max jet mid-air. They sued Alaska Airlines and Boeing for $1 billion last year but settled out of court earlier this month, according to KPTV. The lawsuit was dismissed on July 7 with prejudice, KPTV reports, which means they can't refile the same lawsuit later. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed as part of the settlement agreement, their attorney said. Last month, the National Transportation Safety Board ruled Boeing was at fault in the frightening incident. The agency said it found four bolts missing from the door plug, which caused it to slowly slide out of place for more than 100 flights until it finally fell off. In a statement, Boeing said the company 'regret[s] this accident' and will 'continue to work on strengthening safety and quality across our operations.' The agency says the 174 passengers on board were safe and accounted for thanks to the flight crew. Passengers said they were terrified for their lives, and reported the vacuum of air was so strong that personal belongings were sucked out. One person on board even said that his shirt was torn from his back. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy said it's a 'miracle no one died.' 'This accident never should've happened,' Homendy said last month. 'Since this occurred there's been a lot of focus on human error – on the actions of one or two Boeing employees." 'Let me be clear, an accident like this does not happen because of an individual – or even a group of individuals – aviation is much more resilient than that – an accident like this only happens when there are multiple system failures," she added. Dozens of whistleblowers came forward last summer to describe their concerns about the company's safety protocols. Whistleblower Roy Irvin, who worked as a quality investigator for Boeing for six years, exclusively told The Independent that the 'door blowout really hit home for me because I predicted this.' "Things don't get brought to anybody's attention unless they're found,' he added. 'There's other things that probably haven't been found yet.'
