Airbus Said to Deliver Fewer Aircraft in July Amid Engine Woes
The world's biggest planemaker has delivered around 370 planes in the first seven months of 2025, less than half its annual goal. July delivery figures are preliminary and could change slightly, the people cautioned, asking not to be identified discussing confidential data.
An Airbus spokesperson declined to comment on the July tally ahead of official publication of figures next week.
Deliveries are closely watched by investors because that is when airline customers pay over the bulk of the money for an aircraft order.
This week, Airbus's Chief Executive Officer Guillaume Faury said that while the company continued to maintain its full year guidance of around 820 handovers, supply chain issues would push out the bulk of the deliveries into the second half of the year.
By comparison, Airbus delivered 77 jets in July a year ago, taking seven month handovers to 400 at that point.
The company had 60 so-called gliders — newly built aircraft on the ground without engines — at the end of June, a number it aims to eradicate by the end of the year, Airbus management said on an earnings call on Wednesday.
Boeing Co. has been ramping up production of its competing 737 Max jet and has been catching up to its European rival. It was neck-and-neck with Airbus at the half year mark with 280 deliveries versus 306 at the European planemaker.
The US planemaker has been working to return its factories to a steadier tempo. It's also cushioned by a surplus of inventory as a consequence of a strike in late 2024 and its decision earlier in the year to slow production to address quality shortfalls after a door-shaped panel blew out of an airborne 737 Max.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
FCA Says Banks Could Face £9 Billion Bill on Car Loans
(Bloomberg) -- The UK's Financial Conduct Authority will consult on a redress scheme to guide banks on how they should compensate customers that were missold used car loans, which could leave the lenders on the hook for at least £9 billion ($11.9 billion). The cost of the redress scheme could plausibly be as high as £18 billion but a lower figure was more likely, according to a press release by the FCA on Sunday. The announcement comes after the UK's top court handed a big boost to banks on Friday, overruling lower court judgments and reducing the amount they will need to pay out in compensation. 'Any redress scheme must be fair to consumers who have lost out and ensure the integrity of the motor finance market, so it works well for future consumers,' the FCA said in the statement. 'We will publish the consultation by early October and finalise any scheme in time for people to start receiving compensation next year.' While the Supreme Court's judgment will see banks avoid the enormous payouts many had feared, they still face having to pay out some compensation. Many of the UK's biggest lenders, including Lloyds Banking Group Plc and Banco Santander SA, have provisioned for potential losses. American Depositary Receipts of lenders like Lloyds and Close Brother Group Plc soared in value after the judgment was handed down on Friday. The full extent of the losses that banks will face as a result of hidden commissions in car finance arrangements won't be clear until the redress scheme is finalized, but fears of a PPI style compensation scheme have been allayed by the Supreme Court's judgment. Three rulings by the Court of Appeal were the subject of the decision on Friday, with two of them overturned on appeal in favor of the banks. The Supreme Court did say that in one of the cases a customer had been treated unfairly by the lender, FirstRand Ltd., and that will help shape the regulator's redress scheme. 'The Supreme Court agreed with several factors we had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act,' the FCA said in it's statement. 'This clarity helps us because we have been looking at what is unfair and, prior to this judgment, there were different interpretations of the law coming from different courts.' (Updates with more details) More stories like this are available on
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Death Toll Rises to 4 at Chile Mine Collapse as Search Continues
(Bloomberg) -- Codelco said it recovered the bodies of three of the five workers caught in a tunnel collapse at one of the world's biggest underground copper mines in central Chile. A search for the other two continues. The update brings the official death toll to four after another person was confirmed dead in the immediate aftermath of Thursday's incident. Nine others were injured. 'In parallel with the efforts we continue to make with the utmost commitment to rescue our two colleagues who remain trapped, Codelco is providing all necessary support to families and loved ones during this difficult time,' the company wrote in a statement. The state-owned miner is grappling with a human tragedy unfolding at the site of its El Teniente mine south of Santiago, in an incident that's also stoking concerns for global copper supply. Codelco, the world's biggest copper supplier, halted mining at the site after a collapse attributed to seismic activity struck a new section of the complex, called Andesita. It's the latest setback for the company's efforts to recover from a years-long output slump. A 100-person team — including some of those who helped free 33 workers trapped in another Chilean mine in 2010 — has been working on the El Teniente rescue effort. The 120-year-old El Teniente mine is crucial for Codelco's aim to return to pre-pandemic production levels of about 1.7 million tons a year from about 1.4 million tons now. Codelco delayed reporting quarterly results, including production guidance, on Friday as it deals with the accident. When operations can resume at the mine will depend on the outcome of an investigation into the collapse, how much reinforcement of infrastructure is required and whether mining method adjustments are needed. Mines in Chile are designed to withstand much stronger seismic activity than the 4.2-magnitude event that caused the collapse. More stories like this are available on
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Bryce Harper and His Nine Figures Can't Front MLB's Pay Fight
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Bryce Harper, star first baseman for the Philadelphia Phillies, got in the face of Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred during a team meeting recently. Manfred, according to ESPN, was discussing baseball's challenging economics. Harper, who is in the midst of a $330 million contract, used an expletive to tell the commissioner to leave if he intended to talk about a salary cap. Manfred fired back, and then cooler heads eventually prevailed, allowing the meeting to continue — without a salary cap discussion. The now-infamous confrontation is just the latest skirmish in an intensifying battle between MLB owners and players over how to fairly distribute baseball's riches and maintain competitive balance. The league and its owners believe a salary cap is a tool that can accomplish both goals. The players' union, which has long opposed a cap, argues that the concept will only serve to protect the economic interests of owners. It's certainly in Harper's interest to advance the union's argument. But most MLB players don't — and likely never will — earn the kind of money Bryce Harper does. As labor strife intensifies, and a potential lockout looms with the current collective bargaining agreement set to expire in 2026, it's these everyday players — not the nine-figure superstars — who need to be the face of this fight. Baseball has always had haves and have-nots. But over the last half-decade, spending on free agents by a handful of major market teams has far outpaced what most other teams (small market or otherwise) can afford. At the start of the 2025 season, for example, the Los Angeles Dodgers' $398.2 million payroll was more than four times bigger than the combined payrolls of the bottom four teams (the Marlins, White Sox, Rays, and Athletics). Those well-heeled teams aren't stocking up on players earning $760,000 per year, MLB's minimum salary in 2025. They're inflating their payrolls with big contracts for a small number of free-agent superstars. On Opening Day this year, there were 953 players on MLB rosters, only 15 of whom earned at least $30 million per year. Of course, the other players aren't exactly hurting. More than half of all of the league's players earn at least $1 million per year. That might seem like a lucrative deal for everyone involved. However, between 2002 and 2024, MLB players have actually seen their share of league revenues decline, from 63% in 2002 to just 47% in 2024, according to Manfred. And while blockbuster contracts keep growing — Juan Soto's new 15-year deal with the Mets is worth $765 million — most players face a different reality. At the start of the 2025 season, the median MLB salary was $1.35 million, down from $1.5 million in 2024. In 2015, it was $1.65 million, which remains — a decade later — a record high. Several factors account for the slippage. The most important one is a sort of indentured servitude. MLB rules mandate that a player has six years of service on a big league roster before gaining free-agency rights. This requirement, which typically follows several years at the minor league level, allows a team to control and underpay athletes, often through their prime playing years. Consider Paul Skenes, the ace pitcher for the Pittsburgh Pirates who won the National League Rookie of the Year award. He's currently paid $875,000 and won't be eligible for free agency and a market-rate payday until 2030. As it happens, Skenes is lucky compared to his peers. He's already a superstar and, barring injury, will eventually be paid like one. Most MLB players will never get to free agency at all, much less get the chance to earn their actual worth. Last year, the head team physician for the Texas Rangers claimed that the average career of a major-leaguer lasts three years. Back in 2007, demographic data showed that it was 5.6 years. It's easy to overlook those players; they fill out rosters, have a few good years (hopefully) and ultimately serve as filler in baseball card packs. But if the MLB Players Association is serious about building a fairer economic system, it must prioritize their needs. From a policy standpoint, that means the MLBPA must be willing to negotiate its long-standing opposition to a salary cap. Holding onto principles is admirable, but if the median salary is declining, those principles haven't accomplished much. A better course of action would be to act in the interests of most MLB players, negotiate shorter rookie contracts, a salary floor and a guaranteed share of league revenue in exchange for a salary cap. The concept isn't far-fetched: the National Football League, National Basketball Association, and National Hockey League all have negotiated some version of the concept. Fans like the parity, and players like owning a piece of the league's revenues. Well-paid veteran players certainly have a role in negotiations to obtain these concessions. But they shouldn't be the face of the fight. Not only are they poor representatives for players unlikely to reach age 30 in an MLB uniform. They are uniquely unsympathetic characters to a sporting public wary of money grabs. Bryce Harper, demanding uncapped compensation (while going nose-to-nose with the commissioner), isn't going to persuade anyone. Rookies and role players with a message of fairness just might. Baseball needs their voices more than the vets. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Adam Minter is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the business of sports. He is the author, most recently, of 'Secondhand: Travels in the New Global Garage Sale.' More stories like this are available on
