
What ‘Timefulness' by Marcia Bjornerud taught writer Janice Pariat about Earth's temporal rhythms
If you walk up close, you'll see they are sometimes blanketed in moss or painted by fungus in Pollock-esque patches of grey, red, and black. In or around rivers, stones lie smooth and softened. Often a trail is dwarfed by towering rock faces, solid and ancient. They are a presence, as much as the trees and rivers. It is on these walks that I've become mesmerised by rocks – beginning to see them not as cold and inanimate but as being very much a part of our storied landscape. There has always been evidence for this here. Close to Mairang, for instance, about two hours' drive northwest from Shillong, stands Lum Kyllang, a gigantic mammoth-shaped granite formation towering 700 feet above ground – the story goes that Kyllang and Symper, two spirit guardian brothers, who bickered endlessly, had a final showdown, with Kyllang throwing mud at Symper, and Symper tossing rocks at Kyllang.
Until today, Symper (about 50 kms away to south) is mud-rich and forested, while Kyllang is starkly, slippery stone. And, as local stories go, he's still mischievous in spirit – beguiling climbers, playing tricks on them and leading them astray on their way down. At the edge of Meghalaya, in Sohra, stands Khoh Ramhah, a natural rock formation that resembles a traditional basket, a khoh, or an inverted cone. We grew up hearing stories of how it once belonged to a giant named Ramhah who roamed these hills, and whose basket turned into stone when he lay down to sleep. Ever more importantly, the Khasis are a megalithic culture, raising megaliths to compute their history and clanship, to mark long funeral trails, and the hills even today are dotted with these towering structures, some of which have fallen victim to the weather, many others to modernity, to the construction of buildings and roads. On our walks, especially around Mylliem, an hour southwest of Shillong, we pass clusters of these stones strewn across the hillsides, still marking a clan's memory, hidden in the undergrowth alongside the trails we take.
Perhaps this is why I've found such resonance in the work of American geologist Marcia Bjornerud, who urges us to begin thinking about rocks not as nouns but as verbs – with agency and spirit all their own. They are both witness and journal, both participant in and consequence of the earth's intricate geological processes. In Turning to Stone, Bjornerud twins the story of her life with the biographies of particular rock types, basalt, granite, sandstone, among many others, gleaning succour, wisdom, knowledge from her supposedly 'mute' subjects. Rocks are far from silent – either vibrantly functioning as vehicles of folklore or weaving narratives of geological history. While I'm able to manage gathering the latter, from family, friends, chats with strangers on our walks, it irks me that I am yet unable to read geological text, that I can't quite understand our planet's ancient language.
This drove me to pick up Bjornerud's first book Reading the Rocks: An Autobiography of the Earth – I must admit it wasn't the easiest to follow all the way through, for the language could turn quite technical at times, but I soldiered on – absorbing little by little the deep, continually unfolding history of the earth. It's a tale filled with cataclysm and reincarnation, with flux and constant adjustments over billions of years. Bjornerud is not only a riveting storyteller and an astute historian of her own discipline, but she is also deeply interested in the intersections between geology and philosophy. What questions might be raised given the vastness of deep time? What might rocks teach us about ourselves? What wisdom could they impart? How may they guide us into reframing our lives and the structures of our society? This comes to the fore beautifully in her slim slip of a book Timefulness: How Thinking Like a Geologist Can Help Save the World.
A book that found me just when we began to encounter the quarries.
On our walks, around many corners, and alongside main roads. Hills and hillsides hollowed out for sand and stone. To serve the rampant construction drive across Meghalaya. At first, it was hard to believe that such vast swathes of earth could be reduced to the merest, finest grain, but standing there, a little bit horrified, a little bit in awe, we saw it was all made possible because of colossal machinery. Gnawing into the earth, digging through soil like butter, and to the side, endless trucks waiting hungrily in line. In so many places where we've walked now, the hills are alive with the thudding of stone-crushers. Why must we do this? We've asked, as we walked away. Is there a way to quarry more…ethically? But is this the question to ask? Is it not imperative to wonder whether it's ethical to do so in the first place? And how have we arrived here? At a point when humans (driven by extractive capitalism) are the most major of 'geologic' forces shaping our planet, driving our own selves deeper into ecological devastation?
I found increasingly that I turned to Bjornerud's Timefulness for answers.
'Timefulness', as a word or a notion, hasn't yet entered common parlance or common knowledge. If you Google it or its variant 'timeful', you're greeted with results for a technology company in Mountain View, California and a to-do list app acquired by Google in 2015. But Bjornerud's word refers to none of these. 'Timefulness', for her, is to become acutely aware of how the world is made by – indeed, made of – time. What does this mean? Especially for a species as chronophobic as we are. Willing ourselves to cast time as the enemy and to do everything to deny its passage – Botox, fillers, plastic surgery, anti-ageing, everything. But even this type of time denial, rooted in a very human combination of vanity and existential dread, is more forgivable, Bjornerud says, than other more toxic varieties that work with this mostly benign kind to create a pervasive, stubborn, and dangerous 'temporal illiteracy'. And by this, she means the obliviousness with which most of us live our lives on our planet without knowing anything more than the most superficial highlights of its long, long history.
We've heard of dinosaurs, perhaps Pangaea or tectonic plates but learn little of the durations and happenings of the great chapters in Earth's history. As a species, we largely share a childlike disinterest and partial disbelief in the time before our appearance on the planet and have a small appetite for stories which don't feature us humans in a starring role. Most of us simply can't be bothered with natural history – tragically so at a time when the geosciences are thriving! To disacknowledge time, to ignore how it is intrinsic to the shaping of our earth, untethers us from deep geological history. We are at this point in our human history because we have forgotten, willfully, that we are, above all else, earthlings, shaped by the earth's rocky logic. We are disassociated –detached from our surroundings, speaking of our 'relationship with nature' without realising that that's what we are. In fact, most of us live on our planet behaving like 'bad tourists', Bjornerud says, enjoying its amenities, ransacking its bounty, without ever having noticed that it has its own ancient language and customs. To be in 'timefulness' is the very opposite of this – it is to build an awareness of the rich natural history that envelops us, and a sense that we too live in geologic time and are part of a continuum from the planet's past into its future.
There are terrible ramifications to 'temporal illiteracy'. All is short-term. As a geologist, Bjornerud contends with Young Earthers, creationists and apocalypticists but as frustrating as they might be, she points out, more pervasive and corrosive is time denial that is invisibly woven into the infrastructure of our society. From economic credo that insists on constant growth to populist short-term thinking politics, from biennial budget cycles to last-minute stop-gap spending measures. And at a moment when the need for long-range vision grows ever more imperative, our attention spans are shrinking as we tend to reels, texts, and tweets within an endless, insistent Now. Bjornerud doesn't spare academia too, pointing out that physics and chemistry, 'pure sciences', are considered the highest of scientific pursuits for their quantitative exactitude, possible only under highly controlled, wholly unnatural conditions, divorced from any particular history or moment. It is telling that 'lowly' Geology, with all it has to offer – not least the geologic timescale! – has no Nobel Prize. It largely continues to be seen as a musty, dull, discipline, and this has serious consequences for us at a time when politicians, CEOs, and ordinary citizens urgently need to have a grasp of our planet's history, anatomy, and physiology.
Having an inflated, aggrandised sense of ourselves as a species is harmful – but so is the very opposite. How often we've been told, in movies, books, on the internet, that if the 4.5-billion-year story of the earth is scaled to a 24-hour day, all of human history would transpire in the last fraction of a second before midnight. I'd always thought of this only as a moment to step away from ourselves and contemplate how small we are, a moment to reevaluate. But Bjornerud calls this temporal downscaling also a wrongheaded and irresponsible way to understand our place in time. It suggests, she says, a degree of insignificance and disempowerment that not only is psychologically alienating but also allows us to ignore the magnitude of our effects on the planet in that quarter second. And it denies our deep roots and permanent entanglement with Earth's history; our specific clan may not have shown up until just before the clock struck 12.00, she goes on to point out, but our extended family of living organisms has been around since at least 6 am. Finally, the analogy implies, apocalyptically, that there is no future – what happens after midnight?
I'm not quite sure who has the answer, but I'm thinking it has something to do with us collectively experiencing a shift, a realignment with, and a consciousness of, deep time, of transforming ourselves into polytemporal beings, aware of our own present, contextualised within a deep past, envisioning a distant future. Difficult as this might sound, there are writers and academics like Bjornerud to guide us. And also, I've recently discovered, artists across the globe working on time-transcending projects.
Katie Paterson works with melting glaciers, fossilised insects, dust from meteorites, and 'future libraries' in Oslo to help us expand our time horizons. Photographer Rachel Sussman travelled around the world to take portraits of living organisms older than 2000 years for her series called 'The Oldest Living Things in the World.' Which included 'Spruce Gran Picea, Sweden' (9,550 years), 'Antartic Moss' (5,500 years), 'Lomatia Tasmanica', Tasmania (43,000 years), among many others. Philosopher and conceptual artist Jonathon Keats, in Alaska, engineers monumental-scale clocks that run on 'river time' to unstandardise our atomic time. Somewhere in Western Texas, inventor Daniel Hillis is building a '10,000 Year Clock'. This is in collaboration with The Long Now Foundation, a nonprofit organisation 'established in 01996 to foster long-term thinking.' Their work, talks, workshops, artist collaborations, encourage imagination at the timescale of civilisation – the next and last 10,000 years —a timespan they call 'the long now'. Bjornerud closes Timefulness with the evocation of the Iroquois' 300-year-old Seventh Generation idea, which remains radical and visionary as ever: that leaders should take actions only after contemplating their likely effects on 'the unborn of the future Nation…whose faces are yet beneath the surface of the ground.' In a current world that severely lack both the appetite and political-economic infrastructure for intergenerational action, the Seventh Generation idea is more important than ever.
And it begins with timefulness, with walking the hills, with earth, with stone.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Love Island USA: Why contestants stay out of pool while camera rolls?
American tourists are facing a challenging summer as the U.S. dollar has dropped significantly, recording its worst first half in over 50 years. The dollar has fallen 13% against the euro and 6% against the yen, making overseas travel more expensive. Despite this, many travelers remain undeterred, planning international trips while U.S. multinational companies may benefit from cheaper exports.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Plasticdweep: 4,000 tonnes of non-biodegradable waste pile up in Lakshadweep
Kochi: Black noxious clouds stood as a stark contrast to the azure blue sky on the outskirts of northern Minicoy island, suffocating residents staying even 200 metres away early this month. They realised something had gone terribly wrong to their pristine island. In their backyard, close to the beach, lies an ugly smouldering secret that threatens to destroy not only the clear blue waters and coral reefs, but the rich marine life, in turn impacting their own livelihood in the coming years. Piles of non-degradable waste have been lying there for years and its aftermath was a massive outbreak of fire, similar to the one that occurred in Brahmapuram dumping yard in Kochi a couple of years ago. The black smoke emitted for almost a week, polluting the atmosphere, and its watery effluents leaching the coral reefs, accelerating the bleaching process like never before. This waste pile-up, spread over 1,500 square metres in Minicoy has all kinds of non-degradable material: Plastic bags, e-waste, refrigerators, beds and old fishing nets. Minicoy forms the second largest island in Lakshadweep archipelago which has 36 pristine islands situated in the Arabian Sea, off the southwestern coast of India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Shockingly, this waste pile is not limited to Minicoy alone and is spread across other islands, destroying lagoons and water bodies. The department of forest and environment in Lakshadweep data reveal that around 4,000 tonnes of dry waste remain piled up on various islands, which need to be transported to the mainland by barge or Manchu after segregation. This massive ecological disaster is unveiling at a time when the Union govt has been endorsing Lakshadweep as an alternative to the island nation Maldives on the global beach tourism circuit. "The recent fire occurred due to human intervention and was perhaps done as an easy method to get rid of waste which has led to serious ecological consequences," says Minicoy resident and environmental activist Fathima Querashia. Residents point out dry waste reaching the lagoons along with seawater in the high tide is threatening the existence of sea cucumber and other marine organisms in the lagoons. "The water has gone turbid," says a resident from Kiltan island. To add to the problem, a large quantity of dry waste, including fans and electronic items, washes ashore every now and then along with currents, other than the waste generated by the residents. "The waste, including fishing nets, gets stuck onto the coral reefs and kills them. Dry waste is posing a big issue as there is no collection of it in our area. They are merely dumping it on the coast," he says. Residents point out that the haphazard way in which waste is being disposed here reveals how the govt wants to open the island for tourism purposes without coming up with a sustainable tourism model that will conserve the fragile coastline. "A classic instance is the construction of seawall around the island. Instead of the wall, they could have raised mangroves to protect the soil and thereby reduce soil erosion," a resident pointed out requesting anonymity for fear of backlash from the Lakshadweep administration. The locals and the administration were at loggerheads in 2021 and 2024 over the latter's unilateral decision to implement tourism plans and associated construction activities on the fragile islands, which face the wrath of climate change and burgeoning tourism activities. Unlike other states, there is no local body system in Lakshadweep now. Executive officers appointed by the administration currently head each panchayat and oversee waste management. Until 2021, the forest and environment department was handling it through local bodies and transporting the segregated waste to the mainland, either to Kochi or Kozhikode by vessels, but non-segregated waste remained there. "Earlier, we used to place plastic waste items in a sack outside our house, and the workers of the panchayat used to collect it regularly. If we place the same now, it will remain there for days. Sometimes we have to take it to the yard and dump it there. I am worried about how I will dispose of an unused freezer in my house now. Since it is a heavy electrical appliance, it will be difficult to carry it to the yard. A large quantity of inorganic waste is washed ashore on our beach when there are strong waves. Tonnes of waste wash ashore every year," observes an elderly fisherman from Minicoy Island. He asks how it is possible that in the monsoon season, non-degradable waste piled up in the open catches fire. Leachate from the waste pile also seeps into the ground, polluting the organisms there. "During the monsoon, a large quantity of waste from the dump site was in the sea," says Fathima, calling for urgent measures to prevent the leachate from reaching the ground and lagoons. As the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is monitoring waste management in the Union Territory, the administration is going to call for a request for proposal (RFP), which will provide a solution for segregation and transportation of waste and the cost involved. The existing measures are limited to human-habited islands, and there has been no measure to collect the non-degradable waste washing ashore the 26 uninhabited islands. "Once the rain stops, we will call for an RFP to remove the dry waste on the islands. Transporting waste to the mainland is an expensive affair as many ship operators do not want to transport it in their vessels. Even if someone agrees to it, they charge excess fare. So we are looking to identify agencies who can hire a chartered vessel for the purpose through the RFP. Since the islands are highly eco-fragile, we cannot treat the waste here," says an official with the Lakshadweep administration. The waterscape of every island here is unique. The western side of the islands are protected by lagoons, whereas the eastern side is open to the sea. The eastern side witnesses strong currents and that is where the waste is getting washed ashore during high tide. "On the western shore, the waste entering the lagoons is collected by divers regularly. But the cleaning exercise in lagoons is a highly laborious and cost-intensive exercise. We clean major lagoons on the islands with the support of divers. The problem is that we have only four to five months to segregate and transport waste by ship to the mainland. The UT gets rain in the rest of the months, making transportation of waste an almost impossible task. Still, we are trying our best to transport the waste to the mainland using govt barges, which are used for the transportation of various supplies to the UT from the mainland," said an official with the Lakshadweep administration. Marine litter galore A recent study conducted by the Cochin University of Science and Technology (Cusat) proves that marine litter threatens the UT's coastal and coral ecosystems. The study, conducted across 28 beaches and three lagoon reef stations on Kavaratti island, documented a staggering 32,710 litter items, categorised into 11 types, with an average density of 0.82 ± 0.80 items per sqm. Plastic waste emerged as the most dominant category, accounting for 63.7% of the total litter. Public littering was identified as the primary source, contributing to 43% of the pollution. It also showed that marine litter causes severe stress on the coral reefs; 59.37% of these affected colonies showed signs of disease and tissue loss, while 14.86% exhibited partial bleaching or paling. Experts say that the administration should employ technology-driven measures to remove the non-degradable waste regularly reaching the beaches and lagoons from the sea, instead of mere awareness creation programmes. "Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification is often getting violated there now for construction expansion for various projects of the Union govt in Lakshadweep. Islands have very delicate ecosystems. In order to protect the islands, the administration has to suitably enact the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 and strengthen the CRZ norms and environment monitoring committees, which are currently on paper, to address pollution issues. Plastic enters the food chain through fish. Instead of merely conducting awareness programmes, the administration should employ AI-backed technology-driven systems, including trash booms, for regular harvesting of non-degradable waste that reaches the shore. It is high time strong measures were taken to protect the islands," says S Bijoy Nandan, dean of the School of Marine Sciences in Cusat.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
No more shoe checks: TSA updates airport screening rules; what flyers need to know
The United States has officially ended the long-standing requirement to remove shoes during airport security checks. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced this recently that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would no longer require passengers to take off their footwear at checkpoints, a policy that had been in place since 2006. 'I think most Americans will be very excited to see they will be able to keep their shoes on, and it will be a much more streamlined process,' said Noem, speaking at a press conference at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Why the shoe rule was introduced The 'shoe rule' traces its roots back to a chilling incident in December 2001, when Richard Reid, later dubbed the 'shoe bomber,' attempted to blow up an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami. He tried to detonate explosives hidden in his shoes mid-flight. Thanks to alert passengers and crew, the attack was foiled, and the aircraft landed safely in Boston. Although the attack failed, it prompted the TSA to enforce stricter screening protocols. By 2006, removing shoes became mandatory for all passengers aged 12 to 75 as part of the screening process. Shoes were scanned alongside carry-on items to detect concealed explosives. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo by Taboola by Taboola Read more: What's the difference between a passport and a visa? Explained simply What's changing now? With advancements in security technology and the implementation of a more 'layered' approach to threat detection, the TSA believes the rule is no longer necessary for all passengers. 'Our security technology has changed dramatically. It's evolved,' said Noem. 'We have a multilayered, whole-of-government approach now.' The change, which takes effect immediately, applies across all U.S. airports. However, authorities clarified that passengers may still be asked to remove shoes on a case-by-case basis if additional screening is deemed necessary. Will it help travellers? The most immediate benefit is a faster and more convenient screening process. For years, removing shoes was seen as one of the most annoying, and time-consuming, parts of airport security. Passengers had to juggle their carry-ons, personal items, and sometimes children, while also struggling to take off and put on shoes in crowded lines. Eliminating this step, especially for families, elderly passengers, and those with disabilities, will significantly ease the stress during airport security. The new policy is expected to reduce wait times, improve passenger flow, and make the overall experience less invasive. TSA PreCheck still offers advantages While the no-shoes rule has been lifted for standard screenings, TSA PreCheck, a trusted traveller programme that allows expedited screening for pre-approved passengers, continues to offer other perks. Members don't have to remove belts, light jackets, or laptops from their bags. PreCheck costs around $80 for five years and remains the preferred option for frequent flyers. For now, regular passengers will still have to place items like laptops, liquids, and coats on the conveyor belt for scanning. Read more: 'Welcome to Afghanistan': Viral tourism video sparks debate over Taliban-era travel What's next in airport screening? Secretary Noem hinted at broader reforms on the horizon. 'TSA plans to review other rules and procedures to see how airport screenings can be simplified and expedited,' she said. The agency is experimenting with separate lanes for military personnel and families with young children and is expected to pilot additional changes in the coming months. In recent years, TSA has also introduced facial recognition technology and Real ID requirements as part of its effort to modernise passenger identification and boost security without causing unnecessary friction. While removing shoes may seem like a minor issue, it has long been symbolic of the post-9/11 security landscape. The end of this rule marks a subtle shift toward a more passenger-friendly experience, one that balances efficiency with vigilance.